Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
12 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 31 7月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 21 7月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      bpf: introduce bpf_skb_vlan_push/pop() helpers · 4e10df9a
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      Allow eBPF programs attached to TC qdiscs call skb_vlan_push/pop via
helper functions. These functions may change skb->data/hlen which are
cached by some JITs to improve performance of ld_abs/ld_ind instructions.
Therefore JITs need to recognize bpf_skb_vlan_push/pop() calls,
re-compute header len and re-cache skb->data/hlen back into cpu registers.
Note, skb->data/hlen are not directly accessible from the programs,
so any changes to skb->data done either by these helpers or by other
TC actions are safe.

eBPF JIT supported by three architectures:
- arm64 JIT is using bpf_load_pointer() without caching, so it's ok as-is.
- x64 JIT re-caches skb->data/hlen unconditionally after vlan_push/pop calls
  (experiments showed that conditional re-caching is slower).
- s390 JIT falls back to interpreter for now when bpf_skb_vlan_push() is present
  in the program (re-caching is tbd).

These helpers allow more scalable handling of vlan from the programs.
Instead of creating thousands of vlan netdevs on top of eth0 and attaching
TC+ingress+bpf to all of them, the program can be attached to eth0 directly
and manipulate vlans as necessary.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4e10df9a
  5. 22 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • A
      bpf: allow bpf programs to tail-call other bpf programs · 04fd61ab
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      introduce bpf_tail_call(ctx, &jmp_table, index) helper function
which can be used from BPF programs like:
int bpf_prog(struct pt_regs *ctx)
{
  ...
  bpf_tail_call(ctx, &jmp_table, index);
  ...
}
that is roughly equivalent to:
int bpf_prog(struct pt_regs *ctx)
{
  ...
  if (jmp_table[index])
    return (*jmp_table[index])(ctx);
  ...
}
The important detail that it's not a normal call, but a tail call.
The kernel stack is precious, so this helper reuses the current
stack frame and jumps into another BPF program without adding
extra call frame.
It's trivially done in interpreter and a bit trickier in JITs.
In case of x64 JIT the bigger part of generated assembler prologue
is common for all programs, so it is simply skipped while jumping.
Other JITs can do similar prologue-skipping optimization or
do stack unwind before jumping into the next program.

bpf_tail_call() arguments:
ctx - context pointer
jmp_table - one of BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY maps used as the jump table
index - index in the jump table

Since all BPF programs are idenitified by file descriptor, user space
need to populate the jmp_table with FDs of other BPF programs.
If jmp_table[index] is empty the bpf_tail_call() doesn't jump anywhere
and program execution continues as normal.

New BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY map type is introduced so that user space can
populate this jmp_table array with FDs of other bpf programs.
Programs can share the same jmp_table array or use multiple jmp_tables.

The chain of tail calls can form unpredictable dynamic loops therefore
tail_call_cnt is used to limit the number of calls and currently is set to 32.

Use cases:
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>

==========
- simplify complex programs by splitting them into a sequence of small programs

- dispatch routine
  For tracing and future seccomp the program may be triggered on all system
  calls, but processing of syscall arguments will be different. It's more
  efficient to implement them as:
  int syscall_entry(struct seccomp_data *ctx)
  {
     bpf_tail_call(ctx, &syscall_jmp_table, ctx->nr /* syscall number */);
     ... default: process unknown syscall ...
  }
  int sys_write_event(struct seccomp_data *ctx) {...}
  int sys_read_event(struct seccomp_data *ctx) {...}
  syscall_jmp_table[__NR_write] = sys_write_event;
  syscall_jmp_table[__NR_read] = sys_read_event;

  For networking the program may call into different parsers depending on
  packet format, like:
  int packet_parser(struct __sk_buff *skb)
  {
     ... parse L2, L3 here ...
     __u8 ipproto = load_byte(skb, ... offsetof(struct iphdr, protocol));
     bpf_tail_call(skb, &ipproto_jmp_table, ipproto);
     ... default: process unknown protocol ...
  }
  int parse_tcp(struct __sk_buff *skb) {...}
  int parse_udp(struct __sk_buff *skb) {...}
  ipproto_jmp_table[IPPROTO_TCP] = parse_tcp;
  ipproto_jmp_table[IPPROTO_UDP] = parse_udp;

