1. 20 2月, 2010 1 次提交
    • T
      x86: Move pci init function to x86_init · b72d0db9
      Thomas Gleixner 提交于
      The PCI initialization in pci_subsys_init() is a mess. pci_numaq_init,
      pci_acpi_init, pci_visws_init and pci_legacy_init are called and each
      implementation checks and eventually modifies the global variable
      pcibios_scanned.
      
      x86_init functions allow us to do this more elegant. The pci.init
      function pointer is preset to pci_legacy_init. numaq, acpi and visws
      can modify the pointer in their early setup functions. The functions
      return 0 when they did the full initialization including bus scan. A
      non zero return value indicates that pci_legacy_init needs to be
      called either because the selected function failed or wants the
      generic bus scan in pci_legacy_init to happen (e.g. visws).
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      LKML-Reference: <43F901BD926A4E43B106BF17856F07559FB80CFE@orsmsx508.amr.corp.intel.com>
      Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      b72d0db9
  2. 25 11月, 2009 7 次提交
  3. 25 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  4. 13 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  6. 30 12月, 2008 1 次提交
  7. 12 11月, 2008 1 次提交
    • H
      x86: attempt reboot via port CF9 if we have standard PCI ports · 14d7ca5c
      H. Peter Anvin 提交于
      Impact: Changes reboot behavior.
      
      If port CF9 seems to be safe to touch, attempt it before trying the
      keyboard controller.  Port CF9 is not available on all chipsets (a
      significant but decreasing number of modern chipsets don't implement
      it), but port CF9 itself should in general be safe to poke (no ill
      effects if unimplemented) on any system which has PCI Configuration
      Method #1 or #2, as it falls inside the PCI configuration port range
      in both cases.  No chipset without PCI is known to have port CF9,
      either, although an explicit "pci=bios" would mean we miss this and
      therefore don't use port CF9.  An explicit "reboot=pci" can be used to
      force the use of port CF9.
      Signed-off-by: NH. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>
      14d7ca5c
  8. 12 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  9. 11 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  10. 09 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • R
      x86/pci: removing subsys_initcall ordering dependencies · 8dd779b1
      Robert Richter 提交于
      So far subsys_initcalls has been executed in this order depending on
      the object order in the Makefile:
      
      arch/x86/pci/visws.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_init);
      arch/x86/pci/numa.c:subsys_initcall(pci_numa_init);
      arch/x86/pci/acpi.c:subsys_initcall(pci_acpi_init);
      arch/x86/pci/legacy.c:subsys_initcall(pci_legacy_init);
      arch/x86/pci/irq.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_irq_init);
      arch/x86/pci/common.c:subsys_initcall(pcibios_init);
      
      This patch removes the ordering dependency. There is now only one
      subsys_initcall function that contains subsystem initialization code
      with a defined order.
      Signed-off-by: NRobert Richter <robert.richter@amd.com>
      Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      8dd779b1
  11. 08 7月, 2008 1 次提交
  12. 11 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • G
      PCI: boot parameter to avoid expansion ROM memory allocation · bb71ad88
      Gary Hade 提交于
      Contention for scarce PCI memory resources has been growing
      due to an increasing number of PCI slots in large multi-node
      systems.  The kernel currently attempts by default to
      allocate memory for all PCI expansion ROMs so there has
      also been an increasing number of PCI memory allocation
      failures seen on these systems.  This occurs because the
      BIOS either (1) provides insufficient PCI memory resource
      for all the expansion ROMs or (2) provides adequate PCI
      memory resource for expansion ROMs but provides the
      space in kernel unexpected BIOS assigned P2P non-prefetch
      windows.
      
      The resulting PCI memory allocation failures may be benign
      when related to memory requests for expansion ROMs themselves
      but in some cases they can occur when attempting to allocate
      space for more critical BARs.  This can happen when a successful
      expansion ROM allocation request consumes memory resource
      that was intended for a non-ROM BAR.  We have seen this
      happen during PCI hotplug of an adapter that contains a
      P2P bridge where successful memory allocation for an
      expansion ROM BAR on device behind the bridge consumed
      memory that was intended for a non-ROM BAR on the P2P bridge.
      In all cases the allocation failure messages can be very
      confusing for users.
      
