On ICP-ADP the pins used by the second PPS can be alternatively
muxed to some other function. In that case the second power
sequencer is unusable.

Unfortunately (on my ADL Thinkpad T14 gen3 at least) the
BIOS still likes to enable the VDD on the second PPS (due
to the VBT declaring the second bogus eDP panel) even when
not correctly muxed, so we need to deal with it somehow.
For now let's just initialize the PPS as normal, and then
use the normal eDP probe failure VDD off path to turn it off
(and release the wakeref the PPS init grabbed). The
alternative of just declaring that the platform has a single
PPS doesn't really work since it would cause the second eDP
probe to also try to use the first PPS and thus clobber the
state for the first (real) eDP panel.

Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>

On the PCH side the second PPS was introduced in ICP. Let's
make sure we examine both power sequencer on ICP+ as well.

Note that DG1/2 south block only has the single PPS, so need
to exclude the fake DG1/2 PCHs.

Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>

Currently on bxt/glk we just grab the power sequencer index from
the VBT data even though it may not have been parsed yet. That
could lead us to using the incorrect power sequencer during the
initial panel probe.

To avoid that let's try to read out the current state of the
power sequencer from the hardware. Unfortunately the power
sequencer no longer has anything in its registers to associate
it with the port, so the best we can do is just iterate through
the power sequencers and pick the first one. This should be
sufficient for single panel cases.

For the dual panel cases we probably need to go back to
parsing the VBT before the panel probe (and hope that
panel_type=0xff is never a thing in those cases). To that
end the code always prefers the VBT panel sequencer, if
available.

v2: Restructure a bit for upcoming icp+ dual PPS support

Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NAnimesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>

Restate the vlv_pipe_check() stuff in terms of PPS index
(rather than pipe, which it is on VLV/CHV) so that we can
reuse this same mechanim on other platforms as well.

Cc: Animesh Manna <animesh.manna@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221125173156.31689-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Panel power off delay is the time the panel power needs to remain off
after being switched off, before it can be switched on again.

For the purpose of respecting panel power off delay at driver probe,
assuming the panel was last switched off at driver probe is overly
pessimistic. If the panel was never on, we'd end up waiting for no
reason.

We don't know what has happened before kernel boot, but we can make some
assumptions:

- The panel may have been switched off right before kernel boot by some
  pre-os environment.

- After kernel boot, the panel may only be switched off by i915.

- At i915 driver probe, only a previously loaded and removed i915 may
  have switched the panel power off.

With these assumptions, we can initialize the last power off time to
kernel boot time, if we also ensure i915 driver remove waits for the
panel power off delay after switching panel power off.

This shaves off the time it takes from kernel boot to i915 probe from
the first panel enable, if (and only if) the panel was not already
enabled at boot.

The encoder destroy hook is pretty much the last place where we can
wait, right after we've ensured the panel power has been switched off,
and before the whole encoder is destroyed.

Closes: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/intel/-/issues/7417
Cc: Lee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: NLee Shawn C <shawn.c.lee@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20221116150657.1347504-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

Turns out many of the files that need i915_reg.h get it implicitly via
{display/intel_de.h, gt/intel_context.h} -> i915_trace.h -> i915_irq.h
-> i915_reg.h. Since i915_trace.h doesn't actually need i915_irq.h,
makes sense to drop it, but that requires adding quite a few new
includes all over the place.

Prefer including i915_reg.h where needed instead of adding another
implicit include, because eventually we'll want to split up i915_reg.h
and only include the specific registers at each place.

Also some places actually needed i915_irq.h too.

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/6e78a2e0ac1bffaf5af3b5ccc21dff05e6518cef.1668008071.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Simplify the heavy intel_display_types.h header.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/943dd3e9812138b1cf3ddcfde896cfec006f3847.1667383630.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Add intel_has_quirk() for checking if a display quirk is present. Avoid
accessing i915->quirks all over the place.

v2: Rebase
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/74f954ca81a8068033141a15686dffd01ad9b0f9.1661779055.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Move display PPS related members under drm_i915_private display
sub-struct.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NArun R Murthy <arun.r.murthy@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7ecc37045ab9eb22831517e5a59ca74edb31962f.1661346845.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Move the panel specific VBT parsing to happen during the
output probing stage. Needs to be done because the VBT
parsing will need to look at the EDID to determine
the correct panel_type on some machines.

