The fbdev mailing lists at SourceForge have been migrated to a single
mailing list at kernel.org: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org.
Signed-off-by: NGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Acked-by: NJean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

* 'for-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rostedt/linux-2.6-kconfig:
  kconfig: Fix make O=<dir> local{mod,yes}config

* 'upstream-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jgarzik/libata-dev:
  sata_fsl: Split hard and soft reset

* git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dhowells/linux-2.6-fscache: (31 commits)
  FS-Cache: Provide nop fscache_stat_d() if CONFIG_FSCACHE_STATS=n
  SLOW_WORK: Fix GFS2 to #include <linux/module.h> before using THIS_MODULE
  SLOW_WORK: Fix CIFS to pass THIS_MODULE to slow_work_register_user()
  CacheFiles: Don't log lookup/create failing with ENOBUFS
  CacheFiles: Catch an overly long wait for an old active object
  CacheFiles: Better showing of debugging information in active object problems
  CacheFiles: Mark parent directory locks as I_MUTEX_PARENT to keep lockdep happy
  CacheFiles: Handle truncate unlocking the page we're reading
  CacheFiles: Don't write a full page if there's only a partial page to cache
  FS-Cache: Actually requeue an object when requested
  FS-Cache: Start processing an object's operations on that object's death
  FS-Cache: Make sure FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP cleared on lookup failure
  FS-Cache: Add a retirement stat counter
  FS-Cache: Handle pages pending storage that get evicted under OOM conditions
  FS-Cache: Handle read request vs lookup, creation or other cache failure
  FS-Cache: Don't delete pending pages from the page-store tracking tree
  FS-Cache: Fix lock misorder in fscache_write_op()
  FS-Cache: The object-available state can't rely on the cookie to be available
  FS-Cache: Permit cache retrieval ops to be interrupted in the initial wait phase
  FS-Cache: Use radix tree preload correctly in tracking of pages to be stored
  ...

We can have bzip2 compressed images nowadays.
Signed-off-by: NGertjan van Wingerde <gwingerde@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

kernel unwinding is broken with gcc >= 4.x.  Part of the problem is that
binutils seems very sensitive to where the unwind information is stored.
Signed-off-by: NHelge Deller <deller@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NKyle McMartin <kyle@mcmartin.ca>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Provide nop fscache_stat_d() macro if CONFIG_FSCACHE_STATS=n lest errors like
the following occur:

	fs/fscache/cache.c: In function 'fscache_withdraw_cache':
	fs/fscache/cache.c:386: error: implicit declaration of function 'fscache_stat_d'
	fs/fscache/cache.c:386: error: 'fscache_n_cop_sync_cache' undeclared (first use in this function)
	fs/fscache/cache.c:386: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
	fs/fscache/cache.c:386: error: for each function it appears in.)
	fs/fscache/cache.c:392: error: 'fscache_n_cop_dissociate_pages' undeclared (first use in this function)
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

GFS2 has been altered to pass THIS_MODULE to slow_work_register_user(), but
hasn't been altered to #include <linux/module.h> to provide it, resulting in
the following error:

	fs/gfs2/recovery.c:596: error: 'THIS_MODULE' undeclared here (not in a function)

Add the missing #include.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

As of the patch:

	SLOW_WORK: Wait for outstanding work items belonging to a module to clear

	Wait for outstanding slow work items belonging to a module to clear
	when unregistering that module as a user of the facility.  This
	prevents the put_ref code of a work item from being taken away before
	it returns.

slow_work_register_user() takes a module pointer as an argument.  CIFS must now
pass THIS_MODULE as that argument, lest the following error be observed:

	fs/cifs/cifsfs.c: In function 'init_cifs':
	fs/cifs/cifsfs.c:1040: error: too few arguments to function 'slow_work_register_user'
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

When the output directory is something other than the kernel source,
the streamline_config script gets confused. This patch passes in the
source directory to the script so that it can find the proper files.
Reported-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Tested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>

* 'i2c-pnx-fixes' of git://git.fluff.org/bjdooks/linux:
  i2c: i2c-pnx: Added missing mach/i2c.h and linux/io.h header file includes
  i2c: i2c-pnx: Made buf type unsigned to prevent sign extension
  i2c: i2c-pnx: Limit minimum jiffie timeout to 2

* 'upstream-linus' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jlbec/ocfs2:
  ocfs2: Trivial cleanup of jbd compatibility layer removal
  ocfs2: Refresh documentation
  ocfs2: return f_fsid info in ocfs2_statfs()
  ocfs2: duplicate inline data properly during reflink.
  ocfs2: Move ocfs2_complete_reflink to the right place.
  ocfs2: Return -EINVAL when a device is not ocfs2.

