Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 17 1月, 2013 1 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PM: Rework the handling of devices depending on power resources · bc9b6407
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Commit 0090def6 (ACPI: Add interface to register/unregister device
to/from power resources) made it possible to indicate to the ACPI
core that if the given device depends on any power resources, then
it should be resumed as soon as all of the power resources required
by it to transition to the D0 power state have been turned on.

Unfortunately, however, this was a mistake, because all devices
depending on power resources should be treated this way (i.e. they
should be resumed when all power resources required by their D0
state have been turned on) and for the majority of those devices
the ACPI core can figure out by itself which (physical) devices
depend on what power resources.

For this reason, replace the code added by commit 0090def6 with a
new, much more straightforward, mechanism that will be used
internally by the ACPI core and remove all references to that code
from kernel subsystems using ACPI.

For the cases when there are (physical) devices that should be
resumed whenever a not directly related ACPI device node goes into
D0 as a result of power resources configuration changes, like in
the SATA case, add two new routines, acpi_dev_pm_add_dependent()
and acpi_dev_pm_remove_dependent(), allowing subsystems to manage
such dependencies.  Convert the SATA subsystem to use the new
functions accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      bc9b6407
  3. 15 1月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 03 1月, 2013 5 次提交
    • R
      ACPI / PCI: Move the _PRT setup and cleanup code to pci-acpi.c · 38a9a67a
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Move the code related to _PRT setup and removal and to power
resources from acpi_pci_bind() and acpi_pci_unbind() to the .setup()
and .cleanup() callbacks in acpi_pci_bus and remove acpi_pci_bind()
and acpi_pci_unbind() that have no purpose any more.  Accordingly,
remove the code related to device .bind() and .unbind() operations
from the ACPI PCI root bridge driver.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      38a9a67a
    • R
      ACPI / PCI: Rework the setup and cleanup of device wakeup · d2e5f0c1
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Currently, the ACPI wakeup capability of PCI devices is set up
in two different places, partially in acpi_pci_bind() where
runtime wakeup is initialized and partially in
platform_pci_wakeup_init(), where system wakeup is initialized.
The cleanup is only done in acpi_pci_unbind() and it only covers
runtime wakeup.

Use the new .setup() and .cleanup() callbacks in struct acpi_bus_type
to consolidate that code and do the setup and the cleanup each in one
place.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      d2e5f0c1
    • R
      ACPI: Make acpi_bus_scan() and acpi_bus_add() take only one argument · 0cd6ac52
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The callers of acpi_bus_add() usually assume that if it has
succeeded, then a struct acpi_device object has been attached to
the handle passed as the first argument.  Unfortunately, however,
this assumption is wrong, because acpi_bus_scan(), and acpi_bus_add()
too as a result, may return a pointer to a different struct
acpi_device object on success (it may be an object corresponding to
one of the descendant ACPI nodes in the namespace scope below that
handle).

For this reason, the callers of acpi_bus_add() who care about
whether or not a struct acpi_device object has been created for
its first argument need to check that using acpi_bus_get_device()
anyway, so the second argument of acpi_bus_add() is not really
useful for them.  The same observation applies to acpi_bus_scan()
executed directly from acpi_scan_init().

Therefore modify the relevant callers of acpi_bus_add() to check the
existence of the struct acpi_device in question with the help of
acpi_bus_get_device() and drop the no longer necessary second
argument of acpi_bus_add().  Accordingly, modify acpi_scan_init() to
use acpi_bus_get_device() to get acpi_root and drop the no longer
needed second argument of acpi_bus_scan().
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      0cd6ac52
    • R
      ACPI: Remove the arguments of acpi_bus_add() that are not used · 636458de
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      Notice that acpi_bus_add() uses only 2 of its 4 arguments and
redefine its header to match the body.  Update all of its callers as
necessary and observe that this leads to quite a number of removed
lines of code (Linus will like that).

