- 05 8月, 2010 19 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
We now provide a default (weak) implementation of memblock_nid_range() which uses the early_pfn_map[] if CONFIG_ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP is set. Sparc still needs to use its own method due to the way the pages can be scattered between nodes. This implementation is inefficient due to our main algorithm and callback construct wanting to work on an ascending addresses bases while early_pfn_map[] would rather work with nid's (it's unsorted at that stage). But it should work and we can look into improving it subsequently, possibly using arch compile options to chose a different algorithm alltogether. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
To constraint the search of a region between two boundaries, which will be used by the new NUMA aware allocator among others. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Some archs such as ARM want to avoid coalescing accross things such as the lowmem/highmem boundary or similar. This provides the option to control it via an arch callback for which a weak default is provided which always allows coalescing. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
When one of the array gets full, we resize it. After much thinking and a few iterations of that code, I went back to on-demand resizing using the (new) internal memblock_find_base() function, which is pretty much what Yinghai initially proposed, though there some differences in the details. To work this relies on the default alloc limit being set sensibly by the architecture. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Some shuffling is needed for doing array resize so we may as well put some sense into the ordering of the functions in the whole memblock.c file. No code change. Added some comments. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
This will be used by the array resize code and might prove useful to some arch code as well at which point it can be made non-static. Also add comment as to why aligning size is important Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> --- v2. Fix loss of size alignment v3. Fix result code
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
It's a real PITA to have to search for it in the middle Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
This function will be used to locate a free area to put the new memblock arrays when attempting to resize them. memblock_alloc_region() is gone, the two callsites now call memblock_add_region(). Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> --- v2. Fix membase_alloc_nid_region() conversion
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Since we allocate one more than needed, why not do a bit of sanity checking here to ensure we don't walk past the end of the array ? Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
This is in preparation for having resizable arrays. Note that we still allocate one more than needed, this is unchanged from the previous implementation. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Right now, both the "memory" and "reserved" memblock_type structures have a "size" member. It represents the calculated memory size in the former case and is unused in the latter. This moves it out to the main memblock structure instead Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Let's not waste space and cycles on archs that don't support >32-bit physical address space. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
The RMA (RMO is a misnomer) is a concept specific to ppc64 (in fact server ppc64 though I hijack it on embedded ppc64 for similar purposes) and represents the area of memory that can be accessed in real mode (aka with MMU off), or on embedded, from the exception vectors (which is bolted in the TLB) which pretty much boils down to the same thing. We take that out of the generic MEMBLOCK data structure and move it into arch/powerpc where it belongs, renaming it to "RMA" while at it. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
This introduce memblock.current_limit which is used to limit allocations from memblock_alloc() or memblock_alloc_base(..., MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE). The old MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE changes value from 0 to ~(u64)0 and can still be used with memblock_alloc_base() to allocate really anywhere. It is -no-longer- cropped to MEMBLOCK_REAL_LIMIT which disappears. Note to archs: I'm leaving the default limit to MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ANYWHERE. I strongly recommend that you ensure that you set an appropriate limit during boot in order to guarantee that an memblock_alloc() at any time results in something that is accessible with a simple __va(). The reason is that a subsequent patch will introduce the ability for the array to resize itself by reallocating itself. The MEMBLOCK core will honor the current limit when performing those allocations. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Nobody uses it anymore. It's semantics were ... weird Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 04 8月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
To make it fast, we steal ARM's binary search for memblock_is_memory() and we use that to also the replace existing implementation of memblock_is_reserved(). Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
由 Benjamin Herrenschmidt 提交于
All callers expect a boolean result which is true if the region overlaps a reserved region. However, the implementation actually returns -1 if there is no overlap, and a region index (0 based) if there is. Make it behave as callers (and common sense) expect. Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-
- 14 7月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yinghai Lu 提交于
via following scripts FILES=$(find * -type f | grep -vE 'oprofile|[^K]config') sed -i \ -e 's/lmb/memblock/g' \ -e 's/LMB/MEMBLOCK/g' \ $FILES for N in $(find . -name lmb.[ch]); do M=$(echo $N | sed 's/lmb/memblock/g') mv $N $M done and remove some wrong change like lmbench and dlmb etc. also move memblock.c from lib/ to mm/ Suggested-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Acked-by: N"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NBenjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
-