- for TC use case, bpf_tail_call() allows to implement reclassify-like logic

- bpf_map_update_elem/delete calls into BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY jump table
  are atomic, so user space can build chains of BPF programs on the fly

Implementation details:
=======================
- high performance of bpf_tail_call() is the goal.
  It could have been implemented without JIT changes as a wrapper on top of
  BPF_PROG_RUN() macro, but with two downsides:
  . all programs would have to pay performance penalty for this feature and
    tail call itself would be slower, since mandatory stack unwind, return,
    stack allocate would be done for every tailcall.
  . tailcall would be limited to programs running preempt_disabled, since
    generic 'void *ctx' doesn't have room for 'tail_call_cnt' and it would
    need to be either global per_cpu variable accessed by helper and by wrapper
    or global variable protected by locks.

  In this implementation x64 JIT bypasses stack unwind and jumps into the
  callee program after prologue.

- bpf_prog_array_compatible() ensures that prog_type of callee and caller
  are the same and JITed/non-JITed flag is the same, since calling JITed
  program from non-JITed is invalid, since stack frames are different.
  Similarly calling kprobe type program from socket type program is invalid.

- jump table is implemented as BPF_MAP_TYPE_PROG_ARRAY to reuse 'map'
  abstraction, its user space API and all of verifier logic.
  It's in the existing arraymap.c file, since several functions are
  shared with regular array map.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      04fd61ab
  7. 15 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • D
      test_bpf: add tests related to BPF_MAXINSNS · a4afd37b
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      Couple of torture test cases related to the bug fixed in 0b59d880
("ARM: net: delegate filter to kernel interpreter when imm_offset()
return value can't fit into 12bits.").

I've added a helper to allocate and fill the insn space. Output on
x86_64 from my laptop:

test_bpf: #233 BPF_MAXINSNS: Maximum possible literals jited:0 7 PASS
test_bpf: #234 BPF_MAXINSNS: Single literal jited:0 8 PASS
test_bpf: #235 BPF_MAXINSNS: Run/add until end jited:0 11553 PASS
test_bpf: #236 BPF_MAXINSNS: Too many instructions PASS
test_bpf: #237 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump jited:0 9 PASS
test_bpf: #238 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:0 20329 20398 PASS
test_bpf: #239 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:0 32178 32475 PASS
test_bpf: #240 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:0 10518 PASS

test_bpf: #233 BPF_MAXINSNS: Maximum possible literals jited:1 4 PASS
test_bpf: #234 BPF_MAXINSNS: Single literal jited:1 4 PASS
test_bpf: #235 BPF_MAXINSNS: Run/add until end jited:1 1625 PASS
test_bpf: #236 BPF_MAXINSNS: Too many instructions PASS
test_bpf: #237 BPF_MAXINSNS: Very long jump jited:1 8 PASS
test_bpf: #238 BPF_MAXINSNS: Ctx heavy transformations jited:1 3301 3174 PASS
test_bpf: #239 BPF_MAXINSNS: Call heavy transformations jited:1 24107 23491 PASS
test_bpf: #240 BPF_MAXINSNS: Jump heavy test jited:1 8651 PASS
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@freebox.fr>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a4afd37b
  9. 13 5月, 2015 1 次提交
  11. 10 5月, 2015 3 次提交
  13. 25 3月, 2015 1 次提交
  15. 02 3月, 2015 2 次提交
  17. 06 12月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      net: sock: allow eBPF programs to be attached to sockets · 89aa0758
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      introduce new setsockopt() command:

setsockopt(sock, SOL_SOCKET, SO_ATTACH_BPF, &prog_fd, sizeof(prog_fd))

where prog_fd was received from syscall bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD, attr, ...)
and attr->prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER

setsockopt() calls bpf_prog_get() which increments refcnt of the program,
so it doesn't get unloaded while socket is using the program.

The same eBPF program can be attached to multiple sockets.

