- 26 4月, 2007 28 次提交
-
-
由 Peter Kovar 提交于
SMC SuperIO Chip LPC47N227 used for IrDA is not detected because its device identification byte can be 0x7A instead of 0x5A. Patch from Peter Kovar <peter.kovar@gmail.com> Cc: Jean Delvare <khali@linux-fr.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Samuel Ortiz 提交于
stir4200 doesn't need to include irlap.h Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <samuel@sortiz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Renaming skb->h to skb->transport_header, skb->nh to skb->network_header and skb->mac to skb->mac_header, to match the names of the associated helpers (skb[_[re]set]_{transport,network,mac}_header). Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the common sequence "skb->h.raw - skb->nh.raw", similar to skb->mac_len, that is precalculated tho, don't think we need to bloat skb with one more member, so just use this new helper, reducing the number of non-skbuff.h references to the layer headers even more. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the transport header, it is still legal to touch skb->h.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
The ip_hdrlen() buddy, created to reduce the number of skb->h.th-> uses and to avoid the longer, open coded equivalent. Ditched a no-op in bnx2 in the process. I wonder if we should have a BUG_ON(skb->h.th->doff < 5) in tcp_optlen()... Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the quite common 'skb->h.raw - skb->data' sequence. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the common, open coded 'skb->h.raw = skb->data' operation, so that we can later turn skb->h.raw into a offset, reducing the size of struct sk_buff in 64bit land while possibly keeping it as a pointer on 32bit. This one touches just the most simple cases: skb->h.raw = skb->data; skb->h.raw = {skb_push|[__]skb_pull}() The next ones will handle the slightly more "complex" cases. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Now the skb->nh union has just one member, .raw, i.e. it is just like the skb->mac union, strange, no? I'm just leaving it like that till the transport layer is done with, when we'll rename skb->mac.raw to skb->mac_header (or ->mac_header_offset?), ditto for ->{h,nh}. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the common sequence "skb->nh.iph->ihl * 4", removing a good number of open coded skb->nh.iph uses, now to go after the rest... Just out of curiosity, here are the idioms found to get the same result: skb->nh.iph->ihl << 2 skb->nh.iph->ihl<<2 skb->nh.iph->ihl * 4 skb->nh.iph->ihl*4 (skb->nh.iph)->ihl * sizeof(u32) Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the network header, it is still legal to touch skb->nh.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the quite common 'skb->nh.raw - skb->data' sequence. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the common, open coded 'skb->nh.raw = skb->data' operation, so that we can later turn skb->nh.raw into a offset, reducing the size of struct sk_buff in 64bit land while possibly keeping it as a pointer on 32bit. This one touches just the most simple case, next will handle the slightly more "complex" cases. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For consistency with all the other skb->nh.raw accessors. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For consistency with all the other skb->nh.raw accessors. Also do some really obvious simplifications in pppoe_recvmsg, well the kfree_skb one is not so obvious, but free() and kfree() have the same behaviour (hint :-) ). Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the places where we need a pointer to the mac header, it is still legal to touch skb->mac.raw directly if just adding to, subtracting from or setting it to another layer header. This one also converts some more cases to skb_reset_mac_header() that my regex missed as it had no spaces before nor after '=', ugh. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the cases where we want to set skb->mac.raw to an offset from skb->data. Simple cases first, the memmove ones and specially pktgen will be left for later. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
For the common, open coded 'skb->mac.raw = skb->data' operation, so that we can later turn skb->mac.raw into a offset, reducing the size of struct sk_buff in 64bit land while possibly keeping it as a pointer on 32bit. This one touches just the most simple case, next will handle the slightly more "complex" cases. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
One less thing for drivers writers to worry about. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Now all the _type_trans routines are consistent in this regard. Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo 提交于
Signed-off-by: NArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 25 4月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Michael Chan 提交于
Tweak a register setting to prevent the tx mailbox from halting. Update version to 1.5.8. Signed-off-by: NMichael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
sparc64: drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c: In function `ser12_open': drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c:417: error: `NR_IRQS' undeclared (first us e in this function) drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c:417: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once drivers/net/hamradio/baycom_ser_fdx.c:417: error: for each function it appears i n.) Cc: Folkert van Heusden <folkert@vanheusden.com> Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
The sis900 driver appears to have a bug in which the receive routine passes the skbuff holding the received frame to the network stack before refilling the buffer in the rx ring. If a new skbuff cannot be allocated, the driver simply leaves a hole in the rx ring, which causes the driver to stop receiving frames and become non-recoverable without an rmmod/insmod according to reporters. This patch reverses that order, attempting to allocate a replacement buffer first, and receiving the new frame only if one can be allocated. If no skbuff can be allocated, the current skbuf in the rx ring is recycled, dropping the current frame, but keeping the NIC operational. Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
-
由 Andrea Righi 提交于
The following patch fixes a kernel bug in depca_platform_probe(). We don't use a dynamic pointer for pldev->dev.platform_data, so it seems that the correct way to proceed if platform_device_add(pldev) fails is to explicitly set the pldev->dev.platform_data pointer to NULL, before calling the platform_device_put(pldev), or it will be kfree'ed by platform_device_release(). Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
-
- 24 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 S.Çağlar Onur 提交于
USRobotics Wireless Adapter (Model 5423) works well with current zd1211rw driver also (i have tested 2.6.18, 2.6.20 and 2.6.21-rc7). It just needs its ID added to the list of devices. Signed-off-by: NS.Çağlar Onur <caglar@pardus.org.tr> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 22 4月, 2007 3 次提交
-
-
由 Marcel van Nies 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarcel van Nies <morcles@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Marcel van Nies 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMarcel van Nies <morcles@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Marcel van Nies 提交于
The MAC address assignment at module loading is simply forgotten. The bug at module unloading is caused by an incorrect call. The bug at module unloading does not only happen for sunqe, sunlance and sunhme (sbus) suffer from it too. I've tested this on my SS20. Signed-off-by: NMarcel van Nies <morcles@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 4月, 2007 4 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
This reverts commit 60cba200. It's been linked to lockups of the e1000 hardware, see for example https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=229603 but it's likely that the commit itself is not really introducing the bug, but just allowing an unrelated problem to rear its ugly head (ie one current working theory is that the code exposes us to a hardware race condition by decreasing the amount of time we spend in each NAPI poll cycle). We'll revert it until root cause is known. Intel has a repeatable reproduction on two different machines and bus traces of the hardware doing something bad. Acked-by: NJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Cc: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@suse.de> Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> Cc: Auke Kok <auke-jan.h.kok@intel.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Paul Mackerras 提交于
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org> This fixes: Subject: kernel BUG at net/core/skbuff.c in linux-2.6.21-rc6 process_input_packet() treats the case where the first byte is 0xff (PPP_ALLSTATIONS) but the second byte is 0x03 (PPP_UI) as indicating a packet with a PPP protocol number of 0xff. Arguably that's wrong since PPP protocol 0xff is reserved, and the RFC does envision the possibility of receiving frames where the control field has values other than 0x03. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
The Yukon FE (100mbit only) chips do not support large packets. Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NJeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
-