Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 12 4月, 2021 10 次提交
  3. 09 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  5. 08 4月, 2021 1 次提交
  7. 03 4月, 2021 1 次提交
    • J
      io_uring: fix !CONFIG_BLOCK compilation failure · e82ad485
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      kernel test robot correctly pinpoints a compilation failure if
CONFIG_BLOCK isn't set:

fs/io_uring.c: In function '__io_complete_rw':
>> fs/io_uring.c:2509:48: error: implicit declaration of function 'io_rw_should_reissue'; did you mean 'io_rw_reissue'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
    2509 |  if ((res == -EAGAIN || res == -EOPNOTSUPP) && io_rw_should_reissue(req)) {
         |                                                ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                                                io_rw_reissue
    cc1: some warnings being treated as errors

Ensure that we have a stub declaration of io_rw_should_reissue() for
!CONFIG_BLOCK.

Fixes: 230d50d4 ("io_uring: move reissue into regular IO path")
Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      e82ad485
  9. 02 4月, 2021 1 次提交
    • J
      io_uring: move reissue into regular IO path · 230d50d4
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      It's non-obvious how retry is done for block backed files, when it happens
off the kiocb done path. It also makes it tricky to deal with the iov_iter
handling.

Just mark the req as needing a reissue, and handling it from the
submission path instead. This makes it directly obvious that we're not
re-importing the iovec from userspace past the submit point, and it means
that we can just reuse our usual -EAGAIN retry path from the read/write
handling.

At some point in the future, we'll gain the ability to always reliably
return -EAGAIN through the stack. A previous attempt on the block side
didn't pan out and got reverted, hence the need to check for this
information out-of-band right now.
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      230d50d4
  11. 01 4月, 2021 3 次提交
  13. 31 3月, 2021 1 次提交
    • J
      io_uring: drop sqd lock before handling signals for SQPOLL · 82734c5b
      由 Jens Axboe 提交于 
      Don't call into get_signal() with the sqd mutex held, it'll fail if we're
freezing the task and we'll get complaints on locks still being held:

====================================
WARNING: iou-sqp-8386/8387 still has locks held!
5.12.0-rc4-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
------------------------------------
1 lock held by iou-sqp-8386/8387:
 #0: ffff88801e1d2470 (&sqd->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: io_sq_thread+0x24c/0x13a0 fs/io_uring.c:6731

 stack backtrace:
 CPU: 1 PID: 8387 Comm: iou-sqp-8386 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
 Call Trace:
  __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
  dump_stack+0x141/0x1d7 lib/dump_stack.c:120
  try_to_freeze include/linux/freezer.h:66 [inline]
  get_signal+0x171a/0x2150 kernel/signal.c:2576
  io_sq_thread+0x8d2/0x13a0 fs/io_uring.c:6748

Fold the get_signal() case in with the parking checks, as we need to drop
the lock in both cases, and since we need to be checking for parking when
juggling the lock anyway.

Reported-by: syzbot+796d767eb376810256f5@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: dbe1bdbb ("io_uring: handle signals for IO threads like a normal thread")
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      82734c5b
  15. 29 3月, 2021 2 次提交
  17. 28 3月, 2021 6 次提交
  19. 26 3月, 2021 1 次提交
  21. 24 3月, 2021 1 次提交
    • P
      io_uring: do ctx sqd ejection in a clear context · a185f1db
      由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于 
      WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 27907 at fs/io_uring.c:7147 io_sq_thread_park+0xb5/0xd0 fs/io_uring.c:7147
CPU: 1 PID: 27907 Comm: iou-sqp-27905 Not tainted 5.12.0-rc4-syzkaller #0
RIP: 0010:io_sq_thread_park+0xb5/0xd0 fs/io_uring.c:7147
Call Trace:
 io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill+0x214/0x700 fs/io_uring.c:8619
 io_uring_release+0x3e/0x50 fs/io_uring.c:8646
 __fput+0x288/0x920 fs/file_table.c:280
 task_work_run+0xdd/0x1a0 kernel/task_work.c:140
 io_run_task_work fs/io_uring.c:2238 [inline]
 io_run_task_work fs/io_uring.c:2228 [inline]
 io_uring_try_cancel_requests+0x8ec/0xc60 fs/io_uring.c:8770
 io_uring_cancel_sqpoll+0x1cf/0x290 fs/io_uring.c:8974
 io_sqpoll_cancel_cb+0x87/0xb0 fs/io_uring.c:8907
 io_run_task_work_head+0x58/0xb0 fs/io_uring.c:1961
 io_sq_thread+0x3e2/0x18d0 fs/io_uring.c:6763
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30 arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:294

May happen that last ctx ref is killed in io_uring_cancel_sqpoll(), so
fput callback (i.e. io_uring_release()) is enqueued through task_work,
and run by same cancellation. As it's deeply nested we can't do parking
or taking sqd->lock there, because its state is unclear. So avoid
ctx ejection from sqd list from io_ring_ctx_wait_and_kill() and do it
in a clear context in io_ring_exit_work().