User task exit automatically closes socket which calls sk_filter_uncharge()
which decrements refcnt of eBPF program
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      89aa0758
  19. 27 9月, 2014 2 次提交
    • A
      bpf: handle pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insn · 0246e64d
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      eBPF programs passed from userspace are using pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 instructions
to refer to process-local map_fd. Scan the program for such instructions and
if FDs are valid, convert them to 'struct bpf_map' pointers which will be used
by verifier to check access to maps in bpf_map_lookup/update() calls.
If program passes verifier, convert pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 into generic by dropping
BPF_PSEUDO_MAP_FD flag.

Note that eBPF interpreter is generic and knows nothing about pseudo insns.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      0246e64d
    • A
      bpf: expand BPF syscall with program load/unload · 09756af4
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      eBPF programs are similar to kernel modules. They are loaded by the user
process and automatically unloaded when process exits. Each eBPF program is
a safe run-to-completion set of instructions. eBPF verifier statically
determines that the program terminates and is safe to execute.

The following syscall wrapper can be used to load the program:
int bpf_prog_load(enum bpf_prog_type prog_type,
                  const struct bpf_insn *insns, int insn_cnt,
                  const char *license)
{
    union bpf_attr attr = {
        .prog_type = prog_type,
        .insns = ptr_to_u64(insns),
        .insn_cnt = insn_cnt,
        .license = ptr_to_u64(license),
    };

    return bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD, &attr, sizeof(attr));
}
where 'insns' is an array of eBPF instructions and 'license' is a string
that must be GPL compatible to call helper functions marked gpl_only

Upon succesful load the syscall returns prog_fd.
Use close(prog_fd) to unload the program.

User space tests and examples follow in the later patches
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      09756af4
  21. 11 9月, 2014 1 次提交
  23. 10 9月, 2014 4 次提交
    • D
      net: bpf: be friendly to kmemcheck · 286aad3c
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      Reported by Mikulas Patocka, kmemcheck currently barks out a
false positive since we don't have special kmemcheck annotation
for bitfields used in bpf_prog structure.

We currently have jited:1, len:31 and thus when accessing len
while CONFIG_KMEMCHECK enabled, kmemcheck throws a warning that
we're reading uninitialized memory.

As we don't need the whole bit universe for pages member, we
can just split it to u16 and use a bool flag for jited instead
of a bitfield.
Signed-off-by: NMikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      286aad3c
    • D
      net: bpf: consolidate JIT binary allocator · 738cbe72
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      Introduced in commit 314beb9b ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit
against spraying attacks") and later on replicated in aa2d2c73
("s390/bpf,jit: address randomize and write protect jit code") for
s390 architecture, write protection for BPF JIT images got added and
a random start address of the JIT code, so that it's not on a page
boundary anymore.

Since both use a very similar allocator for the BPF binary header,
we can consolidate this code into the BPF core as it's mostly JIT
independant anyway.

This will also allow for future archs that support DEBUG_SET_MODULE_RONX
to just reuse instead of reimplementing it.

JIT tested on x86_64 and s390x with BPF test suite.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      738cbe72
    • A
      net: filter: split filter.h and expose eBPF to user space · daedfb22
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      allow user space to generate eBPF programs

uapi/linux/bpf.h: eBPF instruction set definition

linux/filter.h: the rest

This patch only moves macro definitions, but practically it freezes existing
eBPF instruction set, though new instructions can still be added in the future.

These eBPF definitions cannot go into uapi/linux/filter.h, since the names
may conflict with existing applications.

Full eBPF ISA description is in Documentation/networking/filter.txt
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      daedfb22
    • A
      net: filter: add "load 64-bit immediate" eBPF instruction · 02ab695b
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      add BPF_LD_IMM64 instruction to load 64-bit immediate value into a register.
All previous instructions were 8-byte. This is first 16-byte instruction.
Two consecutive 'struct bpf_insn' blocks are interpreted as single instruction:
insn[0].code = BPF_LD | BPF_DW | BPF_IMM
insn[0].dst_reg = destination register
insn[0].imm = lower 32-bit
insn[1].code = 0
insn[1].imm = upper 32-bit
All unused fields must be zero.

