1. 19 4月, 2022 2 次提交
  2. 13 4月, 2022 8 次提交
  3. 12 4月, 2022 11 次提交
  4. 11 4月, 2022 3 次提交
    • S
      drm/i915: Swap ret and status returned from skl_pcode_request · 40a56956
      Stanislav Lisovskiy 提交于
      If ret isn't zero, it is almost for sure ETIMEDOUT, because
      we use it in wait_for macro which does continuous retries
      until timeout is reached. If we still ran out of time and
      retries, we most likely would be interested in getting status,
      to understand what was the actual error propagated from PCode,
      rather than to find out that we had a time out, which is anyway
      quite obvious, if the function fails.
      
      v2: Make it status ? status : ret(thanks Vinod for the hint)
      Signed-off-by: NStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NVinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220411081343.18099-1-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
      40a56956
    • S
      drm/i915: Fix skl_pcode_try_request function · 9e0a1c3c
      Stanislav Lisovskiy 提交于
      Currently skl_pcode_try_request function doesn't
      properly handle return value it gets from
      snb_pcode_rw, but treats status != 0 as success,
      returning true, which basically doesn't allow
      to use retry/timeout mechanisms if PCode happens
      to be busy and returns EGAIN or some other status
      code not equal to 0.
      
      We saw this on real hw and also tried simulating this
      by always returning -EAGAIN from snb_pcode_rw for 6 times, which
      currently will just result in false success, while it should
      have tried until timeout is reached:
      
      [   22.357729] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_cdclk_dump_config [i915]] Changing CDCLK to
      307200 kHz, VCO 614400 kHz, ref 38400 kHz, bypass 19200 kHz, voltage level 0
      [   22.357831] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:__snb_pcode_rw [i915]] Returning EAGAIN retry 1
      [   22.357892] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:skl_pcode_request [i915]] Success, exiting
      [   22.357936] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm] ERROR Failed to inform PCU about cdclk change (err -11, freq 307200)
      
      We see en error because higher level api, still notices that status was wrong,
      however we still did try only once.
      
      We fix it by requiring _both_ the status to be 0 and
      request/reply match for success(true) and function
      should return failure(false) if either status turns
      out to be EAGAIN, EBUSY or whatever or reply/request
      masks do not match.
      
      So now we see this in the logs:
      
      [   22.318667] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:intel_cdclk_dump_config [i915]] Changing CDCLK to
      307200 kHz, VCO 614400 kHz, ref 38400 kHz, bypass 19200 kHz, voltage level 0
      [   22.318782] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:__snb_pcode_rw [i915]] Returning EAGAIN retry 1
      [   22.318849] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:__snb_pcode_rw [i915]] Returning EAGAIN retry 2
      [   22.319006] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:__snb_pcode_rw [i915]] Returning EAGAIN retry 3
      [   22.319091] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:__snb_pcode_rw [i915]] Returning EAGAIN retry 4
      [   22.319158] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:__snb_pcode_rw [i915]] Returning EAGAIN retry 5
      [   22.319224] i915 0000:00:02.0: [drm:__snb_pcode_rw [i915]] Returning EAGAIN retry 6
      Reviewed-by: NVinod Govindapillai <vinod.govindapillai@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NStanislav Lisovskiy <stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com>
      Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220408125200.9069-2-stanislav.lisovskiy@intel.com
      9e0a1c3c
    • J
      Merge drm/drm-next into drm-intel-next · 83970cd6
      Jani Nikula 提交于
      Sync up with v5.18-rc1, in particular to get 5e3094cf
      ("drm/i915/xehpsdv: Add has_flat_ccs to device info").
      Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
      83970cd6
  5. 10 4月, 2022 1 次提交
  6. 09 4月, 2022 1 次提交
  7. 07 4月, 2022 3 次提交
  8. 06 4月, 2022 4 次提交
  9. 05 4月, 2022 7 次提交