Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 12月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 15 11月, 2021 2 次提交
  5. 26 8月, 2021 4 次提交
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Update cpu_cpu_map on CPU online/offline · 9a245d0e
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      cpu_cpu_map holds all the CPUs in the DIE. However in PowerPC, when
onlining/offlining of CPUs, this mask doesn't get updated.  This mask
is however updated when CPUs are added/removed. So when both
operations like online/offline of CPUs and adding/removing of CPUs are
done simultaneously, then cpumaps end up broken.

WARNING: CPU: 13 PID: 1142 at kernel/sched/topology.c:898
build_sched_domains+0xd48/0x1720
Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp mptcp_diag xsk_diag tcp_diag
udp_diag raw_diag inet_diag unix_diag af_packet_diag netlink_diag
bonding tls nft_fib_inet nft_fib_ipv4 nft_fib_ipv6 nft_fib
nft_reject_inet nf_reject_ipv4 nf_reject_ipv6 nft_reject nft_ct
nft_chain_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack nf_defrag_ipv6 nf_defrag_ipv4 ip_set
rfkill nf_tables nfnetlink pseries_rng xts vmx_crypto uio_pdrv_genirq
uio binfmt_misc ip_tables xfs libcrc32c dm_service_time sd_mod t10_pi sg
ibmvfc scsi_transport_fc ibmveth dm_multipath dm_mirror dm_region_hash
dm_log dm_mod fuse
CPU: 13 PID: 1142 Comm: kworker/13:2 Not tainted 5.13.0-rc6+ #28
Workqueue: events cpuset_hotplug_workfn
NIP:  c0000000001caac8 LR: c0000000001caac4 CTR: 00000000007088ec
REGS: c00000005596f220 TRAP: 0700   Not tainted  (5.13.0-rc6+)
MSR:  8000000000029033 <SF,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE>  CR: 48828222  XER:
00000009
CFAR: c0000000001ea698 IRQMASK: 0
GPR00: c0000000001caac4 c00000005596f4c0 c000000001c4a400 0000000000000036
GPR04: 00000000fffdffff c00000005596f1d0 0000000000000027 c0000018cfd07f90
GPR08: 0000000000000023 0000000000000001 0000000000000027 c0000018fe68ffe8
GPR12: 0000000000008000 c00000001e9d1880 c00000013a047200 0000000000000800
GPR16: c000000001d3c7d0 0000000000000240 0000000000000048 c000000010aacd18
GPR20: 0000000000000001 c000000010aacc18 c00000013a047c00 c000000139ec2400
GPR24: 0000000000000280 c000000139ec2520 c000000136c1b400 c000000001c93060
GPR28: c00000013a047c20 c000000001d3c6c0 c000000001c978a0 000000000000000d
NIP [c0000000001caac8] build_sched_domains+0xd48/0x1720
LR [c0000000001caac4] build_sched_domains+0xd44/0x1720
Call Trace:
[c00000005596f4c0] [c0000000001caac4] build_sched_domains+0xd44/0x1720 (unreliable)
[c00000005596f670] [c0000000001cc5ec] partition_sched_domains_locked+0x3ac/0x4b0
[c00000005596f710] [c0000000002804e4] rebuild_sched_domains_locked+0x404/0x9e0
[c00000005596f810] [c000000000283e60] rebuild_sched_domains+0x40/0x70
[c00000005596f840] [c000000000284124] cpuset_hotplug_workfn+0x294/0xf10
[c00000005596fc60] [c000000000175040] process_one_work+0x290/0x590
[c00000005596fd00] [c0000000001753c8] worker_thread+0x88/0x620
[c00000005596fda0] [c000000000181704] kthread+0x194/0x1a0
[c00000005596fe10] [c00000000000ccec] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x70
Instruction dump:
485af049 60000000 2fa30800 409e0028 80fe0000 e89a00f8 e86100e8 38da0120
7f88e378 7ce53b78 4801fb91 60000000 <0fe00000> 39000000 38e00000 38c00000

Fix this by updating cpu_cpu_map aka cpumask_of_node() on every CPU
online/offline.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826100521.412639-5-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      9a245d0e
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Print debug statements only when required · 544a09ee
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Currently, a debug message gets printed every time an attempt to
add(remove) a CPU. However this is redundant if the CPU is already added
(removed) from the node.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826100521.412639-4-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      544a09ee
    • S
      powerpc/numa: convert printk to pr_xxx · 506c2075
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Convert the remaining printk to pr_xxx
One advantage would be all prints will now have prefix "numa:" from
pr_fmt().