Add a kerneldoc comment documenting acpi_bus_add() and wonder how
its callers make wrong assumptions about the second argument (make
note to self to take care of that later).
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      636458de
    • R
      ACPI: Remove acpi_start_single_object() and acpi_bus_start() · 02f57c67
      由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于 
      The ACPI PCI root bridge driver was the only ACPI driver implementing
the .start() callback, which isn't used by any ACPI drivers any more
now.

For this reason, acpi_start_single_object() has no purpose any more,
so remove it and all references to it.  Also remove
acpi_bus_start_device(), whose only purpose was to call
acpi_start_single_object().

Moreover, since after the removal of acpi_bus_start_device() the
only purpose of acpi_bus_start() remains to call
acpi_update_all_gpes(), move that into acpi_bus_add() and drop
acpi_bus_start() too, remove its header from acpi_bus.h and
update all of its former users accordingly.

This change was previously proposed in a different from by
Yinghai Lu.
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
      02f57c67
  7. 27 12月, 2012 3 次提交
  9. 11 12月, 2012 1 次提交
  11. 08 12月, 2012 3 次提交
  13. 06 12月, 2012 3 次提交
  15. 05 12月, 2012 1 次提交
    • H
      PCI/PM: Keep runtime PM enabled for unbound PCI devices · 967577b0
      由 Huang Ying 提交于 
      For unbound PCI devices, what we need is:

 - Always in D0 state, because some devices do not work again after
   being put into D3 by the PCI bus.

 - In SUSPENDED state if allowed, so that the parent devices can still
   be put into low power state.

To satisfy these requirements, the runtime PM for the unbound PCI
devices are disabled and set to SUSPENDED state.  One issue of this
solution is that the PCI devices will be put into SUSPENDED state even
if the SUSPENDED state is forbidden via the sysfs interface
(.../power/control) of the device.  This is not an issue for most
devices, because most PCI devices are not used at all if unbound.
But there are exceptions.  For example, unbound VGA card can be used
for display, but suspending its parents makes it stop working.

To fix the issue, we keep the runtime PM enabled when the PCI devices
are unbound.  But the runtime PM callbacks will do nothing if the PCI
devices are unbound.  This way, we can put the PCI devices into
SUSPENDED state without putting the PCI devices into D3 state.

Reference: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48201Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Acked-by: NAlan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org          # v3.6+
      967577b0
  17. 01 12月, 2012 3 次提交
  19. 29 11月, 2012 4 次提交
  21. 27 11月, 2012 1 次提交
    • V
      PCI/AER: Report success only when every device has AER-aware driver · 918b4053
      由 Vijay Mohan Pandarathil 提交于 
      When an error is detected on a PCIe device which does not have an
AER-aware driver, prevent AER infrastructure from reporting
successful error recovery.

This is because the report_error_detected() function that gets
called in the first phase of recovery process allows forward
progress even when the driver for the device does not have AER
capabilities. It seems that all callbacks (in pci_error_handlers
structure) registered by drivers that gets called during error
recovery are not mandatory. So the intention of the infrastructure
design seems to be to allow forward progress even when a specific
callback has not been registered by a driver. However, if error
handler structure itself has not been registered, it doesn't make
sense to allow forward progress.

As a result of the current design, in the case of a single device
having an AER-unaware driver or in the case of any function in a
multi-function card having an AER-unaware driver, a successful
recovery is reported.

Typical scenario this happens is when a PCI device is detached
from a KVM host and the pci-stub driver on the host claims the
device. The pci-stub driver does not have error handling capabilities
but the AER infrastructure still reports that the device recovered
successfully.

The changes proposed here leaves the device(s)in an unrecovered state
if the driver for the device or for any device in the subtree
does not have error handler structure registered. This reflects
the true state of the device and prevents any partial recovery (or no
recovery at all) reported as successful.

[bhelgaas: changelog]
Signed-off-by: NVijay Mohan Pandarathil <vijaymohan.pandarathil@hp.com>
Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: NLinas Vepstas <linasvepstas@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NMyron Stowe <myron.stowe@redhat.com>
      918b4053
  23. 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  25. 14 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  27. 10 11月, 2012 6 次提交
  29. 08 11月, 2012 6 次提交