Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 08 1月, 2021 1 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: don't use switchdev_notifier_fdb_info in dsa_switchdev_event_work · c4bb76a9
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Currently DSA doesn't add FDB entries on the CPU port, because it only
does so through switchdev, which is associated with a net_device, and
there are none of those for the CPU port.

But actually FDB addresses on the CPU port have some use cases of their
own, if the switchdev operations are initiated from within the DSA
layer. There is just one problem with the existing code: it passes a
structure in dsa_switchdev_event_work which was retrieved directly from
switchdev, so it contains a net_device. We need to generalize the
contents to something that covers the CPU port as well: the "ds, port"
tuple is fine for that.

Note that the new procedure for notifying the successful FDB offload is
inspired from the rocker model.

Also, nothing was being done if added_by_user was false. Let's check for
that a lot earlier, and don't actually bother to schedule the worker
for nothing.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      c4bb76a9
  3. 10 11月, 2020 1 次提交
  5. 03 10月, 2020 2 次提交
  7. 24 9月, 2020 1 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: untag the bridge pvid from rx skbs · 412a1526
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Currently the bridge untags VLANs present in its VLAN groups in
__allowed_ingress() only when VLAN filtering is enabled.

But when a skb is seen on the RX path as tagged with the bridge's pvid,
and that bridge has vlan_filtering=0, and there isn't any 8021q upper
with that VLAN either, then we have a problem. The bridge will not untag
it (since it is supposed to remain VLAN-unaware), and pvid-tagged
communication will be broken.

There are 2 situations where we can end up like that:

1. When installing a pvid in egress-tagged mode, like this:

ip link add dev br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 0
ip link set swp0 master br0
bridge vlan del dev swp0 vid 1
bridge vlan add dev swp0 vid 1 pvid

This happens because DSA configures the VLAN membership of the CPU port
using the same flags as swp0 (in this case "pvid and not untagged"), in
an attempt to copy the frame as-is from ingress to the CPU.

However, in this case, the packet may arrive untagged on ingress, it
will be pvid-tagged by the ingress port, and will be sent as
egress-tagged towards the CPU. Otherwise stated, the CPU will see a VLAN
tag where there was none to speak of on ingress.

When vlan_filtering is 1, this is not a problem, as stated in the first
paragraph, because __allowed_ingress() will pop it. But currently, when
vlan_filtering is 0 and we have such a VLAN configuration, we need an
8021q upper (br0.1) to be able to ping over that VLAN, which is not
symmetrical with the vlan_filtering=1 case, and therefore, confusing for
users.

Basically what DSA attempts to do is simply an approximation: try to
copy the skb with (or without) the same VLAN all the way up to the CPU.
But DSA drivers treat CPU port VLAN membership in various ways (which is
a good segue into situation 2). And some of those drivers simply tell
the CPU port to copy the frame unmodified, which is the golden standard
when it comes to VLAN processing (therefore, any driver which can
configure the hardware to do that, should do that, and discard the VLAN
flags requested by DSA on the CPU port).

2. Some DSA drivers always configure the CPU port as egress-tagged, in
an attempt to recover the classified VLAN from the skb. These drivers
cannot work at all with untagged traffic when bridged in
vlan_filtering=0 mode. And they can't go for the easy "just keep the
pvid as egress-untagged towards the CPU" route, because each front port
can have its own pvid, and that might require conflicting VLAN
membership settings on the CPU port (swp1 is pvid for VID 1 and
egress-tagged for VID 2; swp2 is egress-taggeed for VID 1 and pvid for
VID 2; with this simplistic approach, the CPU port, which is really a
separate hardware entity and has its own VLAN membership settings, would
end up being egress-untagged in both VID 1 and VID 2, therefore losing
the VLAN tags of ingress traffic).

