- 21 5月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric W. Biederman 提交于
Today security_bprm_set_creds has several implementations: apparmor_bprm_set_creds, cap_bprm_set_creds, selinux_bprm_set_creds, smack_bprm_set_creds, and tomoyo_bprm_set_creds. Except for cap_bprm_set_creds they all test bprm->called_set_creds and return immediately if it is true. The function cap_bprm_set_creds ignores bprm->calld_sed_creds entirely. Create a new LSM hook security_bprm_creds_for_exec that is called just before prepare_binprm in __do_execve_file, resulting in a LSM hook that is called exactly once for the entire of exec. Modify the bits of security_bprm_set_creds that only want to be called once per exec into security_bprm_creds_for_exec, leaving only cap_bprm_set_creds behind. Remove bprm->called_set_creds all of it's former users have been moved to security_bprm_creds_for_exec. Add or upate comments a appropriate to bring them up to date and to reflect this change. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87v9kszrzh.fsf_-_@x220.int.ebiederm.orgAcked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Acked-by: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> # For the LSM and Smack bits Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: N"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
-
- 30 3月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 KP Singh 提交于
The information about the different types of LSM hooks is scattered in two locations i.e. union security_list_options and struct security_hook_heads. Rather than duplicating this information even further for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM, define all the hooks with the LSM_HOOK macro in lsm_hook_defs.h which is then used to generate all the data structures required by the LSM framework. The LSM hooks are defined as: LSM_HOOK(<return_type>, <default_value>, <hook_name>, args...) with <default_value> acccessible in security.c as: LSM_RET_DEFAULT(<hook_name>) Signed-off-by: NKP Singh <kpsingh@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Reviewed-by: NBrendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com> Reviewed-by: NFlorent Revest <revest@google.com> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Acked-by: NJames Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200329004356.27286-3-kpsingh@chromium.org
-
- 28 1月, 2020 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alex Shi 提交于
This macro is never used from it was introduced in commit e6b1db98 ("security: Support early LSMs"), better to remove it. Signed-off-by: NAlex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serge@hallyn.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
-
- 10 12月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Smalley 提交于
Implement a SELinux hook for lockdown. If the lockdown module is also enabled, then a denial by the lockdown module will take precedence over SELinux, so SELinux can only further restrict lockdown decisions. The SELinux hook only distinguishes at the granularity of integrity versus confidentiality similar to the lockdown module, but includes the full lockdown reason as part of the audit record as a hint in diagnosing what triggered the denial. To support this auditing, move the lockdown_reasons[] string array from being private to the lockdown module to the security framework so that it can be used by the lsm audit code and so that it is always available even when the lockdown module is disabled. Note that the SELinux implementation allows the integrity and confidentiality reasons to be controlled independently from one another. Thus, in an SELinux policy, one could allow operations that specify an integrity reason while blocking operations that specify a confidentiality reason. The SELinux hook implementation is stricter than the lockdown module in validating the provided reason value. Sample AVC audit output from denials: avc: denied { integrity } for pid=3402 comm="fwupd" lockdown_reason="/dev/mem,kmem,port" scontext=system_u:system_r:fwupd_t:s0 tcontext=system_u:system_r:fwupd_t:s0 tclass=lockdown permissive=0 avc: denied { confidentiality } for pid=4628 comm="cp" lockdown_reason="/proc/kcore access" scontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:test_lockdown_integrity_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tcontext=unconfined_u:unconfined_r:test_lockdown_integrity_t:s0-s0:c0.c1023 tclass=lockdown permissive=0 Signed-off-by: NStephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> Reviewed-by: NJames Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> [PM: some merge fuzz do the the perf hooks] Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
-
- 18 10月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Joel Fernandes (Google) 提交于
In current mainline, the degree of access to perf_event_open(2) system call depends on the perf_event_paranoid sysctl. This has a number of limitations: 1. The sysctl is only a single value. Many types of accesses are controlled based on the single value thus making the control very limited and coarse grained. 2. The sysctl is global, so if the sysctl is changed, then that means all processes get access to perf_event_open(2) opening the door to security issues. This patch adds LSM and SELinux access checking which will be used in Android to access perf_event_open(2) for the purposes of attaching BPF programs to tracepoints, perf profiling and other operations from userspace. These operations are intended for production systems. 