Classic BPF has similar instruction: BPF_LD | BPF_W | BPF_IMM
which loads 32-bit immediate value into a register.

x64 JITs it as single 'movabsq %rax, imm64'
arm64 may JIT as sequence of four 'movk x0, #imm16, lsl #shift' insn

Note that old eBPF programs are binary compatible with new interpreter.

It helps eBPF programs load 64-bit constant into a register with one
instruction instead of using two registers and 4 instructions:
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R1, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_IMM(BPF_LSH, R1, 32)
BPF_MOV32_IMM(R2, imm32)
BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_OR, R1, R2)

User space generated programs will use this instruction to load constants only.

To tell kernel that user space needs a pointer the _pseudo_ variant of
this instruction may be added later, which will use extra bits of encoding
to indicate what type of pointer user space is asking kernel to provide.
For example 'off' or 'src_reg' fields can be used for such purpose.
src_reg = 1 could mean that user space is asking kernel to validate and
load in-kernel map pointer.
src_reg = 2 could mean that user space needs readonly data section pointer
src_reg = 3 could mean that user space needs a pointer to per-cpu local data
All such future pseudo instructions will not be carrying the actual pointer
as part of the instruction, but rather will be treated as a request to kernel
to provide one. The kernel will verify the request_for_a_pointer, then
will drop _pseudo_ marking and will store actual internal pointer inside
the instruction, so the end result is the interpreter and JITs never
see pseudo BPF_LD_IMM64 insns and only operate on generic BPF_LD_IMM64 that
loads 64-bit immediate into a register. User space never operates on direct
pointers and verifier can easily recognize request_for_pointer vs other
instructions.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      02ab695b
  25. 06 9月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      net: bpf: make eBPF interpreter images read-only · 60a3b225
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      With eBPF getting more extended and exposure to user space is on it's way,
hardening the memory range the interpreter uses to steer its command flow
seems appropriate.  This patch moves the to be interpreted bytecode to
read-only pages.

In case we execute a corrupted BPF interpreter image for some reason e.g.
caused by an attacker which got past a verifier stage, it would not only
provide arbitrary read/write memory access but arbitrary function calls
as well. After setting up the BPF interpreter image, its contents do not
change until destruction time, thus we can setup the image on immutable
made pages in order to mitigate modifications to that code. The idea
is derived from commit 314beb9b ("x86: bpf_jit_comp: secure bpf jit
against spraying attacks").

This is possible because bpf_prog is not part of sk_filter anymore.
After setup bpf_prog cannot be altered during its life-time. This prevents
any modifications to the entire bpf_prog structure (incl. function/JIT
image pointer).

Every eBPF program (including classic BPF that are migrated) have to call
bpf_prog_select_runtime() to select either interpreter or a JIT image
as a last setup step, and they all are being freed via bpf_prog_free(),
including non-JIT. Therefore, we can easily integrate this into the
eBPF life-time, plus since we directly allocate a bpf_prog, we have no
performance penalty.

Tested with seccomp and test_bpf testsuite in JIT/non-JIT mode and manual
inspection of kernel_page_tables.  Brad Spengler proposed the same idea
via Twitter during development of this patch.

Joint work with Hannes Frederic Sowa.
Suggested-by: NBrad Spengler <spender@grsecurity.net>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NHannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      60a3b225
  27. 03 8月, 2014 5 次提交
  29. 25 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  31. 14 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  33. 09 7月, 2014 1 次提交
  35. 11 6月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      net: filter: cleanup A/X name usage · e430f34e
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      The macro 'A' used in internal BPF interpreter:
 #define A regs[insn->a_reg]
was easily confused with the name of classic BPF register 'A', since
'A' would mean two different things depending on context.