Added missing mach/i2c.h and linux/io.h header file includes
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wells <kevin.wells@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>

Made buf type unsigned to prevent sign extension
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wells <kevin.wells@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>

Limit minimum jiffie timeout to 2 to prevent early timeout on systems
with low tick rates
Signed-off-by: NKevin Wells <kevin.wells@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Dooks <ben-linux@fluff.org>

Split sata_fsl_softreset() into hard and soft resets to make
error-handling more efficient & device and PMP detection more
reliable.

Also includes fix for PMP support, driver tested with Sil3726,
Sil4726 & Exar PMP controllers.

[AV: Also fixes resuming from deep sleep on MPC8315 CPUs]
Signed-off-by: NJiang Yutang <b14898@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>

* 'bugfixes' of git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/nfs-2.6:
  SUNRPC: Address buffer overrun in rpc_uaddr2sockaddr()
  NFSv4: Fix a cache validation bug which causes getcwd() to return ENOENT

As this struct is exposed to user space and the API was added for this
release it's a bit of a pain for the C++ world and we still have time to
fix it. Rename the fields before we end up with that pain in an actual
release.
Signed-off-by: NAlan Cox <alan@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Olivier Goffart
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Commit 86cf898e ("intel-iommu: Check for
'DMAR at zero' BIOS error earlier.") was supposed to work by pretending
not to detect an IOMMU if it was actually being reported by the BIOS at
physical address zero.

However, the intel_iommu_init() function is called unconditionally, as
are the corresponding functions for other IOMMU hardware.

So the patch only worked if you have RAM above the 4GiB boundary. It
caused swiotlb to be initialised when no IOMMU was detected during early
boot, and thus the later IOMMU init would refuse to run.

But if you have less RAM than that, swiotlb wouldn't get set up and the
IOMMU _would_ still end up being initialised, even though we never
claimed to detect it.

This patch also sets the dmar_disabled flag when the error is detected
during the initial detection phase -- so that the later call to
intel_iommu_init() will return without doing anything, regardless of
whether swiotlb is used or not.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Don't log the CacheFiles lookup/create object routined failing with ENOBUFS as
under high memory load or high cache load they can do this quite a lot.  This
error simply means that the requested object cannot be created on disk due to
lack of space, or due to failure of the backing filesystem to find sufficient
resources.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Catch an overly long wait for an old, dying active object when we want to
replace it with a new one.  The probability is that all the slow-work threads
are hogged, and the delete can't get a look in.

What we do instead is:

 (1) if there's nothing in the slow work queue, we sleep until either the dying
     object has finished dying or there is something in the slow work queue
     behind which we can queue our object.

 (2) if there is something in the slow work queue, we return ETIMEDOUT to
     fscache_lookup_object(), which then puts us back on the slow work queue,
     presumably behind the deletion that we're blocked by.  We are then
     deferred for a while until we work our way back through the queue -
     without blocking a slow-work thread unnecessarily.

A backtrace similar to the following may appear in the log without this patch:

	INFO: task kslowd004:5711 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
	"echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
	kslowd004     D 0000000000000000     0  5711      2 0x00000080
	 ffff88000340bb80 0000000000000046 ffff88002550d000 0000000000000000
	 ffff88002550d000 0000000000000007 ffff88000340bfd8 ffff88002550d2a8
	 000000000000ddf0 00000000000118c0 00000000000118c0 ffff88002550d2a8
	Call Trace:
	 [<ffffffff81058e21>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
	 [<ffffffffa011c4d8>] ? cachefiles_wait_bit+0x0/0xd [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffffa011c4e1>] cachefiles_wait_bit+0x9/0xd [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffff81353153>] __wait_on_bit+0x43/0x76
	 [<ffffffff8111ae39>] ? ext3_xattr_get+0x1ec/0x270
	 [<ffffffff813531ef>] out_of_line_wait_on_bit+0x69/0x74
	 [<ffffffffa011c4d8>] ? cachefiles_wait_bit+0x0/0xd [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffff8104c125>] ? wake_bit_function+0x0/0x2e
	 [<ffffffffa011bc79>] cachefiles_mark_object_active+0x203/0x23b [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffffa011c209>] cachefiles_walk_to_object+0x558/0x827 [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffffa011a429>] cachefiles_lookup_object+0xac/0x12a [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffffa00aa1e9>] fscache_lookup_object+0x1c7/0x214 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffffa00aafc5>] fscache_object_state_machine+0xa5/0x52d [fscache]
	 [<ffffffffa00ab4ac>] fscache_object_slow_work_execute+0x5f/0xa0 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffff81082093>] slow_work_execute+0x18f/0x2d1
	 [<ffffffff8108239a>] slow_work_thread+0x1c5/0x308
	 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
	 [<ffffffff810821d5>] ? slow_work_thread+0x0/0x308
	 [<ffffffff8104be91>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
	 [<ffffffff8100beda>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
	 [<ffffffff8100b87c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
	 [<ffffffff8104be17>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
	 [<ffffffff8100bed0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
	1 lock held by kslowd004/5711:
	 #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7/1){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa011be64>] cachefiles_walk_to_object+0x1b3/0x827 [cachefiles]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Show more debugging information if cachefiles_mark_object_active() is asked to
activate an active object.

