- 20 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Cyrill Gorcunov 提交于
Impact: cleanup We are in setup stage so we use GLOBAL instead of ENTRY and do not increase code size. Signed-off-by: NCyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 01 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > Maybe it really does require the far jump immediately after setting PE > in cr0... > > Hm, I don't remember this paragraph being in vol 3a, section 8.9.1 > before. Is it a recent addition? > > Random failures can occur if other instructions exist between steps > 3 and 4 above. Failures will be readily seen in some situations, > such as when instructions that reference memory are inserted between > steps 3 and 4 while in system management mode. > I don't remember that, either. Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 20 4月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 WANG Cong 提交于
Remove old comments that include the old arch/i386 directory. Signed-off-by: NWANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Acked-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 30 1月, 2008 3 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
To set CR0.PE, use the X86_CR0_PE macro defined in <asm/processor-flags.h> instead of hardcoding it as a constant (1). Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Intel VT doesn't like to engage when the protected-mode state isn't fully initialized. Make life easier for it by initializing LDTR (to null) and TR (to a dummy hunk of low memory which will never actually be touched.) Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
Make the transition to protected mode more paranoid by having back-to-back near jump (to synchronize the 386/486 prefetch queue) and far jump (to set up the code segment.) While we're at it, zero as many registers as practical (for future expandability of the 32-bit entry interface) and enter 32-bit mode with a valid stack. Note that the 32-bit code cannot rely on this stack, or we'll break all other existing users of the 32-bit entrypoint, but it may make debugging hacks easier to write. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
-
- 05 11月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
In accordance with the newly formalized 32-bit boot protocol, set %ebx == %ebp == %edi == 0 in order to support future extensions to the protocol. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
The 386 and 486 needs a jump immediately after setting %cr0 in order to serialize the pipeline. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
-
- 13 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 H. Peter Anvin 提交于
This is the code which actually does the switch to protected mode, including all preparation. It is also responsible for invoking the boot loader hooks, if present. Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-