Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 10月, 2018 9 次提交
  3. 30 9月, 2018 1 次提交
    • M
      xarray: Replace exceptional entries · 3159f943
      由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于 
      Introduce xarray value entries and tagged pointers to replace radix
tree exceptional entries.  This is a slight change in encoding to allow
the use of an extra bit (we can now store BITS_PER_LONG - 1 bits in a
value entry).  It is also a change in emphasis; exceptional entries are
intimidating and different.  As the comment explains, you can choose
to store values or pointers in the xarray and they are both first-class
citizens.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      3159f943
  5. 08 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 21 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 14 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 12 4月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 01 2月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 16 11月, 2017 11 次提交
  17. 13 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 04 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 25 9月, 2017 1 次提交
    • L
      fs: Fix page cache inconsistency when mixing buffered and AIO DIO · 332391a9
      由 Lukas Czerner 提交于 
      Currently when mixing buffered reads and asynchronous direct writes it
is possible to end up with the situation where we have stale data in the
page cache while the new data is already written to disk. This is
permanent until the affected pages are flushed away. Despite the fact
that mixing buffered and direct IO is ill-advised it does pose a thread
for a data integrity, is unexpected and should be fixed.

Fix this by deferring completion of asynchronous direct writes to a
process context in the case that there are mapped pages to be found in
the inode. Later before the completion in dio_complete() invalidate
the pages in question. This ensures that after the completion the pages
in the written area are either unmapped, or populated with up-to-date
data. Also do the same for the iomap case which uses
iomap_dio_complete() instead.

This has a side effect of deferring the completion to a process context
for every AIO DIO that happens on inode that has pages mapped. However
since the consensus is that this is ill-advised practice the performance
implication should not be a problem.

This was based on proposal from Jeff Moyer, thanks!
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Reviewed-by: NDarrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NJeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NLukas Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      332391a9
  23. 15 9月, 2017 1 次提交
    • T
      sched/wait: Introduce wakeup boomark in wake_up_page_bit · 11a19c7b
      由 Tim Chen 提交于 
      Now that we have added breaks in the wait queue scan and allow bookmark
on scan position, we put this logic in the wake_up_page_bit function.

We can have very long page wait list in large system where multiple
pages share the same wait list. We break the wake up walk here to allow
other cpus a chance to access the list, and not to disable the interrupts
when traversing the list for too long.  This reduces the interrupt and
rescheduling latency, and excessive page wait queue lock hold time.

[ v2: Remove bookmark_wake_function ]
Signed-off-by: NTim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      11a19c7b
  25. 07 9月, 2017 4 次提交
  27. 05 9月, 2017 2 次提交
  29. 29 8月, 2017 1 次提交
    • L
      page waitqueue: always add new entries at the end · 9c3a815f
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Commit 3510ca20 ("Minor page waitqueue cleanups") made the page
queue code always add new waiters to the back of the queue, which helps
upcoming patches to batch the wakeups for some horrid loads where the
wait queues grow to thousands of entries.

However, I forgot about the nasrt add_page_wait_queue() special case
code that is only used by the cachefiles code.  That one still continued
to add the new wait queue entries at the beginning of the list.

Fix it, because any sane batched wakeup will require that we don't
suddenly start getting new entries at the beginning of the list that we
already handled in a previous batch.

[ The current code always does the whole list while holding the lock, so
  wait queue ordering doesn't matter for correctness, but even then it's
  better to add later entries at the end from a fairness standpoint ]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9c3a815f
  31. 28 8月, 2017 2 次提交
    • L
      Avoid page waitqueue race leaving possible page locker waiting · a8b169af
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The "lock_page_killable()" function waits for exclusive access to the
page lock bit using the WQ_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE bit in the waitqueue entry
set.

That means that if it gets woken up, other waiters may have been
skipped.

That, in turn, means that if it sees the page being unlocked, it *must*
take that lock and return success, even if a lethal signal is also
pending.

So instead of checking for lethal signals first, we need to check for
them after we've checked the actual bit that we were waiting for.  Even
if that might then delay the killing of the process.

This matches the order of the old "wait_on_bit_lock()" infrastructure
that the page locking used to use (and is still used in a few other
areas).

Note that if we still return an error after having unsuccessfully tried
to acquire the page lock, that is ok: that means that some other thread
was able to get ahead of us and lock the page, and when that other
thread then unlocks the page, the wakeup event will be repeated.  So any
other pending waiters will now get properly woken up.

Fixes: 62906027 ("mm: add PageWaiters indicating tasks are waiting for a page bit")
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a8b169af
    • L
      Minor page waitqueue cleanups · 3510ca20
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      Tim Chen and Kan Liang have been battling a customer load that shows
extremely long page wakeup lists.  The cause seems to be constant NUMA
migration of a hot page that is shared across a lot of threads, but the
actual root cause for the exact behavior has not been found.

Tim has a patch that batches the wait list traversal at wakeup time, so
that we at least don't get long uninterruptible cases where we traverse
and wake up thousands of processes and get nasty latency spikes.  That
is likely 4.14 material, but we're still discussing the page waitqueue
specific parts of it.

In the meantime, I've tried to look at making the page wait queues less
expensive, and failing miserably.  If you have thousands of threads
waiting for the same page, it will be painful.  We'll need to try to
figure out the NUMA balancing issue some day, in addition to avoiding
the excessive spinlock hold times.

That said, having tried to rewrite the page wait queues, I can at least
fix up some of the braindamage in the current situation. In particular:

 (a) we don't want to continue walking the page wait list if the bit
     we're waiting for already got set again (which seems to be one of
     the patterns of the bad load).  That makes no progress and just
     causes pointless cache pollution chasing the pointers.

 (b) we don't want to put the non-locking waiters always on the front of
     the queue, and the locking waiters always on the back.  Not only is
     that unfair, it means that we wake up thousands of reading threads
     that will just end up being blocked by the writer later anyway.

Also add a comment about the layout of 'struct wait_page_key' - there is
an external user of it in the cachefiles code that means that it has to
match the layout of 'struct wait_bit_key' in the two first members.  It
so happens to match, because 'struct page *' and 'unsigned long *' end
up having the same values simply because the page flags are the first
member in struct page.

Cc: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@intel.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Christopher Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      3510ca20
  33. 01 8月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      mm: remove optimizations based on i_size in mapping writeback waits · ffb959bb
      由 Jeff Layton 提交于 
      Marcelo added this i_size based optimization with a patch in 2004
(commitid is from the linux-history tree):

    commit 765dad09b4ac101a32d87af2bb793c3060497d3c
    Author: Marcelo Tosatti <marcelo.tosatti@cyclades.com>
    Date:   Tue Sep 7 17:51:17 2004 -0700

	small wait_on_page_writeback_range() optimization

	filemap_fdatawait() calls wait_on_page_writeback_range() with -1
	as "end" parameter.  This is not needed since we know the EOF
	from the inode.  Use that instead.

There may be races here, particularly with clustered or network
filesystems. It also seems like a bit of a layering violation since
we're operating on an address_space here, not an inode.

Finally, it's also questionable whether this optimization really helps
on workloads that we care about. Should we be optimizing for writeback
vs. truncate races in a codepath where we expect to wait anyway? It
doesn't seem worth the risk.

Remove this optimization from the filemap_fdatawait codepaths. This
means that filemap_fdatawait becomes a trivial wrapper around
filemap_fdatawait_range.
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
      ffb959bb