1. 07 12月, 2016 6 次提交
  2. 06 12月, 2016 9 次提交
  3. 05 12月, 2016 21 次提交
  4. 04 12月, 2016 2 次提交
  5. 03 12月, 2016 2 次提交
    • L
      Merge branch 'akpm' (patches from Andrew) · 3c49de52
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Merge more fixes from Andrew Morton:
       "2 fixes"
      
      * emailed patches from Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>:
        mm, vmscan: add cond_resched() into shrink_node_memcg()
        mm: workingset: fix NULL ptr in count_shadow_nodes
      3c49de52
    • M
      mm, vmscan: add cond_resched() into shrink_node_memcg() · bd041733
      Michal Hocko 提交于
      Boris Zhmurov has reported RCU stalls during the kswapd reclaim:
      
        INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
         23-...: (22 ticks this GP) idle=92f/140000000000000/0 softirq=2638404/2638404 fqs=23
         (detected by 4, t=6389 jiffies, g=786259, c=786258, q=42115)
        Task dump for CPU 23:
        kswapd1         R  running task        0   148      2 0x00000008
        Call Trace:
          shrink_node+0xd2/0x2f0
          kswapd+0x2cb/0x6a0
          mem_cgroup_shrink_node+0x160/0x160
          kthread+0xbd/0xe0
          __switch_to+0x1fa/0x5c0
          ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40
          kthread_create_on_node+0x180/0x180
      
      a closer code inspection has shown that we might indeed miss all the
      scheduling points in the reclaim path if no pages can be isolated from
      the LRU list.  This is a pathological case but other reports from Donald
      Buczek have shown that we might indeed hit such a path:
      
              clusterd-989   [009] .... 118023.654491: mm_vmscan_direct_reclaim_end: nr_reclaimed=193
               kswapd1-86    [001] dN.. 118023.987475: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=0 classzone=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=4239830 nr_taken=0 file=1
               kswapd1-86    [001] dN.. 118024.320968: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=0 classzone=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=4239844 nr_taken=0 file=1
               kswapd1-86    [001] dN.. 118024.654375: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=0 classzone=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=4239858 nr_taken=0 file=1
               kswapd1-86    [001] dN.. 118024.987036: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=0 classzone=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=4239872 nr_taken=0 file=1
               kswapd1-86    [001] dN.. 118025.319651: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=0 classzone=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=4239886 nr_taken=0 file=1
               kswapd1-86    [001] dN.. 118025.652248: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=0 classzone=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=4239900 nr_taken=0 file=1
               kswapd1-86    [001] dN.. 118025.984870: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=0 classzone=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=4239914 nr_taken=0 file=1
        [...]
               kswapd1-86    [001] dN.. 118084.274403: mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=0 classzone=0 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=4241133 nr_taken=0 file=1
      
      this is minute long snapshot which didn't take a single page from the
      LRU.  It is not entirely clear why only 1303 pages have been scanned
      during that time (maybe there was a heavy IRQ activity interfering).
      
      In any case it looks like we can really hit long periods without
      scheduling on non preemptive kernels so an explicit cond_resched() in
      shrink_node_memcg which is independent on the reclaim operation is due.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20161202095841.16648-1-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Reported-by: NBoris Zhmurov <bb@kernelpanic.ru>
      Tested-by: NBoris Zhmurov <bb@kernelpanic.ru>
      Reported-by: NDonald Buczek <buczek@molgen.mpg.de>
      Reported-by: N"Christopher S. Aker" <caker@theshore.net>
      Reported-by: NPaul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      bd041733