Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 22 3月, 2023 1 次提交
  3. 30 12月, 2021 3 次提交
  5. 12 10月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 14 7月, 2021 10 次提交
  9. 10 7月, 2021 1 次提交
    • U
      mm/vmalloc: rework the drain logic · 9fe4fcab
      由 Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) 提交于 
      mainline inclusion
from mainline-5.11-rc1
commit 96e2db45
category: feature
bugzilla: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel/issues/I3ZG5D
CVE: NA

-------------------------------------------------

A current "lazy drain" model suffers from at least two issues.

First one is related to the unsorted list of vmap areas, thus in order to
identify the [min:max] range of areas to be drained, it requires a full
list scan.  What is a time consuming if the list is too long.

Second one and as a next step is about merging all fragments with a free
space.  What is also a time consuming because it has to iterate over
entire list which holds outstanding lazy areas.

See below the "preemptirqsoff" tracer that illustrates a high latency.  It
is ~24676us.  Our workloads like audio and video are effected by such long
latency:

<snip>
  tracer: preemptirqsoff

  preemptirqsoff latency trace v1.1.5 on 4.9.186-perf+
  --------------------------------------------------------------------
  latency: 24676 us, #4/4, CPU#1 | (M:preempt VP:0, KP:0, SP:0 HP:0 P:8)
     -----------------
     | task: crtc_commit:112-261 (uid:0 nice:0 policy:1 rt_prio:16)
     -----------------
   => started at: __purge_vmap_area_lazy
   => ended at:   __purge_vmap_area_lazy

                   _------=> CPU#
                  / _-----=> irqs-off
                 | / _----=> need-resched
                 || / _---=> hardirq/softirq
                 ||| / _--=> preempt-depth
                 |||| /     delay
   cmd     pid   ||||| time  |   caller
      \   /      |||||  \    |   /
crtc_com-261     1...1    1us*: _raw_spin_lock <-__purge_vmap_area_lazy
[...]
crtc_com-261     1...1 24675us : _raw_spin_unlock <-__purge_vmap_area_lazy
crtc_com-261     1...1 24677us : trace_preempt_on <-__purge_vmap_area_lazy
crtc_com-261     1...1 24683us : <stack trace>
 => free_vmap_area_noflush
 => remove_vm_area
 => __vunmap
 => vfree
 => drm_property_free_blob
 => drm_mode_object_unreference
 => drm_property_unreference_blob
 => __drm_atomic_helper_crtc_destroy_state
 => sde_crtc_destroy_state
 => drm_atomic_state_default_clear
 => drm_atomic_state_clear
 => drm_atomic_state_free
 => complete_commit
 => _msm_drm_commit_work_cb
 => kthread_worker_fn
 => kthread
 => ret_from_fork
<snip>

To address those two issues we can redesign a purging of the outstanding
lazy areas.  Instead of queuing vmap areas to the list, we replace it by
the separate rb-tree.  In hat case an area is located in the tree/list in
ascending order.  It will give us below advantages:

a) Outstanding vmap areas are merged creating bigger coalesced blocks,
   thus it becomes less fragmented.

b) It is possible to calculate a flush range [min:max] without scanning
   all elements.  It is O(1) access time or complexity;

c) The final merge of areas with the rb-tree that represents a free
   space is faster because of (a).  As a result the lock contention is
   also reduced.

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201116220033.1837-2-urezki@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NUladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Cc: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleksiy Avramchenko <oleksiy.avramchenko@sonymobile.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: huang ying <huang.ying.caritas@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
(cherry picked from commit 96e2db45)
Signed-off-by: NYue Zou <zouyue3@huawei.com>
Reviewed-by: Nchenwandun <chenwandun@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NZheng Zengkai <zhengzengkai@huawei.com>
      9fe4fcab
  11. 28 1月, 2021 1 次提交
  13. 12 1月, 2021 2 次提交
  15. 19 10月, 2020 6 次提交
  17. 14 10月, 2020 2 次提交
  19. 22 8月, 2020 1 次提交
  21. 08 8月, 2020 8 次提交
  23. 26 6月, 2020 2 次提交
  25. 05 6月, 2020 1 次提交
  27. 03 6月, 2020 1 次提交