Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 06 12月, 2016 6 次提交
  3. 28 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  5. 27 9月, 2016 4 次提交
  7. 26 9月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: add a flags field to btrfs_fs_info · afcdd129
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      We have a lot of random ints in btrfs_fs_info that can be put into flags.  This
is mostly equivalent with the exception of how we deal with quota going on or
off, now instead we set a flag when we are turning it on or off and deal with
that appropriately, rather than just having a pending state that the current
quota_enabled gets set to.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      afcdd129
  9. 25 8月, 2016 1 次提交
    • W
      btrfs: fix fsfreeze hang caused by delayed iputs deal · 9e7cc91a
      由 Wang Xiaoguang 提交于 
      When running fstests generic/068, sometimes we got below deadlock:
  xfs_io          D ffff8800331dbb20     0  6697   6693 0x00000080
  ffff8800331dbb20 ffff88007acfc140 ffff880034d895c0 ffff8800331dc000
  ffff880032d243e8 fffffffeffffffff ffff880032d24400 0000000000000001
  ffff8800331dbb38 ffffffff816a9045 ffff880034d895c0 ffff8800331dbba8
  Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff816a9045>] schedule+0x35/0x80
  [<ffffffff816abab2>] rwsem_down_read_failed+0xf2/0x140
  [<ffffffff8118f5e1>] ? __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xd1/0x100
  [<ffffffff8134f978>] call_rwsem_down_read_failed+0x18/0x30
  [<ffffffffa06631fc>] ? btrfs_alloc_block_rsv+0x2c/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff810d32b5>] percpu_down_read+0x35/0x50
  [<ffffffff81217dfc>] __sb_start_write+0x2c/0x40
  [<ffffffffa067f5d5>] start_transaction+0x2a5/0x4d0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa067f857>] btrfs_join_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa068ba34>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x3c4/0x5d0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81230a1a>] evict+0xba/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff812316b6>] iput+0x196/0x200
  [<ffffffffa06851d0>] btrfs_run_delayed_iputs+0x70/0xc0 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa067f1d8>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x928/0xa80 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffffa0646df0>] btrfs_freeze+0x30/0x40 [btrfs]
  [<ffffffff81218040>] freeze_super+0xf0/0x190
  [<ffffffff81229275>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x4a5/0x5c0
  [<ffffffff81003176>] ? do_audit_syscall_entry+0x66/0x70
  [<ffffffff810038cf>] ? syscall_trace_enter_phase1+0x11f/0x140
  [<ffffffff81229409>] SyS_ioctl+0x79/0x90
  [<ffffffff81003c12>] do_syscall_64+0x62/0x110
  [<ffffffff816acbe1>] entry_SYSCALL64_slow_path+0x25/0x25

>From this warning, freeze_super() already holds SB_FREEZE_FS, but
btrfs_freeze() will call btrfs_commit_transaction() again, if
btrfs_commit_transaction() finds that it has delayed iputs to handle,
it'll start_transaction(), which will try to get SB_FREEZE_FS lock
again, then deadlock occurs.

The root cause is that in btrfs, sync_filesystem(sb) does not make
sure all metadata is updated. There still maybe some codes adding
delayed iputs, see below sample race window:

         CPU1                                  |         CPU2
|-> freeze_super()                             |
    |-> sync_filesystem(sb);                   |
    |                                          |-> cleaner_kthread()
    |                                          |   |-> btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
    |                                          |       |-> btrfs_remove_chunk()
    |                                          |           |-> btrfs_remove_block_group()
    |                                          |               |-> btrfs_add_delayed_iput()
    |                                          |
    |-> sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_FREEZE_FS;   |
    |-> sb_wait_write(sb, SB_FREEZE_FS);       |
    |   acquire SB_FREEZE_FS lock.             |
    |                                          |
    |-> btrfs_freeze()                         |
        |-> btrfs_commit_transaction()         |
            |-> btrfs_run_delayed_iputs()      |
            |   will handle delayed iputs,     |
            |   that means start_transaction() |
            |   will be called, which will try |
            |   to get SB_FREEZE_FS lock.      |

To fix this issue, introduce a "int fs_frozen" to record internally whether
fs has been frozen. If fs has been frozen, we can not handle delayed iputs.
Signed-off-by: NWang Xiaoguang <wangxg.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
[ add comment to btrfs_freeze ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      9e7cc91a
  11. 26 7月, 2016 3 次提交
  13. 23 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: track transid for delayed ref flushing · 31b9655f
      由 Josef Bacik 提交于 
      Using the offwakecputime bpf script I noticed most of our time was spent waiting
on the delayed ref throttling.  This is what is supposed to happen, but
sometimes the transaction can commit and then we're waiting for throttling that
doesn't matter anymore.  So change this stuff to be a little smarter by tracking
the transid we were in when we initiated the throttling.  If the transaction we
get is different then we can just bail out.  This resulted in a 50% speedup in
my fs_mark test, and reduced the amount of time spent throttling by 60 seconds
over the entire run (which is about 30 minutes).  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      31b9655f
  15. 18 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  17. 13 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 12 5月, 2016 2 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: build fixup for qgroup_account_snapshot · 2c1984f2
      由 David Sterba 提交于 
      The macro btrfs_std_error got renamed to btrfs_handle_fs_error in an
independent branch for the same merge target (4.7). To make the code
compilable for bisectability reasons, add a temporary stub.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      2c1984f2
    • Q
      btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup accounting when creating snapshot · 6426c7ad
      由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 
      Current btrfs qgroup design implies a requirement that after calling
btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() there must be a commit root switch.

