1. 30 3月, 2018 1 次提交
    • K
      net: Introduce net_rwsem to protect net_namespace_list · f0b07bb1
      Kirill Tkhai 提交于
      rtnl_lock() is used everywhere, and contention is very high.
      When someone wants to iterate over alive net namespaces,
      he/she has no a possibility to do that without exclusive lock.
      But the exclusive rtnl_lock() in such places is overkill,
      and it just increases the contention. Yes, there is already
      for_each_net_rcu() in kernel, but it requires rcu_read_lock(),
      and this can't be sleepable. Also, sometimes it may be need
      really prevent net_namespace_list growth, so for_each_net_rcu()
      is not fit there.
      
      This patch introduces new rw_semaphore, which will be used
      instead of rtnl_mutex to protect net_namespace_list. It is
      sleepable and allows not-exclusive iterations over net
      namespaces list. It allows to stop using rtnl_lock()
      in several places (what is made in next patches) and makes
      less the time, we keep rtnl_mutex. Here we just add new lock,
      while the explanation of we can remove rtnl_lock() there are
      in next patches.
      
      Fine grained locks generally are better, then one big lock,
      so let's do that with net_namespace_list, while the situation
      allows that.
      Signed-off-by: NKirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f0b07bb1
  2. 29 3月, 2018 8 次提交
  3. 28 3月, 2018 4 次提交
  4. 27 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  5. 24 3月, 2018 6 次提交
  6. 23 3月, 2018 4 次提交
  7. 22 3月, 2018 1 次提交
    • C
      net: add uevent socket member · 94e5e308
      Christian Brauner 提交于
      This commit adds struct uevent_sock to struct net. Since struct uevent_sock
      records the position of the uevent socket in the uevent socket list we can
      trivially remove it from the uevent socket list during cleanup. This speeds
      up the old removal codepath.
      Note, list_del() will hit __list_del_entry_valid() in its call chain which
      will validate that the element is a member of the list. If it isn't it will
      take care that the list is not modified.
      Signed-off-by: NChristian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      94e5e308
  8. 21 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 20 3月, 2018 2 次提交
  10. 18 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 17 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  12. 16 3月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      net/ipv6: Change address check to always take a device argument · 232378e8
      David Ahern 提交于
      ipv6_chk_addr_and_flags determines if an address is a local address and
      optionally if it is an address on a specific device. For example, it is
      called by ip6_route_info_create to determine if a given gateway address
      is a local address. The address check currently does not consider L3
      domains and as a result does not allow a route to be added in one VRF
      if the nexthop points to an address in a second VRF. e.g.,
      
          $ ip route add 2001:db8:1::/64 vrf r2 via 2001:db8:102::23
          Error: Invalid gateway address.
      
      where 2001:db8:102::23 is an address on an interface in vrf r1.
      
      ipv6_chk_addr_and_flags needs to allow callers to always pass in a device
      with a separate argument to not limit the address to the specific device.
      The device is used used to determine the L3 domain of interest.
      
      To that end add an argument to skip the device check and update callers
      to always pass a device where possible and use the new argument to mean
      any address in the domain.
      
      Update a handful of users of ipv6_chk_addr with a NULL dev argument. This
      patch handles the change to these callers without adding the domain check.
      
      ip6_validate_gw needs to handle 2 cases - one where the device is given
      as part of the nexthop spec and the other where the device is resolved.
      There is at least 1 VRF case where deferring the check to only after
      the route lookup has resolved the device fails with an unintuitive error
      "RTNETLINK answers: No route to host" as opposed to the preferred
      "Error: Gateway can not be a local address." The 'no route to host'
      error is because of the fallback to a full lookup. The check is done
      twice to avoid this error.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NIdo Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      232378e8
  13. 15 3月, 2018 5 次提交
  14. 14 3月, 2018 3 次提交