So the only thing we can do is to create a helper function for resolving
the problematic case (that is, a function which untags the bridge pvid
when that is in vlan_filtering=0 mode), which taggers in need should
call. It isn't called from the generic DSA receive path because there
are drivers that fall neither in the first nor second category.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      412a1526
  9. 12 9月, 2020 1 次提交
  11. 06 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  13. 13 5月, 2020 1 次提交
    • R
      net: dsa: provide an option for drivers to always receive bridge VLANs · 54a0ed0d
      由 Russell King 提交于 
      DSA assumes that a bridge which has vlan filtering disabled is not
vlan aware, and ignores all vlan configuration. However, the kernel
software bridge code allows configuration in this state.

This causes the kernel's idea of the bridge vlan state and the
hardware state to disagree, so "bridge vlan show" indicates a correct
configuration but the hardware lacks all configuration. Even worse,
enabling vlan filtering on a DSA bridge immediately blocks all traffic
which, given the output of "bridge vlan show", is very confusing.

Provide an option that drivers can set to indicate they want to receive
vlan configuration even when vlan filtering is disabled. At the very
least, this is safe for Marvell DSA bridges, which do not look up
ingress traffic in the VTU if the port is in 8021Q disabled state. It is
also safe for the Ocelot switch family. Whether this change is suitable
for all DSA bridges is not known.
Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      54a0ed0d
  15. 11 5月, 2020 1 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: permit cross-chip bridging between all trees in the system · f66a6a69
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      One way of utilizing DSA is by cascading switches which do not all have
compatible taggers. Consider the following real-life topology:

      +---------------------------------------------------------------+
      | LS1028A                                                       |
      |               +------------------------------+                |
      |               |      DSA master for Felix    |                |
      |               |(internal ENETC port 2: eno2))|                |
      |  +------------+------------------------------+-------------+  |
      |  | Felix embedded L2 switch                                |  |
      |  |                                                         |  |
      |  | +--------------+   +--------------+   +--------------+  |  |
      |  | |DSA master for|   |DSA master for|   |DSA master for|  |  |
      |  | |  SJA1105 1   |   |  SJA1105 2   |   |  SJA1105 3   |  |  |
      |  | |(Felix port 1)|   |(Felix port 2)|   |(Felix port 3)|  |  |
      +--+-+--------------+---+--------------+---+--------------+--+--+

+-----------------------+ +-----------------------+ +-----------------------+
|   SJA1105 switch 1    | |   SJA1105 switch 2    | |   SJA1105 switch 3    |
+-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+
|sw1p0|sw1p1|sw1p2|sw1p3| |sw2p0|sw2p1|sw2p2|sw2p3| |sw3p0|sw3p1|sw3p2|sw3p3|
+-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+ +-----+-----+-----+-----+

The above can be described in the device tree as follows (obviously not
complete):

mscc_felix {
	dsa,member = <0 0>;
	ports {
		port@4 {
			ethernet = <&enetc_port2>;
		};
	};
};

sja1105_switch1 {
	dsa,member = <1 1>;
	ports {
		port@4 {
			ethernet = <&mscc_felix_port1>;
		};
	};
};

sja1105_switch2 {
	dsa,member = <2 2>;
	ports {
		port@4 {
			ethernet = <&mscc_felix_port2>;
		};
	};
};

sja1105_switch3 {
	dsa,member = <3 3>;
	ports {
		port@4 {
			ethernet = <&mscc_felix_port3>;
		};
	};
};

Basically we instantiate one DSA switch tree for every hardware switch
in the system, but we still give them globally unique switch IDs (will
come back to that later). Having 3 disjoint switch trees makes the
tagger drivers "just work", because net devices are registered for the
3 Felix DSA master ports, and they are also DSA slave ports to the ENETC
port. So packets received on the ENETC port are stripped of their
stacked DSA tags one by one.

Currently, hardware bridging between ports on the same sja1105 chip is
possible, but switching between sja1105 ports on different chips is
handled by the software bridge. This is fine, but we can do better.

In fact, the dsa_8021q tag used by sja1105 is compatible with cascading.
In other words, a sja1105 switch can correctly parse and route a packet
containing a dsa_8021q tag. So if we could enable hardware bridging on
the Felix DSA master ports, cross-chip bridging could be completely
offloaded.

