1. 11 3月, 2014 3 次提交
  2. 29 1月, 2014 10 次提交
    • W
      Btrfs: fix memory leaks on walking backrefs failure · f05c4746
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      When walking backrefs, we may iterate every inode's extent
      and add/merge them into ulist, and the caller will free memory
      from ulist.
      
      However, if we fail to allocate inode's extents element
      memory or ulist_add() fail to allocate memory, we won't
      add allocated memory into ulist, and the caller won't
      free some allocated memory thus memory leaks happen.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      f05c4746
    • W
      Btrfs: add a reschedule point in btrfs_find_all_roots() · bca1a290
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      I can easily trigger the following warnings when enabling quota
      in my virtual machine(running Opensuse), Steps are firstly creating
      a subvolume full of fragment extents, and then create many snapshots
      (500 in my test case).
      
      [ 2362.808459] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 22s! [btrfs-qgroup-re:1970]
      
      [ 2362.809023] task: e4af8450 ti: e371c000 task.ti: e371c000
      [ 2362.809026] EIP: 0060:[<fa38f4ae>] EFLAGS: 00000246 CPU: 0
      [ 2362.809049] EIP is at __merge_refs+0x5e/0x100 [btrfs]
      [ 2362.809051] EAX: 00000000 EBX: cfadbcf0 ECX: 00000000 EDX: cfadbcb0
      [ 2362.809052] ESI: dd8d3370 EDI: e371dde0 EBP: e371dd6c ESP: e371dd5c
      [ 2362.809054]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
      [ 2362.809055] CR0: 80050033 CR2: ac454d50 CR3: 009a9000 CR4: 001407d0
      [ 2362.809099] Stack:
      [ 2362.809100]  00000001 e371dde0 dfcc6890 f29f8000 e371de28 fa39016d 00000011 00000001
      [ 2362.809105]  99bfc000 00000000 93928000 00000000 00000001 00000050 e371dda8 00000001
      [ 2362.809109]  f3a31000 f3413000 00000001 e371ddb8 000040a8 00000202 00000000 00000023
      [ 2362.809113] Call Trace:
      [ 2362.809136]  [<fa39016d>] find_parent_nodes+0x34d/0x1280 [btrfs]
      [ 2362.809156]  [<fa391172>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0xb2/0x110 [btrfs]
      [ 2362.809174]  [<fa3934a8>] btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker+0x358/0x7a0 [btrfs]
      [ 2362.809180]  [<c024d0ce>] ? lock_timer_base.isra.39+0x1e/0x40
      [ 2362.809199]  [<fa3648df>] worker_loop+0xff/0x470 [btrfs]
      [ 2362.809204]  [<c027a88a>] ? __wake_up_locked+0x1a/0x20
      [ 2362.809221]  [<fa3647e0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x2b0/0x2b0 [btrfs]
      [ 2362.809225]  [<c025ebbc>] kthread+0x9c/0xb0
      [ 2362.809229]  [<c06b487b>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x1b/0x30
      [ 2362.809233]  [<c025eb20>] ? kthread_create_on_node+0x110/0x110
      
      By adding a reschedule point at the end of btrfs_find_all_roots(), i no longer
      hit these warnings.
      
      Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      bca1a290
    • W
      Btrfs: fix to catch all errors when resolving indirect ref · 95def2ed
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      We can only tolerate ENOENT here, for other errors, we should
      return directly.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      95def2ed
    • W
      Btrfs: fix protection between walking backrefs and root deletion · 538f72cd
      Wang Shilong 提交于
      There is a race condition between resolving indirect ref and root deletion,
      and we should gurantee that root can not be destroyed to avoid accessing
      broken tree here.
      
      Here we fix it by holding @subvol_srcu, and we will release it as soon
      as we have held root node lock.
      Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      538f72cd
    • J
      Btrfs: only process as many file extents as there are refs · 7ef81ac8
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      The backref walking code will search down to the key it is looking for and then
      proceed to walk _all_ of the extents on the file until it hits the end.  This is
      suboptimal with large files, we only need to look for as many extents as we have
      references for that inode.  I have a testcase that creates a randomly written 4
      gig file and before this patch it took 6min 30sec to do the initial send, with
      this patch it takes 2min 30sec to do the intial send.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      7ef81ac8
    • J
      Btrfs: fix extent_from_logical to deal with skinny metadata · 580f0a67
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      I don't think this is an issue and I've not seen it in practice but
      extent_from_logical will fail to find a skinny extent because it uses
      btrfs_previous_item and gives it the normal extent item type.  This is just not
      a place to use btrfs_previous_item since we care about either normal extents or
      skinny extents, so open code btrfs_previous_item to properly check.  This would
      only affect metadata and the only place this is used for metadata is scrub and
      I'm pretty sure it's just for printing stuff out, not actually doing any work so
      hopefully it was never a problem other than a cosmetic one.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      580f0a67
    • J
      Btrfs: attach delayed ref updates to delayed ref heads · d7df2c79
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Currently we have two rb-trees, one for delayed ref heads and one for all of the
      delayed refs, including the delayed ref heads.  When we process the delayed refs
      we have to hold onto the delayed ref lock for all of the selecting and merging
      and such, which results in quite a bit of lock contention.  This was solved by
      having a waitqueue and only one flusher at a time, however this hurts if we get
      a lot of delayed refs queued up.
      
      So instead just have an rb tree for the delayed ref heads, and then attach the
      delayed ref updates to an rb tree that is per delayed ref head.  Then we only
      need to take the delayed ref lock when adding new delayed refs and when
      selecting a delayed ref head to process, all the rest of the time we deal with a
      per delayed ref head lock which will be much less contentious.
      
      The locking rules for this get a little more complicated since we have to lock
      up to 3 things to properly process delayed refs, but I will address that problem
      later.  For now this passes all of xfstests and my overnight stress tests.
      Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      d7df2c79
    • F
      Btrfs: fix deadlock when iterating inode refs and running delayed inodes · 3fe81ce2
      Filipe David Borba Manana 提交于
      While running btrfs/004 from xfstests, after 503 iterations, dmesg reported
      a deadlock between tasks iterating inode refs and tasks running delayed inodes
      (during a transaction commit).
      
      It turns out that iterating inode refs implies doing one tree search and
      release all nodes in the path except the leaf node, and then passing that
      leaf node to btrfs_ref_to_path(), which in turn does another tree search
      without releasing the lock on the leaf node it received as parameter.
      
      This is a problem when other task wants to write to the btree as well and
      ends up updating the leaf that is read locked - the writer task locks the
      parent of the leaf and then blocks waiting for the leaf's lock to be
      released - at the same time, the task executing btrfs_ref_to_path()
      does a second tree search, without releasing the lock on the first leaf,
      and wants to access a leaf (the same or another one) that is a child of
      the same parent, resulting in a deadlock.
      
      The trace reported by lockdep follows.
      
      [84314.936373] INFO: task fsstress:11930 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [84314.936381]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
      [84314.936383] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [84314.936386] fsstress        D ffff8806e1bf8000     0 11930  11926 0x00000000
      [84314.936393]  ffff8804d6d89b78 0000000000000046 ffff8804d6d89b18 ffffffff810bd8bd
      [84314.936399]  ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8 ffff8804d6d89fd8
      [84314.936405]  ffff880806308000 ffff8806e1bf8000 ffff8804d6d89c08 ffff8804deb8f190
      [84314.936410] Call Trace:
      [84314.936421]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
      [84314.936428]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
      [84314.936451]  [<ffffffffa0715bf5>] btrfs_tree_lock+0x75/0x270 [btrfs]
      [84314.936457]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
      [84314.936470]  [<ffffffffa06ba231>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7f1/0x930 [btrfs]
      [84314.936489]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936504]  [<ffffffffa06d2e1f>] btrfs_lookup_inode+0x2f/0xa0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936510]  [<ffffffff810bd6ef>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f/0x1e0
      [84314.936528]  [<ffffffffa073173c>] __btrfs_update_delayed_inode+0x4c/0x1d0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936543]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936558]  [<ffffffffa0731c2a>] ? __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13a/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936573]  [<ffffffffa0731c82>] __btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x192/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936589]  [<ffffffffa0731d03>] btrfs_run_delayed_items+0x13/0x20 [btrfs]
      [84314.936604]  [<ffffffffa06dbcd4>] btrfs_flush_all_pending_stuffs+0x24/0x80 [btrfs]
      [84314.936620]  [<ffffffffa06ddc13>] btrfs_commit_transaction+0x223/0xa20 [btrfs]
      [84314.936630]  [<ffffffffa06ae5ae>] btrfs_sync_fs+0x6e/0x110 [btrfs]
      [84314.936635]  [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60
      [84314.936639]  [<ffffffff811d0b50>] ? __sync_filesystem+0x60/0x60
      [84314.936643]  [<ffffffff811d0b70>] sync_fs_one_sb+0x20/0x30
      [84314.936648]  [<ffffffff811a3541>] iterate_supers+0xf1/0x100
      [84314.936652]  [<ffffffff811d0c45>] sys_sync+0x55/0x90
      [84314.936658]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [84314.936660] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
      [84314.936663] INFO: task btrfs:11955 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [84314.936666]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
      [84314.936668] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [84314.936670] btrfs           D ffff880541729a88     0 11955  11608 0x00000000
      [84314.936674]  ffff880541729a38 0000000000000046 ffff8805417299d8 ffffffff810bd8bd
      [84314.936680]  ffff88075430c8a0 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8 ffff880541729fd8
      [84314.936685]  ffffffff81c104e0 ffff88075430c8a0 ffff8804de8b00b8 ffff8804de8b0000
      [84314.936690] Call Trace:
      [84314.936695]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
      [84314.936700]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
      [84314.936717]  [<ffffffffa0715815>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xd5/0x140 [btrfs]
      [84314.936721]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
      [84314.936733]  [<ffffffffa06ba201>] btrfs_search_slot+0x7c1/0x930 [btrfs]
      [84314.936746]  [<ffffffffa06bd505>] btrfs_find_item+0x55/0x160 [btrfs]
      [84314.936763]  [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936780]  [<ffffffffa073c9ca>] btrfs_ref_to_path+0xba/0x1e0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936797]  [<ffffffffa06f9719>] ? release_extent_buffer+0xb9/0xe0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936813]  [<ffffffffa06ff689>] ? free_extent_buffer+0x49/0xc0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936830]  [<ffffffffa073cb50>] inode_to_path+0x60/0xd0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936846]  [<ffffffffa073d365>] paths_from_inode+0x115/0x3c0 [btrfs]
      [84314.936851]  [<ffffffff8118dd44>] ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x114/0x200
      [84314.936868]  [<ffffffffa0714494>] btrfs_ioctl+0xf14/0x2030 [btrfs]
      [84314.936873]  [<ffffffff817762db>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x2b/0x50
      [84314.936877]  [<ffffffff8116598f>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x34f/0xb00
      [84314.936882]  [<ffffffff81075563>] ? up_read+0x23/0x40
      [84314.936886]  [<ffffffff8177a41c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x20c/0x5a0
      [84314.936892]  [<ffffffff811b2946>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x96/0x570
      [84314.936896]  [<ffffffff81776e23>] ? error_sti+0x5/0x6
      [84314.936901]  [<ffffffff810b71e8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
      [84314.936906]  [<ffffffff81776a09>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
      [84314.936910]  [<ffffffff811b2eb1>] SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xb0
      [84314.936915]  [<ffffffff813eecde>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
      [84314.936920]  [<ffffffff8177ef12>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      [84314.936922] INFO: lockdep is turned off.
      [84434.866873] INFO: task btrfs-transacti:11921 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
      [84434.866881]       Tainted: G        W  O 3.12.0-fdm-btrfs-next-16+ #70
      [84434.866883] "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
      [84434.866886] btrfs-transacti D ffff880755b6a478     0 11921      2 0x00000000
      [84434.866893]  ffff8800735b9ce8 0000000000000046 ffff8800735b9c88 ffffffff810bd8bd
      [84434.866899]  ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8 ffff8800735b9fd8
      [84434.866904]  ffffffff81c104e0 ffff8805a1b848a0 ffff880755b6a478 ffff8804cece78f0
      [84434.866910] Call Trace:
      [84434.866920]  [<ffffffff810bd8bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
      [84434.866927]  [<ffffffff81774269>] schedule+0x29/0x70
      [84434.866948]  [<ffffffffa06dd2ef>] wait_current_trans.isra.33+0xbf/0x120 [btrfs]
      [84434.866954]  [<ffffffff810715c0>] ? __init_waitqueue_head+0x60/0x60
      [84434.866970]  [<ffffffffa06dec18>] start_transaction+0x388/0x5a0 [btrfs]
      [84434.866985]  [<ffffffffa06db9b5>] ? transaction_kthread+0xb5/0x280 [btrfs]
      [84434.866999]  [<ffffffffa06dee97>] btrfs_attach_transaction+0x17/0x20 [btrfs]
      [84434.867012]  [<ffffffffa06dba9e>] transaction_kthread+0x19e/0x280 [btrfs]
      [84434.867026]  [<ffffffffa06db900>] ? open_ctree+0x2260/0x2260 [btrfs]
      [84434.867030]  [<ffffffff81070dad>] kthread+0xed/0x100
      [84434.867035]  [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190
      [84434.867040]  [<ffffffff8177ee6c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
      [84434.867044]  [<ffffffff81070cc0>] ? flush_kthread_worker+0x190/0x190
      Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      3fe81ce2
    • K
      btrfs: bootstrap generic btrfs_find_item interface · e33d5c3d
      Kelley Nielsen 提交于
      There are many btrfs functions that manually search the tree for an
      item. They all reimplement the same mechanism and differ in the
      conditions that they use to find the item. __inode_info() is one such
      example. Zach Brown proposed creating a new interface to take the place
      of these functions.
      
      This patch is the first step to creating the interface. A new function,
      btrfs_find_item, has been added to ctree.c and prototyped in ctree.h.
      It is identical to __inode_info, except that the order of the parameters
      has been rearranged to more closely those of similar functions elsewhere
      in the code (now, root and path come first, then the objectid, offset
      and type, and the key to be filled in last). __inode_info's callers have
      been set to call this new function instead, and __inode_info itself has
      been removed.
      Signed-off-by: NKelley Nielsen <kelleynnn@gmail.com>
      Suggested-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
      e33d5c3d
    • V
  3. 12 11月, 2013 3 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) · fae7f21c
      Dulshani Gunawardhana 提交于
      Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source
      code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling
      warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix.
      Signed-off-by: NDulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      fae7f21c
    • L
      Btrfs: fix a crash when running balance and defrag concurrently · 48ec4736
      Liu Bo 提交于
      Running balance and defrag concurrently can end up with a crash:
      
      kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/relocation.c:4528!
      RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa01ac33b>]  [<ffffffffa01ac33b>] btrfs_reloc_cow_block+ 0x1eb/0x230 [btrfs]
      Call Trace:
        [<ffffffffa01398c1>] ? update_ref_for_cow+0x241/0x380 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0180bad>] ? copy_extent_buffer+0xad/0x110 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0139da1>] __btrfs_cow_block+0x3a1/0x520 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa013a0b6>] btrfs_cow_block+0x116/0x1b0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa013ddad>] btrfs_search_slot+0x43d/0x970 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0153c57>] btrfs_lookup_file_extent+0x37/0x40 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0172a5e>] __btrfs_drop_extents+0x11e/0xae0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa013b3fd>] ? generic_bin_search.constprop.39+0x8d/0x1a0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffff8117d14a>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0x1da/0x200
        [<ffffffffa0138e7a>] ? btrfs_alloc_path+0x1a/0x20 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0173ef0>] btrfs_drop_extents+0x60/0x90 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa016b24d>] relink_extent_backref+0x2ed/0x780 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa0162fe0>] ? btrfs_submit_bio_hook+0x1e0/0x1e0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa01b8ed7>] ? iterate_inodes_from_logical+0x87/0xa0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa016b909>] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x229/0xac0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa016c3b5>] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa018cbe5>] worker_loop+0x125/0x4e0 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffffa018cac0>] ? btrfs_queue_worker+0x300/0x300 [btrfs]
        [<ffffffff81075ea0>] kthread+0xc0/0xd0
        [<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40
        [<ffffffff8164796c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0
        [<ffffffff81075de0>] ? insert_kthread_work+0x40/0x40
      ----------------------------------------------------------------------
      
      It turns out to be that balance operation will bump root's @last_snapshot,
      which enables snapshot-aware defrag path, and backref walking stuff will
      find data reloc tree as refs' parent, and hit the BUG_ON() during COW.
      
      As data reloc tree's data is just for relocation purpose, and will be deleted right
      after relocation is done, it's unnecessary to walk those refs belonged to data reloc
      tree, it'd be better to skip them.
      Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      48ec4736
    • R
      btrfs: drop unused parameter from btrfs_item_nr · dd3cc16b
      Ross Kirk 提交于
      Remove unused eb parameter from btrfs_item_nr
      Signed-off-by: NRoss Kirk <ross.kirk@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      dd3cc16b
  4. 01 9月, 2013 6 次提交
  5. 10 8月, 2013 2 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: make sure the backref walker catches all refs to our extent · ed8c4913
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Because we don't mess with the offset into the extent for compressed we will
      properly find both extents for this case
      
      [extent a][extent b][rest of extent a]
      
      but because we already added a ref for the front half we won't add the inode
      information for the second half.  This causes us to leak that memory and not
      print out the other offset when we do logical-resolve.  So fix this by calling
      ulist_add_merge and then add our eie to the existing entry if there is one.
      With this patch we get both offsets out of logical-resolve.  With this and the
      other 2 patches I've sent we now pass btrfs/276 on my vm with compress-force=lzo
      set.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      ed8c4913
    • J
      Btrfs: fix backref walking when we hit a compressed extent · 8ca15e05
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      If you do btrfs inspect-internal logical-resolve on a compressed extent that has
      been partly overwritten it won't find anything.  This is because we try and
      match the extent offset we've searched for based on the extent offset in the
      data extent entry.  However this doesn't work for compressed extents because the
      offsets are for the uncompressed size, not the compressed size.  So instead only
      do this check if we are not compressed, that way we can get an actual entry for
      the physical offset rather than nothing for compressed.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
      8ca15e05
  6. 02 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  7. 01 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • J
      Btrfs: cleanup backref search commit root flag stuff · da61d31a
      Josef Bacik 提交于
      Looking into this backref problem I noticed we're using a macro to what turns
      out to essentially be a NULL check to see if we need to search the commit root.
      I'm killing this, let's just do what everybody else does and checks if trans ==
      NULL.  I've also made it so we pass in the path to __resolve_indirect_refs which
      will have the search_commit_root flag set properly already and that way we can
      avoid allocating another path when we have a perfectly good one to use.  Thanks,
      Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
      da61d31a
  8. 18 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 07 5月, 2013 8 次提交
  10. 27 2月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 13 12月, 2012 2 次提交
  12. 26 10月, 2012 2 次提交