Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
11 个月 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

前往新版Gitcode，体验更适合开发者的 AI 搜索 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 18 4月, 2017 5 次提交
  3. 28 2月, 2017 3 次提交
  5. 17 2月, 2017 2 次提交
  7. 06 12月, 2016 5 次提交
  9. 29 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 01 11月, 2016 1 次提交
  13. 27 9月, 2016 1 次提交
  15. 26 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  17. 08 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  19. 30 5月, 2016 3 次提交
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race setting block group back to RW mode during device replace · 1a1a8b73
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      After it finishes processing a device extent, the device replace code sets
back the block group to RW mode and then after that it sets the left cursor
to match the logical end address of the block group, so that future writes
into extents belonging to the block group go both the source (old) and
target (new) devices. However from the moment we turn the block group
back to RW mode we have a short time window, that lasts until we update
the left cursor's value, where extents can be allocated from the block
group and written to, in which case they will not be copied/written to
the target (new) device. Fix this by updating the left cursor's value
before turning the block group back to RW mode.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      1a1a8b73
    • F
      Btrfs: fix unprotected assignment of the left cursor for device replace · 81e87a73
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      We were assigning new values to fields of the device replace object
without holding the respective lock after processing each device extent.
This is important for the left cursor field which can be accessed by a
concurrent task running __btrfs_map_block (which, correctly, takes the
device replace lock).
So change these fields while holding the device replace lock.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      81e87a73
    • F
      Btrfs: fix race setting block group readonly during device replace · f0e9b7d6
      由 Filipe Manana 提交于 
      When we do a device replace, for each device extent we find from the
source device, we set the corresponding block group to readonly mode to
prevent writes into it from happening while we are copying the device
extent from the source to the target device. However just before we set
the block group to readonly mode some concurrent task might have already
allocated an extent from it or decided it could perform a nocow write
into one of its extents, which can make the device replace process to
miss copying an extent since it uses the extent tree's commit root to
search for extents and only once it finishes searching for all extents
belonging to the block group it does set the left cursor to the logical
end address of the block group - this is a problem if the respective
ordered extents finish while we are searching for extents using the
extent tree's commit root and no transaction commit happens while we
are iterating the tree, since it's the delayed references created by the
ordered extents (when they complete) that insert the extent items into
the extent tree (using the non-commit root of course).
Example:

          CPU 1                                            CPU 2

 btrfs_dev_replace_start()
   btrfs_scrub_dev()
     scrub_enumerate_chunks()
       --> finds device extent belonging
           to block group X

                               <transaction N starts>

                                                      starts buffered write
                                                      against some inode

                                                      writepages is run against
                                                      that inode forcing dellaloc
                                                      to run

                                                      btrfs_writepages()
                                                        extent_writepages()
                                                          extent_write_cache_pages()
                                                            __extent_writepage()
                                                              writepage_delalloc()
                                                                run_delalloc_range()
                                                                  cow_file_range()
                                                                    btrfs_reserve_extent()
                                                                      --> allocates an extent
                                                                          from block group X
                                                                          (which is not yet
                                                                           in RO mode)
                                                                    btrfs_add_ordered_extent()
                                                                      --> creates ordered extent Y
                                                        flush_epd_write_bio()
                                                          --> bio against the extent from
                                                              block group X is submitted

       btrfs_inc_block_group_ro(bg X)
         --> sets block group X to readonly

       scrub_chunk(bg X)
         scrub_stripe(device extent from srcdev)
           --> keeps searching for extent items
               belonging to the block group using
               the extent tree's commit root
           --> it never blocks due to
               fs_info->scrub_pause_req as no
               one tries to commit transaction N
           --> copies all extents found from the
               source device into the target device
           --> finishes search loop

                                                        bio completes

                                                        ordered extent Y completes
                                                        and creates delayed data
                                                        reference which will add an
                                                        extent item to the extent
                                                        tree when run (typically
                                                        at transaction commit time)

                                                          --> so the task doing the
                                                              scrub/device replace
                                                              at CPU 1 misses this
                                                              and does not copy this
                                                              extent into the new/target
                                                              device

       btrfs_dec_block_group_ro(bg X)
         --> turns block group X back to RW mode

       dev_replace->cursor_left is set to the
       logical end offset of block group X

So fix this by waiting for all cow and nocow writes after setting a block
group to readonly mode.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
      f0e9b7d6
  21. 26 5月, 2016 2 次提交
  23. 16 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  25. 06 5月, 2016 3 次提交
  27. 29 4月, 2016 2 次提交
  29. 05 4月, 2016 1 次提交
    • K
      mm, fs: get rid of PAGE_CACHE_* and page_cache_{get,release} macros · 09cbfeaf
      由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于 
      PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} macros were introduced *long* time
ago with promise that one day it will be possible to implement page
cache with bigger chunks than PAGE_SIZE.

This promise never materialized.  And unlikely will.

We have many places where PAGE_CACHE_SIZE assumed to be equal to
PAGE_SIZE.  And it's constant source of confusion on whether
PAGE_CACHE_* or PAGE_* constant should be used in a particular case,
especially on the border between fs and mm.

Global switching to PAGE_CACHE_SIZE != PAGE_SIZE would cause to much
breakage to be doable.

