1. 06 8月, 2013 2 次提交
  2. 05 8月, 2013 17 次提交
  3. 27 7月, 2013 4 次提交
  4. 25 7月, 2013 8 次提交
  5. 24 7月, 2013 7 次提交
  6. 21 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: fix up gt init sequence fallout · 181d1b9e
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The regression fix for gen6+ rps fallout
      
      commit 7dcd2677
      Author: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
      Date:   Wed Jul 17 10:22:58 2013 +0400
      
          drm/i915: fix long-standing SNB regression in power consumption after resume
      
      unintentionally also changed the init sequence ordering between
      gt_init and gt_reset - we need to reset BIOS damage like leftover
      forcewake references before we run our own code. Otherwise we can get
      nasty dmesg noise like
      
      [drm:__gen6_gt_force_wake_mt_get] *ERROR* Timed out waiting for forcewake old ack to clear.
      
      again. Since _reset suggests that we first need to have stuff
      initialized (which isn't the case here) call it sanitze instead.
      
      While at it also block out the rps disable introduced by the above
      commit on ilk: We don't have any knowledge of ilk rps being broken in
      similar ways. And the disable functions uses the default hw state
      which is only read out when we're enabling rps. So essentially we've
      been writing random grabage into that register.
      Reported-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org>
      Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Tested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      181d1b9e
  7. 20 7月, 2013 1 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915: Serialize almost all register access · a7cd1b8f
      Chris Wilson 提交于
      In theory, the different register blocks were meant to be only ever
      touched when holding either the struct_mutex, mode_config.lock or even a
      specific localised lock. This does not seem to be the case, and the
      hardware reacts extremely badly if we attempt to concurrently access two
      registers within the same cacheline.
      
      The HSD suggests that we only need to do this workaround for display
      range registers. However, upon review we need to serialize the multiple
      stages in our register write functions - if only for preemption
      protection.
      
      Irrespective of the hardware requirements, the current io functions are
      a little too loose with respect to the combination of pre- and
      post-condition testing that we do in conjunction with the actual io. As
      a result, we may be pre-empted and generate both false-postive and
      false-negative errors.
      
      Note well that this is a "90%" solution, there remains a few direct
      users of ioread/iowrite which will be fixed up in the next few patches.
      Since they are more invasive and that this simple change will prevent
      almost all lockups on Haswell, we kept this patch simple to facilitate
      backporting to stable.
      
      Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63914Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      a7cd1b8f