This may happen, for instance, if the netfs tries to register an object with
the same key multiple times.

The code is changed to (a) get the appropriate object lock to protect the
cookie pointer whilst we dereference it, and (b) get and display the cookie key
if available.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Mark parent directory locks as I_MUTEX_PARENT in the callers of
cachefiles_bury_object() so that lockdep doesn't complain when that invokes
vfs_unlink():

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #47
---------------------------------------------
kslowd002/3089 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff810bbf72>] vfs_unlink+0x8b/0x128

but task is already holding lock:
 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00e4e61>] cachefiles_walk_to_object+0x1b0/0x831 [cachefiles]

other info that might help us debug this:
1 lock held by kslowd002/3089:
 #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#7){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa00e4e61>] cachefiles_walk_to_object+0x1b0/0x831 [cachefiles]

stack backtrace:
Pid: 3089, comm: kslowd002 Not tainted 2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #47
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8105ad7b>] __lock_acquire+0x1649/0x16e3
 [<ffffffff8118170e>] ? inode_has_perm+0x5f/0x61
 [<ffffffff8105ae6c>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
 [<ffffffff810bbf72>] ? vfs_unlink+0x8b/0x128
 [<ffffffff81353ac3>] mutex_lock_nested+0x54/0x292
 [<ffffffff810bbf72>] ? vfs_unlink+0x8b/0x128
 [<ffffffff8118179e>] ? selinux_inode_permission+0x8e/0x90
 [<ffffffff8117e271>] ? security_inode_permission+0x1c/0x1e
 [<ffffffff810bb4fb>] ? inode_permission+0x99/0xa5
 [<ffffffff810bbf72>] vfs_unlink+0x8b/0x128
 [<ffffffff810adb19>] ? kfree+0xed/0xf9
 [<ffffffffa00e3f00>] cachefiles_bury_object+0xb6/0x420 [cachefiles]
 [<ffffffff81058e21>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
 [<ffffffffa00e7e24>] ? cachefiles_check_object_xattr+0x233/0x293 [cachefiles]
 [<ffffffffa00e51b0>] cachefiles_walk_to_object+0x4ff/0x831 [cachefiles]
 [<ffffffff81032238>] ? finish_task_switch+0x0/0xb2
 [<ffffffffa00e3429>] cachefiles_lookup_object+0xac/0x12a [cachefiles]
 [<ffffffffa00741e9>] fscache_lookup_object+0x1c7/0x214 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa0074fc5>] fscache_object_state_machine+0xa5/0x52d [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa00754ac>] fscache_object_slow_work_execute+0x5f/0xa0 [fscache]
 [<ffffffff81082093>] slow_work_execute+0x18f/0x2d1
 [<ffffffff8108239a>] slow_work_thread+0x1c5/0x308
 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
 [<ffffffff810821d5>] ? slow_work_thread+0x0/0x308
 [<ffffffff8104be91>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
 [<ffffffff8100beda>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [<ffffffff8100b87c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [<ffffffff8104be17>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
 [<ffffffff8100bed0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Signed-off-by: NDaivd Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Handle truncate unlocking the page we're attempting to read from the backing
device before the read has completed.

