1. 18 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 12 8月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      ipw2100: register pm_qos request before registering pci driver · 2f81b471
      John W. Linville 提交于
      It is necessary to call pm_qos_add_request prior to calling
      pm_qos_update_request.  It was revealed that ipw2100 has been
      doing this wrong since "pm_qos: Get rid of the allocation in
      pm_qos_add_request()" (commit 82f68251)
      added a WARN that results in the following backtrace:
      
      WARNING: at kernel/pm_qos_params.c:264 pm_qos_update_request+0x5e/0x70()
      pm_qos_update_request() called for unknown object
      Call Trace:
      [<c1024088>] ? warn_slowpath_common+0x78/0xb0
      [<c1041c9e>] ? pm_qos_update_request+0x5e/0x70
      [<c1041c9e>] ? pm_qos_update_request+0x5e/0x70
      [<c1024153>] ? warn_slowpath_fmt+0x33/0x40
      [<c1041c9e>] ? pm_qos_update_request+0x5e/0x70
      [<f89fe15f>] ? ipw2100_up+0x3f/0xf10 [ipw2100]
      [<c11961c9>] ? vsnprintf+0xc9/0x530
      [<f89ff36c>] ? ipw2100_net_init+0x2c/0x1c0 [ipw2100]
      [<c12f542d>] ? register_netdevice+0x7d/0x3c0
      [<f89f9b00>] ? ipw2100_irq_tasklet+0x910/0x9a0 [ipw2100]
      [<c12f579f>] ? register_netdev+0x2f/0x40
      [<f89fd471>] ? ipw2100_pci_init_one+0xd21/0x1060 [ipw2100]
      [<c11a5ebb>] ? local_pci_probe+0xb/0x10
      [<c11a6d49>] ? pci_device_probe+0x69/0x90
      [<c1224704>] ? driver_probe_device+0x74/0x180
      [<c10dd15a>] ? sysfs_create_dir+0x6a/0xb0
      [<c1224889>] ? __driver_attach+0x79/0x80
      [<c1224810>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x80
      [<c1223fa2>] ? bus_for_each_dev+0x52/0x80
      [<c1224586>] ? driver_attach+0x16/0x20
      [<c1224810>] ? __driver_attach+0x0/0x80
      [<c122395f>] ? bus_add_driver+0x17f/0x250
      [<c11a5ec0>] ? pci_device_shutdown+0x0/0x20
      [<c11a6c80>] ? pci_device_remove+0x0/0x40
      [<c1224b13>] ? driver_register+0x63/0x120
      [<c11a6f96>] ? __pci_register_driver+0x36/0xa0
      [<f84f9048>] ? ipw2100_init+0x48/0x67 [ipw2100]
      [<c1001122>] ? do_one_initcall+0x32/0x170
      [<c1087078>] ? __vunmap+0xb8/0xf0
      [<f84f9000>] ? ipw2100_init+0x0/0x67 [ipw2100]
      [<c10510c1>] ? sys_init_module+0x161/0x1000
      [<c108f847>] ? sys_close+0x67/0xe0
      [<c13647c1>] ? syscall_call+0x7/0xb
      
      This patch moves pm_qos_add_request prior to pci_register_driver in
      ipw2100 in order to avoid this problem.
      Reported-by: NChristoph Fritz <chf.fritz@googlemail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      2f81b471
  3. 05 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 27 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 21 7月, 2010 2 次提交
  6. 19 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 17 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 04 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  9. 03 6月, 2010 2 次提交
  10. 14 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      drivers/net: Remove unnecessary returns from void function()s · a4b77097
      Joe Perches 提交于
      This patch removes from drivers/net/ all the unnecessary
      return; statements that precede the last closing brace of
      void functions.
      
      It does not remove the returns that are immediately
      preceded by a label as gcc doesn't like that.
      
      It also does not remove null void functions with return.
      
      Done via:
      $ grep -rP --include=*.[ch] -l "return;\n}" net/ | \
        xargs perl -i -e 'local $/ ; while (<>) { s/\n[ \t\n]+return;\n}/\n}/g; print; }'
      
      with some cleanups by hand.
      
      Compile tested x86 allmodconfig only.
      Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a4b77097
  11. 11 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • M
      PM QOS update · ed77134b
      Mark Gross 提交于
      This patch changes the string based list management to a handle base
      implementation to help with the hot path use of pm-qos, it also renames
      much of the API to use "request" as opposed to "requirement" that was
      used in the initial implementation.  I did this because request more
      accurately represents what it actually does.
      
      Also, I added a string based ABI for users wanting to use a string
      interface.  So if the user writes 0xDDDDDDDD formatted hex it will be
      accepted by the interface.  (someone asked me for it and I don't think
      it hurts anything.)
      
