1. 18 12月, 2017 1 次提交
    • A
      selftests/bpf: add verifier tests for bpf_call · a7ff3eca
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      Add extensive set of tests for bpf_call verification logic:
      
      calls: basic sanity
      calls: using r0 returned by callee
      calls: callee is using r1
      calls: callee using args1
      calls: callee using wrong args2
      calls: callee using two args
      calls: callee changing pkt pointers
      calls: two calls with args
      calls: two calls with bad jump
      calls: recursive call. test1
      calls: recursive call. test2
      calls: unreachable code
      calls: invalid call
      calls: jumping across function bodies. test1
      calls: jumping across function bodies. test2
      calls: call without exit
      calls: call into middle of ld_imm64
      calls: call into middle of other call
      calls: two calls with bad fallthrough
      calls: two calls with stack read
      calls: two calls with stack write
      calls: spill into caller stack frame
      calls: two calls with stack write and void return
      calls: ambiguous return value
      calls: two calls that return map_value
      calls: two calls that return map_value with bool condition
      calls: two calls that return map_value with incorrect bool check
      calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test1
      calls: two calls that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_caller. test2
      calls: two jumps that receive map_value via arg=ptr_stack_of_jumper. test3
      calls: two calls that receive map_value_ptr_or_null via arg. test1
      calls: two calls that receive map_value_ptr_or_null via arg. test2
      calls: pkt_ptr spill into caller stack
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      a7ff3eca
  2. 13 12月, 2017 2 次提交
  3. 12 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  4. 03 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 01 12月, 2017 2 次提交
  6. 23 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • G
      bpf: introduce ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL · db1ac496
      Gianluca Borello 提交于
      With the current ARG_PTR_TO_MEM/ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM semantics, an helper
      argument can be NULL when the next argument type is ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO
      and the verifier can prove the value of this next argument is 0. However,
      most helpers are just interested in handling <!NULL, 0>, so forcing them to
      deal with <NULL, 0> makes the implementation of those helpers more
      complicated for no apparent benefits, requiring them to explicitly handle
      those corner cases with checks that bpf programs could start relying upon,
      preventing the possibility of removing them later.
      
      Solve this by making ARG_PTR_TO_MEM/ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM never accept NULL
      even when ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO is set, and introduce a new argument type
      ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL to explicitly deal with the NULL case.
      
      Currently, the only helper that needs this is bpf_csum_diff_proto(), so
      change arg1 and arg3 to this new type as well.
      
      Also add a new battery of tests that explicitly test the
      !ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL combination: all the current ones testing the
      various <NULL, 0> variations are focused on bpf_csum_diff, so cover also
      other helpers.
      Signed-off-by: NGianluca Borello <g.borello@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      db1ac496
  7. 22 11月, 2017 1 次提交
    • Y
      bpf: change bpf_probe_write_user to bpf_trace_printk in test_verifier · f1a8b8e3
      Yonghong Song 提交于
      There are four tests in test_verifier using bpf_probe_write_user
      helper. These four tests will emit the following kernel messages
        [   12.974753] test_verifier[220] is installing a program with bpf_probe_write_user
                                          helper that may corrupt user memory!
        [   12.979285] test_verifier[220] is installing a program with bpf_probe_write_user
                                          helper that may corrupt user memory!
        ......
      
      This may confuse certain users. This patch replaces bpf_probe_write_user
      with bpf_trace_printk. The test_verifier already uses bpf_trace_printk
      earlier in the test and a trace_printk warning message has been printed.
      So this patch does not emit any more kernel messages.
      
      Fixes: b6ff6391 ("bpf: fix and add test cases for ARG_CONST_SIZE_OR_ZERO semantics change")
      Signed-off-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      f1a8b8e3
  8. 14 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  9. 11 11月, 2017 2 次提交
  10. 05 11月, 2017 2 次提交
  11. 02 11月, 2017 3 次提交
    • G
      License cleanup: add SPDX GPL-2.0 license identifier to files with no license · b2441318
      Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
      Many source files in the tree are missing licensing information, which
      makes it harder for compliance tools to determine the correct license.
      
      By default all files without license information are under the default
      license of the kernel, which is GPL version 2.
      
      Update the files which contain no license information with the 'GPL-2.0'
      SPDX license identifier.  The SPDX identifier is a legally binding
      shorthand, which can be used instead of the full boiler plate text.
      
      This patch is based on work done by Thomas Gleixner and Kate Stewart and
      Philippe Ombredanne.
      