This was causing reports like the following to occur:

	Pid: 4765, comm: kslowd Not tainted 2.6.30.1 #1
	Call Trace:
	 [<ffffffffa0331d7a>] ? cachefiles_read_waiter+0xd9/0x147 [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffff804b74bd>] ? __wait_on_bit+0x60/0x6f
	 [<ffffffff8022bbbb>] ? __wake_up_common+0x3f/0x71
	 [<ffffffff8022cc32>] ? __wake_up+0x30/0x44
	 [<ffffffff8024a41f>] ? __wake_up_bit+0x28/0x2d
	 [<ffffffffa003a793>] ? ext3_truncate+0x4d7/0x8ed [ext3]
	 [<ffffffff80281f90>] ? pagevec_lookup+0x17/0x1f
	 [<ffffffff8028c2ff>] ? unmap_mapping_range+0x59/0x1ff
	 [<ffffffff8022cc32>] ? __wake_up+0x30/0x44
	 [<ffffffff8028e286>] ? vmtruncate+0xc2/0xe2
	 [<ffffffff802b82cf>] ? inode_setattr+0x22/0x10a
	 [<ffffffffa003baa5>] ? ext3_setattr+0x17b/0x1e6 [ext3]
	 [<ffffffff802b853d>] ? notify_change+0x186/0x2c9
	 [<ffffffffa032d9de>] ? cachefiles_attr_changed+0x133/0x1cd [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffffa032df7f>] ? cachefiles_lookup_object+0xcf/0x12a [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffffa0318165>] ? fscache_lookup_object+0x110/0x122 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffffa03188c3>] ? fscache_object_slow_work_execute+0x590/0x6bc
	[fscache]
	 [<ffffffff80278f82>] ? slow_work_thread+0x285/0x43a
	 [<ffffffff8024a446>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x2e
	 [<ffffffff80278cfd>] ? slow_work_thread+0x0/0x43a
	 [<ffffffff8024a317>] ? kthread+0x54/0x81
	 [<ffffffff8020c93a>] ? child_rip+0xa/0x20
	 [<ffffffff8024a2c3>] ? kthread+0x0/0x81
	 [<ffffffff8020c930>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
	CacheFiles: I/O Error: Readpage failed on backing file 200000000000810
	FS-Cache: Cache cachefiles stopped due to I/O error
Reported-by: NChristian Kujau <lists@nerdbynature.de>
Reported-by: NTakashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Reported-by: NDuc Le Minh <duclm.vn@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

cachefiles_write_page() writes a full page to the backing file for the last
page of the netfs file, even if the netfs file's last page is only a partial
page.

This causes the EOF on the backing file to be extended beyond the EOF of the
netfs, and thus the backing file will be truncated by cachefiles_attr_changed()
called from cachefiles_lookup_object().

So we need to limit the write we make to the backing file on that last page
such that it doesn't push the EOF too far.

Also, if a backing file that has a partial page at the end is expanded, we
discard the partial page and refetch it on the basis that we then have a hole
in the file with invalid data, and should the power go out...  A better way to
deal with this could be to record a note that the partial page contains invalid
data until the correct data is written into it.

This isn't a problem for netfs's that discard the whole backing file if the
file size changes (such as NFS).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

FS-Cache objects have an FSCACHE_OBJECT_EV_REQUEUE event that can theoretically
be raised to ask the state machine to requeue the object for further processing
before the work function returns to the slow-work facility.

However, fscache_object_work_execute() was clearing that bit before checking
the event mask to see whether the object has any pending events that require it
to be requeued immediately.

Instead, the bit should be cleared after the check and enqueue.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Start processing an object's operations when that object moves into the DYING
state as the object cannot be destroyed until all its outstanding operations
have completed.

Furthermore, make sure that read and allocation operations handle being woken
up on a dead object.  Such events are recorded in the Allocs.abt and
Retrvls.abt statistics as viewable through /proc/fs/fscache/stats.

The code for waiting for object activation for the read and allocation
operations is also extracted into its own function as it is much the same in
all cases, differing only in the stats incremented.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

We must make sure that FSCACHE_COOKIE_LOOKING_UP is cleared on lookup failure
(if an object reaches the LC_DYING state), and we should clear it before
clearing FSCACHE_COOKIE_CREATING.

If this doesn't happen then fscache_wait_for_deferred_lookup() may hold
allocation and retrieval operations indefinitely until they're interrupted by
signals - which in turn pins the dying object until they go away.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Add a stat counter to count retirement events rather than ordinary release
events (the retire argument to fscache_relinquish_cookie()).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Handle netfs pages that the vmscan algorithm wants to evict from the pagecache
under OOM conditions, but that are waiting for write to the cache.  Under these
conditions, vmscan calls the releasepage() function of the netfs, asking if a
page can be discarded.

