- 13 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yijing Wang 提交于
When we have a hotplug-capable PCIe port with a second hotplug-capable PCIe port below it, removing the device below the upstream port causes a deadlock. The deadlock happens because we use the pciehp_wq workqueue to run pciehp_power_thread(), which uses pciehp_disable_slot() to remove devices below the upstream port. When we remove the downstream PCIe port, we call pciehp_remove(), the pciehp driver's .remove() method. That calls flush_workqueue(pciehp_wq), which deadlocks because the pciehp_power_thread() work item is still running. This patch avoids the deadlock by creating a workqueue for every PCIe port and removing the single shared workqueue. Here's the call path that leads to the deadlock: pciehp_queue_pushbutton_work queue_work(pciehp_wq) # queue pciehp_power_thread ... pciehp_power_thread pciehp_disable_slot remove_board pciehp_unconfigure_device pci_stop_and_remove_bus_device ... pciehp_remove # pciehp driver .remove method pciehp_release_ctrl pcie_cleanup_slot flush_workqueue(pciehp_wq) This is fairly urgent because it can be caused by simply unplugging a Thunderbolt adapter, as reported by Daniel below. [bhelgaas: changelog] Reference: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAMVG2ssiRgcTD1bej2tkUUfsWmpL5eNtPcNif9va2-Gzb2u8nQ@mail.gmail.comReported-and-tested-by: NDaniel J Blueman <daniel@quora.org> Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NYijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> CC: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 13 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com>
-
- 13 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rusty Russell 提交于
module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy trick. It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version. Acked-by: NMauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
-
- 07 1月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Use non-ordered workqueue for attention button events. Attention button events on each slot can be handled asynchronously. So we should use non-ordered workqueue. This patch also removes ordered workqueue in pciehp as a result. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Use non-ordered workqueue for attention button events. Attention button events on each slot can be handled asynchronously. So we should use non-ordered workqueue. This patch also removes ordered workqueue in pciehp as a result. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 18 10月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
* Rename pciehp_wq to pciehp_ordered_wq and add non-ordered pciehp_wq which is used instead of the system workqueue. This is to remove the use of flush_scheduled_work() which is deprecated and scheduled for removal. * With cmwq in place, there's no point in creating workqueues lazily. Create both pciehp_wq and pciehp_ordered_wq upfront. * Include workqueue.h from pciehp.h. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 26 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
One of the recent changes caused complilation of drivers/pci/hotplug/pciehp_core.c to fail. Fix this issue. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 25 8月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit 852972ac (ACPI: Disable ASPM if the platform won't provide _OSC control for PCIe) control of the PCIe Capability Structure is unconditionally requested by acpi_pci_root_add(), which in principle may cause problems to happen in two ways. First, the BIOS may refuse to give control of the PCIe Capability Structure if it is not asked for any of the _OSC features depending on it at the same time. Second, the BIOS may assume that control of the _OSC features depending on the PCIe Capability Structure will be requested in the future and may behave incorrectly if that doesn't happen. For this reason, control of the PCIe Capability Structure should always be requested along with control of any other _OSC features that may depend on it (ie. PCIe native PME, PCIe native hot-plug, PCIe AER). Rework the PCIe port driver so that (1) it checks which native PCIe port services can be enabled, according to the BIOS, and (2) it requests control of all these services simultaneously. In particular, this causes pcie_portdrv_probe() to fail if the BIOS refuses to grant control of the PCIe Capability Structure, which means that no native PCIe port services can be enabled for the PCIe Root Complex the given port belongs to. If that happens, ASPM is disabled to avoid problems with mishandling it by the part of the PCIe hierarchy for which control of the PCIe Capability Structure has not been received. Make it possible to override this behavior using 'pcie_ports=native' (use the PCIe native services regardless of the BIOS response to the control request), or 'pcie_ports=compat' (do not use the PCIe native services at all). Accordingly, rework the existing PCIe port service drivers so that they don't request control of the services directly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 25 11月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Use pci_pcie_cap() instead of pci_find_capability() to get PCIe capability offset in pciehp driver. This avoids unnecessary search in PCI configuration space. This patch also removes 'cap_base' field in struct controller, that was used to hold PCIe capability offset by pciehp itself. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 18 9月, 2009 15 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Use generic PCIe slot capabilities register definitions instead of internal definitions. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Remove (almost) unused error message definitions. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Since slot_cap field in struct controller contains physical slot number informationq, we don't need number field in struct slot. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The struct hpc_ops seems a set of hooks to controller specific routines. But, it is meaningless because no hotplug controller driver follows this framework. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Since we have a pointer to pcie_device in struct controller, we don't need a pointer to pci_dev. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The crit_sect mutex defined in struct controller is to serialize hot-plug operations against multiple slots under the same bus. But, since PCIe doesnstream port has only one slot at most, it is meaningless and we don't need it. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Remove unused slot_bus field in struct controller. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The slot number can be calculated only by physical slot number field in the slot capabilities register. So the first_slot field in struct controller is meaningless and we don't need it. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Since the device number of the hot-slot under the PCIe downstream port is always 0, the slot_device_offset field in the slot is meaningless and we don't need it. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The hp_slot field is to identify the slot under the same controller. But, since PCIe downstream port has only one slot at most, it is meaningless and we don't need it. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The device field in the struct slot is not necessary because it is always 0 in pciehp driver. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The bus field in struct slot is not necessary. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The slot_num_inc field in struct controller is unused and meaningless in pciehp driver. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Since PCIe downstream port has only one slot at most, we don't need num_slots field in struct controller. Note that struct controller itself doesn't exist if PCIe downstream port has no slot. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Since PCIe downstream port has only one slot at most, we don't need 'slot_list' linked list to manage multiple slots under the port. Acked-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 15 9月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Use the generic pci_configure_slot() rather than the PCIe-specific program_fw_provided_values(). Unlike the previous pciehp-specific code, we now walk through subordinate devices even if there are no settings for the parent. This should be harmless because we won't change anything unless we discover firmware settings farther down. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
