1. 22 12月, 2018 5 次提交
  2. 11 10月, 2018 2 次提交
  3. 03 10月, 2018 1 次提交
    • E
      signal: Distinguish between kernel_siginfo and siginfo · ae7795bc
      Eric W. Biederman 提交于
      Linus recently observed that if we did not worry about the padding
      member in struct siginfo it is only about 48 bytes, and 48 bytes is
      much nicer than 128 bytes for allocating on the stack and copying
      around in the kernel.
      
      The obvious thing of only adding the padding when userspace is
      including siginfo.h won't work as there are sigframe definitions in
      the kernel that embed struct siginfo.
      
      So split siginfo in two; kernel_siginfo and siginfo.  Keeping the
      traditional name for the userspace definition.  While the version that
      is used internally to the kernel and ultimately will not be padded to
      128 bytes is called kernel_siginfo.
      
      The definition of struct kernel_siginfo I have put in include/signal_types.h
      
      A set of buildtime checks has been added to verify the two structures have
      the same field offsets.
      
      To make it easy to verify the change kernel_siginfo retains the same
      size as siginfo.  The reduction in size comes in a following change.
      Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      ae7795bc
  4. 19 9月, 2018 2 次提交
  5. 24 7月, 2018 3 次提交
  6. 12 7月, 2018 1 次提交
  7. 23 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  8. 06 6月, 2018 1 次提交
  9. 05 5月, 2018 1 次提交
  10. 12 4月, 2018 3 次提交
    • D
      ipc/msg: introduce msgctl(MSG_STAT_ANY) · 23c8cec8
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      There is a permission discrepancy when consulting msq ipc object
      metadata between /proc/sysvipc/msg (0444) and the MSG_STAT shmctl
      command.  The later does permission checks for the object vs S_IRUGO.
      As such there can be cases where EACCESS is returned via syscall but the
      info is displayed anyways in the procfs files.
      
      While this might have security implications via info leaking (albeit no
      writing to the msq metadata), this behavior goes way back and showing
      all the objects regardless of the permissions was most likely an
      overlook - so we are stuck with it.  Furthermore, modifying either the
      syscall or the procfs file can cause userspace programs to break (ie
      ipcs).  Some applications require getting the procfs info (without root
      privileges) and can be rather slow in comparison with a syscall -- up to
      500x in some reported cases for shm.
      
      This patch introduces a new MSG_STAT_ANY command such that the msq ipc
      object permissions are ignored, and only audited instead.  In addition,
      I've left the lsm security hook checks in place, as if some policy can
      block the call, then the user has no other choice than just parsing the
      procfs file.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215162458.10059-4-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
      Reported-by: NRobert Kettler <robert.kettler@outlook.com>
      Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      23c8cec8
    • D
      ipc/sem: introduce semctl(SEM_STAT_ANY) · a280d6dc
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      There is a permission discrepancy when consulting shm ipc object
      metadata between /proc/sysvipc/sem (0444) and the SEM_STAT semctl
      command.  The later does permission checks for the object vs S_IRUGO.
      As such there can be cases where EACCESS is returned via syscall but the
      info is displayed anyways in the procfs files.
      
      While this might have security implications via info leaking (albeit no
      writing to the sma metadata), this behavior goes way back and showing
      all the objects regardless of the permissions was most likely an
      overlook - so we are stuck with it.  Furthermore, modifying either the
      syscall or the procfs file can cause userspace programs to break (ie
      ipcs).  Some applications require getting the procfs info (without root
      privileges) and can be rather slow in comparison with a syscall -- up to
      500x in some reported cases for shm.
      
      This patch introduces a new SEM_STAT_ANY command such that the sem ipc
      object permissions are ignored, and only audited instead.  In addition,
      I've left the lsm security hook checks in place, as if some policy can
      block the call, then the user has no other choice than just parsing the
      procfs file.
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215162458.10059-3-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
      Reported-by: NRobert Kettler <robert.kettler@outlook.com>
      Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a280d6dc
    • D
      ipc/shm: introduce shmctl(SHM_STAT_ANY) · c21a6970
      Davidlohr Bueso 提交于
      Patch series "sysvipc: introduce STAT_ANY commands", v2.
      
      The following patches adds the discussed (see [1]) new command for shm
      as well as for sems and msq as they are subject to the same
      discrepancies for ipc object permission checks between the syscall and
      via procfs.  These new commands are justified in that (1) we are stuck
      with this semantics as changing syscall and procfs can break userland;
      and (2) some users can benefit from performance (for large amounts of
      shm segments, for example) from not having to parse the procfs
      interface.
      