The problem is typified by the following trace of a stuck process:

	kslowd005     D 0000000000000000     0  4253      2 0x00000080
	 ffff88001b14f370 0000000000000046 ffff880020d0d000 0000000000000007
	 0000000000000006 0000000000000001 ffff88001b14ffd8 ffff880020d0d2a8
	 000000000000ddf0 00000000000118c0 00000000000118c0 ffff880020d0d2a8
	Call Trace:
	 [<ffffffffa00782d8>] __fscache_wait_on_page_write+0x8b/0xa7 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
	 [<ffffffffa0078240>] ? __fscache_check_page_write+0x63/0x70 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffffa00b671d>] nfs_fscache_release_page+0x4e/0xc4 [nfs]
	 [<ffffffffa00927f0>] nfs_release_page+0x3c/0x41 [nfs]
	 [<ffffffff810885d3>] try_to_release_page+0x32/0x3b
	 [<ffffffff81093203>] shrink_page_list+0x316/0x4ac
	 [<ffffffff8109372b>] shrink_inactive_list+0x392/0x67c
	 [<ffffffff813532fa>] ? __mutex_unlock_slowpath+0x100/0x10b
	 [<ffffffff81058df0>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10c/0x130
	 [<ffffffff8135330e>] ? mutex_unlock+0x9/0xb
	 [<ffffffff81093aa2>] shrink_list+0x8d/0x8f
	 [<ffffffff81093d1c>] shrink_zone+0x278/0x33c
	 [<ffffffff81052d6c>] ? ktime_get_ts+0xad/0xba
	 [<ffffffff81094b13>] try_to_free_pages+0x22e/0x392
	 [<ffffffff81091e24>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x212
	 [<ffffffff8108e743>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3dc/0x5cf
	 [<ffffffff81089529>] grab_cache_page_write_begin+0x65/0xaa
	 [<ffffffff8110f8c0>] ext3_write_begin+0x78/0x1eb
	 [<ffffffff81089ec5>] generic_file_buffered_write+0x109/0x28c
	 [<ffffffff8103cb69>] ? current_fs_time+0x22/0x29
	 [<ffffffff8108a509>] __generic_file_aio_write+0x350/0x385
	 [<ffffffff8108a588>] ? generic_file_aio_write+0x4a/0xae
	 [<ffffffff8108a59e>] generic_file_aio_write+0x60/0xae
	 [<ffffffff810b2e82>] do_sync_write+0xe3/0x120
	 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
	 [<ffffffff810b18e1>] ? __dentry_open+0x1a5/0x2b8
	 [<ffffffff810b1a76>] ? dentry_open+0x82/0x89
	 [<ffffffffa00e693c>] cachefiles_write_page+0x298/0x335 [cachefiles]
	 [<ffffffffa0077147>] fscache_write_op+0x178/0x2c2 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffffa0075656>] fscache_op_execute+0x7a/0xd1 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffff81082093>] slow_work_execute+0x18f/0x2d1
	 [<ffffffff8108239a>] slow_work_thread+0x1c5/0x308
	 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
	 [<ffffffff810821d5>] ? slow_work_thread+0x0/0x308
	 [<ffffffff8104be91>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
	 [<ffffffff8100beda>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
	 [<ffffffff8100b87c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
	 [<ffffffff8102ef83>] ? tg_shares_up+0x171/0x227
	 [<ffffffff8104be17>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
	 [<ffffffff8100bed0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20

In the above backtrace, the following is happening:

 (1) A page storage operation is being executed by a slow-work thread
     (fscache_write_op()).

 (2) FS-Cache farms the operation out to the cache to perform
     (cachefiles_write_page()).

 (3) CacheFiles is then calling Ext3 to perform the actual write, using Ext3's
     standard write (do_sync_write()) under KERNEL_DS directly from the netfs
     page.

 (4) However, for Ext3 to perform the write, it must allocate some memory, in
     particular, it must allocate at least one page cache page into which it
     can copy the data from the netfs page.

 (5) Under OOM conditions, the memory allocator can't immediately come up with
     a page, so it uses vmscan to find something to discard
     (try_to_free_pages()).

 (6) vmscan finds a clean netfs page it might be able to discard (possibly the
     one it's trying to write out).

 (7) The netfs is called to throw the page away (nfs_release_page()) - but it's
     called with __GFP_WAIT, so the netfs decides to wait for the store to
     complete (__fscache_wait_on_page_write()).

 (8) This blocks a slow-work processing thread - possibly against itself.