Normally this is OK, as btrfs_qgroup_accounting_extents() is only called
inside btrfs_commit_transaction() just be commit_cowonly_roots().

However there is a exception at create_pending_snapshot(), which will
call btrfs_qgroup_account_extents() but no any commit root switch.

In case of creating a snapshot whose parent root is itself (create a
snapshot of fs tree), it will corrupt qgroup by the following trace:
(skipped unrelated data)
======
btrfs_qgroup_account_extent: bytenr = 29786112, num_bytes = 16384, nr_old_roots = 0, nr_new_roots = 1
qgroup_update_counters: qgid = 5, cur_old_count = 0, cur_new_count = 1, rfer = 0, excl = 0
qgroup_update_counters: qgid = 5, cur_old_count = 0, cur_new_count = 1, rfer = 16384, excl = 16384
btrfs_qgroup_account_extent: bytenr = 29786112, num_bytes = 16384, nr_old_roots = 0, nr_new_roots = 0
======

The problem here is in first qgroup_account_extent(), the
nr_new_roots of the extent is 1, which means its reference got
increased, and qgroup increased its rfer and excl.

But at second qgroup_account_extent(), its reference got decreased, but
between these two qgroup_account_extent(), there is no switch roots.
This leads to the same nr_old_roots, and this extent just got ignored by
qgroup, which means this extent is wrongly accounted.

Fix it by call commit_cowonly_roots() after qgroup_account_extent() in
create_pending_snapshot(), with needed preparation.

Mark: I added a check at the top of qgroup_account_snapshot() to skip this
code if qgroups are turned off. xfstest btrfs/122 exposes this problem.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      6426c7ad
  21. 29 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  23. 28 4月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 18 2月, 2016 2 次提交
  27. 07 1月, 2016 3 次提交
  29. 17 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix memory leaks after transaction is aborted · 7785a663
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When a transaction is aborted, or its commit fails before writing the new
superblock and calling btrfs_finish_extent_commit(), we leak reference
counts on the block groups attached to the transaction's delete_bgs list,
because btrfs_finish_extent_commit() is never called for those two cases.
Fix this by dropping their references at btrfs_put_transaction(), which
is called when transactions are aborted (by making the transaction kthread
commit the transaction) or if their commits fail.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      7785a663
  31. 10 12月, 2015 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix unprotected list move from unused_bgs to deleted_bgs list · 348a0013
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      As of my previous change titled "Btrfs: fix scrub preventing unused block
groups from being deleted", the following warning at
extent-tree.c:btrfs_delete_unused_bgs() can be hit when we mount the a
filesysten with "-o discard":

 10263  void btrfs_delete_unused_bgs(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
 10264  {
 (...)
 10405                  if (trimming) {
 10406                          WARN_ON(!list_empty(&block_group->bg_list));
 10407                          spin_lock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
 10408                          list_move(&block_group->bg_list,
 10409                                    &trans->transaction->deleted_bgs);
 10410                          spin_unlock(&trans->transaction->deleted_bgs_lock);
 10411                          btrfs_get_block_group(block_group);
 10412                  }
 (...)

This happens because scrub can now add back the block group to the list of
unused block groups (fs_info->unused_bgs). This is dangerous because we
are moving the block group from the unused block groups list to the list
of deleted block groups without holding the lock that protects the source
list (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock).

The following diagram illustrates how this happens:

            CPU 1                                     CPU 2

 cleaner_kthread()
   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

     sees bg X in list
      fs_info->unused_bgs

     deletes bg X from list
      fs_info->unused_bgs

                                            scrub_enumerate_chunks()

                                              searches device tree using
                                              its commit root

                                              finds device extent for
                                              block group X

                                              gets block group X from the tree
                                              fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
                                              (via btrfs_lookup_block_group())

                                              sets bg X to RO (again)

                                              scrub_chunk(bg X)

                                              sets bg X back to RW mode

                                              adds bg X to the list
                                              fs_info->unused_bgs again,
                                              since it's still unused and
                                              currently not in that list

     sets bg X to RO mode

     btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)

     --> discard is enabled and bg X
         is in the fs_info->unused_bgs
         list again so the warning is
         triggered
     --> we move it from that list into
         the transaction's delete_bgs
         list, but we can have another
         task currently manipulating
         the first list (fs_info->unused_bgs)

Fix this by using the same lock (fs_info->unused_bgs_lock) to protect both
the list of unused block groups and the list of deleted block groups. This
makes it safe and there's not much worry for more lock contention, as this
lock is seldom used and only the cleaner kthread adds elements to the list
of deleted block groups. The warning goes away too, as this was previously
an impossible case (and would have been better a BUG_ON/ASSERT) but it's
not impossible anymore.
Reproduced with fstest btrfs/073 (using MOUNT_OPTIONS="-o discard").
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
      348a0013
  33. 25 11月, 2015 1 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: use global reserve when deleting unused block group after ENOSPC · 8eab77ff
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to
start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough
free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate
a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from
the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so
that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for
filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with
-ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over
a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was
failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a
transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with
ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't
help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to
delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      8eab77ff
  35. 22 10月, 2015 6 次提交
  37. 11 10月, 2015 2 次提交