We split the parsed VBT data (i915->vbt) along the same
boundary. For the moment we just hoist all the panel
specific stuff into connector->panel.vbt since that seems
like the most convenient place for eg. the backlight code.

Note that we simply drop the drrs type check from
intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() since that operates on the whole
device rather than a specific connector/encoder. But the check
was just a micro optimization so removing it doesn't actually
mattter for correctness.

TODO: Lot's of cleanup to be done in the future. Eg. most of
the DSI stuff could probably be eliminated entirely and just
parsed on demand during DSI init.

v2: Note the intel_drrs_frontbuffer_update() change
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-13-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Disable the delayed VDD off work during the eDP probe.
If we never turn off the VDD then we can't violate the
panel's power sequencing delays despite not having read
them out yet from the VBT.

This is mostly a belt+suspenders type of thing since the
the timeout we'd use for the delayed work should be long
enough that this won't normally happen. But I don't really
like relying on timeouts for correctless so might as well
make sure.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-10-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

During the eDP probe we may not yet know the panel_type used
to index the VBT panel tables. So the initial eDP probe will have
to be done without that, and thus we won't yet have the PPS delays
from the VBT. Once the VBT has been fully parse we should reinit
the PPS delays to make sure it's fully accounted for.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-9-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Split the PPS init to something we do at the start of the eDP
probe and a second part we do at the end.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-8-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

In order to do the panel VBT parsing after the EDID read
(needed to determine panel_type from PNPID) we need to stash
away the original BIOS programmed PPS delays so that we
can consult them again when we reinit the PPS delays after
the VBT parsing has been done.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-7-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Skip QUIRK_INCREASE_T12_DELAY and the t11_t12 adjustment of the
VBT PPS delays if we've not yet initialized them. Will be important
later when the PPS delay init can happen before VBT parsing.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Add a small helper that determines if the PPS delays have been
initialized or not.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-5-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Split each of the hw/vbt/spec PPS delay initialization into
separate functions to make the whole thing less cluttered.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220510104242.6099-4-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Spelling mistakes (triple letters) in comments.
Detected with the help of Coccinelle.
Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@inria.fr>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220521111145.81697-90-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr

Move the implementation of platform specific power well hooks to
intel_display_power_well.c, to reduce the clutter in
intel_display_power.c.

The locking of all the power domain/power well state is handled in the
power domain functions in intel_display_power.c using
i915_power_domains::lock. This patch also moves the
chy_phy_powergate_ch/lanes() functions to intel_display_power_well.c
which borrow the same lock to protect the DISPLAY_PHY_CONTROL register
state, which the HW uses both for toggling power wells and power gating
PHY lanes.

No functional change.

v2:
- Clarify in the commit log why CHV functions using the
  i915_power_domains::lock were moved, while others locking the power
  domain/well state were kept in intel_display_power.c . (Jouni)
- Move forward declaration of chv_phy_powergate_ch/lanes() to
  intel_display_power_well.h .
Signed-off-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJouni Högander <jouni.hogander@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220414210657.1785773-1-imre.deak@intel.com

Commit 13ea6db2 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel
powered off") completely broke short pulse handling for eDP as it is
usually generated by sink when it is displaying image and there is
some error or status that source needs to handle.

When power panel is enabled, this state is enough to power aux
transactions and VDD override is disabled, so intel_pps_have_power()
is always returning false causing short pulses to be ignored.

So here better naming this function that intends to check if aux
lines are powered to avoid the endless cycle mentioned in the commit
being fixed and fixing the check for what it is intended.

v2:
- renamed to intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd()
- fixed indentation

Fixes: 13ea6db2 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off")
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-1-jose.souza@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 8f0c1c09)
Signed-off-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

Commit 13ea6db2 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel
powered off") completely broke short pulse handling for eDP as it is
usually generated by sink when it is displaying image and there is
some error or status that source needs to handle.

