Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
“6f09801ef97d58ac9a2cc4962edbb812287a9df5”上不存在“projects/IKende/imports.yml”
切换分支/标签
  1. 21 10月, 2021 4 次提交
    • V
      net: mscc: ocelot: add the local station MAC addresses in VID 0 · bfbab310
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      The ocelot switchdev driver does not include the CPU port in the list of
flooding destinations for unknown traffic, instead that traffic is
supposed to match FDB entries to reach the CPU.

The addresses it installs are:
(a) the station MAC address, in ocelot_probe_port() and later during
    runtime in ocelot_port_set_mac_address(). These are the VLAN-unaware
    addresses. The VLAN-aware addresses are in ocelot_vlan_vid_add().
(b) multicast addresses added with dev_mc_add() (not bridge host MDB
    entries) in ocelot_mc_sync()
(c) multicast destination MAC addresses for MRP in ocelot_mrp_save_mac(),
    to make sure those are dropped (not forwarded) by the bridging
    service, just trapped to the CPU

So we can see that the logic is slightly buggy ever since the initial
commit a556c76a ("net: mscc: Add initial Ocelot switch support").
This is because, when ocelot_probe_port() runs, the port pvid is 0.
Then we join a VLAN-aware bridge, the pvid becomes 1, we call
ocelot_port_set_mac_address(), this learns the new MAC address in VID 1
(also fails to forget the old one, since it thinks it's in VID 1, but
that's not so important). Then when we leave the VLAN-aware bridge,
outside world is unable to ping our new MAC address because it isn't
learned in VID 0, the VLAN-unaware pvid.

[ note: this is strictly based on static analysis, I don't have hardware
  to test. But there are also many more corner cases ]

The basic idea is that we should have a separation of concerns, and the
FDB entries used for standalone operation should be managed by the
driver, and the FDB entries used by the bridging service should be
managed by the bridge. So the standalone and VLAN-unaware bridge FDB
entries should not follow the bridge PVID, because that will only be
active when the bridge is VLAN-aware. So since the port pvid is
coincidentally zero during probe time, just make those entries
statically go to VID 0.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      bfbab310
    • V
      net: mscc: ocelot: allow a config where all bridge VLANs are egress-untagged · 0da1a1c4
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      At present, the ocelot driver accepts a single egress-untagged bridge
VLAN, meaning that this sequence of operations:

ip link add br0 type bridge vlan_filtering 1
ip link set swp0 master br0
bridge vlan add dev swp0 vid 2 pvid untagged

fails because the bridge automatically installs VID 1 as a pvid & untagged
VLAN, and vid 2 would be the second untagged VLAN on this port. It is
necessary to delete VID 1 before proceeding to add VID 2.

This limitation comes from the fact that we operate the port tag, when
it has an egress-untagged VID, in the OCELOT_PORT_TAG_NATIVE mode.
The ocelot switches do not have full flexibility and can either have one
single VID as egress-untagged, or all of them.

There are use cases for having all VLANs as egress-untagged as well, and
this patch adds support for that.

The change rewrites ocelot_port_set_native_vlan() into a more generic
ocelot_port_manage_port_tag() function. Because the software bridge's
state, transmitted to us via switchdev, can become very complex, we
don't attempt to track all possible state transitions, but instead take
a more declarative approach and just make ocelot_port_manage_port_tag()
figure out which more to operate in:

- port is VLAN-unaware: the classified VLAN (internal, unrelated to the
                        802.1Q header) is not inserted into packets on egress
- port is VLAN-aware:
  - port has tagged VLANs:
    -> port has no untagged VLAN: set up as pure trunk
    -> port has one untagged VLAN: set up as trunk port + native VLAN
    -> port has more than one untagged VLAN: this is an invalid config
       which is rejected by ocelot_vlan_prepare
  - port has no tagged VLANs
    -> set up as pure egress-untagged port

We don't keep the number of tagged and untagged VLANs, we just count the
structures we keep.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0da1a1c4
    • V
      net: mscc: ocelot: convert the VLAN masks to a list · 90e0aa8d
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      First and foremost, the driver currently allocates a constant sized
4K * u32 (16KB memory) array for the VLAN masks. However, a typical
application might not need so many VLANs, so if we dynamically allocate
the memory as needed, we might actually save some space.

Secondly, we'll need to keep more advanced bookkeeping of the VLANs we
have, notably we'll have to check how many untagged and how many tagged
VLANs we have. This will have to stay in a structure, and allocating
another 16 KB array for that is again a bit too much.

So refactor the bridge VLANs in a linked list of structures.

The hook points inside the driver are ocelot_vlan_member_add() and
ocelot_vlan_member_del(), which previously used to operate on the
ocelot->vlan_mask[vid] array element.

ocelot_vlan_member_add() and ocelot_vlan_member_del() used to call
ocelot_vlan_member_set() to commit to the ocelot->vlan_mask.
Additionally, we had two calls to ocelot_vlan_member_set() from outside
those callers, and those were directly from ocelot_vlan_init().
Those calls do not set up bridging service VLANs, instead they:

- clear the VLAN table on reset
- set the port pvid to the value used by this driver for VLAN-unaware
  standalone port operation (VID 0)

So now, when we have a structure which represents actual bridge VLANs,
VID 0 doesn't belong in that structure, since it is not part of the
bridging layer.

So delete the middle man, ocelot_vlan_member_set(), and let
ocelot_vlan_init() call directly ocelot_vlant_set_mask() which forgoes
any data structure and writes directly to hardware, which is all that we
need.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      90e0aa8d
    • V
      net: mscc: ocelot: add a type definition for REW_TAG_CFG_TAG_CFG · 62a22bcb
      由 Vladimir Oltean 提交于 
      This is a cosmetic patch which clarifies what are the port tagging
options for Ocelot switches.
Signed-off-by: NVladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      62a22bcb
  3. 20 10月, 2021 17 次提交
  5. 19 10月, 2021 19 次提交