This patch is trying to clean up the naming and clarify its usage in the
following way:

- A and X are names of two classic BPF registers

- BPF_REG_A denotes internal BPF register R0 used to map classic register A
  in internal BPF programs generated from classic

- BPF_REG_X denotes internal BPF register R7 used to map classic register X
  in internal BPF programs generated from classic

- internal BPF instruction format:
struct sock_filter_int {
        __u8    code;           /* opcode */
        __u8    dst_reg:4;      /* dest register */
        __u8    src_reg:4;      /* source register */
        __s16   off;            /* signed offset */
        __s32   imm;            /* signed immediate constant */
};

- BPF_X/BPF_K is 1 bit used to encode source operand of instruction
In classic:
  BPF_X - means use register X as source operand
  BPF_K - means use 32-bit immediate as source operand
In internal:
  BPF_X - means use 'src_reg' register as source operand
  BPF_K - means use 32-bit immediate as source operand
Suggested-by: NChema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NChema Gonzalez <chema@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      e430f34e
  37. 02 6月, 2014 2 次提交
    • D
      net: filter: improve filter block macros · f8f6d679
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      Commit 9739eef1 ("net: filter: make BPF conversion more readable")
started to introduce helper macros similar to BPF_STMT()/BPF_JUMP()
macros from classic BPF.

However, quite some statements in the filter conversion functions
remained in the old style which gives a mixture of block macros and
non block macros in the code. This patch makes the block macros itself
more readable by using explicit member initialization, and converts
the remaining ones where possible to remain in a more consistent state.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      f8f6d679
    • D
      net: filter: get rid of BPF_S_* enum · 34805931
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      This patch finally allows us to get rid of the BPF_S_* enum.
Currently, the code performs unnecessary encode and decode
workarounds in seccomp and filter migration itself when a filter
is being attached in order to overcome BPF_S_* encoding which
is not used anymore by the new interpreter resp. JIT compilers.

Keeping it around would mean that also in future we would need
to extend and maintain this enum and related encoders/decoders.
We can get rid of all that and save us these operations during
filter attaching. Naturally, also JIT compilers need to be updated
by this.

Before JIT conversion is being done, each compiler checks if A
is being loaded at startup to obtain information if it needs to
emit instructions to clear A first. Since BPF extensions are a
subset of BPF_LD | BPF_{W,H,B} | BPF_ABS variants, case statements
for extensions can be removed at that point. To ease and minimalize
code changes in the classic JITs, we have introduced bpf_anc_helper().

Tested with test_bpf on x86_64 (JIT, int), s390x (JIT, int),
arm (JIT, int), i368 (int), ppc64 (JIT, int); for sparc we
unfortunately didn't have access, but changes are analogous to
the rest.

Joint work with Alexei Starovoitov.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Mircea Gherzan <mgherzan@gmail.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: NChema Gonzalez <chemag@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      34805931
  39. 24 5月, 2014 2 次提交
  41. 22 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      net: filter: cleanup invocation of internal BPF · 5fe821a9
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      Kernel API for classic BPF socket filters is:

sk_unattached_filter_create() - validate classic BPF, convert, JIT
SK_RUN_FILTER() - run it
sk_unattached_filter_destroy() - destroy socket filter

Cleanup internal BPF kernel API as following:

sk_filter_select_runtime() - final step of internal BPF creation.
  Try to JIT internal BPF program, if JIT is not available select interpreter
SK_RUN_FILTER() - run it
sk_filter_free() - free internal BPF program

Disallow direct calls to BPF interpreter. Execution of the BPF program should
be done with SK_RUN_FILTER() macro.

Example of internal BPF create, run, destroy:

  struct sk_filter *fp;

  fp = kzalloc(sk_filter_size(prog_len), GFP_KERNEL);
  memcpy(fp->insni, prog, prog_len * sizeof(fp->insni[0]));
  fp->len = prog_len;

  sk_filter_select_runtime(fp);

  SK_RUN_FILTER(fp, ctx);

  sk_filter_free(fp);

Sockets, seccomp, testsuite, tracing are using different ways to populate
sk_filter, so first steps of program creation are not common.
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5fe821a9
  43. 16 5月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      net: filter: x86: internal BPF JIT · 62258278
      由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于 
      Maps all internal BPF instructions into x86_64 instructions.
This patch replaces original BPF x64 JIT with internal BPF x64 JIT.
sysctl net.core.bpf_jit_enable is reused as on/off switch.