      This patch updates some documentation input I got from Randy.
      Signed-off-by: Nmarkgross <mgross@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
      ed77134b
  12. 01 4月, 2010 2 次提交
  13. 30 3月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking... · 5a0e3ad6
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      include cleanup: Update gfp.h and slab.h includes to prepare for breaking implicit slab.h inclusion from percpu.h
      
      percpu.h is included by sched.h and module.h and thus ends up being
      included when building most .c files.  percpu.h includes slab.h which
      in turn includes gfp.h making everything defined by the two files
      universally available and complicating inclusion dependencies.
      
      percpu.h -> slab.h dependency is about to be removed.  Prepare for
      this change by updating users of gfp and slab facilities include those
      headers directly instead of assuming availability.  As this conversion
      needs to touch large number of source files, the following script is
      used as the basis of conversion.
      
        http://userweb.kernel.org/~tj/misc/slabh-sweep.py
      
      The script does the followings.
      
      * Scan files for gfp and slab usages and update includes such that
        only the necessary includes are there.  ie. if only gfp is used,
        gfp.h, if slab is used, slab.h.
      
      * When the script inserts a new include, it looks at the include
        blocks and try to put the new include such that its order conforms
        to its surrounding.  It's put in the include block which contains
        core kernel includes, in the same order that the rest are ordered -
        alphabetical, Christmas tree, rev-Xmas-tree or at the end if there
        doesn't seem to be any matching order.
      
      * If the script can't find a place to put a new include (mostly
        because the file doesn't have fitting include block), it prints out
        an error message indicating which .h file needs to be added to the
        file.
      
      The conversion was done in the following steps.
      
      1. The initial automatic conversion of all .c files updated slightly
         over 4000 files, deleting around 700 includes and adding ~480 gfp.h
         and ~3000 slab.h inclusions.  The script emitted errors for ~400
         files.
      
      2. Each error was manually checked.  Some didn't need the inclusion,
         some needed manual addition while adding it to implementation .h or
         embedding .c file was more appropriate for others.  This step added
         inclusions to around 150 files.
      
      3. The script was run again and the output was compared to the edits
         from #2 to make sure no file was left behind.
      
      4. Several build tests were done and a couple of problems were fixed.
         e.g. lib/decompress_*.c used malloc/free() wrappers around slab
         APIs requiring slab.h to be added manually.
      
      5. The script was run on all .h files but without automatically
         editing them as sprinkling gfp.h and slab.h inclusions around .h
         files could easily lead to inclusion dependency hell.  Most gfp.h
         inclusion directives were ignored as stuff from gfp.h was usually
         wildly available and often used in preprocessor macros.  Each
         slab.h inclusion directive was examined and added manually as
         necessary.
      
      6. percpu.h was updated not to include slab.h.
      
      7. Build test were done on the following configurations and failures
         were fixed.  CONFIG_GCOV_KERNEL was turned off for all tests (as my
         distributed build env didn't work with gcov compiles) and a few
         more options had to be turned off depending on archs to make things
         build (like ipr on powerpc/64 which failed due to missing writeq).
      
         * x86 and x86_64 UP and SMP allmodconfig and a custom test config.
         * powerpc and powerpc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * sparc and sparc64 SMP allmodconfig
         * ia64 SMP allmodconfig
         * s390 SMP allmodconfig
         * alpha SMP allmodconfig
         * um on x86_64 SMP allmodconfig
      
      8. percpu.h modifications were reverted so that it could be applied as
         a separate patch and serve as bisection point.
      
      Given the fact that I had only a couple of failures from tests on step
      6, I'm fairly confident about the coverage of this conversion patch.
      If there is a breakage, it's likely to be something in one of the arch
      headers which should be easily discoverable easily on most builds of
      the specific arch.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Guess-its-ok-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <Lee.Schermerhorn@hp.com>
      5a0e3ad6
  14. 24 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  15. 16 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  16. 11 3月, 2010 2 次提交
  17. 08 1月, 2010 1 次提交
  18. 05 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 04 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  20. 29 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 24 11月, 2009 3 次提交
  22. 14 11月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 12 11月, 2009 2 次提交
  24. 07 11月, 2009 1 次提交
    • J
      Revert "ipw2200: fix oops on missing firmware" · 143d40f3
      John W. Linville 提交于
      This reverts commit e6c5fc53.
      
      Based on this regression report:
      
      Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:59:16 +0100
      From: Holger Schurig <holgerschurig@gmail.com>
      To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
      Subject: BUG: oops when "rmmod ipw2200"
      
      This happened on wireless-testing v2.6.32-rc6-41575-g5e68bfb. I
      modprobed ipw2200, put it into monitor mode, used tshark a while to
      monitor, then I stopped tshark, "ifconfig eth2 down" and finally
      "rmmod ipw2200", and voila:
      