Such as system would be used as follows:

ip link add dev br0 type bridge && ip link set dev br0 up
for port in sw0p0 sw0p1 sw0p2 sw0p3 \
	    sw1p0 sw1p1 sw1p2 sw1p3 \
	    sw2p0 sw2p1 sw2p2 sw2p3; do
	ip link set dev $port master br0
done

The above makes switching between ports on the same row be performed in
hardware, and between ports on different rows in software. Now assume
the Felix switch ports are called swp0, swp1, swp2. By running the
following extra commands:

ip link add dev br1 type bridge && ip link set dev br1 up
for port in swp0 swp1 swp2; do
	ip link set dev $port master br1
done

the CPU no longer sees packets which traverse sja1105 switch boundaries
and can be forwarded directly by Felix. The br1 bridge would not be used
for any sort of traffic termination.

For this to work, we need to give drivers an opportunity to listen for
bridging events on DSA trees other than their own, and pass that other
tree index as argument. I have made the assumption, for the moment, that
the other existing DSA notifiers don't need to be broadcast to other
trees. That assumption might turn out to be incorrect. But in the
meantime, introduce a dsa_broadcast function, similar in purpose to
dsa_port_notify, which is used only by the bridging notifiers.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
      f66a6a69
  17. 24 4月, 2020 1 次提交
    • A
      net: dsa: add GRO support via gro_cells · e131a563
      由 Alexander Lobakin 提交于 
      gro_cells lib is used by different encapsulating netdevices, such as
geneve, macsec, vxlan etc. to speed up decapsulated traffic processing.
CPU tag is a sort of "encapsulation", and we can use the same mechs to
greatly improve overall DSA performance.
skbs are passed to the GRO layer after removing CPU tags, so we don't
need any new packet offload types as it was firstly proposed by me in
the first GRO-over-DSA variant [1].

The size of struct gro_cells is sizeof(void *), so hot struct
dsa_slave_priv becomes only 4/8 bytes bigger, and all critical fields
remain in one 32-byte cacheline.
The other positive side effect is that drivers for network devices
that can be shipped as CPU ports of DSA-driven switches can now use
napi_gro_frags() to pass skbs to kernel. Packets built that way are
completely non-linear and are likely being dropped without GRO.

This was tested on to-be-mainlined-soon Ethernet driver that uses
napi_gro_frags(), and the overall performance was on par with the
variant from [1], sometimes even better due to minimal overhead.
net.core.gro_normal_batch tuning may help to push it to the limit
on particular setups and platforms.

iperf3 IPoE VLAN NAT TCP forwarding (port1.218 -> port0) setup
on 1.2 GHz MIPS board:

5.7-rc2 baseline:

[ID]  Interval         Transfer     Bitrate        Retr
[ 5]  0.00-120.01 sec  9.00 GBytes  644 Mbits/sec  413  sender
[ 5]  0.00-120.00 sec  8.99 GBytes  644 Mbits/sec       receiver

Iface      RX packets  TX packets
eth0       7097731     7097702
port0      426050      6671829
port1      6671681     425862
port1.218  6671677     425851

With this patch:

[ID]  Interval         Transfer     Bitrate        Retr
[ 5]  0.00-120.01 sec  12.2 GBytes  870 Mbits/sec  122  sender
[ 5]  0.00-120.00 sec  12.2 GBytes  870 Mbits/sec       receiver

Iface      RX packets  TX packets
eth0       9474792     9474777
port0      455200      353288
port1      9019592     455035
port1.218  353144      455024

v2:
 - Add some performance examples in the commit message;
 - No functional changes.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20191230143028.27313-1-alobakin@dlink.ru/Signed-off-by: NAlexander Lobakin <bloodyreaper@yandex.ru>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e131a563
  19. 28 3月, 2020 2 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: implement auto-normalization of MTU for bridge hardware datapath · bff33f7e
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Many switches don't have an explicit knob for configuring the MTU
(maximum transmission unit per interface).  Instead, they do the
length-based packet admission checks on the ingress interface, for
reasons that are easy to understand (why would you accept a packet in
the queuing subsystem if you know you're going to drop it anyway).