Performance:

1. old BPF JIT and internal BPF JIT generate equivalent x86_64 code.
  No performance difference is observed for filters that were JIT-able before

Example assembler code for BPF filter "tcpdump port 22"

original BPF -> old JIT:            original BPF -> internal BPF -> new JIT:
   0:   push   %rbp                      0:     push   %rbp
   1:   mov    %rsp,%rbp                 1:     mov    %rsp,%rbp
   4:   sub    $0x60,%rsp                4:     sub    $0x228,%rsp
   8:   mov    %rbx,-0x8(%rbp)           b:     mov    %rbx,-0x228(%rbp) // prologue
                                        12:     mov    %r13,-0x220(%rbp)
                                        19:     mov    %r14,-0x218(%rbp)
                                        20:     mov    %r15,-0x210(%rbp)
                                        27:     xor    %eax,%eax         // clear A
   c:   xor    %ebx,%ebx                29:     xor    %r13,%r13         // clear X
   e:   mov    0x68(%rdi),%r9d          2c:     mov    0x68(%rdi),%r9d
  12:   sub    0x6c(%rdi),%r9d          30:     sub    0x6c(%rdi),%r9d
  16:   mov    0xd8(%rdi),%r8           34:     mov    0xd8(%rdi),%r10
                                        3b:     mov    %rdi,%rbx
  1d:   mov    $0xc,%esi                3e:     mov    $0xc,%esi
  22:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e15       43:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd75
  27:   cmp    $0x86dd,%eax             48:     cmp    $0x86dd,%rax
  2c:   jne    0x0000000000000069       4f:     jne    0x000000000000009a
  2e:   mov    $0x14,%esi               51:     mov    $0x14,%esi
  33:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e31       56:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd91
  38:   cmp    $0x84,%eax               5b:     cmp    $0x84,%rax
  3d:   je     0x0000000000000049       62:     je     0x0000000000000074
  3f:   cmp    $0x6,%eax                64:     cmp    $0x6,%rax
  42:   je     0x0000000000000049       68:     je     0x0000000000000074
  44:   cmp    $0x11,%eax               6a:     cmp    $0x11,%rax
  47:   jne    0x00000000000000c6       6e:     jne    0x0000000000000117
  49:   mov    $0x36,%esi               74:     mov    $0x36,%esi
  4e:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e15       79:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd75
  53:   cmp    $0x16,%eax               7e:     cmp    $0x16,%rax
  56:   je     0x00000000000000bf       82:     je     0x0000000000000110
  58:   mov    $0x38,%esi               88:     mov    $0x38,%esi
  5d:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e15       8d:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd75
  62:   cmp    $0x16,%eax               92:     cmp    $0x16,%rax
  65:   je     0x00000000000000bf       96:     je     0x0000000000000110
  67:   jmp    0x00000000000000c6       98:     jmp    0x0000000000000117
  69:   cmp    $0x800,%eax              9a:     cmp    $0x800,%rax
  6e:   jne    0x00000000000000c6       a1:     jne    0x0000000000000117
  70:   mov    $0x17,%esi               a3:     mov    $0x17,%esi
  75:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e31       a8:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd91
  7a:   cmp    $0x84,%eax               ad:     cmp    $0x84,%rax
  7f:   je     0x000000000000008b       b4:     je     0x00000000000000c2
  81:   cmp    $0x6,%eax                b6:     cmp    $0x6,%rax
  84:   je     0x000000000000008b       ba:     je     0x00000000000000c2
  86:   cmp    $0x11,%eax               bc:     cmp    $0x11,%rax
  89:   jne    0x00000000000000c6       c0:     jne    0x0000000000000117
  8b:   mov    $0x14,%esi               c2:     mov    $0x14,%esi
  90:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e15       c7:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd75
  95:   test   $0x1fff,%ax              cc:     test   $0x1fff,%rax
  99:   jne    0x00000000000000c6       d3:     jne    0x0000000000000117
                                        d5:     mov    %rax,%r14
  9b:   mov    $0xe,%esi                d8:     mov    $0xe,%esi
  a0:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e44       dd:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd91 // MSH
                                        e2:     and    $0xf,%eax
                                        e5:     shl    $0x2,%eax
                                        e8:     mov    %rax,%r13
                                        eb:     mov    %r14,%rax
                                        ee:     mov    %r13,%rsi
  a5:   lea    0xe(%rbx),%esi           f1:     add    $0xe,%esi
  a8:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e0d       f4:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd6d
  ad:   cmp    $0x16,%eax               f9:     cmp    $0x16,%rax
  b0:   je     0x00000000000000bf       fd:     je     0x0000000000000110
                                        ff:     mov    %r13,%rsi
  b2:   lea    0x10(%rbx),%esi         102:     add    $0x10,%esi
  b5:   callq  0xffffffffe1021e0d      105:     callq  0xffffffffe102bd6d
  ba:   cmp    $0x16,%eax              10a:     cmp    $0x16,%rax
  bd:   jne    0x00000000000000c6      10e:     jne    0x0000000000000117
  bf:   mov    $0xffff,%eax            110:     mov    $0xffff,%eax
  c4:   jmp    0x00000000000000c8      115:     jmp    0x000000000000011c
  c6:   xor    %eax,%eax               117:     mov    $0x0,%eax
  c8:   mov    -0x8(%rbp),%rbx         11c:     mov    -0x228(%rbp),%rbx // epilogue
  cc:   leaveq                         123:     mov    -0x220(%rbp),%r13
  cd:   retq                           12a:     mov    -0x218(%rbp),%r14
                                       131:     mov    -0x210(%rbp),%r15
                                       138:     leaveq
                                       139:     retq

