Problem observed:
               In IPv6, in the presence of multiple routers candidates to
               default gateway in one segment, each sending a different
               value of preference, the Linux hosts connected to the
               segment weren't selecting the right one in all the
               combinations possible of LOW/MEDIUM/HIGH preference.

This patch changes two files:
include/linux/icmpv6.h
               Get the "router_pref" bitfield in the right place
               (as RFC4191 says), named the bit left with this fix as
               "home_agent" (RFC3775 say that's his function)

net/ipv6/ndisc.c
               Corrects the binary logic behind the updating of the
               router preference in the flags of the routing table

Result:
               With this two fixes applied, the default route used by
               the system was to consistent with the rules mentioned
               in RFC4191 in case of changes in the value of preference
               in router advertisements
Signed-off-by: NPedro Ribeiro <pribeiro@net.ipl.pt>
Acked-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Introduced by changeset 95e41e93
("[IPV6]: Make ndisc_flow_init() common for later use.")

Reported by Stephen Rothwell.

In file included from net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c:21:
include/linux/icmpv6.h:192: warning: 'struct in6_addr' declared inside parameter list
include/linux/icmpv6.h:192: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

For later use, this patch is renaming ndisc_flow_init() to
icmpv6_flow_init() and putting it in common place.
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>

struct net_proto_family* is not used in icmp[v6]_init, ndisc_init,
igmp_init and tcp_v4_init. Remove it.
Signed-off-by: NDenis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
Acked-by: NDaniel Lezcano <dlezcano@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

For the places where we need a pointer to the transport header, it is
still legal to touch skb->h.raw directly if just adding to,
subtracting from or setting it to another layer header.
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

For consistency with all the other skb->h.raw accessors.
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!