So it is actually the MRU that these switches permit configuring.

In Linux there only exists the IFLA_MTU netlink attribute and the
associated dev_set_mtu function. The comments like to play blind and say
that it's changing the "maximum transfer unit", which is to say that
there isn't any directionality in the meaning of the MTU word. So that
is the interpretation that this patch is giving to things: MTU == MRU.

When 2 interfaces having different MTUs are bridged, the bridge driver
MTU auto-adjustment logic kicks in: what br_mtu_auto_adjust() does is it
adjusts the MTU of the bridge net device itself (and not that of the
slave net devices) to the minimum value of all slave interfaces, in
order for forwarded packets to not exceed the MTU regardless of the
interface they are received and send on.

The idea behind this behavior, and why the slave MTUs are not adjusted,
is that normal termination from Linux over the L2 forwarding domain
should happen over the bridge net device, which _is_ properly limited by
the minimum MTU. And termination over individual slave devices is
possible even if those are bridged. But that is not "forwarding", so
there's no reason to do normalization there, since only a single
interface sees that packet.

The problem with those switches that can only control the MRU is with
the offloaded data path, where a packet received on an interface with
MRU 9000 would still be forwarded to an interface with MRU 1500. And the
br_mtu_auto_adjust() function does not really help, since the MTU
configured on the bridge net device is ignored.

In order to enforce the de-facto MTU == MRU rule for these switches, we
need to do MTU normalization, which means: in order for no packet larger
than the MTU configured on this port to be sent, then we need to limit
the MRU on all ports that this packet could possibly come from. AKA
since we are configuring the MRU via MTU, it means that all ports within
a bridge forwarding domain should have the same MTU.

And that is exactly what this patch is trying to do.

>From an implementation perspective, we try to follow the intent of the
user, otherwise there is a risk that we might livelock them (they try to
change the MTU on an already-bridged interface, but we just keep
changing it back in an attempt to keep the MTU normalized). So the MTU
that the bridge is normalized to is either:

 - The most recently changed one:

   ip link set dev swp0 master br0
   ip link set dev swp1 master br0
   ip link set dev swp0 mtu 1400

   This sequence will make swp1 inherit MTU 1400 from swp0.

 - The one of the most recently added interface to the bridge:

   ip link set dev swp0 master br0
   ip link set dev swp1 mtu 1400
   ip link set dev swp1 master br0

   The above sequence will make swp0 inherit MTU 1400 as well.
Suggested-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bff33f7e
    • V
      net: dsa: configure the MTU for switch ports · bfcb8132
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      It is useful be able to configure port policers on a switch to accept
frames of various sizes:

- Increase the MTU for better throughput from the default of 1500 if it
  is known that there is no 10/100 Mbps device in the network.
- Decrease the MTU to limit the latency of high-priority frames under
  congestion, or work around various network segments that add extra
  headers to packets which can't be fragmented.

For DSA slave ports, this is mostly a pass-through callback, called
through the regular ndo ops and at probe time (to ensure consistency
across all supported switches).

The CPU port is called with an MTU equal to the largest configured MTU
of the slave ports. The assumption is that the user might want to
sustain a bidirectional conversation with a partner over any switch
port.

The DSA master is configured the same as the CPU port, plus the tagger
overhead. Since the MTU is by definition L2 payload (sans Ethernet
header), it is up to each individual driver to figure out if it needs to
do anything special for its frame tags on the CPU port (it shouldn't
except in special cases). So the MTU does not contain the tagger
overhead on the CPU port.
However the MTU of the DSA master, minus the tagger overhead, is used as
a proxy for the MTU of the CPU port, which does not have a net device.
This is to avoid uselessly calling the .change_mtu function on the CPU
port when nothing should change.

So it is safe to assume that the DSA master and the CPU port MTUs are
apart by exactly the tagger's overhead in bytes.