      This patch provides a new 'pci=norom' kernel boot parameter
      that can be used to disable the default PCI expansion ROM memory
      resource allocation.  This provides a way to avoid the above
      described issues on systems that do not contain PCI devices
      for which drivers or user-level applications depend on the
      default PCI expansion ROM memory resource allocation behavior.
      Signed-off-by: NGary Hade <garyhade@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      bb71ad88
  13. 06 6月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      PCI/x86: fix up PCI stuff so that PCI_GOANY supports OLPC · 2bdd1b03
      Andres Salomon 提交于
      Previously, one would have to specifically choose CONFIG_OLPC and
      CONFIG_PCI_GOOLPC in order to enable PCI_OLPC.  That doesn't really work
      for distro kernels, so this patch allows one to choose CONFIG_OLPC and
      CONFIG_PCI_GOANY in order to build in OLPC support in a generic kernel (as
      requested by Robert Millan).
      
      This also moves GOOLPC before GOANY in the menuconfig list.
      
      Finally, make pci_access_init return early if we detect OLPC hardware.
      There's no need to continue probing stuff, and pci_pcbios_init
      specifically trashes our settings (we didn't run into that before because
      PCI_GOANY wasn't supported).
      Signed-off-by: NAndres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
      Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      2bdd1b03
  14. 06 5月, 2008 2 次提交
  15. 29 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 27 4月, 2008 3 次提交
    • Y
      x86: add pci=check_enable_amd_mmconf and dmi check · 5f0b2976
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      so will disable that feature by default, and only enable that via
      pci=check_enable_amd_mmconf or for system match with dmi table.
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      5f0b2976
    • Y
      x86: clear pci_mmcfg_virt when mmcfg get rejected · 0b64ad71
      Yinghai Lu 提交于
      For x86_64, need to free pci_mmcfg_virt, and iounmap some pointers
      when MMCONF is not reserved in E820 or acpi _CRS and get rejected.
      Signed-off-by: NYinghai Lu <yinghai.lu@sun.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      0b64ad71
    • R
      x86: validate against acpi motherboard resources · 7752d5cf
      Robert Hancock 提交于
      This path adds validation of the MMCONFIG table against the ACPI reserved
      motherboard resources.  If the MMCONFIG table is found to be reserved in
      ACPI, we don't bother checking the E820 table.  The PCI Express firmware
      spec apparently tells BIOS developers that reservation in ACPI is required
      and E820 reservation is optional, so checking against ACPI first makes
      sense.  Many BIOSes don't reserve the MMCONFIG region in E820 even though
      it is perfectly functional, the existing check needlessly disables MMCONFIG
      in these cases.
      
      In order to do this, MMCONFIG setup has been split into two phases.  If PCI
      configuration type 1 is not available then MMCONFIG is enabled early as
      before.  Otherwise, it is enabled later after the ACPI interpreter is
      enabled, since we need to be able to execute control methods in order to
      check the ACPI reserved resources.  Presently this is just triggered off
      the end of ACPI interpreter initialization.
      
      There are a few other behavioral changes here:
      
      - Validate all MMCONFIG configurations provided, not just the first one.
      
      - Validate the entire required length of each configuration according to
        the provided ending bus number is reserved, not just the minimum required
        allocation.
      
      - Validate that the area is reserved even if we read it from the chipset
        directly and not from the MCFG table.  This catches the case where the
        BIOS didn't set the location properly in the chipset and has mapped it
        over other things it shouldn't have.
      
      This also cleans up the MMCONFIG initialization functions so that they
      simply do nothing if MMCONFIG is not compiled in.
      
      Based on an original patch by Rajesh Shah from Intel.
      
      [akpm@linux-foundation.org: many fixes and cleanups]
      Signed-off-by: NRobert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>
      Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      Tested-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Cc: Rajesh Shah <rajesh.shah@intel.com>
      Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
      Acked-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
      Signed-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
      7752d5cf
  17. 21 4月, 2008 2 次提交
    • B
      PCI: x86: use generic pci_enable_resources() · b81d988c
      Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
      Use the generic pci_enable_resources() instead of the arch-specific code.
      