5 new LSM hooks are added: 1. perf_event_open: This controls access during the perf_event_open(2) syscall itself. The hook is called from all the places that the perf_event_paranoid sysctl is checked to keep it consistent with the systctl. The hook gets passed a 'type' argument which controls CPU, kernel and tracepoint accesses (in this context, CPU, kernel and tracepoint have the same semantics as the perf_event_paranoid sysctl). Additionally, I added an 'open' type which is similar to perf_event_paranoid sysctl == 3 patch carried in Android and several other distros but was rejected in mainline [1] in 2016. 2. perf_event_alloc: This allocates a new security object for the event which stores the current SID within the event. It will be useful when the perf event's FD is passed through IPC to another process which may try to read the FD. Appropriate security checks will limit access. 3. perf_event_free: Called when the event is closed. 4. perf_event_read: Called from the read(2) and mmap(2) syscalls for the event. 5. perf_event_write: Called from the ioctl(2) syscalls for the event. [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/696240/ Since Peter had suggest LSM hooks in 2016 [1], I am adding his Suggested-by tag below. To use this patch, we set the perf_event_paranoid sysctl to -1 and then apply selinux checking as appropriate (default deny everything, and then add policy rules to give access to domains that need it). In the future we can remove the perf_event_paranoid sysctl altogether. Suggested-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Co-developed-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NJoel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Acked-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org> Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> Cc: rostedt@goodmis.org Cc: Yonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com> Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Cc: jeffv@google.com Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Cc: primiano@google.com Cc: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Cc: rsavitski@google.com Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <matthewgarrett@google.com> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20191014170308.70668-1-joel@joelfernandes.org
-
- 20 8月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Add a mechanism to allow LSMs to make a policy decision around whether kernel functionality that would allow tampering with or examining the runtime state of the kernel should be permitted. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
The lockdown module is intended to allow for kernels to be locked down early in boot - sufficiently early that we don't have the ability to kmalloc() yet. Add support for early initialisation of some LSMs, and then add them to the list of names when we do full initialisation later. Early LSMs are initialised in link order and cannot be overridden via boot parameters, and cannot make use of kmalloc() (since the allocator isn't initialised yet). (Fixed by Stephen Rothwell to include a stub to fix builds when !CONFIG_SECURITY) Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg59@google.com> Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
-
- 13 8月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Goidel 提交于
As of now, setting watches on filesystem objects has, at most, applied a check for read access to the inode, and in the case of fanotify, requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN. No specific security hook or permission check has been provided to control the setting of watches. Using any of inotify, dnotify, or fanotify, it is possible to observe, not only write-like operations, but even read access to a file. Modeling the watch as being merely a read from the file is insufficient for the needs of SELinux. This is due to the fact that read access should not necessarily imply access to information about when another process reads from a file. Furthermore, fanotify watches grant more power to an application in the form of permission events. While notification events are solely, unidirectional (i.e. they only pass information to the receiving application), permission events are blocking. Permission events make a request to the receiving application which will then reply with a decision as to whether or not that action may be completed. This causes the issue of the watching application having the ability to exercise control over the triggering process. Without drawing a distinction within the permission check, the ability to read would imply the greater ability to control an application. Additionally, mount and superblock watches apply to all files within the same mount or superblock. Read access to one file should not necessarily imply the ability to watch all files accessed within a given mount or superblock. In order to solve these issues, a new LSM hook is implemented and has been placed within the system calls for marking filesystem objects with inotify, fanotify, and dnotify watches. These calls to the hook are placed at the point at which the target path has been resolved and are provided with the path struct, the mask of requested notification events, and the type of object on which the mark is being set (inode, superblock, or mount). The mask and obj_type have already been translated into common FS_* values shared by the entirety of the fs notification infrastructure. The path struct is passed rather than just the inode so that the mount is available, particularly for mount watches. This also allows for use of the hook by pathname-based security modules. However, since the hook is intended for use even by inode based security modules, it is not placed under the CONFIG_SECURITY_PATH conditional. Otherwise, the inode-based security modules would need to enable all of the path hooks, even though they do not use any of them. This only provides a hook at the point of setting a watch, and presumes that permission to set a particular watch implies the ability to receive all notification about that object which match the mask. This