      [  917.189620] ------------[ cut here ]------------
      [  917.189717] kernel BUG at net/wireless/core.c:543!
      [  917.189805] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
      [  917.190002] last sysfs file: /sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:0d.0/firmware/0000:02:0d.0/loading
      [  917.190136] Modules linked in: lib80211_crypt_wep ipw2200(-) libipw lib80211 ath5k mac80211 ath cfg80211 psmouse uhci_hcd
      [  917.190680]
      [  917.190759] Pid: 1763, comm: rmmod Not tainted (2.6.32-rc6-wl #26) Amilo M1425
      [  917.190886] EIP: 0060:[<f8accf34>] EFLAGS: 00010202 CPU: 0
      [  917.190992] EIP is at wiphy_unregister+0xd3/0x175 [cfg80211]
      [  917.191083] EAX: f601d4c4 EBX: 00000000 ECX: 00000000 EDX: f79e8600
      [  917.191176] ESI: f601d400 EDI: f95b4350 EBP: f6009eb4 ESP: f6009e8c
      [  917.191269]  DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 0033 SS: 0068
      [  917.191360] Process rmmod (pid: 1763, ti=f6008000 task=f79e8130 task.ti=f6008000)
      [  917.191486] Stack:
      [  917.191562]  f601d5a0 f601d484 f6460e98 f6009ea0 c01407ee f6009eb8 00000246 f64604c0
      [  917.191916] <0> f6460e5c f95b4350 f6009ec0 f94fd030 f6460e98 f6009edc f95a9d4f f787bc00
      [  917.192100] <0> f787bc58 f787bc00 f95b4350 f95b4350 f6009ee8 c0207fca f787bc58 f6009ef8
      [  917.192100] Call Trace:
      [  917.192100]  [<c01407ee>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb/0xd
      [  917.192100]  [<f94fd030>] ? unregister_ieee80211+0xe/0x27 [libipw]
      [  917.192100]  [<f95a9d4f>] ? ipw_pci_remove+0x59/0x227 [ipw2200]
      [  917.192100]  [<c0207fca>] ? pci_device_remove+0x19/0x39
      [  917.192100]  [<c02b93a4>] ? __device_release_driver+0x59/0x9d
      [  917.192100]  [<c02b944f>] ? driver_detach+0x67/0x85
      [  917.192100]  [<c02b88d6>] ? bus_remove_driver+0x69/0x85
      [  917.192100]  [<c02b9878>] ? driver_unregister+0x4d/0x54
      [  917.192100]  [<c02081c3>] ? pci_unregister_driver+0x28/0x71
      [  917.192100]  [<f95a9cf4>] ? ipw_exit+0x1c/0x1e [ipw2200]
      [  917.192100]  [<c0148e2b>] ? sys_delete_module+0x192/0x1ef
      [  917.192100]  [<c0162cdb>] ? remove_vma+0x52/0x58
      [  917.192100]  [<c01028bb>] ? sysenter_exit+0xf/0x18
      [  917.192100]  [<c0102888>] ? sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x36
      [  917.192100] Code: 74 07 e8 81 bc 8c c7 eb c8 8d 55 e0 89 f8 e8 d6 6d 66 c7 8b 45 dc 31 d2 e8 81 cc 8c c7 8d 86 c4 00 00 00 39 86 c4 00 00 00 74 04 <0f> 0b eb fe 8b 45 dc 8d 5e 0c e8 5a cc 8c c7 8b 86 94 03 00 00
      [  917.192100] EIP: [<f8accf34>] wiphy_unregister+0xd3/0x175 [cfg80211] SS:ESP 0068:f6009e8c
      [  917.203718] ---[ end trace bcaaf449945a5100 ]---
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      143d40f3
  25. 31 10月, 2009 2 次提交
  26. 12 10月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 08 10月, 2009 3 次提交
    • R
      wireless: fix CFG80211_WEXT build problems · c6d3597c
      Randy Dunlap 提交于
      Fix CFG80211_WEXT build dependencies/errors:
      
      ERROR: "cfg80211_wext_siwscan" [drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco.ko] undefined!
      ERROR: "cfg80211_wext_siwmode" [drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco.ko] undefined!
      ERROR: "cfg80211_wext_giwrange" [drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco.ko] undefined!
      ERROR: "cfg80211_wext_giwmode" [drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco.ko] undefined!
      ERROR: "cfg80211_wext_giwname" [drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco.ko] undefined!
      ERROR: "cfg80211_wext_giwscan" [drivers/net/wireless/orinoco/orinoco.ko] undefined!
      ERROR: "cfg80211_wext_giwname" [drivers/net/wireless/ipw2x00/ipw2200.ko] undefined!
      Signed-off-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      c6d3597c
    • J
      ipw2200: support ETHTOOL_GPERMADDR · 5e5eab5d
      John W. Linville 提交于
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      5e5eab5d
    • J
      wext: refactor · 3d23e349
      Johannes Berg 提交于
      Refactor wext to
       * split out iwpriv handling
       * split out iwspy handling
       * split out procfs support
       * allow cfg80211 to have wireless extensions compat code
         w/o CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT
      
      After this, drivers need to
       - select WIRELESS_EXT	- for wext support
       - select WEXT_PRIV	- for iwpriv support
       - select WEXT_SPY	- for iwspy support
      
      except cfg80211 -- which gets new hooks in wext-core.c
      and can then get wext handlers without CONFIG_WIRELESS_EXT.
      
      Wireless extensions procfs support is auto-selected
      based on PROC_FS and anything that requires the wext core
      (i.e. WIRELESS_EXT or CFG80211_WEXT).
      Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      3d23e349
  28. 01 9月, 2009 2 次提交
  29. 29 8月, 2009 1 次提交