Let's stop pretending that pages in page cache are special.  They are
not.

The changes are pretty straight-forward:

 - <foo> << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - <foo> >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT) -> <foo>;

 - PAGE_CACHE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN} -> PAGE_{SIZE,SHIFT,MASK,ALIGN};

 - page_cache_get() -> get_page();

 - page_cache_release() -> put_page();

This patch contains automated changes generated with coccinelle using
script below.  For some reason, coccinelle doesn't patch header files.
I've called spatch for them manually.

The only adjustment after coccinelle is revert of changes to
PAGE_CAHCE_ALIGN definition: we are going to drop it later.

There are few places in the code where coccinelle didn't reach.  I'll
fix them manually in a separate patch.  Comments and documentation also
will be addressed with the separate patch.

virtual patch

@@
expression E;
@@
- E << (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
expression E;
@@
- E >> (PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT - PAGE_SHIFT)
+ E

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT
+ PAGE_SHIFT

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_SIZE
+ PAGE_SIZE

@@
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_MASK
+ PAGE_MASK

@@
expression E;
@@
- PAGE_CACHE_ALIGN(E)
+ PAGE_ALIGN(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_get(E)
+ get_page(E)

@@
expression E;
@@
- page_cache_release(E)
+ put_page(E)
Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      09cbfeaf
  31. 12 3月, 2016 1 次提交
  33. 23 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • L
      Btrfs: fix lockdep deadlock warning due to dev_replace · 73beece9
      由 Liu Bo 提交于 
      Xfstests btrfs/011 complains about a deadlock warning,

[ 1226.649039] =========================================================
[ 1226.649039] [ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]
[ 1226.649039] 4.1.0+ #270 Not tainted
[ 1226.649039] ---------------------------------------------------------
[ 1226.652955] kswapd0/46 just changed the state of lock:
[ 1226.652955]  (&delayed_node->mutex){+.+.-.}, at: [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955] but this lock took another, RECLAIM_FS-unsafe lock in the past:
[ 1226.652955]  (&fs_info->dev_replace.lock){+.+.+.}

and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.

[ 1226.652955]
other info that might help us debug this:
[ 1226.652955] Chain exists of:
  &delayed_node->mutex --> &found->groups_sem --> &fs_info->dev_replace.lock

[ 1226.652955]  Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:

[ 1226.652955]        CPU0                    CPU1
[ 1226.652955]        ----                    ----
[ 1226.652955]   lock(&fs_info->dev_replace.lock);
[ 1226.652955]                                local_irq_disable();
[ 1226.652955]                                lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]                                lock(&found->groups_sem);
[ 1226.652955]   <Interrupt>
[ 1226.652955]     lock(&delayed_node->mutex);
[ 1226.652955]
 *** DEADLOCK ***

Commit 084b6e7c ("btrfs: Fix a lockdep warning when running xfstest.") tried
to fix a similar one that has the exactly same warning, but with that, we still
run to this.

The above lock chain comes from
btrfs_commit_transaction
  ->btrfs_run_delayed_items
    ...
    ->__btrfs_update_delayed_inode
      ...
      ->__btrfs_cow_block
         ...
         ->find_free_extent
            ->cache_block_group
              ->load_free_space_cache
                ->btrfs_readpages
                  ->submit_one_bio
                    ...
                    ->__btrfs_map_block
                      ->btrfs_dev_replace_lock

However, with high memory pressure, tasks which hold dev_replace.lock can
be interrupted by kswapd and then kswapd is intended to release memory occupied
by superblock, inodes and dentries, where we may call evict_inode, and it comes
to

[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81458735>] __btrfs_release_delayed_node+0x45/0x1d0
[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff81459e74>] btrfs_remove_delayed_node+0x24/0x30
[ 1226.652955]  [<ffffffff8140c5fe>] btrfs_evict_inode+0x34e/0x700

delayed_node->mutex may be acquired in __btrfs_release_delayed_node(), and it leads
to a ABBA deadlock.

To fix this, we can use "blocking rwlock" used in the case of extent_buffer, but
things are simpler here since we only needs read's spinlock to blocking lock.

With this, btrfs/011 no more produces warnings in dmesg.
Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      73beece9
  35. 11 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      btrfs: scrub: use GFP_KERNEL on the submission path · 58c4e173
      由 David Sterba 提交于 
      Scrub is not on the critical writeback path we don't need to use
GFP_NOFS for all allocations. The failures are handled and stats passed
back to userspace.

Let's use GFP_KERNEL on the paths where everything is ok, ie. setup the
global structures and the IO submission paths.

Functions that do the repair and fixups still use GFP_NOFS as we might
want to skip any other filesystem activity if we encounter an error.
This could turn out to be unnecessary, but requires more review compared
to the easy cases in this patch.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      58c4e173
  37. 23 1月, 2016 1 次提交
    • A
      wrappers for ->i_mutex access · 5955102c
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      parallel to mutex_{lock,unlock,trylock,is_locked,lock_nested},
inode_foo(inode) being mutex_foo(&inode->i_mutex).

Please, use those for access to ->i_mutex; over the coming cycle
->i_mutex will become rwsem, with ->lookup() done with it held
only shared.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      5955102c
  39. 20 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  41. 16 1月, 2016 1 次提交