Fixes: f6d54255 ("io_uring: halt SQO submission on ctx exit")
Reported-by: syzbot+e3a3f84f5cecf61f0583@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/e90df88b8ff2cabb14a7534601d35d62ab4cb8c7.1616496707.git.asml.silence@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      a185f1db
  23. 22 3月, 2021 4 次提交
  25. 21 3月, 2021 1 次提交
    • S
      io_uring: call req_set_fail_links() on short send[msg]()/recv[msg]() with MSG_WAITALL · 0031275d
      由 Stefan Metzmacher 提交于 
      Without that it's not safe to use them in a linked combination with
others.

Now combinations like IORING_OP_SENDMSG followed by IORING_OP_SPLICE
should be possible.

We already handle short reads and writes for the following opcodes:

- IORING_OP_READV
- IORING_OP_READ_FIXED
- IORING_OP_READ
- IORING_OP_WRITEV
- IORING_OP_WRITE_FIXED
- IORING_OP_WRITE
- IORING_OP_SPLICE
- IORING_OP_TEE

Now we have it for these as well:

- IORING_OP_SENDMSG
- IORING_OP_SEND
- IORING_OP_RECVMSG
- IORING_OP_RECV

For IORING_OP_RECVMSG we also check for the MSG_TRUNC and MSG_CTRUNC
flags in order to call req_set_fail_links().

There might be applications arround depending on the behavior
that even short send[msg]()/recv[msg]() retuns continue an
IOSQE_IO_LINK chain.

It's very unlikely that such applications pass in MSG_WAITALL,
which is only defined in 'man 2 recvmsg', but not in 'man 2 sendmsg'.

It's expected that the low level sock_sendmsg() call just ignores
MSG_WAITALL, as MSG_ZEROCOPY is also ignored without explicitly set
SO_ZEROCOPY.

We also expect the caller to know about the implicit truncation to
MAX_RW_COUNT, which we don't detect.

cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/c4e1a4cc0d905314f4d5dc567e65a7b09621aab3.1615908477.git.metze@samba.orgSigned-off-by: NStefan Metzmacher <metze@samba.org>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      0031275d
  27. 18 3月, 2021 4 次提交
  29. 15 3月, 2021 3 次提交
    • P
      io_uring: fix sqpoll cancellation via task_work · b7f5a0bf
      由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于 
      Running sqpoll cancellations via task_work_run() is a bad idea because
it depends on other task works to be run, but those may be locked in
currently running task_work_run() because of how it's (splicing the list
in batches).

Enqueue and run them through a separate callback head, namely
struct io_sq_data::park_task_work. As a nice bonus we now precisely
control where it's run, that's much safer than guessing where it can
happen as it was before.
Reported-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      b7f5a0bf
    • P
      io_uring: add generic callback_head helpers · 9b465711
      由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于 
      We already have helpers to run/add callback_head but taking ctx and
working with ctx->exit_task_work. Extract generic versions of them
implemented in terms of struct callback_head, it will be used later.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      9b465711
    • P
      io_uring: fix concurrent parking · 9e138a48
      由 Pavel Begunkov 提交于 
      If io_sq_thread_park() of one task got rescheduled right after
set_bit(), before it gets back to mutex_lock() there can happen
park()/unpark() by another task with SQPOLL locking again and
continuing running never seeing that first set_bit(SHOULD_PARK),
so won't even try to put the mutex down for parking.

It will get parked eventually when SQPOLL drops the lock for reschedule,
but may be problematic and will get in the way of further fixes.

Account number of tasks waiting for parking with a new atomic variable
park_pending and adjust SHOULD_PARK accordingly. It doesn't entirely
replaces SHOULD_PARK bit with this atomic var because it's convenient
to have it as a bit in the state and will help to do optimisations
later.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      9e138a48