1. 25 6月, 2021 4 次提交
  2. 09 6月, 2021 1 次提交
    • L
      KVM: X86: MMU: Use the correct inherited permissions to get shadow page · b1bd5cba
      Lai Jiangshan 提交于
      When computing the access permissions of a shadow page, use the effective
      permissions of the walk up to that point, i.e. the logic AND of its parents'
      permissions.  Two guest PxE entries that point at the same table gfn need to
      be shadowed with different shadow pages if their parents' permissions are
      different.  KVM currently uses the effective permissions of the last
      non-leaf entry for all non-leaf entries.  Because all non-leaf SPTEs have
      full ("uwx") permissions, and the effective permissions are recorded only
      in role.access and merged into the leaves, this can lead to incorrect
      reuse of a shadow page and eventually to a missing guest protection page
      fault.
      
      For example, here is a shared pagetable:
      
         pgd[]   pud[]        pmd[]            virtual address pointers
                           /->pmd1(u--)->pte1(uw-)->page1 <- ptr1 (u--)
              /->pud1(uw-)--->pmd2(uw-)->pte2(uw-)->page2 <- ptr2 (uw-)
         pgd-|           (shared pmd[] as above)
              \->pud2(u--)--->pmd1(u--)->pte1(uw-)->page1 <- ptr3 (u--)
                           \->pmd2(uw-)->pte2(uw-)->page2 <- ptr4 (u--)
      
        pud1 and pud2 point to the same pmd table, so:
        - ptr1 and ptr3 points to the same page.
        - ptr2 and ptr4 points to the same page.
      
      (pud1 and pud2 here are pud entries, while pmd1 and pmd2 here are pmd entries)
      
      - First, the guest reads from ptr1 first and KVM prepares a shadow
        page table with role.access=u--, from ptr1's pud1 and ptr1's pmd1.
        "u--" comes from the effective permissions of pgd, pud1 and
        pmd1, which are stored in pt->access.  "u--" is used also to get
        the pagetable for pud1, instead of "uw-".
      
      - Then the guest writes to ptr2 and KVM reuses pud1 which is present.
        The hypervisor set up a shadow page for ptr2 with pt->access is "uw-"
        even though the pud1 pmd (because of the incorrect argument to
        kvm_mmu_get_page in the previous step) has role.access="u--".
      
      - Then the guest reads from ptr3.  The hypervisor reuses pud1's
        shadow pmd for pud2, because both use "u--" for their permissions.
        Thus, the shadow pmd already includes entries for both pmd1 and pmd2.
      
      - At last, the guest writes to ptr4.  This causes no vmexit or pagefault,
        because pud1's shadow page structures included an "uw-" page even though
        its role.access was "u--".
      
      Any kind of shared pagetable might have the similar problem when in
      virtual machine without TDP enabled if the permissions are different
      from different ancestors.
      
      In order to fix the problem, we change pt->access to be an array, and
      any access in it will not include permissions ANDed from child ptes.
      
      The test code is: https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20210603050537.19605-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com/
      Remember to test it with TDP disabled.
      
      The problem had existed long before the commit 41074d07 ("KVM: MMU:
      Fix inherited permissions for emulated guest pte updates"), and it
      is hard to find which is the culprit.  So there is no fixes tag here.
      Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
      Message-Id: <20210603052455.21023-1-jiangshanlai@gmail.com>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Fixes: cea0f0e7 ("[PATCH] KVM: MMU: Shadow page table caching")
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      b1bd5cba
  3. 15 3月, 2021 2 次提交
  4. 23 2月, 2021 2 次提交
    • D
      KVM: x86/mmu: Consider the hva in mmu_notifier retry · 4a42d848
      David Stevens 提交于
      Track the range being invalidated by mmu_notifier and skip page fault
      retries if the fault address is not affected by the in-progress
      invalidation. Handle concurrent invalidations by finding the minimal
      range which includes all ranges being invalidated. Although the combined
      range may include unrelated addresses and cannot be shrunk as individual
      invalidation operations complete, it is unlikely the marginal gains of
      proper range tracking are worth the additional complexity.
      
      The primary benefit of this change is the reduction in the likelihood of
      extreme latency when handing a page fault due to another thread having
      been preempted while modifying host virtual addresses.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Stevens <stevensd@chromium.org>
      Message-Id: <20210222024522.1751719-3-stevensd@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      4a42d848
    • S
      KVM: x86/mmu: Skip mmu_notifier check when handling MMIO page fault · 5f8a7cf2
      Sean Christopherson 提交于
      Don't retry a page fault due to an mmu_notifier invalidation when
      handling a page fault for a GPA that did not resolve to a memslot, i.e.
      an MMIO page fault.  Invalidations from the mmu_notifier signal a change
      in a host virtual address (HVA) mapping; without a memslot, there is no
      HVA and thus no possibility that the invalidation is relevant to the
      page fault being handled.
      
      Note, the MMIO vs. memslot generation checks handle the case where a
      pending memslot will create a memslot overlapping the faulting GPA.  The
      mmu_notifier checks are orthogonal to memslot updates.
      Signed-off-by: NSean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
      Message-Id: <20210222024522.1751719-2-stevensd@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      5f8a7cf2
  5. 04 2月, 2021 1 次提交
  6. 22 10月, 2020 1 次提交
  7. 28 9月, 2020 9 次提交
  8. 17 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  9. 10 7月, 2020 2 次提交
  10. 09 7月, 2020 4 次提交
  11. 23 6月, 2020 2 次提交
  12. 10 6月, 2020 1 次提交
  13. 16 5月, 2020 2 次提交
  14. 21 4月, 2020 1 次提交
  15. 17 3月, 2020 2 次提交
  16. 16 2月, 2020 1 次提交
  17. 13 2月, 2020 1 次提交
    • S
      KVM: x86/mmu: Fix struct guest_walker arrays for 5-level paging · f6ab0107
      Sean Christopherson 提交于
      Define PT_MAX_FULL_LEVELS as PT64_ROOT_MAX_LEVEL, i.e. 5, to fix shadow
      paging for 5-level guest page tables.  PT_MAX_FULL_LEVELS is used to
      size the arrays that track guest pages table information, i.e. using a
      "max levels" of 4 causes KVM to access garbage beyond the end of an
      array when querying state for level 5 entries.  E.g. FNAME(gpte_changed)
      will read garbage and most likely return %true for a level 5 entry,
      soft-hanging the guest because FNAME(fetch) will restart the guest
      instead of creating SPTEs because it thinks the guest PTE has changed.
      
      Note, KVM doesn't yet support 5-level nested EPT, so PT_MAX_FULL_LEVELS
      gets to stay "4" for the PTTYPE_EPT case.
      
      Fixes: 855feb67 ("KVM: MMU: Add 5 level EPT & Shadow page table support.")
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NSean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
      f6ab0107
  18. 28 1月, 2020 3 次提交