[ convert printk(KERN_ERR) to pr_warn : Suggested by Laurent Dufour ]
Suggested-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[mpe: Rebase onto powerpc/next, s/WARNING/Warning/]
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826100521.412639-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      506c2075
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Drop dbg in favour of pr_debug · 544af642
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      powerpc supported numa=debug which is not documented. This option was
used to print early debug output. However something more flexible can be
achieved by using CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG.

Hence drop dbg (and numa=debug) in favour of pr_debug
Suggested-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[mpe: Rebase on to powerpc/next form2 affinity changes]
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210826100521.412639-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      544af642
  7. 13 8月, 2021 5 次提交
  9. 10 8月, 2021 1 次提交
    • L
      powerpc/numa: Consider the max NUMA node for migratable LPAR · 9c7248bb
      由 Laurent Dufour 提交于 
      When a LPAR is migratable, we should consider the maximum possible NUMA
node instead of the number of NUMA nodes from the actual system.

The DT property 'ibm,current-associativity-domains' defines the maximum
number of nodes the LPAR can see when running on that box. But if the
LPAR is being migrated on another box, it may see up to the nodes
defined by 'ibm,max-associativity-domains'. So if a LPAR is migratable,
that value should be used.

Unfortunately, there is no easy way to know if an LPAR is migratable or
not. The hypervisor exports the property 'ibm,migratable-partition' in
the case it set to migrate partition, but that would not mean that the
current partition is migratable.

Without this patch, when a LPAR is started on a 2 node box and then
migrated to a 3 node box, the hypervisor may spread the LPAR's CPUs on
the 3rd node. In that case if a CPU from that 3rd node is added to the
LPAR, it will be wrongly assigned to the node because the kernel has
been set to use up to 2 nodes (the configuration of the departure node).
With this patch applies, the CPU is correctly added to the 3rd node.

Fixes: f9f130ff ("powerpc/numa: Detect support for coregroup")
Signed-off-by: NLaurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210511073136.17795-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com
      9c7248bb
  11. 27 11月, 2020 1 次提交
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Fix a regression on memoryless node 0 · 10f78fd0
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Commit e75130f2 ("powerpc/numa: Offline memoryless cpuless node 0")
offlines node 0 and expects nodes to be subsequently onlined when CPUs
or nodes are detected.

Commit 6398eaa2 ("powerpc/numa: Prefer node id queried from vphn")
skips onlining node 0 when CPUs are associated with node 0.

On systems with node 0 having CPUs but no memory, this causes node 0 be
marked offline. This causes issues at boot time when trying to set
memory node for online CPUs while building the zonelist.

0:mon> t
[link register   ] c000000000400354 __build_all_zonelists+0x164/0x280
[c00000000161bda0] c0000000016533c8 node_states+0x20/0xa0 (unreliable)
[c00000000161bdc0] c000000000400384 __build_all_zonelists+0x194/0x280
[c00000000161be30] c000000001041800 build_all_zonelists_init+0x4c/0x118
[c00000000161be80] c0000000004020d0 build_all_zonelists+0x190/0x1b0
[c00000000161bef0] c000000001003cf8 start_kernel+0x18c/0x6a8
[c00000000161bf90] c00000000000adb4 start_here_common+0x1c/0x3e8
0:mon> r
R00 = c000000000400354   R16 = 000000000b57a0e8
R01 = c00000000161bda0   R17 = 000000000b57a6b0
R02 = c00000000161ce00   R18 = 000000000b5afee8
R03 = 0000000000000000   R19 = 000000000b6448a0
R04 = 0000000000000000   R20 = fffffffffffffffd
R05 = 0000000000000000   R21 = 0000000001400000
R06 = 0000000000000000   R22 = 000000001ec00000
R07 = 0000000000000001   R23 = c000000001175580
R08 = 0000000000000000   R24 = c000000001651ed8
R09 = c0000000017e84d8   R25 = c000000001652480
R10 = 0000000000000000   R26 = c000000001175584
R11 = c000000c7fac0d10   R27 = c0000000019568d0
R12 = c000000000400180   R28 = 0000000000000000
R13 = c000000002200000   R29 = c00000000164dd78
R14 = 000000000b579f78   R30 = 0000000000000000
R15 = 000000000b57a2b8   R31 = c000000001175584
pc  = c000000000400194 local_memory_node+0x24/0x80
cfar= c000000000074334 mcount+0xc/0x10
lr  = c000000000400354 __build_all_zonelists+0x164/0x280
msr = 8000000002001033   cr  = 44002284
ctr = c000000000400180   xer = 0000000000000001   trap =  380
dar = 0000000000001388   dsisr = c00000000161bc90
0:mon>

Fix this by setting node to be online while onlining CPUs that belong to
node 0.

