To be able to setup GuC submission functions during engine init we need
to commit to using GuC as soon as possible.
Currently, the only thing that can stop us from using the
microcontrollers once we've fetched the blobs is a fundamental
error (e.g. OOM); given that if we hit such an error we can't really
fall-back to anything, we can "officialize" the FW fetching completion
as the moment at which we're committing to using GuC.

To better differentiate this case, the uses_guc check, which indicates
that GuC is supported and was selected in modparam, is renamed to
wants_guc and a new uses_guc is introduced to represent the case were
we're committed to using the GuC. Note that uses_guc does still not imply
that the blob is actually loaded on the HW (is_running is the check for
that). Also, since we need to have attempted the fetch for the result
of uses_guc to be meaningful, we need to make sure we've moved away
from INTEL_UC_FIRMWARE_SELECTED.

All the GuC changes have been mirrored on the HuC for coherency.

v2: split fetch return changes and new macros to their own patches,
    support HuC only if GuC is wanted, improve "used" state
    description (Michal)

v3: s/wants_huc/uses_huc in uc_init_wopcm
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Fernando Pacheco <fernando.pacheco@intel.com> #v1
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We want to map uC-level checks to GuC/HuC-level ones. The mapping from
the uC state to the GuC/HuC one follows the same pattern for all the
functions:

 uc_xxx_guc() -> guc_is_yyy()

So we can easily use a macro to autogenerate the functions via macros by
passing in the 2 mapped states.

v2: Split this change to its own patch (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

In a follow up patch we will rely on the fact that the status always
moves away from "SELECTED" after the fetch is attempted to decide what
to do with the GuC.

v2: Split this change to its own patch (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200218223327.11058-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We are sanitizing firmware status and old mmio message, but
we forget to sanitize CT status.

Fixes: e85de177 ("drm/i915/guc: Introduce guc_is_ready")
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200207131938.2787828-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukSigned-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

We already have guc_is_running function, but it only reflects
firmware status, while to fully use GuC we need to know if we've
already established communication with it.

v2: also s/intel_guc_is_running/intel_guc_is_fw_running (Chris)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200131153706.109528-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

On Braswell and Broxton (also known as Valleyview and Apollolake), we
need to serialise updates of the GGTT using the big stop_machine()
hammer. This has the side effect of appearing to lockdep as a possible
reclaim (since it uses the cpuhp mutex and that is tainted by per-cpu
allocations). However, we want to use vm->mutex (including ggtt->mutex)
from within the shrinker and so must avoid such possible taints. For this
purpose, we introduced the asynchronous vma binding and we can apply it
to the PIN_GLOBAL so long as take care to add the necessary waits for
the worker afterwards.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/issues/211Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200130181710.2030251-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We should never BUG_ON on any corruption in CTB descriptor as
data there can be also modified by the GuC. Instead we can
use flag "is_in_error" to indicate that we will not process
any further messages over this CTB (until reset).
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200120191817.50164-1-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

As we now have "ct" available almost in all functions we can
start using dev variants of logs also for debug.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-6-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

As we now have "ct" available in ct_read function we can switch
from generic DRM_ERROR to our custom CT_ERROR.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NPiotr Piórkowski <piotr.piorkowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Since we only have one RECV buffer we don't need to explicitly pass
it to the read function.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Since we only have one SEND buffer we don't need to explicitly pass
it to the write function.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We should never BUG_ON on any corruption in CTB descriptor as
data there can be also modified by the GuC. Instead we can
use flag "is_in_error" to indicate that we will not process
any further messages over this CTB (until reset). While here
move descriptor error reporting to the function that actually
touches that descriptor.

Note that unexpected content of the specific CT messages, that
still complies with generic CT message format, shall not trigger
disabling whole CTB, as that might just indicate new unsupported
message types.

v2: drop redundant message (Daniele)
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200117082039.65644-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

While we have function that returns "next fence" that can be used
by new CT request, we internally store value of the last used fence.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200111231114.59208-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Update GuC CTB action helpers to benefit from new CT_ERROR macro.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200111231114.59208-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We should start using dev variants of error logging and
to simplify that introduce helper macro that will do any
necessary conversions to obtain pointer to device struct.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200111231114.59208-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We need CT message size in bytes so just use that in helper var.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200111231114.59208-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

uC sanitization is only meaningful if we are running with uC present
or enabled. Make this function part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-5-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

uC preparation and cleanup steps are only meaningful if we are
running with uC enabled. Make these functions part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Firmware fetching and cleanup steps are only meaningful if we are
running with uC enabled. Make these functions part of the uc_ops.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

Instead of spreading multiple conditionals across the uC code
to find out current mode of uC operation, start using predefined
set of function pointers that reflect that mode.

Begin with pair of init_hw/fini_hw functions that are responsible
for uC hardware initialization and cleanup.

v2: drop ops_none, use macro to generate ops helpers
v3: reuse __uc_check_hw to avoid redundant comment
v4: forward declare ops struct vs functions
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20200110222723.14724-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

I implemented a small build rule in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile
without relying on the special header-test-y syntax that was removed in
commit fcbb8461 ("kbuild: remove header compile test").

I excluded some headers from the test coverage. I hope somebody
intrested can take a closer look at them.