When power panel is enabled, this state is enough to power aux
transactions and VDD override is disabled, so intel_pps_have_power()
is always returning false causing short pulses to be ignored.

So here better naming this function that intends to check if aux
lines are powered to avoid the endless cycle mentioned in the commit
being fixed and fixing the check for what it is intended.

v2:
- renamed to intel_pps_have_panel_power_or_vdd()
- fixed indentation

Fixes: 13ea6db2 ("drm/i915/edp: Ignore short pulse when panel powered off")
Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Cc: Uma Shankar <uma.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20220311185149.110527-1-jose.souza@intel.com

Prefer drm device based logging.

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/3caf86f20680478763321e8e3a5fbfa30ab06ec3.1642769982.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Move assert_panel_unlocked() to intel_pps.c and rename
assert_pps_unlocked(). Keep the functionality and the assert code
together.

There's still a bit of a split between the eDP PPS usage in intel_pps.c
and all the other PPS usage, and assert_pps_unlocked() is arguably more
related to the latter. However, intel_pps.c is the best fit for anything
touching the PPS registers.
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/a9b77692a145891789eefb0447e082cfc22aaa85.1632992608.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Hoist the intel_de.h include from intel_display_types.h one
level up. I need this in order to untangle the include order
so that I can add tracepoints into intel_de.h.

This little cocci script did most of the work for me:
@find@
@@
(
intel_de_read(...)
|
intel_de_read_fw(...)
|
intel_de_write(...)
|
intel_de_write_fw(...)
)

@has_include@
@@
(
 #include "intel_de.h"
|
 #include "display/intel_de.h"
)

@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "intel_de.h"
  #include "intel_display_types.h"

@depends on find && !has_include@
@@
+ #include "display/intel_de.h"
  #include "display/intel_display_types.h"

Cc: Cooper Chiou <cooper.chiou@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210430143945.6776-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

Now that we've eliminated INTEL_GEN(), IS_GEN_RANGE(), etc. from the
display code, we should also kill off our use of the IS_GEN9_* macros
too.  We'll do the conversion manually this time instead of using
Coccinelle since the most logical substitution can depend heavily on the
code context, and sometimes we can keep the code simpler if we make
additional adjustments such as swapping the order of if/else arms.

v2:
 - Restore a lost negation in intel_pll_is_valid().

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRadhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210407203945.1432531-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 70bfb307)
[Jani: cherry picked to topic branch to reduce conflicts]
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Display features should not be initialized or de-initialized when there
is no display. Skip modeset initialization, output setup, plane, crtc,
encoder, connector registration, display cdclk and rawclk
initialization, display core initialization, etc.

Skip the functionality at as high level as possible, and remove any
redundant checks. If the functionality is conditional to *other* display
checks, do not add more. If the un-initialization has checks for
initialization, do not add more.

We explicitly do not care about any GMCH/VLV/CHV code paths, as they've
always had and will have display.
Reviewed-by: NRadhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosé Roberto de Souza <jose.souza@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210408203150.237947-3-jose.souza@intel.com

Now that we've eliminated INTEL_GEN(), IS_GEN_RANGE(), etc. from the
display code, we should also kill off our use of the IS_GEN9_* macros
too.  We'll do the conversion manually this time instead of using
Coccinelle since the most logical substitution can depend heavily on the
code context, and sometimes we can keep the code simpler if we make
additional adjustments such as swapping the order of if/else arms.

v2:
 - Restore a lost negation in intel_pll_is_valid().

Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRadhakrishna Sripada <radhakrishna.sripada@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210407203945.1432531-1-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

ILK is the only platform that we consider "gen5" and SNB is the only
platform we consider "gen6."  Add an IS_SANDYBRIDGE() macro and then
replace numeric platform tests for these two generations with direct
platform tests with the following Coccinelle semantic patch:

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        - IS_GEN(dev_priv, 5)
        + IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv)

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        - IS_GEN(dev_priv, 6)
        + IS_SANDYBRIDGE(dev_priv)

        @@ expression dev_priv; @@
        - IS_GEN_RANGE(dev_priv, 5, 6)
        + IS_IRONLAKE(dev_priv) || IS_SANDYBRIDGE(dev_priv)

This will simplify our upcoming patches which eliminate INTEL_GEN()
usage in the display code.

v2:
 - Reverse ilk/snb order for IS_GEN_RANGE conversion.  (Ville)
 - Rebase + regenerate from semantic patch
Signed-off-by: NMatt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210320044245.3920043-2-matthew.d.roper@intel.com

Move the g4x+ DP code into a new file. This will leave mostly
platform agnostic code in intel_dp.c. Well, the misplaced phy
test stuff pretty much ruins that, but let's squint real hard
for now.

v2: Add comment exlaining which platforms are covered (Daniel)
    Leave intel_dp_unused_lane_mask() be since it is pretty generic
Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210318161015.22070-6-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com

This moves the older i9xx/vlv/chv enable/disable to dpll file.
Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/7fa8c76b0f07f3ede9efd7c1f989f33fbc8c53a3.1612536383.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Add some namespacing to highlight what belongs where. No functional
changes.

Cc: Anshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-3-jani.nikula@intel.com

intel_display.c has some pps functions that belong to intel_pps.c. Move
them over.

While at it, refactor the duplicate intel_pps_init() in intel_display.c
into an orthogonal intel_pps_setup() in intel_pps.c, and call it earlier
in intel_modeset_init_nogem().
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-2-jani.nikula@intel.com

Once you realize there is no need to hold the pps mutex when calling
pps_init_timestamps() in intel_pps_init(), we can reuse
intel_pps_encoder_reset() which has the same code.

Since intel_dp_pps_init() is only called from one place now, move it
inline to remove one "init" function altogether.

Finally, remove some initialization from
vlv_initial_power_sequencer_setup() and do it in the caller to highlight
the similarity, not the difference, in the platforms.

v2: Fix comment (Anshuman)
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20210120101834.19813-1-jani.nikula@intel.com

There are a number of functions that "init" pps in various ways. Try to
find some more consistency in the naming.

Rename:
 - intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer -> pps_init_delays
 - intel_dp_init_panel_power_sequencer_registers -> pps_init_registers
 - intel_dp_init_panel_power_timestamps -> pps_init_timestamps

as this is what the functions do. Skip the intel_ prefix here to
emphasize these are static and not exported.

No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/15260c28060f3f90276ab395da4d3999ccdb641f.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

This function is a bit of an outlier, but try to change to a name that
is more in line with the rest of the intel_pps functions. No functional
changes.
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/644b89c1d88d4d2cd7a9426ec7d7ea14eb65a8bc.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Prefer keeping the unlocked variants hidden if possible. No functional
changes.
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/4b712770deab9de8c3aeea8df35269433977038a.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Follow the usual naming pattern for functions. "reset all" because it
iterates over all DP encoders. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/b10013e2c976ca140b1ad62669e18a2e9f1e8c35.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Follow the usual naming pattern for functions. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/f03f7195fb62b250847909e0972f69a151095529.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Add an "encoder reset" call to hide some more pps functions, and clean
up the callers. A minor functional change is not holding the pps lock
across the whole operation in intel_dp_encoder_reset, but instead doing
it in two steps.

v2: rename intel_pps_reinit to intel_pps_encoder_reset for clarity
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/84a50f2700b19c6719cd3e1e931c64f1e2027551.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com

Add a new init call to be called only once, unlike some of the other
various init calls. This lets us hide more functions within
intel_pps.c. No functional changes.
Reviewed-by: NAnshuman Gupta <anshuman.gupta@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/290865ed9b0ea79120222a24c233a2d596239076.1610127741.git.jani.nikula@intel.com