Some changes were made around dsa_master_set_mtu(), function which was
now removed, for 2 reasons:
  - dev_set_mtu() already calls dev_validate_mtu(), so it's redundant to
    do the same thing in DSA
  - __dev_set_mtu() returns 0 if ops->ndo_change_mtu is an absent method
That is to say, there's no need for this function in DSA, we can safely
call dev_set_mtu() directly, take the rtnl lock when necessary, and just
propagate whatever errors get reported (since the user probably wants to
be informed).

Some inspiration (mainly in the MTU DSA notifier) was taken from a
vaguely similar patch from Murali and Florian, who are credited as
co-developers down below.
Co-developed-by: NMurali Krishna Policharla <murali.policharla@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: NMurali Krishna Policharla <murali.policharla@broadcom.com>
Co-developed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bfcb8132
  21. 04 3月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 09 1月, 2020 1 次提交
    • F
      net: dsa: Get information about stacked DSA protocol · 4d776482
      由 Florian Fainelli 提交于 
      It is possible to stack multiple DSA switches in a way that they are not
part of the tree (disjoint) but the DSA master of a switch is a DSA
slave of another. When that happens switch drivers may have to know this
is the case so as to determine whether their tagging protocol has a
remove chance of working.

This is useful for specific switch drivers such as b53 where devices
have been known to be stacked in the wild without the Broadcom tag
protocol supporting that feature. This allows b53 to continue supporting
those devices by forcing the disabling of Broadcom tags on the outermost
switches if necessary.

The get_tag_protocol() function is therefore updated to gain an
additional enum dsa_tag_protocol argument which denotes the current
tagging protocol used by the DSA master we are attached to, else
DSA_TAG_PROTO_NONE for the top of the dsa_switch_tree.
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4d776482
  25. 06 1月, 2020 1 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: Make deferred_xmit private to sja1105 · a68578c2
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      There are 3 things that are wrong with the DSA deferred xmit mechanism:

1. Its introduction has made the DSA hotpath ever so slightly more
   inefficient for everybody, since DSA_SKB_CB(skb)->deferred_xmit needs
   to be initialized to false for every transmitted frame, in order to
   figure out whether the driver requested deferral or not (a very rare
   occasion, rare even for the only driver that does use this mechanism:
   sja1105). That was necessary to avoid kfree_skb from freeing the skb.

2. Because L2 PTP is a link-local protocol like STP, it requires
   management routes and deferred xmit with this switch. But as opposed
   to STP, the deferred work mechanism needs to schedule the packet
   rather quickly for the TX timstamp to be collected in time and sent
   to user space. But there is no provision for controlling the
   scheduling priority of this deferred xmit workqueue. Too bad this is
   a rather specific requirement for a feature that nobody else uses
   (more below).

3. Perhaps most importantly, it makes the DSA core adhere a bit too
   much to the NXP company-wide policy "Innovate Where It Doesn't
   Matter". The sja1105 is probably the only DSA switch that requires
   some frames sent from the CPU to be routed to the slave port via an
   out-of-band configuration (register write) rather than in-band (DSA
   tag). And there are indeed very good reasons to not want to do that:
   if that out-of-band register is at the other end of a slow bus such
   as SPI, then you limit that Ethernet flow's throughput to effectively
   the throughput of the SPI bus. So hardware vendors should definitely
   not be encouraged to design this way. We do _not_ want more
   widespread use of this mechanism.

Luckily we have a solution for each of the 3 issues:

For 1, we can just remove that variable in the skb->cb and counteract
the effect of kfree_skb with skb_get, much to the same effect. The
advantage, of course, being that anybody who doesn't use deferred xmit
doesn't need to do any extra operation in the hotpath.

For 2, we can create a kernel thread for each port's deferred xmit work.
If the user switch ports are named swp0, swp1, swp2, the kernel threads
will be named swp0_xmit, swp1_xmit, swp2_xmit (there appears to be a 15
character length limit on kernel thread names). With this, the user can
change the scheduling priority with chrt $(pidof swp2_xmit).

For 3, we can actually move the entire implementation to the sja1105
driver.