is all that is required for SELinux. If other security modules require additional hooks or infrastructure to control delivery of notification, these can be added by them. It does not make sense for us to propose hooks for which we have no implementation. The understanding that all notifications received by the requesting application are all strictly of a type for which the application has been granted permission shows that this implementation is sufficient in its coverage. Security modules wishing to provide complete control over fanotify must also implement a security_file_open hook that validates that the access requested by the watching application is authorized. Fanotify has the issue that it returns a file descriptor with the file mode specified during fanotify_init() to the watching process on event. This is already covered by the LSM security_file_open hook if the security module implements checking of the requested file mode there. Otherwise, a watching process can obtain escalated access to a file for which it has not been authorized. The selinux_path_notify hook implementation works by adding five new file permissions: watch, watch_mount, watch_sb, watch_reads, and watch_with_perm (descriptions about which will follow), and one new filesystem permission: watch (which is applied to superblock checks). The hook then decides which subset of these permissions must be held by the requesting application based on the contents of the provided mask and the obj_type. The selinux_file_open hook already checks the requested file mode and therefore ensures that a watching process cannot escalate its access through fanotify. The watch, watch_mount, and watch_sb permissions are the baseline permissions for setting a watch on an object and each are a requirement for any watch to be set on a file, mount, or superblock respectively. It should be noted that having either of the other two permissions (watch_reads and watch_with_perm) does not imply the watch, watch_mount, or watch_sb permission. Superblock watches further require the filesystem watch permission to the superblock. As there is no labeled object in view for mounts, there is no specific check for mount watches beyond watch_mount to the inode. Such a check could be added in the future, if a suitable labeled object existed representing the mount. The watch_reads permission is required to receive notifications from read-exclusive events on filesystem objects. These events include accessing a file for the purpose of reading and closing a file which has been opened read-only. This distinction has been drawn in order to provide a direct indication in the policy for this otherwise not obvious capability. Read access to a file should not necessarily imply the ability to observe read events on a file. Finally, watch_with_perm only applies to fanotify masks since it is the only way to set a mask which allows for the blocking, permission event. This permission is needed for any watch which is of this type. Though fanotify requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN, this is insufficient as it gives implicit trust to root, which we do not do, and does not support least privilege. Signed-off-by: NAaron Goidel <acgoide@tycho.nsa.gov> Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Acked-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
-
- 14 6月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Janne Karhunen 提交于
Atomic policy updaters are not very useful as they cannot usually perform the policy updates on their own. Since it seems that there is no strict need for the atomicity, switch to the blocking variant. While doing so, rename the functions accordingly. Signed-off-by: NJanne Karhunen <janne.karhunen@gmail.com> Acked-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com> Acked-by: NJames Morris <jamorris@linux.microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: NMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
-
- 31 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Gleixner 提交于
Based on 1 normalized pattern(s): this program is free software you can redistribute it and or modify it under the terms of the gnu general public license as published by the free software foundation either version 2 of the license or at your option any later version extracted by the scancode license scanner the SPDX license identifier GPL-2.0-or-later has been chosen to replace the boilerplate/reference in 3029 file(s). Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: NAllison Randal <allison@lohutok.net> Cc: linux-spdx@vger.kernel.org Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190527070032.746973796@linutronix.deSigned-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 21 3月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Ondrej Mosnacek 提交于
This patch introduces a new security hook that is intended for initializing the security data for newly created kernfs nodes, which provide a way of storing a non-default security context, but need to operate independently from mounts (and therefore may not have an associated inode at the moment of creation). The main motivation is to allow kernfs nodes to inherit the context of the parent under SELinux, similar to the behavior of security_inode_init_security(). Other LSMs may implement their own logic for handling the creation of new nodes. This patch also adds helper functions to <linux/kernfs.h> for getting/setting security xattrs of a kernfs node so that LSMs hooks are able to do their job. Other important attributes should be accessible direcly in the kernfs_node fields (in case there is need for more, then new helpers should be added to kernfs.h along with the patch that needs them). Signed-off-by: NOndrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com> Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> [PM: more manual merge fixes] Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add a move_mount() system call that will move a mount from one place to another and, in the next commit, allow to attach an unattached mount tree. The new system call looks like the following: int move_mount(int from_dfd, const char *from_path, int to_dfd, const char *to_path, unsigned int flags); Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 28 2月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
