1. 01 7月, 2015 11 次提交
  2. 14 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  3. 06 1月, 2015 1 次提交
  4. 12 12月, 2014 4 次提交
    • M
      fuse: introduce fuse_simple_request() helper · 7078187a
      Miklos Szeredi 提交于
      The following pattern is repeated many times:
      
      	req = fuse_get_req_nopages(fc);
      	/* Initialize req->(in|out).args */
      	fuse_request_send(fc, req);
      	err = req->out.h.error;
      	fuse_put_request(req);
      
      Create a new replacement helper:
      
      	/* Initialize args */
      	err = fuse_simple_request(fc, &args);
      
      In addition to reducing the code size, this will ease moving from the
      complex arg-based to a simpler page-based I/O on the fuse device.
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      7078187a
    • M
      fuse: reduce max out args · f704dcb5
      Miklos Szeredi 提交于
      The third out-arg is never actually used.
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      f704dcb5
    • M
      fuse: hold inode instead of path after release · baebccbe
      Miklos Szeredi 提交于
      path_put() in release could trigger a DESTROY request in fuseblk.  The
      possible deadlock was worked around by doing the path_put() with
      schedule_work().
      
      This complexity isn't needed if we just hold the inode instead of the path.
      Since we now flush all requests before destroying the super block we can be
      sure that all held inodes will be dropped.
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      baebccbe
    • M
      fuse: flush requests on umount · 580640ba
      Miklos Szeredi 提交于
      Use fuse_abort_conn() instead of fuse_conn_kill() in fuse_put_super().
      This flushes and aborts requests still on any queues.  But since we've
      already reset fc->connected, those requests would not be useful anyway and
      would be flushed when the fuse device is closed.
      
      Next patches will rely on requests being flushed before the superblock is
      destroyed.
      
      Use fuse_abort_conn() in cuse_process_init_reply() too, since it makes no
      difference there, and we can get rid of fuse_conn_kill().
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      580640ba
  5. 07 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  6. 28 4月, 2014 4 次提交
  7. 02 4月, 2014 3 次提交
  8. 23 1月, 2014 2 次提交
    • A
      fuse: support clients that don't implement 'open' · 7678ac50
      Andrew Gallagher 提交于
      open/release operations require userspace transitions to keep track
      of the open count and to perform any FS-specific setup.  However,
      for some purely read-only FSs which don't need to perform any setup
      at open/release time, we can avoid the performance overhead of
      calling into userspace for open/release calls.
      
      This patch adds the necessary support to the fuse kernel modules to prevent
      open/release operations from hitting in userspace. When the client returns
      ENOSYS, we avoid sending the subsequent release to userspace, and also
      remember this so that future opens also don't trigger a userspace
      operation.
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      7678ac50
    • A
      fuse: don't invalidate attrs when not using atime · 451418fc
      Andrew Gallagher 提交于
      Various read operations (e.g. readlink, readdir) invalidate the cached
      attrs for atime changes.  This patch adds a new function
      'fuse_invalidate_atime', which checks for a read-only super block and
      avoids the attr invalidation in that case.
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Gallagher <andrewjcg@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      451418fc
  9. 25 10月, 2013 2 次提交
  10. 01 10月, 2013 2 次提交
    • M
      fuse: writepages: handle same page rewrites · 8b284dc4
      Miklos Szeredi 提交于
      As Maxim Patlasov pointed out, it's possible to get a dirty page while it's
      copy is still under writeback, despite fuse_page_mkwrite() doing its thing
      (direct IO).
      
      This could result in two concurrent write request for the same offset, with
      data corruption if they get mixed up.
      
      To prevent this, fuse needs to check and delay such writes.  This
      implementation does this by:
      
       1. check if page is still under writeout, if so create a new, single page
          secondary request for it
      
       2. chain this secondary request onto the in-flight request
      
       2/a. if a seconday request for the same offset was already chained to the
          in-flight request, then just copy the contents of the page and discard
          the new secondary request.  This makes sure that for each page will
          have at most two requests associated with it
      
       3. when the in-flight request finished, send off all secondary requests
          chained onto it
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      8b284dc4
    • M
      fuse: readdirplus: fix RCU walk · 6314efee
      Miklos Szeredi 提交于
      Doing dput(parent) is not valid in RCU walk mode.  In RCU mode it would
      probably be okay to update the parent flags, but it's actually not
      necessary most of the time...
      
      So only set the FUSE_I_ADVISE_RDPLUS flag on the parent when the entry was
      recently initialized by READDIRPLUS.
      
      This is achieved by setting FUSE_I_INIT_RDPLUS on entries added by
      READDIRPLUS and only dropping out of RCU mode if this flag is set.
      FUSE_I_INIT_RDPLUS is cleared once the FUSE_I_ADVISE_RDPLUS flag is set in
      the parent.
      Reported-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      6314efee
  11. 03 9月, 2013 1 次提交
    • M
      fuse: hotfix truncate_pagecache() issue · 06a7c3c2
      Maxim Patlasov 提交于
      The way how fuse calls truncate_pagecache() from fuse_change_attributes()
      is completely wrong. Because, w/o i_mutex held, we never sure whether
      'oldsize' and 'attr->size' are valid by the time of execution of
      truncate_pagecache(inode, oldsize, attr->size). In fact, as soon as we
      released fc->lock in the middle of fuse_change_attributes(), we completely
      loose control of actions which may happen with given inode until we reach
      truncate_pagecache. The list of potentially dangerous actions includes
      mmap-ed reads and writes, ftruncate(2) and write(2) extending file size.
      