      How this work was done:
      
      Patches were generated and checked against linux-4.14-rc6 for a subset of
      the use cases:
       - file had no licensing information it it.
       - file was a */uapi/* one with no licensing information in it,
       - file was a */uapi/* one with existing licensing information,
      
      Further patches will be generated in subsequent months to fix up cases
      where non-standard license headers were used, and references to license
      had to be inferred by heuristics based on keywords.
      
      The analysis to determine which SPDX License Identifier to be applied to
      a file was done in a spreadsheet of side by side results from of the
      output of two independent scanners (ScanCode & Windriver) producing SPDX
      tag:value files created by Philippe Ombredanne.  Philippe prepared the
      base worksheet, and did an initial spot review of a few 1000 files.
      
      The 4.13 kernel was the starting point of the analysis with 60,537 files
      assessed.  Kate Stewart did a file by file comparison of the scanner
      results in the spreadsheet to determine which SPDX license identifier(s)
      to be applied to the file. She confirmed any determination that was not
      immediately clear with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
      Criteria used to select files for SPDX license identifier tagging was:
       - Files considered eligible had to be source code files.
       - Make and config files were included as candidates if they contained >5
         lines of source
       - File already had some variant of a license header in it (even if <5
         lines).
      
      All documentation files were explicitly excluded.
      
      The following heuristics were used to determine which SPDX license
      identifiers to apply.
      
       - when both scanners couldn't find any license traces, file was
         considered to have no license information in it, and the top level
         COPYING file license applied.
      
         For non */uapi/* files that summary was:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|-------
         GPL-2.0                                              11139
      
         and resulted in the first patch in this series.
      
         If that file was a */uapi/* path one, it was "GPL-2.0 WITH
         Linux-syscall-note" otherwise it was "GPL-2.0".  Results of that was:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|-------
         GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        930
      
         and resulted in the second patch in this series.
      
       - if a file had some form of licensing information in it, and was one
         of the */uapi/* ones, it was denoted with the Linux-syscall-note if
         any GPL family license was found in the file or had no licensing in
         it (per prior point).  Results summary:
      
         SPDX license identifier                            # files
         ---------------------------------------------------|------
         GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note                       270
         GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      169
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-2-Clause)    21
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    17
         LGPL-2.1+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                      15
         GPL-1.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       14
         ((GPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR BSD-3-Clause)    5
         LGPL-2.0+ WITH Linux-syscall-note                       4
         LGPL-2.1 WITH Linux-syscall-note                        3
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) OR MIT)              3
         ((GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note) AND MIT)             1
      
         and that resulted in the third patch in this series.
      
       - when the two scanners agreed on the detected license(s), that became
         the concluded license(s).
      
       - when there was disagreement between the two scanners (one detected a
         license but the other didn't, or they both detected different
         licenses) a manual inspection of the file occurred.
      
       - In most cases a manual inspection of the information in the file
         resulted in a clear resolution of the license that should apply (and
         which scanner probably needed to revisit its heuristics).
      
       - When it was not immediately clear, the license identifier was
         confirmed with lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
       - If there was any question as to the appropriate license identifier,
         the file was flagged for further research and to be revisited later
         in time.
      
      In total, over 70 hours of logged manual review was done on the
      spreadsheet to determine the SPDX license identifiers to apply to the
      source files by Kate, Philippe, Thomas and, in some cases, confirmation
      by lawyers working with the Linux Foundation.
      
      Kate also obtained a third independent scan of the 4.13 code base from
      FOSSology, and compared selected files where the other two scanners
      disagreed against that SPDX file, to see if there was new insights.  The
      Windriver scanner is based on an older version of FOSSology in part, so
      they are related.
      
      Thomas did random spot checks in about 500 files from the spreadsheets
      for the uapi headers and agreed with SPDX license identifier in the
      files he inspected. For the non-uapi files Thomas did random spot checks
      in about 15000 files.
      
      In initial set of patches against 4.14-rc6, 3 files were found to have
      copy/paste license identifier errors, and have been fixed to reflect the
      correct identifier.
      
      Additionally Philippe spent 10 hours this week doing a detailed manual
      inspection and review of the 12,461 patched files from the initial patch
      version early this week with:
       - a full scancode scan run, collecting the matched texts, detected
         license ids and scores
       - reviewing anything where there was a license detected (about 500+
         files) to ensure that the applied SPDX license was correct
       - reviewing anything where there was no detection but the patch license
         was not GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note to ensure that the applied
         SPDX license was correct
      
      This produced a worksheet with 20 files needing minor correction.  This
      worksheet was then exported into 3 different .csv files for the
      different types of files to be modified.
      