Fixes: e75130f2 ("powerpc/numa: Offline memoryless cpuless node 0")
Fixes: 6398eaa2 ("powerpc/numa: Prefer node id queried from vphn")
Reported-by: NMilan Mohanty <milmohan@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201127053738.10085-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      10f78fd0
  13. 14 10月, 2020 1 次提交
    • M
      arch, mm: replace for_each_memblock() with for_each_mem_pfn_range() · c9118e6c
      由 Mike Rapoport 提交于 
      There are several occurrences of the following pattern:

	for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
		start_pfn = memblock_region_memory_base_pfn(reg);
		end_pfn = memblock_region_memory_end_pfn(reg);

		/* do something with start_pfn and end_pfn */
	}

Rather than iterate over all memblock.memory regions and each time query
for their start and end PFNs, use for_each_mem_pfn_range() iterator to get
simpler and clearer code.
Signed-off-by: NMike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: NBaoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>	[.clang-format]
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
Cc: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Cc: Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michal Simek <monstr@monstr.eu>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Stafford Horne <shorne@gmail.com>
Cc: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Yoshinori Sato <ysato@users.sourceforge.jp>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200818151634.14343-12-rppt@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c9118e6c
  15. 06 10月, 2020 1 次提交
    • S
      pseries/hotplug-memory: hot-add: skip redundant LMB lookup · 72cdd117
      由 Scott Cheloha 提交于 
      During memory hot-add, dlpar_add_lmb() calls memory_add_physaddr_to_nid()
to determine which node id (nid) to use when later calling __add_memory().

This is wasteful.  On pseries, memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() finds an
appropriate nid for a given address by looking up the LMB containing the
address and then passing that LMB to of_drconf_to_nid_single() to get the
nid.  In dlpar_add_lmb() we get this address from the LMB itself.

In short, we have a pointer to an LMB and then we are searching for
that LMB *again* in order to find its nid.

If we call of_drconf_to_nid_single() directly from dlpar_add_lmb() we
can skip the redundant lookup.  The only error handling we need to
duplicate from memory_add_physaddr_to_nid() is the fallback to the
default nid when drconf_to_nid_single() returns -1 (NUMA_NO_NODE) or
an invalid nid.

Skipping the extra lookup makes hot-add operations faster, especially
on machines with many LMBs.

Consider an LPAR with 126976 LMBs.  In one test, hot-adding 126000
LMBs on an upatched kernel took ~3.5 hours while a patched kernel
completed the same operation in ~2 hours:

Unpatched (12450 seconds):
Sep  9 04:06:31 ltc-brazos1 drmgr[810169]: drmgr: -c mem -a -q 126000
Sep  9 04:06:31 ltc-brazos1 kernel: pseries-hotplug-mem: Attempting to hot-add 126000 LMB(s)
[...]
Sep  9 07:34:01 ltc-brazos1 kernel: pseries-hotplug-mem: Memory at 20000000 (drc index 80000002) was hot-added

Patched (7065 seconds):
Sep  8 21:49:57 ltc-brazos1 drmgr[877703]: drmgr: -c mem -a -q 126000
Sep  8 21:49:57 ltc-brazos1 kernel: pseries-hotplug-mem: Attempting to hot-add 126000 LMB(s)
[...]
Sep  8 23:27:42 ltc-brazos1 kernel: pseries-hotplug-mem: Memory at 20000000 (drc index 80000002) was hot-added

It should be noted that the speedup grows more substantial when
hot-adding LMBs at the end of the drconf range.  This is because we
are skipping a linear LMB search.

