- 27 9月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The problem is that the garbage collector for the 'host' structures nlm_gc_hosts(), holds nlm_host_mutex while calling down to nlmsvc_mark_resources, which, eventually takes the file->f_mutex. We cannot therefore call nlmsvc_lookup_host() from within nlmsvc_create_block, since the caller will already hold file->f_mutex, so the attempt to grab nlm_host_mutex may deadlock. Fix the problem by calling nlmsvc_lookup_host() outside the file->f_mutex. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 27 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 5月, 2007 8 次提交
-
-
由 Marc Eshel 提交于
Rewrite nlmsvc_lock() to use the asynchronous interface. As with testlock, we answer nlm requests in nlmsvc_lock by first looking up the block and then using the results we find in the block if B_QUEUED is set, and calling vfs_lock_file() otherwise. If this a new lock request and we get -EINPROGRESS return on a non-blocking request then we defer the request. Also modify nlmsvc_unlock() to call the filesystem method if appropriate. Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
由 Marc Eshel 提交于
Normally we could skip ever having to allocate a block in the case where the client asks for a non-blocking lock, or asks for a blocking lock that succeeds immediately. However we're going to want to always look up a block first in order to check whether we're revisiting a deferred lock call, and to be prepared to handle the case where the filesystem returns -EINPROGRESS--in that case we want to make sure the lock we've given the filesystem is the one embedded in the block that we'll use to track the deferred request. Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
由 Marc Eshel 提交于
Rewrite nlmsvc_testlock() to use the new asynchronous interface: instead of immediately doing a posix_test_lock(), we first look for a matching block. If the subsequent test_lock returns anything other than -EINPROGRESS, we then remove the block we've found and return the results. If it returns -EINPROGRESS, then we defer the lock request. In the case where the block we find in the first step has B_QUEUED set, we bypass the vfs_test_lock entirely, instead using the block to decide how to respond: with nlm_lck_denied if B_TIMED_OUT is set. with nlm_granted if B_GOT_CALLBACK is set. by dropping if neither B_TIMED_OUT nor B_GOT_CALLBACK is set Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
由 Marc Eshel 提交于
Change NLM internal interface to pass more information for test lock; we need this to make sure the cookie information is pushed down to the place where we do request deferral, which is handled for testlock by the following patch. Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
由 Marc Eshel 提交于
Add code to handle file system callback when the lock is finally granted. Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
由 Marc Eshel 提交于
We need to keep some state for a pending asynchronous lock request, so this patch adds that state to struct nlm_block. This also adds a function which defers the request, by calling rqstp->rq_chandle.defer and storing the resulting deferred request in a nlm_block structure which we insert into lockd's global block list. That new function isn't called yet, so it's dead code until a later patch. Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
由 Marc Eshel 提交于
The nfsv4 protocol's lock operation, in the case of a conflict, returns information about the conflicting lock. It's unclear how clients can use this, so for now we're not going so far as to add a filesystem method that can return a conflicting lock, but we may as well return something in the local case when it's easy to. Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
由 Marc Eshel 提交于
posix_test_lock() and ->lock() do the same job but have gratuitously different interfaces. Modify posix_test_lock() so the two agree, simplifying some code in the process. Signed-off-by: NMarc Eshel <eshel@almaden.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: N"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
-
- 04 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
rpc_call_async() will always call rpc_release_calldata(), so it is an error for __nlm_async_call() to do so as well. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 14 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Annotated, all places switched to keeping status net-endian. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Josef Sipek 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJosef Sipek <jsipek@fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 21 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Acked-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 04 10月, 2006 5 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Brown 提交于
Both the (recently introduces) nsm_sema and the older f_sema are converted over. Cc: Olaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Olaf Kirch 提交于
When we send a GRANTED_MSG call, we current copy the NLM cookie provided in the original LOCK call - because in 1996, some broken clients seemed to rely on this bug. However, this means the cookies are not unique, so that when the client's GRANTED_RES message comes back, we cannot simply match it based on the cookie, but have to use the client's IP address in addition. Which breaks when you have a multi-homed NFS client. The X/Open spec explicitly mentions that clients should not expect the same cookie; so one may hope that any clients that were broken in 1996 have either been fixed or rendered obsolete. Signed-off-by: NOlaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Olaf Kirch 提交于
This patch makes nlm_traverse{locks,blocks,shares} and friends use a function pointer rather than a "action" enum. This function pointer is given two nlm_hosts (one given by the caller, the other taken from the lock/block/share currently visited), and is free to do with them as it wants. If it returns a non-zero value, the lockd/block/share is released. Signed-off-by: NOlaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Olaf Kirch 提交于