new primitive: vfs_dup_fs_context(). Comes with fs_context method (->dup()) for copying the filesystem-specific parts of fs_context, along with LSM one (->fs_context_dup()) for doing the same to LSM parts. [needs better commit message, and change of Author:, anyway] Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 David Howells 提交于
Add LSM hooks for use by the new mount API and filesystem context code. This includes: (1) Hooks to handle allocation, duplication and freeing of the security record attached to a filesystem context. (2) A hook to snoop source specifications. There may be multiple of these if the filesystem supports it. They will to be local files/devices if fs_context::source_is_dev is true and will be something else, possibly remote server specifications, if false. (3) A hook to snoop superblock configuration options in key[=val] form. If the LSM decides it wants to handle it, it can suppress the option being passed to the filesystem. Note that 'val' may include commas and binary data with the fsopen patch. (4) A hook to perform validation and allocation after the configuration has been done but before the superblock is allocated and set up. (5) A hook to transfer the security from the context to a newly created superblock. (6) A hook to rule on whether a path point can be used as a mountpoint. These are intended to replace: security_sb_copy_data security_sb_kern_mount security_sb_mount security_sb_set_mnt_opts security_sb_clone_mnt_opts security_sb_parse_opts_str [AV -- some of the methods being replaced are already gone, some of the methods are not added for the lack of need] Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 26 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
To avoid potential confusion, explicitly ignore "security=" when "lsm=" is used on the command line, and report that it is happening. Suggested-by: NTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Acked-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Richard Guy Briggs 提交于
The audit_rule_match() struct audit_context *actx parameter is not used by any in-tree consumers (selinux, apparmour, integrity, smack). The audit context is an internal audit structure that should only be accessed by audit accessor functions. It was part of commit 03d37d25 ("LSM/Audit: Introduce generic Audit LSM hooks") but appears to have never been used. Remove it. Please see the github issue https://github.com/linux-audit/audit-kernel/issues/107Signed-off-by: NRichard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com> [PM: fixed the referenced commit title] Signed-off-by: NPaul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>
-
- 19 1月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Fixes the following sparse warnings: security/security.c:533:5: warning: symbol 'lsm_task_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static? security/security.c:554:5: warning: symbol 'lsm_ipc_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static? security/security.c:575:5: warning: symbol 'lsm_msg_msg_alloc' was not declared. Should it be static? Fixes: f4ad8f2c ("LSM: Infrastructure management of the task security") Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <weiyongjun1@huawei.com> Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
-
由 Tetsuo Handa 提交于
Since current->cred == current->real_cred when ordered_lsm_init() is called, and lsm_early_cred()/lsm_early_task() need to be called between the amount of required bytes is determined and module specific initialization function is called, we can move these calls from individual modules to ordered_lsm_init(). Signed-off-by: NTetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Acked-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 James Morris 提交于
From: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Check that the cred security blob has been set before trying to clean it up. There is a case during credential initialization that could result in this. Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Acked-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com> Reported-by: syzbot+69ca07954461f189e808@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
-
- 11 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Micah Morton 提交于
This patch provides a general mechanism for passing flags to the security_capable LSM hook. It replaces the specific 'audit' flag that is used to tell security_capable whether it should log an audit message for the given capability check. The reason for generalizing this flag passing is so we can add an additional flag that signifies whether security_capable is being called by a setid syscall (which is needed by the proposed SafeSetID LSM). Signed-off-by: NMicah Morton <mortonm@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NJames Morris <james.morris@microsoft.com>
-
- 09 1月, 2019 20 次提交
-
-
由 Casey Schaufler 提交于
Move management of the kern_ipc_perm->security and msg_msg->security blobs out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Casey Schaufler 提交于
Move management of the task_struct->security blob out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. The only user of this blob is AppArmor. The AppArmor use is abstracted to avoid future conflict. Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Casey Schaufler 提交于