      Once merged, I will submit the necesary manpage updates.  But I'm thinking
      something like:
      
      : diff --git a/man2/shmctl.2 b/man2/shmctl.2
      : index 7bb503999941..bb00bbe21a57 100644
      : --- a/man2/shmctl.2
      : +++ b/man2/shmctl.2
      : @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
      :  .\" 2005-04-25, mtk -- noted aberrant Linux behavior w.r.t. new
      :  .\"	attaches to a segment that has already been marked for deletion.
      :  .\" 2005-08-02, mtk: Added IPC_INFO, SHM_INFO, SHM_STAT descriptions.
      : +.\" 2018-02-13, dbueso: Added SHM_STAT_ANY description.
      :  .\"
      :  .TH SHMCTL 2 2017-09-15 "Linux" "Linux Programmer's Manual"
      :  .SH NAME
      : @@ -242,6 +243,18 @@ However, the
      :  argument is not a segment identifier, but instead an index into
      :  the kernel's internal array that maintains information about
      :  all shared memory segments on the system.
      : +.TP
      : +.BR SHM_STAT_ANY " (Linux-specific)"
      : +Return a
      : +.I shmid_ds
      : +structure as for
      : +.BR SHM_STAT .
      : +However, the
      : +.I shm_perm.mode
      : +is not checked for read access for
      : +.IR shmid ,
      : +resembing the behaviour of
      : +/proc/sysvipc/shm.
      :  .PP
      :  The caller can prevent or allow swapping of a shared
      :  memory segment with the following \fIcmd\fP values:
      : @@ -287,7 +300,7 @@ operation returns the index of the highest used entry in the
      :  kernel's internal array recording information about all
      :  shared memory segments.
      :  (This information can be used with repeated
      : -.B SHM_STAT
      : +.B SHM_STAT/SHM_STAT_ANY
      :  operations to obtain information about all shared memory segments
      :  on the system.)
      :  A successful
      : @@ -328,7 +341,7 @@ isn't accessible.
      :  \fIshmid\fP is not a valid identifier, or \fIcmd\fP
      :  is not a valid command.
      :  Or: for a
      : -.B SHM_STAT
      : +.B SHM_STAT/SHM_STAT_ANY
      :  operation, the index value specified in
      :  .I shmid
      :  referred to an array slot that is currently unused.
      
      This patch (of 3):
      
      There is a permission discrepancy when consulting shm ipc object metadata
      between /proc/sysvipc/shm (0444) and the SHM_STAT shmctl command.  The
      later does permission checks for the object vs S_IRUGO.  As such there can
      be cases where EACCESS is returned via syscall but the info is displayed
      anyways in the procfs files.
      
      While this might have security implications via info leaking (albeit no
      writing to the shm metadata), this behavior goes way back and showing all
      the objects regardless of the permissions was most likely an overlook - so
      we are stuck with it.  Furthermore, modifying either the syscall or the
      procfs file can cause userspace programs to break (ie ipcs).  Some
      applications require getting the procfs info (without root privileges) and
      can be rather slow in comparison with a syscall -- up to 500x in some
      reported cases.
      
      This patch introduces a new SHM_STAT_ANY command such that the shm ipc
      object permissions are ignored, and only audited instead.  In addition,
      I've left the lsm security hook checks in place, as if some policy can
      block the call, then the user has no other choice than just parsing the
      procfs file.
      
      [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/12/19/220
      
      Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180215162458.10059-2-dave@stgolabs.netSigned-off-by: NDavidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>
      Cc: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
      Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
      Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      Cc: Robert Kettler <robert.kettler@outlook.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      c21a6970
  11. 28 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  12. 23 3月, 2018 4 次提交
  13. 07 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  14. 01 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 11 1月, 2018 1 次提交
  16. 28 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  17. 02 11月, 2017 1 次提交
  18. 04 10月, 2017 1 次提交
    • C
      lsm: fix smack_inode_removexattr and xattr_getsecurity memleak · 57e7ba04
      Casey Schaufler 提交于
      security_inode_getsecurity() provides the text string value
      of a security attribute. It does not provide a "secctx".
      The code in xattr_getsecurity() that calls security_inode_getsecurity()
      and then calls security_release_secctx() happened to work because
      SElinux and Smack treat the attribute and the secctx the same way.
      It fails for cap_inode_getsecurity(), because that module has no
      secctx that ever needs releasing. It turns out that Smack is the
      one that's doing things wrong by not allocating memory when instructed
      to do so by the "alloc" parameter.
      
      The fix is simple enough. Change the security_release_secctx() to
      kfree() because it isn't a secctx being returned by
      security_inode_getsecurity(). Change Smack to allocate the string when
      told to do so.
      
      Note: this also fixes memory leaks for LSMs which implement
      inode_getsecurity but not release_secctx, such as capabilities.
      Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
      Reported-by: NKonstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@yandex-team.ru>
      Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
      Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.l.morris@oracle.com>
      57e7ba04
  19. 02 8月, 2017 3 次提交
  20. 02 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 05 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  22. 06 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  23. 24 1月, 2017 1 次提交
  24. 19 1月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 13 1月, 2017 1 次提交