There is some concern that these iput()'s could be the final iputs and could
induce lockups on people waiting on writeback.  This would happen in the
rare case that we don't create ordered extents because of an error, but it
is theoretically possible and we already have a mechanism to deal with this
so just make them delayed iputs to negate any worry.
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When fixing up the locking in the delayed ref destruction work I accidently
broke the locking myself ;(.  Add back a spin_lock that should be there and
we are now all set.  Thanks,
Btrfs: add a missing spin_lock

When fixing up the locking in the delayed ref destruction work I accidently
broke the locking myself ;(.  Add back a spin_lock that should be there and
we are now all set.  Thanks,
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

add_all_parents did assume that path is already at a correct extent data
item, which may not be true in case of data extents that were partly
rewritten and splitted.

We need to check if we're on a matching extent for every item and only
for the ones after the first. The loop is changed to do this now.

This patch also fixes a bug introduced with commit 3b127fd8 "Btrfs:
remove obsolete btrfs_next_leaf call from __resolve_indirect_ref".
The removal of next_leaf did sometimes result in slot==nritems when
the above described case happens, and thus resulting in invalid values
(e.g. wanted_obejctid) in add_all_parents (leading to missed backrefs
or even crashes).
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We introduce btrfs_next_old_item that uses btrfs_next_old_leaf instead
of btrfs_next_leaf.

btrfs_next_item is also changed to simply call btrfs_next_old_item with
time_seq being 0.
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Block <ablock84@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Avoid warning in 32 bit machines
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

gcc was giving an uninit variable warning here.  Strictly
speaking we don't need to init it, but this will make things
much less error prone.
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Update to the latest btrfs's maintainer mail and git repo.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

the items of the delayed inodes were forgotten to be freed, this patch
fixes it.
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Since we have two trees for recording pinned extents, we need to go through
both of them to make sure that we've done everything clean.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We've forgotten to clear extent states in pinned tree, which will results in
space counter mismatch and memory leak:

WARNING: at fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c:7537 btrfs_free_block_groups+0x1f3/0x2e0 [btrfs]()
...
space_info 2 has 8380416 free, is not full
space_info total=12582912, used=4096, pinned=4096, reserved=0, may_use=0, readonly=4194304
btrfs state leak: start 29364224 end 29376511 state 1 in tree ffff880075f20090 refs 1
...
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Seeding devices are not supposed to change any more.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When we move a file into a directory with compression flag, we need to
inherite BTRFS_INODE_COMPRESS and clear BTRFS_INODE_NOCOMPRESS as well.
But if we move a file into a directory without compression flag, we need
to clear both of them.

It is the way how our setflags deals with compression flag, so keep
the same behaviour here.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <liubo2009@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

It's a bug, but it happens to work, as BTRFS_COMPRESS_LZO == 2, which
has only one bit set.
Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>

If a file has 3 small extents:

| ext1 | ext2 | ext3 |

Running "btrfs fi defrag" will only defrag the last two extents, if those
extent mappings hasn't been read into memory from disk.

This bug was introduced by commit 17ce6ef8
("Btrfs: add a check to decide if we should defrag the range")

The cause is, that commit looked into previous and next extents using
lookup_extent_mapping() only.

While at it, remove the code that checks the previous extent, since
it's sufficient to check the next extent.
Signed-off-by: NLi Zefan <lizefan@huawei.com>

I removed this in an earlier commit and I was wrong.  Because compression
can return from filemap_fdatawrite() without having actually set any of it's
pages as writeback() it can make filemap_fdatawait() do essentially nothing,
and then we won't find any ordered extents because they may not have been
created yet.  So not only does this make fsync() completely useless, but it
will also screw up if you truncate on a non-page aligned offset since we
zero out the end and then wait on ordered extents and then call drop caches.
We can drop the cache before the io completes and then we try to unpin the
extent we just wrote we won't find it and everything goes sideways.  So fix
this by putting it back and put a giant comment there to keep me from trying
to remove it in the future.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

A user reported lots of problems using compression on the new code and it
turns out part of the problem was that igrab() was failing when we added a
new ordered extent.  This is because when writing out an inode under
compression we immediately return without actually doing anything to the
pages, and then in another thread at some point down the line actually do
the ordered dance.  The problem is between the point that we start writeback
and we actually add the ordered extent we could be trying to reclaim the
inode, which makes igrab() return NULL.  So we need to do an igrab() when we
create the async extent and then drop it when we are done with it.  This
makes sure we stay pinned in memory until the ordered extent can get a
reference on it and we are good to go.  With this patch we no longer panic
in btrfs_finish_ordered_io().  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

Because btrfs can remove the device that was mounted we need to have a
->show_devname so that in this case we can print out some other device in
the file system to /proc/mount.  So if there are multiple devices in a btrfs
file system we will just print the device with the lowest devid that we can
find.  This will make everything consistent and deal with device removal
properly.  The drawback is if you mount with a device that is higher than
the lowest devicd it won't show up as the mounted device in /proc/mounts,
but this is a small price to pay. This was inspired by Miao Xie's patch.
Thanks,
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

Al pointed out that we can just toss out the old name on a device and add a
new one arbitrarily, so anybody who uses device->name in printk could
possibly use free'd memory.  Instead of adding locking around all of this he
suggested doing it with RCU, so I've introduced a struct rcu_string that
does just that and have gone through and protected all accesses to
device->name that aren't under the uuid_mutex with rcu_read_lock().  This
protects us and I will use it for dealing with removing the device that we
used to mount the file system in a later patch.  Thanks,
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