So this patch deletes the generic implementation from the DSA core and
adds a new one, more adequate to the requirements of PTP TX
timestamping, in sja1105_main.c.
Suggested-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a68578c2
  27. 18 12月, 2019 1 次提交
  29. 24 11月, 2019 1 次提交
  31. 23 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  33. 10 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  35. 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  37. 30 5月, 2019 1 次提交
  39. 06 5月, 2019 1 次提交
    • V
      net: dsa: Add support for deferred xmit · 97a69a0d
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      Some hardware needs to take work to get convinced to receive frames on
the CPU port (such as the sja1105 which takes temporary L2 forwarding
rules over SPI that last for a single frame). Such work needs a
sleepable context, and because the regular .ndo_start_xmit is atomic,
this cannot be done in the tagger. So introduce a generic DSA mechanism
that sets up a transmit skb queue and a workqueue for deferred
transmission.

The new driver callback (.port_deferred_xmit) is in dsa_switch and not
in the tagger because the operations that require sleeping typically
also involve interacting with the hardware, and not simply skb
manipulations. Therefore having it there simplifies the structure a bit
and makes it unnecessary to export functions from the driver to the
tagger.

The driver is responsible of calling dsa_enqueue_skb which transfers it
to the master netdevice. This is so that it has a chance of performing
some more work afterwards, such as cleanup or TX timestamping.

To tell DSA that skb xmit deferral is required, I have thought about
changing the return type of the tagger .xmit from struct sk_buff * into
a enum dsa_tx_t that could potentially encode a DSA_XMIT_DEFER value.

But the trailer tagger is reallocating every skb on xmit and therefore
making a valid use of the pointer return value. So instead of reworking
the API in complicated ways, right now a boolean property in the newly
introduced DSA_SKB_CB is set.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <olteanv@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      97a69a0d
  41. 01 5月, 2019 2 次提交
  43. 29 4月, 2019 3 次提交
  45. 04 3月, 2019 1 次提交
  47. 25 2月, 2019 1 次提交
  49. 22 2月, 2019 2 次提交
  51. 18 1月, 2019 1 次提交
    • P
      net: Add extack argument to ndo_fdb_add() · 87b0984e
      由 Petr Machata 提交于 
      Drivers may not be able to support certain FDB entries, and an error
code is insufficient to give clear hints as to the reasons of rejection.

In order to make it possible to communicate the rejection reason, extend
ndo_fdb_add() with an extack argument. Adapt the existing
implementations of ndo_fdb_add() to take the parameter (and ignore it).
Pass the extack parameter when invoking ndo_fdb_add() from rtnl_fdb_add().
Signed-off-by: NPetr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      87b0984e
  53. 17 12月, 2018 1 次提交
  55. 13 9月, 2018 1 次提交
  57. 08 9月, 2018 1 次提交
  59. 12 5月, 2018 1 次提交
    • F
      net: dsa: Plug in PHYLINK support · aab9c406
      由 Florian Fainelli 提交于 
      Add support for PHYLINK within the DSA subsystem in order to support more
complex devices such as pluggable (SFP) and non-pluggable (SFF) modules, 10G
PHYs, and traditional PHYs. Using PHYLINK allows us to drop some amount of
complexity we had while probing fixed and non-fixed PHYs using Device Tree.

Because PHYLINK separates the Ethernet MAC/port configuration into different
stages, we let switch drivers implement those, and for now, we maintain
functionality by calling dsa_slave_adjust_link() during
phylink_mac_link_{up,down} which provides semantically equivalent steps.

Drivers willing to take advantage of PHYLINK should implement the phylink_mac_*
operations that DSA wraps.

We cannot quite remove the adjust_link() callback just yet, because a number of
drivers rely on that for configuring their "CPU" and "DSA" ports, this is done
dsa_port_setup_phy_of() and dsa_port_fixed_link_register_of() still.

Drivers that utilize fixed links for user-facing ports (e.g: bcm_sf2) will need
to implement phylink_mac_ops from now on to preserve functionality, since PHYLINK
*does not* create a phy_device instance for fixed links.
Signed-off-by: NFlorian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      aab9c406
  61. 08 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  63. 24 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  65. 03 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  67. 08 12月, 2017 1 次提交