      The typical outcome of doing truncate_pagecache() with outdated arguments
      is data corruption from user point of view. This is (in some sense)
      acceptable in cases when the issue is triggered by a change of the file on
      the server (i.e. externally wrt fuse operation), but it is absolutely
      intolerable in scenarios when a single fuse client modifies a file without
      any external intervention. A real life case I discovered by fsx-linux
      looked like this:
      
      1. Shrinking ftruncate(2) comes to fuse_do_setattr(). The latter sends
      FUSE_SETATTR to the server synchronously, but before getting fc->lock ...
      2. fuse_dentry_revalidate() is asynchronously called. It sends FUSE_LOOKUP
      to the server synchronously, then calls fuse_change_attributes(). The
      latter updates i_size, releases fc->lock, but before comparing oldsize vs
      attr->size..
      3. fuse_do_setattr() from the first step proceeds by acquiring fc->lock and
      updating attributes and i_size, but now oldsize is equal to
      outarg.attr.size because i_size has just been updated (step 2). Hence,
      fuse_do_setattr() returns w/o calling truncate_pagecache().
      4. As soon as ftruncate(2) completes, the user extends file size by
      write(2) making a hole in the middle of file, then reads data from the hole
      either by read(2) or mmap-ed read. The user expects to get zero data from
      the hole, but gets stale data because truncate_pagecache() is not executed
      yet.
      
      The scenario above illustrates one side of the problem: not truncating the
      page cache even though we should. Another side corresponds to truncating
      page cache too late, when the state of inode changed significantly.
      Theoretically, the following is possible:
      
      1. As in the previous scenario fuse_dentry_revalidate() discovered that
      i_size changed (due to our own fuse_do_setattr()) and is going to call
      truncate_pagecache() for some 'new_size' it believes valid right now. But
      by the time that particular truncate_pagecache() is called ...
      2. fuse_do_setattr() returns (either having called truncate_pagecache() or
      not -- it doesn't matter).
      3. The file is extended either by write(2) or ftruncate(2) or fallocate(2).
      4. mmap-ed write makes a page in the extended region dirty.
      
      The result will be the lost of data user wrote on the fourth step.
      
      The patch is a hotfix resolving the issue in a simplistic way: let's skip
      dangerous i_size update and truncate_pagecache if an operation changing
      file size is in progress. This simplistic approach looks correct for the
      cases w/o external changes. And to handle them properly, more sophisticated
      and intrusive techniques (e.g. NFS-like one) would be required. I'd like to
      postpone it until the issue is well discussed on the mailing list(s).
      
      Changed in v2:
       - improved patch description to cover both sides of the issue.
      Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      06a7c3c2
  12. 01 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  13. 18 4月, 2013 3 次提交
    • M
      fuse: truncate file if async dio failed · efb9fa9e
      Maxim Patlasov 提交于
      The patch improves error handling in fuse_direct_IO(): if we successfully
      submitted several fuse requests on behalf of synchronous direct write
      extending file and some of them failed, let's try to do our best to clean-up.
      
      Changed in v2: reuse fuse_do_setattr(). Thanks to Brian for suggestion.
      Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      efb9fa9e
    • M
      fuse: make fuse_direct_io() aware about AIO · 36cf66ed
      Maxim Patlasov 提交于
      The patch implements passing "struct fuse_io_priv *io" down the stack up to
      fuse_send_read/write where it is used to submit request asynchronously.
      io->async==0 designates synchronous processing.
      
      Non-trivial part of the patch is changes in fuse_direct_io(): resources
      like fuse requests and user pages cannot be released immediately in async
      case.
      Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      36cf66ed
    • M
      fuse: add support of async IO · 01e9d11a
      Maxim Patlasov 提交于
      The patch implements a framework to process an IO request asynchronously. The
      idea is to associate several fuse requests with a single kiocb by means of
      fuse_io_priv structure. The structure plays the same role for FUSE as 'struct
      dio' for direct-io.c.
      
      The framework is supposed to be used like this:
       - someone (who wants to process an IO asynchronously) allocates fuse_io_priv
         and initializes it setting 'async' field to non-zero value.
       - as soon as fuse request is filled, it can be submitted (in non-blocking way)
         by fuse_async_req_send()
       - when all submitted requests are ACKed by userspace, io->reqs drops to zero
         triggering aio_complete()
      
      In case of IO initiated by libaio, aio_complete() will finish processing the
      same way as in case of dio_complete() calling aio_complete(). But the
      framework may be also used for internal FUSE use when initial IO request
      was synchronous (from user perspective), but it's beneficial to process it
      asynchronously. Then the caller should wait on kiocb explicitly and
      aio_complete() will wake the caller up.
      Signed-off-by: NMaxim Patlasov <mpatlasov@parallels.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      01e9d11a
  14. 17 4月, 2013 2 次提交
  15. 07 2月, 2013 1 次提交
    • E
      fuse: allow control of adaptive readdirplus use · 634734b6
      Eric Wong 提交于
      For some filesystems (e.g. GlusterFS), the cost of performing a
      normal readdir and readdirplus are identical.  Since adaptively
      using readdirplus has no benefit for those systems, give
      users/filesystems the option to control adaptive readdirplus use.
      
      v2 of this patch incorporates Miklos's suggestion to simplify the code,
      as well as improving consistency of macro names and documentation.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
      Signed-off-by: NMiklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
      634734b6
  16. 01 2月, 2013 1 次提交