To see the distinction, consider smaller hot-add test on the same
LPAR.  A perf-stat run with 10 iterations showed that hot-adding 4096
LMBs completed less than 1 second faster on a patched kernel:

Unpatched:
 Performance counter stats for 'drmgr -c mem -a -q 4096' (10 runs):

        104,753.42 msec task-clock                #    0.992 CPUs utilized            ( +-  0.55% )
             4,708      context-switches          #    0.045 K/sec                    ( +-  0.69% )
             2,444      cpu-migrations            #    0.023 K/sec                    ( +-  1.25% )
               394      page-faults               #    0.004 K/sec                    ( +-  0.22% )
   445,902,503,057      cycles                    #    4.257 GHz                      ( +-  0.55% )  (66.67%)
     8,558,376,740      stalled-cycles-frontend   #    1.92% frontend cycles idle     ( +-  0.88% )  (49.99%)
   300,346,181,651      stalled-cycles-backend    #   67.36% backend cycles idle      ( +-  0.76% )  (50.01%)
   258,091,488,691      instructions              #    0.58  insn per cycle
                                                  #    1.16  stalled cycles per insn  ( +-  0.22% )  (66.67%)
    70,568,169,256      branches                  #  673.660 M/sec                    ( +-  0.17% )  (50.01%)
     3,100,725,426      branch-misses             #    4.39% of all branches          ( +-  0.20% )  (49.99%)

           105.583 +- 0.589 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.56% )

Patched:
 Performance counter stats for 'drmgr -c mem -a -q 4096' (10 runs):

        104,055.69 msec task-clock                #    0.993 CPUs utilized            ( +-  0.32% )
             4,606      context-switches          #    0.044 K/sec                    ( +-  0.20% )
             2,463      cpu-migrations            #    0.024 K/sec                    ( +-  0.93% )
               394      page-faults               #    0.004 K/sec                    ( +-  0.25% )
   442,951,129,921      cycles                    #    4.257 GHz                      ( +-  0.32% )  (66.66%)
     8,710,413,329      stalled-cycles-frontend   #    1.97% frontend cycles idle     ( +-  0.47% )  (50.06%)
   299,656,905,836      stalled-cycles-backend    #   67.65% backend cycles idle      ( +-  0.39% )  (50.02%)
   252,731,168,193      instructions              #    0.57  insn per cycle
                                                  #    1.19  stalled cycles per insn  ( +-  0.20% )  (66.66%)
    68,902,851,121      branches                  #  662.173 M/sec                    ( +-  0.13% )  (49.94%)
     3,100,242,882      branch-misses             #    4.50% of all branches          ( +-  0.15% )  (49.98%)

           104.829 +- 0.325 seconds time elapsed  ( +-  0.31% )

This is consistent.  An add-by-count hot-add operation adds LMBs
greedily, so LMBs near the start of the drconf range are considered
first.  On an otherwise idle LPAR with so many LMBs we would expect to
find the LMBs we need near the start of the drconf range, hence the
smaller speedup.
Signed-off-by: NScott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NLaurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200916145122.3408129-1-cheloha@linux.ibm.com
      72cdd117
  17. 16 9月, 2020 7 次提交
    • S
      powerpc/smp: Implement cpu_to_coregroup_id · fa35e868
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Lookup the coregroup id from the associativity array.

If unable to detect the coregroup id, fallback on the core id.
This way, ensure sched_domain degenerates and an extra sched domain is
not created.

Ideally this function should have been implemented in
arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c. However if its implemented in mm/numa.c, we
don't need to find the primary domain again.

If the device-tree mentions more than one coregroup, then kernel
implements only the last or the smallest coregroup, which currently
corresponds to the penultimate domain in the device-tree.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NGautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200810071834.92514-11-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      fa35e868
    • S
      powerpc/smp: Create coregroup domain · 72730bfc
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Add percpu coregroup maps and masks to create coregroup domain.
If a coregroup doesn't exist, the coregroup domain will be degenerated
in favour of SMT/CACHE domain. Do note this patch is only creating stubs
for cpu_to_coregroup_id. The actual cpu_to_coregroup_id implementation
would be in a subsequent patch.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NGautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200810071834.92514-10-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      72730bfc
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Detect support for coregroup · f9f130ff
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Add support for grouping cores based on the device-tree classification.
- The last domain in the associativity domains always refers to the
core.
- If primary reference domain happens to be the penultimate domain in
the associativity domains device-tree property, then there are no
coregroups. However if its not a penultimate domain, then there are
coregroups. There can be more than one coregroup. For now we would be
interested in the last or the smallest coregroups, i.e one sub-group
per DIE.

