1. 14 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 26 5月, 2012 2 次提交
  3. 07 5月, 2012 3 次提交
  4. 28 3月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 06 3月, 2012 2 次提交
  6. 06 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 17 12月, 2011 1 次提交
    • E
      iommu: Export intel_iommu_enabled to signal when iommu is in use · 8bc1f85c
      Eugeni Dodonov 提交于
      In i915 driver, we do not enable either rc6 or semaphores on SNB when dmar
      is enabled. The new 'intel_iommu_enabled' variable signals when the
      iommu code is in operation.
      
      Cc: Ted Phelps <phelps@gnusto.com>
      Cc: Peter <pab1612@gmail.com>
      Cc: Lukas Hejtmanek <xhejtman@fi.muni.cz>
      Cc: Andrew Lutomirski <luto@mit.edu>
      CC: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Cc: Eugeni Dodonov <eugeni.dodonov@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NKeith Packard <keithp@keithp.com>
      8bc1f85c
  8. 09 12月, 2011 1 次提交
    • T
      memblock: Kill early_node_map[] · 0ee332c1
      Tejun Heo 提交于
      Now all ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP archs select HAVE_MEBLOCK_NODE_MAP -
      there's no user of early_node_map[] left.  Kill early_node_map[] and
      replace ARCH_POPULATES_NODE_MAP with HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP.  Also,
      relocate for_each_mem_pfn_range() and helper from mm.h to memblock.h
      as page_alloc.c would no longer host an alternative implementation.
      
      This change is ultimately one to one mapping and shouldn't cause any
      observable difference; however, after the recent changes, there are
      some functions which now would fit memblock.c better than page_alloc.c
      and dependency on HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP instead of HAVE_MEMBLOCK
      doesn't make much sense on some of them.  Further cleanups for
      functions inside HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP in mm.h would be nice.
      
      -v2: Fix compile bug introduced by mis-spelling
       CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP to CONFIG_MEMBLOCK_HAVE_NODE_MAP in
       mmzone.h.  Reported by Stephen Rothwell.
      Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
      Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
      Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
      Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@kernel.org>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
      Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      Cc: Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@sunplusct.com>
      Cc: Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
      0ee332c1
  9. 06 12月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 15 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 10 11月, 2011 2 次提交
    • O
      iommu/intel: announce supported page sizes · 6d1c56a9
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      Let the IOMMU core know we support arbitrary page sizes (as long as
      they're an order of 4KiB).
      
      This way the IOMMU core will retain the existing behavior we're used to;
      it will let us map regions that:
      - their size is an order of 4KiB
      - they are naturally aligned
      
      Note: Intel IOMMU hardware doesn't support arbitrary page sizes,
      but the driver does (it splits arbitrary-sized mappings into
      the pages supported by the hardware).
      
      To make everything simpler for now, though, this patch effectively tells
      the IOMMU core to keep giving this driver the same memory regions it did
      before, so nothing is changed as far as it's concerned.
      
      At this point, the page sizes announced remain static within the IOMMU
      core. To correctly utilize the pgsize-splitting of the IOMMU core by
      this driver, it seems that some core changes should still be done,
      because Intel's IOMMU page size capabilities seem to have the potential
      to be different between different DMA remapping devices.
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
      6d1c56a9
    • O
      iommu/core: stop converting bytes to page order back and forth · 5009065d
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      Express sizes in bytes rather than in page order, to eliminate the
      size->order->size conversions we have whenever the IOMMU API is calling
      the low level drivers' map/unmap methods.
      
      Adopt all existing drivers.
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      Cc: David Brown <davidb@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Cc: Joerg Roedel <Joerg.Roedel@amd.com>
      Cc: Stepan Moskovchenko <stepanm@codeaurora.org>
      Cc: KyongHo Cho <pullip.cho@samsung.com>
      Cc: Hiroshi DOYU <hdoyu@nvidia.com>
      Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
      5009065d
  12. 01 11月, 2011 1 次提交
  13. 21 10月, 2011 3 次提交
  14. 19 10月, 2011 3 次提交
  15. 15 10月, 2011 2 次提交
  16. 11 10月, 2011 1 次提交
    • R
      intel-iommu: Fix AB-BA lockdep report · 3e7abe25
      Roland Dreier 提交于
      When unbinding a device so that I could pass it through to a KVM VM, I
      got the lockdep report below.  It looks like a legitimate lock
      ordering problem:
      
       - domain_context_mapping_one() takes iommu->lock and calls
         iommu_support_dev_iotlb(), which takes device_domain_lock (inside
         iommu->lock).
      
       - domain_remove_one_dev_info() starts by taking device_domain_lock
         then takes iommu->lock inside it (near the end of the function).
      
      So this is the classic AB-BA deadlock.  It looks like a safe fix is to
      simply release device_domain_lock a bit earlier, since as far as I can
      tell, it doesn't protect any of the stuff accessed at the end of
      domain_remove_one_dev_info() anyway.
      