Dummy subdir Makefiles can be removed altogether as single target build
use case is now covered by commit 394053f4 ("kbuild: make single
targets work more correctly").

v2 by Jani:
- add selftests/i915_perf_selftests.h to no-header-test
- add .gitignore for *.hdrtest

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Signed-off-by: NMasahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191219155652.2666-3-jani.nikula@intel.com

Begin pulling the GT setup underneath a single GT umbrella; let intel_gt
take ownership of its engines! As hinted, the complication is the
lifetime of the probed engine versus the active lifetime of the GT
backends. We need to detect the engine layout early and keep it until
the end so that we can sanitize state on takeover and release.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191222120752.1368352-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Keep the intel_context as being the primary state for i915_request, with
the GEM context a backpointer from the low level state for the rarer
cases we need client information. Our goal is to remove such references
to clients from the backend, and leave the HW submission agnostic to
client interfaces and self-contained.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191220101230.256839-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The Gen11+ and the legacy function differ in the register and value
written to interrupt the GuC. However, while on older gen the value
matches a bit on the register, on Gen11+ the value is a SW defined
payload that is sent to the FW. Since the FW behaves the same no matter
what value we pass to it, we can just write the same thing on all gens
and get rid of the function pointer by saving the register offset.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-6-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Since we started using CT buffers on all gens, the function pointers can
only be set to either the _nop() or the _ct() functions. Since the
_nop() case applies to when the CT are disabled, we can just handle that
case in the _ct() functions and call them directly.

v2: keep intel_guc_send() and make the CT send/receive functions work on
    intel_guc_ct. (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-5-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

For better isolation of the request tracking from the rest of the
CT-related data.

v2: split to separate patch, move next_fence to substructure (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

The GuC supports having multiple CT buffer pairs and we designed our
implementation with that in mind. However, the different channels are not
processed in parallel within the GuC, so there is very little advantage
in having multiple channels (independent locks?), compared to the
drawbacks (one channel can starve the other if messages keep being
submitted to it). Given this, it is unlikely we'll ever add a second
channel and therefore we can simplify our code by removing the
flexibility.

v2: split substructure grouping to separate patch, improve docs (Michal)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We track the status of the GuC much more closely now and we expect the
enable/disable functions to be correctly called only once. If this isn't
true we do want to flag it as a flow failure (via the BUG_ON in the ctch
functions) and not silently ignore the call.
Suggested-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

The only difference from the GuC POV between guc_communication_stop and
guc_communication_disable is that the former can be called after GuC
has been reset. Instead of having two separate paths, we can just skip
the call into GuC in the disabling path and re-use that.

Note that by using the disable() path instead of the stop() one there
are two additional changes in SW side for the stop path:

- interrupts are now disabled before disabling the CT, which is ok
  because we do not want interrupts with CT disabled;
- guc_get_mmio_msg() is called in the stop case as well, which is ok
  because if there are errors before the reset we do want to record
  them.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191217012316.13271-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

New macros ENGINE_TRACE(), CE_TRACE(), RQ_TRACE() and
GT_TRACE() are introduce to tag device name and engine
name with contexts and requests tracing in i915.

Cc: Sudeep Dutt <sudeep.dutt@intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVenkata Sandeep Dhanalakota <venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191213155152.69182-2-venkata.s.dhanalakota@intel.com

There is no need to pass explicit ggtt since we already have
a trick to get parent gt from uc_fw, we only need to use it.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191211124549.59516-4-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

There is no need to pass explicit gt since we already have
a trick to get parent gt from uc_fw, we only need to use it.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191211124549.59516-3-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

There is no need to pass explicit i915 since we already have
a debug trick to get parent gt from uc_fw, we only need to
make this trick available on non-debug builds.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191211124549.59516-2-michal.wajdeczko@intel.com

We now only use 1 client without any plan to add more. The client is
also only holding information about the WQ and the process desc, so we
can just move those in the intel_guc structure and always use stage_id
0.

v2: fix comment (John)
v3: fix the comment for real, fix kerneldoc
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-4-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Instead of relying on the workqueue, the upcoming reworked GuC
submission flow will offer the host driver indipendent control over
the execution status of each context submitted to GuC. As part of this,
the doorbell usage model has been reworked, with each doorbell being
paired to a single lrc and a doorbell ring representing new work
available for that specific context. This mechanism, however, limits
the number of contexts that can be registered with GuC to the number of
doorbells, which is an undesired limitation. To avoid this limitation,
we requested the GuC team to also provide a H2G that will allow the host
to notify the GuC of work available for a specified lrc, so we can use
that mechanism instead of relying on the doorbells. We can therefore drop
the doorbell code we currently have, also given the fact that in the
unlikely case we'd want to switch back to using doorbells we'd have to
heavily rework it.
The workqueue will still have a use in the new interface to pass special
commands, so that code has been retained for now.

With the doorbells gone and the GuC client becoming even simpler, the
existing GuC selftests don't give us any meaningful coverage so we can
remove them as well. Some selftests might come with the new code, but
they will look different from what we have now so if doesn't seem worth
it to keep the file around in the meantime.

v2: fix comments and commit message (John)
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-3-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

We already have a couple of use-cases in the code and another one will
come in one of the later patches in the series.

v2: use the new function for the CT object as well
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> #v1
Reviewed-by: NJohn Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-2-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

Remove unused enums and ctx_save_restore_disabled() function, leftover
from the legacy preemption removal.
Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205220243.27403-1-daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com

The preferred way to access the uncore is through the GT structure.
Update the GuC function, flush_ggtt_writes, to use this path.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Brost <matthew.brost@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohn Harrison <john.c.harrison@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191207010033.24667-1-John.C.Harrison@Intel.com

Get rid of the last remaining I915_READ in gt/ and make gt-land
the first I915_READ-free happy island.
Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191205164422.727968-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Assume that intel_wakeref_get() may take the mutex, and perform other
sleeping actions in the course of its callbacks and so use might_sleep()
to ensure that all callers abide. Anything that cannot sleep has to use
e.g. intel_wakeref_get_if_active() to guarantee its avoidance of the
non-atomic paths.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121130528.309474-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk