1. 29 6月, 2021 1 次提交
  2. 12 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  3. 11 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  4. 07 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 06 5月, 2021 1 次提交
  6. 04 5月, 2021 2 次提交
  7. 01 5月, 2021 2 次提交
    • M
      afs, rxrpc: Add Marc Dionne as co-maintainer · c5197b4e
      Marc Dionne 提交于
      Add Marc Dionne as a co-maintainer for kafs and rxrpc.
      Signed-off-by: NMarc Dionne <marc.dionne@auristor.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      c5197b4e
    • L
      MAINTAINERS: assign pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT · a3ddd79a
      Lukas Bulwahn 提交于
      Patch series "kernel-doc and MAINTAINERS clean-up".
      
      Roughly 900 warnings of about 21.000 kernel-doc warnings in the kernel
      tree warn with 'cannot understand function prototype:', i.e., the
      kernel-doc parser cannot parse the function's signature.  The majority,
      about 600 cases of those, are just struct definitions following the
      kernel-doc description.  Further, spot-check investigations suggest that
      the authors of the specific kernel-doc descriptions simply were not
      aware that the general format for a kernel-doc description for a
      structure requires to prefix the struct name with the keyword 'struct',
      as in 'struct struct_name - Brief description.'.  Details on kernel-doc
      are at the Link below.
      
      Without the struct keyword, kernel-doc does not check if the kernel-doc
      description fits to the actual struct definition in the source code.
      Fortunately, in roughly a quarter of these cases, the kernel-doc
      description is actually complete wrt.  its corresponding struct
      definition.  So, the trivial change adding the struct keyword will allow
      us to keep the kernel-doc descriptions more consistent for future
      changes, by checking for new kernel-doc warnings.
      
      Also, some of the files in ./include/ are not assigned to a specific
      MAINTAINERS section and hence have no dedicated maintainer.  So, if
      needed, the files in ./include/ are also assigned to the fitting
      MAINTAINERS section, as I need to identify whom to send the clean-up
      patch anyway.
      
      Here is the change from this kernel-doc janitorial work in the
      ./include/ directory for MEMORY MANAGEMENT.
      
      This patch (of 2):
      
      Commit a520110e ("mm: split out a new pagewalk.h header from mm.h")
      adds a new file in ./include/linux, but misses to update MAINTAINERS
      accordingly.  Hence,
      
        ./scripts/get_maintainers.pl include/linux/pagewalk.h
      
      points only to lkml as general fallback for all files, whereas the
      original include/linux/mm.h clearly marks this file part of MEMORY
      MANAGEMENT.
      
      Assign include/linux/pagewalk.h to MEMORY MANAGEMENT.
      
      Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-1-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com
      Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210322122542.15072-2-lukas.bulwahn@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NLukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@gmail.com>
      Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Cc: Ralf Ramsauer <ralf.ramsauer@oth-regensburg.de>
      Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a3ddd79a
  8. 30 4月, 2021 3 次提交
  9. 26 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  10. 25 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  11. 23 4月, 2021 6 次提交
  12. 21 4月, 2021 2 次提交
  13. 20 4月, 2021 9 次提交
  14. 17 4月, 2021 2 次提交
  15. 16 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  16. 15 4月, 2021 2 次提交
  17. 14 4月, 2021 4 次提交