Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 17 8月, 2016 1 次提交
  3. 03 8月, 2016 10 次提交
  5. 20 7月, 2016 2 次提交
  7. 21 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  9. 18 5月, 2016 1 次提交
  11. 06 4月, 2016 2 次提交
  13. 08 2月, 2016 1 次提交
    • C
      xfs: don't use ioends for direct write completions · 273dda76
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      We only need to communicate two bits of information to the direct I/O
completion handler:

 (1) do we need to convert any unwritten extents in the range
 (2) do we need to check if we need to update the inode size based
     on the range passed to the completion handler

We can use the private data passed to the get_block handler and the
completion handler as a simple bitmask to communicate this information
instead of the current complicated infrastructure reusing the ioends
from the buffer I/O path, and thus avoiding a memory allocation and
a context switch for any non-trivial direct write.  As a nice side
effect we also decouple the direct I/O path implementation from that
of the buffered I/O path.
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
      273dda76
  15. 08 1月, 2016 1 次提交
  17. 03 11月, 2015 1 次提交
  19. 12 10月, 2015 1 次提交
  21. 09 9月, 2015 1 次提交
  23. 19 8月, 2015 1 次提交
  25. 29 5月, 2015 1 次提交
    • B
      xfs: allocate sparse inode chunks on full chunk allocation failure · 56d1115c
      由 Brian Foster 提交于 
      xfs_ialloc_ag_alloc() makes several attempts to allocate a full inode
chunk. If all else fails, reduce the allocation to the sparse length and
alignment and attempt to allocate a sparse inode chunk.

If sparse chunk allocation succeeds, check whether an inobt record
already exists that can track the chunk. If so, inherit and update the
existing record. Otherwise, insert a new record for the sparse chunk.

Create helpers to align sparse chunk inode records and insert or update
existing records in the inode btrees. The xfs_inobt_insert_sprec()
helper implements the merge or update semantics required for sparse
inode records with respect to both the inobt and finobt. To update the
inobt, either insert a new record or merge with an existing record. To
update the finobt, use the updated inobt record to either insert or
replace an existing record.
Signed-off-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      56d1115c
  27. 16 4月, 2015 3 次提交
    • D
      xfs: DIO writes within EOF don't need an ioend · a06c277a
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      DIO writes that lie entirely within EOF have nothing to do in IO
completion. In this case, we don't need no steekin' ioend, and so we
can avoid allocating an ioend until we have a mapping that spans
EOF.

This means that IO completion has two contexts - deferred completion
to the dio workqueue that uses an ioend, and interrupt completion
that does nothing because there is nothing that can be done in this
context.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      a06c277a
    • D
      xfs: handle DIO overwrite EOF update completion correctly · 6dfa1b67
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      Currently a DIO overwrite that extends the EOF (e.g sub-block IO or
write into allocated blocks beyond EOF) requires a transaction for
the EOF update. Thi is done in IO completion context, but we aren't
explicitly handling this situation properly and so it can run in
interrupt context. Ensure that we defer IO that spans EOF correctly
to the DIO completion workqueue, and now that we have an ioend in IO
completion we can use the common ioend completion path to do all the
work.

Note: we do not preallocate the append transaction as we can have
multiple mapping and allocation calls per direct IO. hence
preallocating can still leave us with nested transactions by
attempting to map and allocate more blocks after we've preallocated
an append transaction.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      6dfa1b67
    • D
      xfs: DIO needs an ioend for writes · d5cc2e3f
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      Currently we can only tell DIO completion that an IO requires
unwritten extent completion. This is done by a hacky non-null
private pointer passed to Io completion, but the private pointer
does not actually contain any information that is used.

We also need to pass to IO completion the fact that the IO may be
beyond EOF and so a size update transaction needs to be done. This
is currently determined by checks in the io completion, but we need
to determine if this is necessary at block mapping time as we need
to defer the size update transactions to a completion workqueue,
just like unwritten extent conversion.

To do this, first we need to allocate and pass an ioend to to IO
completion. Add this for unwritten extent conversion; we'll do the
EOF updates in the next commit.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NBrian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      d5cc2e3f
  29. 25 3月, 2015 2 次提交
  31. 23 2月, 2015 2 次提交
  33. 02 10月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      xfs: introduce xfs_buf_submit[_wait] · 595bff75
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      There is a lot of cookie-cutter code that looks like:

	if (shutdown)
		handle buffer error
	xfs_buf_iorequest(bp)
	error = xfs_buf_iowait(bp)
	if (error)
		handle buffer error

spread through XFS. There's significant complexity now in
xfs_buf_iorequest() to specifically handle this sort of synchronous
IO pattern, but there's all sorts of nasty surprises in different
error handling code dependent on who owns the buffer references and
the locks.

Pull this pattern into a single helper, where we can hide all the
synchronous IO warts and hence make the error handling for all the
callers much saner. This removes the need for a special extra
reference to protect IO completion processing, as we can now hold a
single reference across dispatch and waiting, simplifying the sync
IO smeantics and error handling.

In doing this, also rename xfs_buf_iorequest to xfs_buf_submit and
make it explicitly handle on asynchronous IO. This forces all users
to be switched specifically to one interface or the other and
removes any ambiguity between how the interfaces are to be used. It
also means that xfs_buf_iowait() goes away.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
      595bff75
  35. 12 6月, 2014 1 次提交
    • A
      ->splice_write() via ->write_iter() · 8d020765
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      iter_file_splice_write() - a ->splice_write() instance that gathers the
pipe buffers, builds a bio_vec-based iov_iter covering those and feeds
it to ->write_iter().  A bunch of simple cases coverted to that...

[AV: fixed the braino spotted by Cyrill]
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      8d020765
  37. 23 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  39. 14 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  41. 24 2月, 2014 1 次提交
  43. 07 11月, 2013 2 次提交
  45. 28 6月, 2013 1 次提交
    • D
      xfs: Introduce an ordered buffer item · 5f6bed76
      由 Dave Chinner 提交于 
      If we have a buffer that we have modified but we do not wish to
physically log in a transaction (e.g. we've logged a logical
change), we still need to ensure that transactional integrity is
maintained. Hence we must not move the tail of the log past the
transaction that the buffer is associated with before the buffer is
written to disk.

This means these special buffers still need to be included in the
transaction and added to the AIL just like a normal buffer, but we
do not want the modifications to the buffer written into the
transaction. IOWs, what we want is an "ordered buffer" that
maintains the same transactional life cycle as a physically logged
buffer, just without the transcribing of the modifications to the
log.

Hence we need to flag the buffer as an "ordered buffer" to avoid
including it in vector size calculations or formatting during the
transaction. Once the transaction is committed, the buffer appears
for all intents to be the same as a physically logged buffer as it
transitions through the log and AIL.

Relogging will also work just fine for such an ordered buffer - the
logical transaction will be replayed before the subsequent
modifications that relog the buffer, so everything will be
reconstructed correctly by recovery.
Signed-off-by: NDave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Reviewed-by: NMark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: NBen Myers <bpm@sgi.com>
      5f6bed76