This patch makes acpi_get_hp_params_from_firmware() take a pci_dev rather than a pci_bus and makes it return a standard int errno rather than acpi_status. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com> Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The EMI support in pciehp is obviously broken. It is implemented using struct hotplug_slot_attribute, but sysfs_ops for pci_slot_ktype is NOT for struct hotplug_slot_attribute, but for struct pci_slot_attribute. This bug had been there for a long time, maybe it was introduced when PCI slot framework was introduced. The reason why this bug didn't cause any problem is maybe the EMI support is not tested at all because of lack of test environment. As described above, the EMI support in pciehp seems not to be tested at all. So this patch removes EMI support from pciehp, instead of fixing the bug. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 20 3月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
The cmd_busy field in struct controller takes only two values 0 or 1. So it should be one bit. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Current pciehp disables software notification of adapter presence changed event and MRL changed event when slot is turned off. Because of this, there is no way to detect those events on empty slots in the current pciehp implementation. According to the past discussion(*), this behavior was introduced to prevent endless loop that could happen if pcie_isr() runs after power fault is detected on a certain platform whose stickey power-fault bit remains on till the slot is powered on again. (*) http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=20051130135409.A14918%40unix-os.sc.intel.com I think this endless loop can be avoided using one bit flag that indicates power fault had been detected, instead of disabling software notification of adapter present changed event and MRL changed event. With this patch, we can enable software notification mechanism of presence changed and MRL changed event on the empty slots again. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Frank Seidel 提交于
According to kerneljanitors todo list all printk calls (beginning a new line) should have an according KERN_* constant. Those are the missing pieces here for the pci subsystem. Signed-off-by: NFrank Seidel <frank@f-seidel.de> Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 25 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Move the enabling of interrupts after all of the data structures are setup so that we can safely run the interrupt handler as soon as it is registered. Reviewed-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Tested-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NEric W. Biederman <ebiederm@aristanetworks.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@hobbes.lan>
-
- 08 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
There is a problem that some non hot-pluggable PCIe slots are detected as hot-pluggable by pciehp on some platforms. The immediate cause of this problem is that hot-plug capable bit in the Slot Capabilities register is set even for non hot-pluggable slots on those platforms. It seems a BIOS/hardware problem, but we need workaround about that. Some of those platforms define hot-pluggable PCIe slots on ACPI namespace properly, while hot-plug capable bit in the Slot Capabilities register is set improperly. So using ACPI namespace information in pciehp to detect PCIe hot-pluggable slots would be a workaround. This patch adds 'pciehp_detect_mode' module option. When 'acpi' is specified, pciehp uses ACPI namespace information to detect PCIe hot-pluggable slots. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 31 12月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
External driver files should not include any private acpica headers. Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
This patch refines messages in pciehp module. The main changes are as follows: - remove the trailing "." - remove __func__ as much as possible - capitalize the first letter of messages - show PCI device address including its domain Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 23 10月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
This patch adds polling mechanism for Data Link Layer Link Active bit after turning power on, instead of waiting for 1000 msec. This reduces reduce the unnecessary long wait. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Alex Chiang 提交于
We do not need to manage our own name parameter, especially since the PCI core can change it on our behalf, in the case of duplicate slot names. Remove 'name' from pciehp's version of struct slot, and remove unused 'task_list' as well. Cc: kristen.c.accardi@intel.com Acked-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 21 10月, 2008 2 次提交
-
-
由 Taku Izumi 提交于
This patch replaces printks within pciehp module with dev_printks. Signed-off-by: NTaku Izumi <izumi.taku@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
由 Kenji Kaneshige 提交于
Current pciehp driver gets irq number from pci_dev->irq. But because pciehp driver is a pci express port service driver, it should get irq number from pcie_device->irq. Signed-off-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 22 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Chiang 提交于
Commit 3800345f (pciehp: fix slot name) introduces the pciehp_slot_with_bus module parameter, which was intended to help work around broken firmware that assigns the same name to multiple slots. Commit 9e4f2e8d (pciehp: add message about pciehp_slot_with_bus option) tells the user to use the above parameter in the event of a name collision. This approach is sub-optimal because it requires too much work from the user. Instead, let's rename the slot on behalf of the user. If firmware assigns the name N to multiple slots, then: The first registered slot is assigned N The second registered slot is assigned N-1 The third registered slot is assigned N-2 The Mth registered slot becomes N-M In the event we overflow the slot->name parameter, we report an error to the user. This is a temporary fix until the entire PCI core can be reworked such that individual drivers no longer have to manage their own slot names. Tested-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NKenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NAlex Chiang <achiang@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-
- 16 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ming Lei 提交于
Proper memory barriers have been added to order accesses to ->cmd_busy, so volatile declaration for cmd_busy can be removed. Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <tom.leiming@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
-