Currently there are no firmwares that are exposing this grouping. Hence
allow the basis for grouping to be abstract.  Once the firmware starts
using this grouping, code would be added to detect the type of grouping
and adjust the sd domain flags accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NGautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200810071834.92514-8-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      f9f130ff
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Offline memoryless cpuless node 0 · e75130f2
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Currently Linux kernel with CONFIG_NUMA on a system with multiple
possible nodes, marks node 0 as online at boot.  However in practice,
there are systems which have node 0 as memoryless and cpuless.

This can cause numa_balancing to be enabled on systems with only one node
with memory and CPUs. The existence of this dummy node which is cpuless and
memoryless node can confuse users/scripts looking at output of lscpu /
numactl.

By marking, node 0 as offline, lets stop assuming that node 0 is
always online. If node 0 has CPU or memory that are online, node 0 will
again be set as online.

v5.8
 available: 2 nodes (0,2)
 node 0 cpus:
 node 0 size: 0 MB
 node 0 free: 0 MB
 node 2 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
 node 2 size: 32625 MB
 node 2 free: 31490 MB
 node distances:
 node   0   2
   0:  10  20
   2:  20  10

proc and sys files
------------------
 /sys/devices/system/node/online:            0,2
 /proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing:            1
 /sys/devices/system/node/has_cpu:           2
 /sys/devices/system/node/has_memory:        2
 /sys/devices/system/node/has_normal_memory: 2
 /sys/devices/system/node/possible:          0-31

v5.8 + patch
------------------
 available: 1 nodes (2)
 node 2 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
 node 2 size: 32625 MB
 node 2 free: 31487 MB
 node distances:
 node   2
   2:  10

proc and sys files
------------------
/sys/devices/system/node/online:            2
/proc/sys/kernel/numa_balancing:            0
/sys/devices/system/node/has_cpu:           2
/sys/devices/system/node/has_memory:        2
/sys/devices/system/node/has_normal_memory: 2
/sys/devices/system/node/possible:          0-31

Example of a node with online CPUs/memory on node 0.
(Same o/p with and without patch)
numactl -H
available: 4 nodes (0-3)
node 0 cpus: 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47
node 0 size: 32482 MB
node 0 free: 22994 MB
node 1 cpus: 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95
node 1 size: 0 MB
node 1 free: 0 MB
node 2 cpus: 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143
node 2 size: 0 MB
node 2 free: 0 MB
node 3 cpus: 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 node 3 size: 0 MB
node 3 free: 0 MB
node distances:
node   0   1   2   3
  0:  10  20  40  40
  1:  20  10  40  40
  2:  40  40  10  20
  3:  40  40  20  10

Note: On Powerpc, cpu_to_node of possible but not present cpus would
previously return 0. Hence this commit depends on commit ("powerpc/numa: Set
numa_node for all possible cpus") and commit ("powerpc/numa: Prefer node id
queried from vphn"). Without the 2 commits, Powerpc system might crash.

1. User space applications like Numactl, lscpu, that parse the sysfs tend to
believe there is an extra online node. This tends to confuse users and
applications. Other user space applications start believing that system was
not able to use all the resources (i.e missing resources) or the system was
not setup correctly.

2. Also existence of dummy node also leads to inconsistent information. The
number of online nodes is inconsistent with the information in the
device-tree and resource-dump

3. When the dummy node is present, single node non-Numa systems end up showing
up as NUMA systems and numa_balancing gets enabled. This will mean we take
the hit from the unnecessary numa hinting faults.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200818081104.57888-4-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      e75130f2
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Prefer node id queried from vphn · 6398eaa2
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      Node id queried from the static device tree may not
be correct. For example: it may always show 0 on a shared processor.
Hence prefer the node id queried from vphn and fallback on the device tree
based node id if vphn query fails.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200818081104.57888-3-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      6398eaa2
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Set numa_node for all possible cpus · a874f100
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      A Powerpc system with multiple possible nodes and with CONFIG_NUMA
enabled always used to have a node 0, even if node 0 does not any cpus
or memory attached to it. As per PAPR, node affinity of a cpu is only
available once its present / online. For all cpus that are possible but
not present, cpu_to_node() would point to node 0.

