1. 02 12月, 2010 2 次提交
    • V
      blk-throttle: Correct the placement of smp_rmb() · 04a6b516
      Vivek Goyal 提交于
      o I was discussing what are the variable being updated without spin lock and
        why do we need barriers and Oleg pointed out that location of smp_rmb()
        should be between read of td->limits_changed and tg->limits_changed. This
        patch fixes it.
      
      o Following is one possible sequence of events. Say cpu0 is executing
        throtl_update_blkio_group_read_bps() and cpu1 is executing
        throtl_process_limit_change().
      
       cpu0                                                cpu1
      
       tg->limits_changed = true;
       smp_mb__before_atomic_inc();
       atomic_inc(&td->limits_changed);
      
                                           if (!atomic_read(&td->limits_changed))
                                                   return;
      
                                           if (tg->limits_changed)
                                                   do_something;
      
       If cpu0 has updated tg->limits_changed and td->limits_changed, we want to
       make sure that if update to td->limits_changed is visible on cpu1, then
       update to tg->limits_changed should also be visible.
      
       Oleg pointed out to ensure that we need to insert an smp_rmb() between
       td->limits_changed read and tg->limits_changed read.
      
      o I had erroneously put smp_rmb() before atomic_read(&td->limits_changed).
        This patch fixes it.
      Reported-by: NOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      04a6b516
    • V
      blk-throttle: Trim/adjust slice_end once a bio has been dispatched · d1ae8ffd
      Vivek Goyal 提交于
      o During some testing I did following and noticed throttling stops working.
      
              - Put a very low limit on a cgroup, say 1 byte per second.
              - Start some reads, this will set slice_end to a very high value.
              - Change the limit to higher value say 1MB/s
              - Now IO unthrottles and finishes as expected.
              - Try to do the read again but IO is not limited to 1MB/s as expected.
      
      o What is happening.
              - Initially low value of limit sets slice_end to a very high value.
              - During updation of limit, slice_end is not being truncated.
              - Very high value of slice_end leads to keeping the existing slice
                valid for a very long time and new slice does not start.
              - tg_may_dispatch() is called in blk_throtle_bio(), and trim_slice()
                is not called in this path. So slice_start is some old value and
                practically we are able to do huge amount of IO.
      
      o There are many ways it can be fixed. I have fixed it by trying to
        adjust/cleanup slice_end in trim_slice(). Generally we extend slices if bio
        is big and can't be dispatched in one slice. After dispatch of bio, readjust
        the slice_end to make sure we don't end up with huge values.
      Signed-off-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      d1ae8ffd
  2. 16 11月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 02 10月, 2010 2 次提交
  4. 01 10月, 2010 3 次提交
    • V
      blkio-throttle: Fix link failure failure on i386 · 3aad5d3e
      Vivek Goyal 提交于
      o Randy Dunlap reported following linux-next failure. This patch fixes it.
      
      on i386:
      
      blk-throttle.c:(.text+0x1abb8): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
      blk-throttle.c:(.text+0x1b1dc): undefined reference to `__udivdi3'
      
      o bytes_per_second interface is 64bit and I was continuing to do 64 bit
        division even on 32bit platform without help of special macros/functions
        hence the failure.
      Signed-off-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
      Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@oracle.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      3aad5d3e
    • V
      blkio: Recalculate the throttled bio dispatch time upon throttle limit change · fe071437
      Vivek Goyal 提交于
      o Currently any cgroup throttle limit changes are processed asynchronousy and
        the change does not take affect till a new bio is dispatched from same group.
      
      o It might happen that a user sets a redicuously low limit on throttling.
        Say 1 bytes per second on reads. In such cases simple operations like mount
        a disk can wait for a very long time.
      
      o Once bio is throttled, there is no easy way to come out of that wait even if
        user increases the read limit later.
      
      o This patch fixes it. Now if a user changes the cgroup limits, we recalculate
        the bio dispatch time according to new limits.
      
      o Can't take queueu lock under blkcg_lock, hence after the change I wake
        up the dispatch thread again which recalculates the time. So there are some
        variables being synchronized across two threads without lock and I had to
        make use of barriers. Hoping I have used barriers correctly. Any review of
        memory barrier code especially will help.
      Signed-off-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      fe071437
    • V
      blkio: Add root group to td->tg_list · 02977e4a
      Vivek Goyal 提交于
      o Currently all the dynamically allocated groups, except root grp is added
        to td->tg_list. This was not a problem so far but in next patch I will
        travel through td->tg_list to process any updates of limits on the group.
        If root group is not in tg_list, then root group's updates are not
        processed.
      
      o It is better to root group also to tg_list instead of doing special
        processing for it during limit updates.
      Signed-off-by: NVivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <jaxboe@fusionio.com>
      02977e4a
  5. 16 9月, 2010 2 次提交