The system ends up stuck because it can't write out any netfs pages to the
cache without allocating more memory.

To avoid this, we make FS-Cache cancel some writes that aren't in the middle of
actually being performed.  This means that some data won't make it into the
cache this time.  To support this, a new FS-Cache function is added
fscache_maybe_release_page() that replaces what the netfs releasepage()
functions used to do with respect to the cache.

The decisions fscache_maybe_release_page() makes are counted and displayed
through /proc/fs/fscache/stats on a line labelled "VmScan".  There are four
counters provided: "nos=N" - pages that weren't pending storage; "gon=N" -
pages that were pending storage when we first looked, but weren't by the time
we got the object lock; "bsy=N" - pages that we ignored as they were actively
being written when we looked; and "can=N" - pages that we cancelled the storage
of.

What I'd really like to do is alter the behaviour of the cancellation
heuristics, depending on how necessary it is to expel pages.  If there are
plenty of other pages that aren't waiting to be written to the cache that
could be ejected first, then it would be nice to hold up on immediate
cancellation of cache writes - but I don't see a way of doing that.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

FS-Cache doesn't correctly handle the netfs requesting a read from the cache
on an object that failed or was withdrawn by the cache.  A trace similar to
the following might be seen:

	CacheFiles: Lookup failed error -105
	[exe   ] unexpected submission OP165afe [OBJ6cac OBJECT_LC_DYING]
	[exe   ] objstate=OBJECT_LC_DYING [OBJECT_LC_DYING]
	[exe   ] objflags=0
	[exe   ] objevent=9 [fffffffffffffffb]
	[exe   ] ops=0 inp=0 exc=0
	Pid: 6970, comm: exe Not tainted 2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #50
	Call Trace:
	 [<ffffffffa0076477>] fscache_submit_op+0x3ff/0x45a [fscache]
	 [<ffffffffa0077997>] __fscache_read_or_alloc_pages+0x187/0x3c4 [fscache]
	 [<ffffffffa00b6480>] ? nfs_readpage_from_fscache_complete+0x0/0x66 [nfs]
	 [<ffffffffa00b6388>] __nfs_readpages_from_fscache+0x7e/0x176 [nfs]
	 [<ffffffff8108e483>] ? __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x11c/0x5cf
	 [<ffffffffa009d796>] nfs_readpages+0x114/0x1d7 [nfs]
	 [<ffffffff81090314>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x15f/0x1ec
	 [<ffffffff81090228>] ? __do_page_cache_readahead+0x73/0x1ec
	 [<ffffffff810903bd>] ra_submit+0x1c/0x20
	 [<ffffffff810906bb>] ondemand_readahead+0x227/0x23a
	 [<ffffffff81090762>] page_cache_sync_readahead+0x17/0x19
	 [<ffffffff8108a99e>] generic_file_aio_read+0x236/0x5a0
	 [<ffffffffa00937bd>] nfs_file_read+0xe4/0xf3 [nfs]
	 [<ffffffff810b2fa2>] do_sync_read+0xe3/0x120
	 [<ffffffff81354cc3>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x31
	 [<ffffffff8104c0f1>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
	 [<ffffffff811848e5>] ? selinux_file_permission+0x5d/0x10f
	 [<ffffffff81352bdb>] ? thread_return+0x3e/0x101
	 [<ffffffff8117d7b0>] ? security_file_permission+0x11/0x13
	 [<ffffffff810b3b06>] vfs_read+0xaa/0x16f
	 [<ffffffff81058df0>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x10c/0x130
	 [<ffffffff810b3c84>] sys_read+0x45/0x6c
	 [<ffffffff8100ae2b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

The object state might also be OBJECT_DYING or OBJECT_WITHDRAWING.

This should be handled by simply rejecting the new operation with ENOBUFS.
There's no need to log an error for it.  Events of this type now appear in the
stats file under Ops:rej.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Don't delete pending pages from the page-store tracking tree, but rather send
them for another write as they've presumably been updated.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

FS-Cache has two structs internally for keeping track of the internal state of
a cached file: the fscache_cookie struct, which represents the netfs's state,
and fscache_object struct, which represents the cache's state.  Each has a
pointer that points to the other (when both are in existence), and each has a
spinlock for pointer maintenance.