Move management of the inode->i_security blob out of the individual security modules and into the security infrastructure. Instead of allocating the blobs from within the modules the modules tell the infrastructure how much space is required, and the space is allocated there. Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Casey Schaufler 提交于
Move management of the file->f_security blob out of the individual security modules and into the infrastructure. The modules no longer allocate or free the data, instead they tell the infrastructure how much space they require. Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Casey Schaufler 提交于
Move management of the cred security blob out of the security modules and into the security infrastructre. Instead of allocating and freeing space the security modules tell the infrastructure how much space they require. Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> [kees: adjusted for ordered init series] Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Casey Schaufler 提交于
Back in 2007 I made what turned out to be a rather serious mistake in the implementation of the Smack security module. The SELinux module used an interface in /proc to manipulate the security context on processes. Rather than use a similar interface, I used the same interface. The AppArmor team did likewise. Now /proc/.../attr/current will tell you the security "context" of the process, but it will be different depending on the security module you're using. This patch provides a subdirectory in /proc/.../attr for Smack. Smack user space can use the "current" file in this subdirectory and never have to worry about getting SELinux attributes by mistake. Programs that use the old interface will continue to work (or fail, as the case may be) as before. The proposed S.A.R.A security module is dependent on the mechanism to create its own attr subdirectory. The original implementation is by Kees Cook. Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
This converts capabilities to use the new LSM_ORDER_FIRST position. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
In preparation for distinguishing the "capability" LSM from other LSMs, it must be ordered first. This introduces LSM_ORDER_MUTABLE for the general LSMs and LSM_ORDER_FIRST for capability. In the future LSM_ORDER_LAST for could be added for anything that must run last (e.g. Landlock may use this). Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
This converts Yama from being a direct "minor" LSM into an ordered LSM. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
This converts LoadPin from being a direct "minor" LSM into an ordered LSM. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
Since we already have to do a pass through the LSMs to figure out if exclusive LSMs should be disabled after the first one is seen as enabled, this splits the logic up a bit more cleanly. Now we do a full "prepare" pass through the LSMs (which also allows for later use by the blob-sharing code), before starting the LSM initialization pass. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Casey Schaufler 提交于
This removes CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY in favor of the explicit ordering offered by CONFIG_LSM and adds all the exclusive LSMs to the ordered LSM initialization. The old meaning of CONFIG_DEFAULT_SECURITY is now captured by which exclusive LSM is listed first in the LSM order. All LSMs not added to the ordered list are explicitly disabled. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
In order to both support old "security=" Legacy Major LSM selection, and handling real exclusivity, this creates LSM_FLAG_EXCLUSIVE and updates the selection logic to handle them. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
For what are marked as the Legacy Major LSMs, make them effectively exclusive when selected on the "security=" boot parameter, to handle the future case of when a previously major LSMs become non-exclusive (e.g. when TOMOYO starts blob-sharing). Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
This moves the string handling for "security=" boot parameter into a stored pointer instead of a string duplicate. This will allow easier handling of the string when switching logic to use the coming enable/disable infrastructure. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
Until now, any LSM without an enable storage variable was considered enabled. This inverts the logic and sets defaults to true only if the LSM gets added to the ordered initialization list. (And an exception continues for the major LSMs until they are integrated into the ordered initialization in a later patch.) Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
Provide a way to explicitly choose LSM initialization order via the new "lsm=" comma-separated list of LSMs. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
This provides a way to declare LSM initialization order via the new CONFIG_LSM. Currently only non-major LSMs are recognized. This will be expanded in future patches. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
This constructs an ordered list of LSMs to initialize, using a hard-coded list of only "integrity": minor LSMs continue to have direct hook calls, and major LSMs continue to initialize separately. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>
-
由 Kees Cook 提交于
As a prerequisite to adjusting LSM selection logic in the future, this moves the selection logic up out of the individual major LSMs, making their init functions only run when actually enabled. This considers all LSMs enabled by default unless they specified an external "enable" variable. Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: NCasey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Johansen <john.johansen@canonical.com>
-