      BTW, the use of device_domain_lock looks a bit unsafe to me... it's
      at least not obvious to me why we aren't vulnerable to the race below:
      
        iommu_support_dev_iotlb()
                                                domain_remove_dev_info()
      
        lock device_domain_lock
          find info
        unlock device_domain_lock
      
                                                lock device_domain_lock
                                                  find same info
                                                unlock device_domain_lock
      
                                                free_devinfo_mem(info)
      
        do stuff with info after it's free
      
      However I don't understand the locking here well enough to know if
      this is a real problem, let alone what the best fix is.
      
      Anyway here's the full lockdep output that prompted all of this:
      
           =======================================================
           [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
           2.6.39.1+ #1
           -------------------------------------------------------
           bash/13954 is trying to acquire lock:
            (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}, at: [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
      
           but task is already holding lock:
            (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230
      
           which lock already depends on the new lock.
      
           the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
      
           -> #1 (device_domain_lock){-.-...}:
                  [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
                  [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
                  [<ffffffff812f8350>] domain_context_mapping_one+0x600/0x750
                  [<ffffffff812f84df>] domain_context_mapping+0x3f/0x120
                  [<ffffffff812f9175>] iommu_prepare_identity_map+0x1c5/0x1e0
                  [<ffffffff81ccf1ca>] intel_iommu_init+0x88e/0xb5e
                  [<ffffffff81cab204>] pci_iommu_init+0x16/0x41
                  [<ffffffff81002165>] do_one_initcall+0x45/0x190
                  [<ffffffff81ca3d3f>] kernel_init+0xe3/0x168
                  [<ffffffff8157ac24>] kernel_thread_helper+0x4/0x10
      
           -> #0 (&(&iommu->lock)->rlock){......}:
                  [<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10
                  [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
                  [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
                  [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
                  [<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90
                  [<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0
                  [<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0
                  [<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
                  [<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0
                  [<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
                  [<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0
                  [<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30
                  [<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170
                  [<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190
                  [<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0
                  [<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      
           other info that might help us debug this:
      
           6 locks held by bash/13954:
            #0:  (&buffer->mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff811e4464>] sysfs_write_file+0x44/0x170
            #1:  (s_active#3){++++.+}, at: [<ffffffff811e44ed>] sysfs_write_file+0xcd/0x170
            #2:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81372edb>] driver_unbind+0x9b/0xc0
            #3:  (&__lockdep_no_validate__){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81373cc7>] device_release_driver+0x27/0x50
            #4:  (&(&priv->bus_notifier)->rwsem){.+.+.+}, at: [<ffffffff8108974f>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x5f/0xb0
            #5:  (device_domain_lock){-.-...}, at: [<ffffffff812f6508>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x208/0x230
      
           stack backtrace:
           Pid: 13954, comm: bash Not tainted 2.6.39.1+ #1
           Call Trace:
            [<ffffffff810993a7>] print_circular_bug+0xf7/0x100
            [<ffffffff8109bf3e>] __lock_acquire+0x195e/0x1e10
            [<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
            [<ffffffff8109d57d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x13d/0x180
            [<ffffffff8109ca9d>] lock_acquire+0x9d/0x130
            [<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
            [<ffffffff81571475>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x55/0xa0
            [<ffffffff812f6421>] ? domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
            [<ffffffff810972bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
            [<ffffffff812f6421>] domain_remove_one_dev_info+0x121/0x230
            [<ffffffff812f8b42>] device_notifier+0x72/0x90
            [<ffffffff8157555c>] notifier_call_chain+0x8c/0xc0
            [<ffffffff81089768>] __blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x78/0xb0
            [<ffffffff810897b6>] blocking_notifier_call_chain+0x16/0x20
            [<ffffffff81373a5c>] __device_release_driver+0xbc/0xe0
            [<ffffffff81373ccf>] device_release_driver+0x2f/0x50
            [<ffffffff81372ee3>] driver_unbind+0xa3/0xc0
            [<ffffffff813724ac>] drv_attr_store+0x2c/0x30
            [<ffffffff811e4506>] sysfs_write_file+0xe6/0x170
            [<ffffffff8117569e>] vfs_write+0xce/0x190
            [<ffffffff811759e4>] sys_write+0x54/0xa0
            [<ffffffff81579a82>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@purestorage.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
      3e7abe25
  17. 21 9月, 2011 3 次提交
  18. 13 9月, 2011 1 次提交
  19. 21 6月, 2011 1 次提交
    • O
      x86/ia64: intel-iommu: move to drivers/iommu/ · 166e9278
      Ohad Ben-Cohen 提交于
      This should ease finding similarities with different platforms,
      with the intention of solving problems once in a generic framework
      which everyone can use.
      
      Note: to move intel-iommu.c, the declaration of pci_find_upstream_pcie_bridge()
      has to move from drivers/pci/pci.h to include/linux/pci.h. This is handled
      in this patch, too.
      
      As suggested, also drop DMAR's EXPERIMENTAL tag while we're at it.
      
      Compile-tested on x86_64.
      Signed-off-by: NOhad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJoerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@amd.com>
      166e9278
  20. 08 6月, 2011 1 次提交
  21. 01 6月, 2011 7 次提交