      These .csv files were then reviewed by Greg.  Thomas wrote a script to
      parse the csv files and add the proper SPDX tag to the file, in the
      format that the file expected.  This script was further refined by Greg
      based on the output to detect more types of files automatically and to
      distinguish between header and source .c files (which need different
      comment types.)  Finally Greg ran the script using the .csv files to
      generate the patches.
      Reviewed-by: NKate Stewart <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>
      Reviewed-by: NPhilippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@nexb.com>
      Reviewed-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      b2441318
    • D
      bpf: add test cases to bpf selftests to cover all meta tests · 634eab11
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      Lets also add test cases to cover all possible data_meta access tests
      for good/bad access cases so we keep tracking them.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      634eab11
    • D
      bpf: minor cleanups after merge · b06723da
      Daniel Borkmann 提交于
      Two minor cleanups after Dave's recent merge in f8ddadc4
      ("Merge git://git.kernel.org...") of net into net-next in
      order to get the code in line with what was done originally
      in the net tree: i) use max() instead of max_t() since both
      ranges are u16, ii) don't split the direct access test cases
      in the middle with bpf_exit test cases from 390ee7e2
      ("bpf: enforce return code for cgroup-bpf programs").
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      b06723da
  12. 01 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  13. 23 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • A
      selftests/bpf: fix broken build of test_maps · e27afb84
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      fix multiple build errors and warnings
      
      1.
      test_maps.c: In function ‘test_map_rdonly’:
      test_maps.c:1051:30: error: ‘BPF_F_RDONLY’ undeclared (first use in this function)
              MAP_SIZE, map_flags | BPF_F_RDONLY);
      
      2.
      test_maps.c:1048:6: warning: unused variable ‘i’ [-Wunused-variable]
        int i, fd, key = 0, value = 0;
      
      3.
      test_maps.c:1087:2: error: called object is not a function or function pointer
        assert(bpf_map_lookup_elem(fd, &key, &value) == -1 && errno == EPERM);
      
      4.
      ./bpf_helpers.h:72:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'BPF_FUNC_getsockopt'
              (void *) BPF_FUNC_getsockopt;
      
      Fixes: e043325b ("bpf: Add tests for eBPF file mode")
      Fixes: 6e71b04a ("bpf: Add file mode configuration into bpf maps")
      Fixes: cd86d1fd ("bpf: Adding helper function bpf_getsockops")
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e27afb84
  14. 22 10月, 2017 2 次提交
  15. 20 10月, 2017 4 次提交
  16. 18 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      bpf: disallow arithmetic operations on context pointer · 28e33f9d
      Jakub Kicinski 提交于
      Commit f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
      removed the crafty selection of which pointer types are
      allowed to be modified.  This is OK for most pointer types
      since adjust_ptr_min_max_vals() will catch operations on
      immutable pointers.  One exception is PTR_TO_CTX which is
      now allowed to be offseted freely.
      
      The intent of aforementioned commit was to allow context
      access via modified registers.  The offset passed to
      ->is_valid_access() verifier callback has been adjusted
      by the value of the variable offset.
      
      What is missing, however, is taking the variable offset
      into account when the context register is used.  Or in terms
      of the code adding the offset to the value passed to the
      ->convert_ctx_access() callback.  This leads to the following
      eBPF user code:
      
           r1 += 68
           r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 + 8)
           exit
      
      being translated to this in kernel space:
      
         0: (07) r1 += 68
         1: (61) r0 = *(u32 *)(r1 +180)
         2: (95) exit
      
      Offset 8 is corresponding to 180 in the kernel, but offset
      76 is valid too.  Verifier will "accept" access to offset
      68+8=76 but then "convert" access to offset 8 as 180.
      Effective access to offset 248 is beyond the kernel context.
      (This is a __sk_buff example on a debug-heavy kernel -
      packet mark is 8 -> 180, 76 would be data.)
      
      Dereferencing the modified context pointer is not as easy
      as dereferencing other types, because we have to translate
      the access to reading a field in kernel structures which is
      usually at a different offset and often of a different size.
      To allow modifying the pointer we would have to make sure
      that given eBPF instruction will always access the same
      field or the fields accessed are "compatible" in terms of
      offset and size...
      
      Disallow dereferencing modified context pointers and add
      to selftests the test case described here.
      
      Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
      Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
      Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      Acked-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      28e33f9d
  17. 11 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  18. 08 10月, 2017 2 次提交
  19. 05 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  20. 29 9月, 2017 3 次提交
  21. 27 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  22. 22 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  23. 20 9月, 2017 2 次提交
  24. 19 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 16 9月, 2017 1 次提交
  26. 09 9月, 2017 1 次提交