To ensure a cpuless, memoryless dummy node is not online, powerpc need
to make sure all possible but not present cpu_to_node are set to a
proper node.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200818081104.57888-2-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      a874f100
    • S
      powerpc/numa: Restrict possible nodes based on platform · 67df7784
      由 Srikar Dronamraju 提交于 
      As per draft LoPAPR (Revision 2.9_pre7), section B.5.3 "Run Time
Abstraction Services (RTAS) Node" available at:
  https://openpowerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/LoPAR-20200611.pdf

... there are 2 device tree properties:

  "ibm,max-associativity-domains"
   which defines the maximum number of domains that the firmware i.e
   PowerVM can support.

and:

  "ibm,current-associativity-domains"
   which defines the maximum number of domains that the current
   platform can support.

The value of "ibm,max-associativity-domains" is always greater than or
equal to "ibm,current-associativity-domains" property. If the latter
property is not available, use "ibm,max-associativity-domain" as a
fallback. In this yet to be released LoPAPR, "ibm,current-associativity-domains"
is mentioned in page 833 / B.5.3 which is covered under under
"Appendix B. System Binding" section

Currently powerpc uses the "ibm,max-associativity-domains" property
while setting the possible number of nodes. This is currently set at
32. However the possible number of nodes for a platform may be
significantly less. Hence set the possible number of nodes based on
"ibm,current-associativity-domains" property.

Nathan Lynch had raised a valid concern that post LPM (Live Partition
Migration), a user could DLPAR add processors and memory after LPM
with "new" associativity properties:
  https://lore.kernel.org/linuxppc-dev/871rljfet9.fsf@linux.ibm.com/t/#u

He also pointed out that "ibm,max-associativity-domains" has the same
contents on all currently available PowerVM systems, unlike
"ibm,current-associativity-domains" and hence may be better able to
handle the new NUMA associativity properties.

However with the recent commit dbce4562 ("powerpc/numa: Limit
possible nodes to within num_possible_nodes"), all new NUMA
associativity properties are capped to initially set nr_node_ids.
Hence this commit should be safe with any new DLPAR add post LPM.

  $ lsprop /proc/device-tree/rtas/ibm,*associ*-domains
  /proc/device-tree/rtas/ibm,current-associativity-domains
  		 00000005 00000001 00000002 00000002 00000002 00000010
  /proc/device-tree/rtas/ibm,max-associativity-domains
  		 00000005 00000001 00000008 00000020 00000020 00000100

  $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/possible ##Before patch
  0-31

  $ cat /sys/devices/system/node/possible ##After patch
  0-1

Note the maximum nodes this platform can support is only 2 but the
possible nodes is set to 32.

This is important because lot of kernel and user space code allocate
structures for all possible nodes leading to a lot of memory that is
allocated but not used.

I ran a simple experiment to create and destroy 100 memory cgroups on
boot on a 8 node machine (Power8 Alpine).

Before patch:
  free -k at boot
                total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:      523498176     4106816   518820608       22272      570752   516606720
  Swap:       4194240           0     4194240

  free -k after creating 100 memory cgroups
                total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:      523498176     4628416   518246464       22336      623296   516058688
  Swap:       4194240           0     4194240

  free -k after destroying 100 memory cgroups
                total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:      523498176     4697408   518173760       22400      627008   515987904
  Swap:       4194240           0     4194240

After patch:
  free -k at boot
                total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:      523498176     3969472   518933888       22272      594816   516731776
  Swap:       4194240           0     4194240

  free -k after creating 100 memory cgroups
                total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:      523498176     4181888   518676096       22208      640192   516496448
  Swap:       4194240           0     4194240

  free -k after destroying 100 memory cgroups
                total        used        free      shared  buff/cache   available
  Mem:      523498176     4232320   518619904       22272      645952   516443264
  Swap:       4194240           0     4194240

Observations:
  Fixed kernel takes 137344 kb (4106816-3969472) less to boot.
  Fixed kernel takes 309184 kb (4628416-4181888-137344) less to create 100 memcgs.
Signed-off-by: NSrikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[mpe: Reformat change log a bit for readability]
Signed-off-by: NMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200817055257.110873-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com
      67df7784
  19. 08 8月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 29 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  23. 26 7月, 2020 1 次提交
  25. 16 7月, 2020 11 次提交
  27. 04 3月, 2020 3 次提交