Since netfs operations approach these structures from the cookie side, they get
the cookie lock first, then the object lock.  Cache operations, on the other
hand, approach from the object side, and get the object lock first.  It is not
then permitted for a cache operation to get the cookie lock whilst it is
holding the object lock lest deadlock occur; instead, it must do one of two
things:

 (1) increment the cookie usage counter, drop the object lock and then get both
     locks in order, or

 (2) simply hold the object lock as certain parts of the cookie may not be
     altered whilst the object lock is held.

It is also not permitted to follow either pointer without holding the lock at
the end you start with.  To break the pointers between the cookie and the
object, both locks must be held.

fscache_write_op(), however, violates the locking rules: It attempts to get the
cookie lock without (a) checking that the cookie pointer is a valid pointer,
and (b) holding the object lock to protect the cookie pointer whilst it follows
it.  This is so that it can access the pending page store tree without
interference from __fscache_write_page().

This is fixed by splitting the cookie lock, such that the page store tracking
tree is protected by its own lock, and checking that the cookie pointer is
non-NULL before we attempt to follow it whilst holding the object lock.

The new lock is subordinate to both the cookie lock and the object lock, and so
should be taken after those.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

The object-available state in the object processing state machine (as
processed by fscache_object_available()) can't rely on the cookie to be
available because the FSCACHE_COOKIE_CREATING bit may have been cleared by
fscache_obtained_object() prior to the object being put into the
FSCACHE_OBJECT_AVAILABLE state.

Clearing the FSCACHE_COOKIE_CREATING bit on a cookie permits
__fscache_relinquish_cookie() to proceed and detach the cookie from the
object.

To deal with this, we don't dereference object->cookie in
fscache_object_available() if the object has already been detached.

In addition, a couple of assertions are added into fscache_drop_object() to
make sure the object is unbound from the cookie before it gets there.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Permit the operations to retrieve data from the cache or to allocate space in
the cache for future writes to be interrupted whilst they're waiting for
permission for the operation to proceed.  Typically this wait occurs whilst the
cache object is being looked up on disk in the background.

If an interruption occurs, and the operation has not yet been given the
go-ahead to run, the operation is dequeued and cancelled, and control returns
to the read operation of the netfs routine with none of the requested pages
having been read or in any way marked as known by the cache.

This means that the initial wait is done interruptibly rather than
uninterruptibly.

In addition, extra stats values are made available to show the number of ops
cancelled and the number of cache space allocations interrupted.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

__fscache_write_page() attempts to load the radix tree preallocation pool for
the CPU it is on before calling radix_tree_insert(), as the insertion must be
done inside a pair of spinlocks.

Use of the preallocation pool, however, is contingent on the radix tree being
initialised without __GFP_WAIT specified.  __fscache_acquire_cookie() was
passing GFP_NOFS to INIT_RADIX_TREE() - but that includes __GFP_WAIT.

The solution is to AND out __GFP_WAIT.

Additionally, the banner comment to radix_tree_preload() is altered to make
note of this prerequisite.  Possibly there should be a WARN_ON() too.

Without this fix, I have seen the following recursive deadlock caused by
radix_tree_insert() attempting to allocate memory inside the spinlocked
region, which resulted in FS-Cache being called back into to release memory -
which required the spinlock already held.

=============================================
[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #24
---------------------------------------------
nfsiod/7916 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076872>] __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]

but task is already holding lock:
 (&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076acc>] __fscache_write_page+0x15c/0x3f3 [fscache]

other info that might help us debug this:
5 locks held by nfsiod/7916:
 #0:  (nfsiod){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81048290>] worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
 #1:  (&task->u.tk_work#2){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81048290>] worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
 #2:  (&cookie->lock){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076acc>] __fscache_write_page+0x15c/0x3f3 [fscache]
 #3:  (&object->lock#2){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffffa0076b07>] __fscache_write_page+0x197/0x3f3 [fscache]
 #4:  (&cookie->stores_lock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa0076b0f>] __fscache_write_page+0x19f/0x3f3 [fscache]