This patch changes the nlm_blocked list to use a list_node instead of homegrown linked list handling. Signed-off-by: NOlaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
由 Olaf Kirch 提交于
This patch adds the peer's hostname (and name length) to all calls to nlm*_lookup_host functions. A subsequent patch will make use of these (is requested by a sysctl). Signed-off-by: NOlaf Kirch <okir@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NNeil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 02 10月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Serge E. Hallyn 提交于
Replace references to system_utsname to the per-process uts namespace where appropriate. This includes things like uname. Changes: Per Eric Biederman's comments, use the per-process uts namespace for ELF_PLATFORM, sunrpc, and parts of net/ipv4/ipconfig.c [jdike@addtoit.com: UML fix] [clg@fr.ibm.com: cleanup] [akpm@osdl.org: build fix] Signed-off-by: NSerge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com> Cc: Kirill Korotaev <dev@openvz.org> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Herbert Poetzl <herbert@13thfloor.at> Cc: Andrey Savochkin <saw@sw.ru> Signed-off-by: NCedric Le Goater <clg@fr.ibm.com> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
-
- 04 8月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We never actually set the b_done field any more; it's always zero. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> (cherry picked from af8412d4283ef91356e65e0ed9b025b376aebded commit)
-
- 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jörn Engel 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJörn Engel <joern@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
-
- 20 4月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adrian Bunk 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAdrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de> Cc: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 21 3月, 2006 14 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Note that we never return non-zero. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Add a helper function to simplify the freeing of NLM client requests. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently it uses nlmclnt_lookup_host(), which puts the resulting host structure on a different list. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Otherwise, the block may disappear from underneath us when in nlmsvc_retry_blocked. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Currently lockd identifies its own locks using the FL_LOCKD flag. This doesn't scale well to multiple lock managers--if we did this in nfsv4 too, for example, we'd be left with only one free flag bit. Instead, we just check whether the file manager ops (fl_lmops) set on this lock are our own. The only use for this is in nlm_traverse_locks, which uses it to find locks that need cleaning up when freeing a host or a file. In the long run it might be nice to do reference counting instead of traversing all the locks like this.... Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
posix_test_lock() returns a pointer to a struct file_lock which is unprotected and can be removed while in use by the caller. Move the conflicting lock from the return to a parameter, and copy the conflicting lock. In most cases the caller ends up putting the copy of the conflicting lock on the stack. On i386, sizeof(struct file_lock) appears to be about 100 bytes. We're assuming that's reasonable. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Reorganize nlmsvc_lock() to make full use of posix_lock_file(), which does eveything nlmsvc_lock() needs - no need to call posix_test_lock(), posix_locks_deadlock(), or posix_block_lock() separately. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Reorganize nlmsvc_grant_blocked() to make full use of posix_lock_file(). Note that there's no need for separate calls to posix_test_lock(), posix_locks_deadlock(), or posix_block_lock(). Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
Slightly more consistent dprintk error reporting, consolidate some up()'s. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead we use the nlm_lockowner->pid. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 07 1月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
If the server receives an NLM cancel call and finds no waiting lock to cancel, then chances are the lock has already been applied, and the client just hadn't yet processed the NLM granted callback before it sent the cancel. The Open Group text, for example, perimts a server to return either success (LCK_GRANTED) or failure (LCK_DENIED) in this case. But returning an error seems more helpful; the client may be able to use it to recognize that a race has occurred and to recover from the race. So, modify the relevant functions to return an error in this case. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The fl_next check here is superfluous (and possibly a layering violation). Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Currently when lockd gets an NLM_CANCEL request, it also does an unlock for the same range. This is incorrect. The Open Group documentation says that "This procedure cancels an *outstanding* blocked lock request." (Emphasis mine.) Also, consider a client that holds a lock on the first byte of a file, and requests a lock on the entire file. If the client cancels that request (perhaps because the requesting process is signalled), the server shouldn't apply perform an unlock on the entire file, since that will also remove the previous lock that the client was already granted. Or consider a lock request that actually *downgraded* an exclusive lock to a shared lock. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-