On fully cached SKBs both JITed functions take 12 nsec to execute.
BPF interpreter executes the program in 30 nsec.

The difference in generated assembler is due to the following:

Old BPF imlements LDX_MSH instruction via sk_load_byte_msh() helper function
inside bpf_jit.S.
New JIT removes the helper and does it explicitly, so ldx_msh cost
is the same for both JITs, but generated code looks longer.

New JIT has 4 registers to save, so prologue/epilogue are larger,
but the cost is within noise on x64.

Old JIT checks whether first insn clears A and if not emits 'xor %eax,%eax'.
New JIT clears %rax unconditionally.

2. old BPF JIT doesn't support ANC_NLATTR, ANC_PAY_OFFSET, ANC_RANDOM
  extensions. New JIT supports all BPF extensions.
  Performance of such filters improves 2-4 times depending on a filter.
  The longer the filter the higher performance gain.
  Synthetic benchmarks with many ancillary loads see 20x speedup
  which seems to be the maximum gain from JIT

Notes:

. net.core.bpf_jit_enable=2 + tools/net/bpf_jit_disasm is still functional
  and can be used to see generated assembler

. there are two jit_compile() functions and code flow for classic filters is:
  sk_attach_filter() - load classic BPF
  bpf_jit_compile() - try to JIT from classic BPF
  sk_convert_filter() - convert classic to internal
  bpf_int_jit_compile() - JIT from internal BPF

  seccomp and tracing filters will just call bpf_int_jit_compile()
Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      62258278
  45. 12 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  47. 05 5月, 2014 2 次提交
    • D
      net: filter: make register naming more comprehensible · 30743837
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      The current code is a bit hard to parse on which registers can be used,
how they are mapped and all play together. It makes much more sense to
define this a bit more clearly so that the code is a bit more intuitive.
This patch cleans this up, and makes naming a bit more consistent among
the code. This also allows for moving some of the defines into the header
file. Clearing of A and X registers in __sk_run_filter() do not get a
particular register name assigned as they have not an 'official' function,
but rather just result from the concrete initial mapping of old BPF
programs. Since for BPF helper functions for BPF_CALL we already use
small letters, so be consistent here as well. No functional changes.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      30743837
    • D
      net: filter: simplify label names from jump-table · 5bcfedf0
      由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于 
      This patch simplifies label naming for the BPF jump-table.
When we define labels via DL(), we just concatenate/textify
the combination of instruction opcode which consists of the
class, subclass, word size, target register and so on. Each
time we leave BPF_ prefix intact, so that e.g. the preprocessor
generates a label BPF_ALU_BPF_ADD_BPF_X for DL(BPF_ALU, BPF_ADD,
BPF_X) whereas a label name of ALU_ADD_X is much more easy
to grasp. Pure cleanup only.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com>
Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      5bcfedf0
  49. 23 4月, 2014 1 次提交