stack backtrace:
Pid: 7916, comm: nfsiod Not tainted 2.6.32-rc6-cachefs #24
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8105ac7f>] __lock_acquire+0x1649/0x16e3
 [<ffffffff81059ded>] ? __lock_acquire+0x7b7/0x16e3
 [<ffffffff8100e27d>] ? dump_trace+0x248/0x257
 [<ffffffff8105ad70>] lock_acquire+0x57/0x6d
 [<ffffffffa0076872>] ? __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
 [<ffffffff8135467c>] _spin_lock+0x2c/0x3b
 [<ffffffffa0076872>] ? __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa0076872>] __fscache_uncache_page+0xdb/0x160 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa0077eb7>] ? __fscache_check_page_write+0x0/0x71 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa00b4755>] nfs_fscache_release_page+0x86/0xc4 [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa00907f0>] nfs_release_page+0x3c/0x41 [nfs]
 [<ffffffff81087ffb>] try_to_release_page+0x32/0x3b
 [<ffffffff81092c2b>] shrink_page_list+0x316/0x4ac
 [<ffffffff81058a9b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x52/0x70
 [<ffffffff8135451b>] ? _spin_unlock_irq+0x2b/0x31
 [<ffffffff81093153>] shrink_inactive_list+0x392/0x67c
 [<ffffffff81058a9b>] ? mark_held_locks+0x52/0x70
 [<ffffffff810934ca>] shrink_list+0x8d/0x8f
 [<ffffffff81093744>] shrink_zone+0x278/0x33c
 [<ffffffff81052c70>] ? ktime_get_ts+0xad/0xba
 [<ffffffff8109453b>] try_to_free_pages+0x22e/0x392
 [<ffffffff8109184c>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x212
 [<ffffffff8108e16b>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x3dc/0x5cf
 [<ffffffff810ae24a>] cache_alloc_refill+0x34d/0x6c1
 [<ffffffff811bcf74>] ? radix_tree_node_alloc+0x52/0x5c
 [<ffffffff810ae929>] kmem_cache_alloc+0xb2/0x118
 [<ffffffff811bcf74>] radix_tree_node_alloc+0x52/0x5c
 [<ffffffff811bcfd5>] radix_tree_insert+0x57/0x19c
 [<ffffffffa0076b53>] __fscache_write_page+0x1e3/0x3f3 [fscache]
 [<ffffffffa00b4248>] __nfs_readpage_to_fscache+0x58/0x11e [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa009bb77>] nfs_readpage_release+0x34/0x9b [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa009c0d9>] nfs_readpage_release_full+0x32/0x4b [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa0006cff>] rpc_release_calldata+0x12/0x14 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa0006e2d>] rpc_free_task+0x59/0x61 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa0006f03>] rpc_async_release+0x10/0x12 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffff810482e5>] worker_thread+0x1ef/0x2e2
 [<ffffffff81048290>] ? worker_thread+0x19a/0x2e2
 [<ffffffff81352433>] ? thread_return+0x3e/0x101
 [<ffffffffa0006ef3>] ? rpc_async_release+0x0/0x12 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffff8104bff5>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x34
 [<ffffffff81058d25>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
 [<ffffffff810480f6>] ? worker_thread+0x0/0x2e2
 [<ffffffff8104bd21>] kthread+0x7a/0x82
 [<ffffffff8100beda>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [<ffffffff8100b87c>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [<ffffffff8104c2b9>] ? add_wait_queue+0x15/0x44
 [<ffffffff8104bca7>] ? kthread+0x0/0x82
 [<ffffffff8100bed0>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Clear the pointers from the fscache_cookie struct to netfs private data after
clearing the pointer to the cookie from the fscache_object struct and
releasing the object lock, rather than before.

This allows the netfs private data pointers to be relied on simply by holding
the object lock, rather than having to hold the cookie lock.  This is makes
things simpler as the cookie lock has to be taken before the object lock, but
sometimes the object pointer is all that the code has.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Count entries to and exits from cache operation table functions.  Maintain
these as a single counter that's added to or removed from as appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>

Allow the current state of all fscache objects to be dumped by doing:

	cat /proc/fs/fscache/objects

By default, all objects and all fields will be shown.  This can be restricted
by adding a suitable key to one of the caller's keyrings (such as the session
keyring):

	keyctl add user fscache:objlist "<restrictions>" @s

The <restrictions> are:

	K	Show hexdump of object key (don't show if not given)
	A	Show hexdump of object aux data (don't show if not given)

And paired restrictions:

	C	Show objects that have a cookie
	c	Show objects that don't have a cookie
	B	Show objects that are busy
	b	Show objects that aren't busy
	W	Show objects that have pending writes
	w	Show objects that don't have pending writes
	R	Show objects that have outstanding reads
	r	Show objects that don't have outstanding reads
	S	Show objects that have slow work queued
	s	Show objects that don't have slow work queued

If neither side of a restriction pair is given, then both are implied.  For
example:

	keyctl add user fscache:objlist KB @s

shows objects that are busy, and lists their object keys, but does not dump
their auxiliary data.  It also implies "CcWwRrSs", but as 'B' is given, 'b' is
not implied.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>