I was getting hung on umount when a transaction was aborted because a range
of one of the free space inodes was still locked.  This is because the nocow
stuff doesn't unlock anything on error.  This fixed the problem and I
verified that is what was happening.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

So we're forcing the eb's to have their ref count set to 1 so invalidatepage
works but this breaks lots of things, for example root nodes, and is just
plain wrong, we don't need to just evict all of this stuff.  Also drop the
invalidatepage altogether and add a page_cache_release().  With this patch
we no longer hang when trying to access the root nodes after an aborted
transaction and we no longer leak memory.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

If a transaction commit fails we don't abort it so we don't set an error on
the file system.  This patch fixes that by actually calling the abort stuff
and then adding a check for a fs error in the transaction start stuff to
make sure it is caught properly.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

I was getting lots of hung tasks and a NULL pointer dereference because we
are not cleaning up the transaction properly when it aborts.  First we need
to reset the running_transaction to NULL so we don't get a bad dereference
for any start_transaction callers after this.  Also we cannot rely on
waitqueue_active() since it's just a list_empty(), so just call wake_up()
directly since that will do the barrier for us and such.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

The transaction abort stuff was throwing warnings from the list debugging
code because we do a list_del_init outside of the delayed_refs spin lock.
The delayed refs locking makes baby Jesus cry so it's not hard to get wrong,
but we need to take the ref head mutex to make sure it's not being processed
currently, and so if it is we need to drop the spin lock and then take and
drop the mutex and do the search again.  If we can take the mutex then we
can safely remove the head from the list and carry on.  Now when the
transaction aborts I don't get the list debugging warnings.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

While doing my enospc work I got a transaction abortion that resulted in a
panic when we tried to unlock_page() an already unlocked page.  This is
because we aren't calling extent_clear_unlock_delalloc with the locked page
so it was unlocking all the pages in the range.  This is wrong since
__extent_writepage expects to have the page locked still unless we return
*page_started as 1.  This should keep us from panicing.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@redhat.com>

When adding to the tree modification log, we grab two locks at different
stages. We must not drop the outer lock until we're done with section
protected by the inner lock. This moves the unlock call for the outer lock
to the appropriate position.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

To make sense of the tree mod log, the backref walker not only needs
btrfs_search_old_slot, but it also called btrfs_next_leaf, which in turn was
calling btrfs_search_slot. This obviously didn't give the correct result.

This commit adds btrfs_next_old_leaf, a drop-in replacement for
btrfs_next_leaf with a time_seq parameter. If it is zero, it behaves exactly
like btrfs_next_leaf. If it is non-zero, it will use btrfs_search_old_slot
with this time_seq parameter.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

In __tree_mod_log_oldest_root() we must return the found operation even if
it's not a ROOT_REPLACE operation. Otherwise, the caller assumes that there
are no operations to be rewinded and returns immediately.

The code in the caller is modified to improve readability.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

get_old_root could race with root node updates because we weren't locking
the node early enough. Use btrfs_read_lock_root_node to grab the root locked
in the very beginning and release the lock as soon as possible (just like
btrfs_search_slot does).
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

When resolving indirect refs, we used to call btrfs_next_leaf in case we
didn't find an exact match. While we should find exact matches most of the
time, in case we don't, we must continue searching. Treating those matches
differently depending on the level we're searching doesn't make sense.

Even worse, we might end up searching for a key larger than the largest, in
which case there is no next_leaf and subsequent jobs would fail. This commit
drops the bogous lines.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

This is a leftover from cleanup patch 559af821. Before the cleanup,
btrfs_header_nritems was called inside an if condition. As it has no side
effects we need to preserve here, it should simply be dropped.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Conflicts:
	fs/btrfs/ulist.h
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@oracle.com>

When we rewind REMOVE_WHILE_FREEING operations, there's code that allocates
a fresh buffer instead of cloning the old one. Setting that buffer's level
correctly was missing in this case.

When rewinding a MOVE_KEYS operation, btrfs_node_key_ptr_offset(slot) was
missing for memmove_extent_buffer()'s arguments.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Logging for del_ptr when we're not deleting the last pointer was wrong. This
fixes both, duplicate log entries and log sequence.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Replace duplicate code by small inline helper function.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

tree_mod_alloc calls __get_tree_mod_seq and must acquire a spinlock before
doing so.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

We must build up the inode list with the extent lock held after following
indirect refs.

This also requires an extension to ulists, which allows to modify the stored
aux value in case a key already exists in the list.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

The sequence number for delayed refs is needed to postpone certain delayed
refs for a very short period while walking backrefs. Before the tree
modification log, we thought we'd only have to hold back those references
that don't have a counter operation.

While now we've the tree mod log, we're rewinding fs tree blocks to a
defined consistent state. We cannot know in advance for which tree block
we'll be doing rewind operations later. Therefore, we must postpone all the
delayed refs for fs-tree blocks, even those having a counter operation.
Signed-off-by: NJan Schmidt <list.btrfs@jan-o-sch.net>

Merge branch 'for-chris' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/josef/btrfs-next into HEAD

During unmount, it could happen that the integrity checker printed a
warning message "attempt to free ... on umount which is not yet iodone"
which turned out to be a false positive.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>