      Unlike this arch-specific code, the generic version:
          - checks for resource collisions with "!r->parent"
      Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@hp.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      b81d988c
    • G
      PCI: remove initial bios sort of PCI devices on x86 · 1ba6ab11
      Greg Kroah-Hartman 提交于
      We currently keep 2 lists of PCI devices in the system, one in the
      driver core, and one all on its own.  This second list is sorted at boot
      time, in "BIOS" order, to try to remain compatible with older kernels
      (2.2 and earlier days).  There was also a "nosort" option to turn this
      sorting off, to remain compatible with even older kernel versions, but
      that just ends up being what we have been doing from 2.5 days...
      
      Unfortunately, the second list of devices is not really ever used to 
      determine the probing order of PCI devices or drivers[1].  That is done
      using the driver core list instead.  This change happened back in the
      early 2.5 days.
      
      Relying on BIOS ording for the binding of drivers to specific device
      names is problematic for many reasons, and userspace tools like udev
      exist to properly name devices in a persistant manner if that is needed,
      no reliance on the BIOS is needed.
      
      Matt Domsch and others at Dell noticed this back in 2006, and added a
      boot option to sort the PCI device lists (both of them) in a
      breadth-first manner to help remain compatible with the 2.4 order, if
      needed for any reason.  This option is not going away, as some systems
      rely on them.
      
      This patch removes the sorting of the internal PCI device list in "BIOS"
      mode, as it's not needed at all anymore, and hasn't for many years.
      I've also removed the PCI flags for this from some other arches that for
      some reason defined them, but never used them.
      
      This should not change the ordering of any drivers or device probing.
      
      [1] The old-style pci_get_device and pci_find_device() still used this
      sorting order, but there are very few drivers that use these functions,
      as they are deprecated for use in this manner.  If for some reason, a
      driver rely on the order and uses these functions, the breadth-first
      boot option will resolve any problem.
      
      Cc: Matt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      1ba6ab11
  18. 11 2月, 2008 2 次提交
  19. 13 10月, 2007 2 次提交
    • G
      PCI: use _CRS for PCI resource allocation · 62f420f8
      Gary Hade 提交于
      Use _CRS for PCI resource allocation
      
      This patch resolves an issue where incorrect PCI memory and i/o ranges
      are being assigned to hotplugged PCI devices on some IBM systems.  The
      resource mis-allocation not only makes the PCI device unuseable but
      often makes the entire system unuseable due to resulting machine checks.
      
      The hotplug capable PCI slots on the affected systems are not located
      under a standard P2P bridge but are instead located under PCI root
      bridges or subtractive decode P2P bridges.  For example, the IBM x3850
      contains 2 hotplug capable PCI-X slots and 4 hotplug capable PCIe slots
      with the PCI-X slots each located under a PCI root bridge and the PCIe
      slots each located under a subtractive decode P2P bridge.
      
      The current i386/x86_64 PCI resource allocation code does not use _CRS
      returned resource information.  No other resource information source is
      available for slots that are not below a standard P2P bridge so
      incorrect ranges are being allocated from e820 hole causing the bad
      result.
      
      This patch causes the kernel to use _CRS returned resource info.  It is
      roughly based on a change provided by Matthew Wilcox for the ia64 kernel
      in 2005.  Due to possible buggy BIOS factor and possible yet to be
      discovered kernel issues the function is disabled by default and can be
      enabled with pci=use_crs.
      Signed-off-by: NGary Hade <gary.hade@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      62f420f8
    • G
      PCI: skip ISA ioresource alignment on some systems · 036fff4c
      Gary Hade 提交于
      Skip ISA ioresource alignment on some systems
      
      To conserve limited PCI i/o resource on some IBM multi-node systems, the
      BIOS allocates (via _CRS) and expects the kernel to use addresses in
      ranges currently excluded by pcibios_align_resource() [i386/pci/i386.c].
      This change allows the kernel to use the currently excluded address
      ranges on the IBM x3800, x3850, and x3950.
      Signed-off-by: NGary Hade <gary.hade@us.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      036fff4c
  20. 11 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  21. 12 8月, 2007 1 次提交
  22. 13 2月, 2007 3 次提交
  23. 03 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  24. 19 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • M
      PCI: optionally sort device lists breadth-first · 6b4b78fe
      Matt Domsch 提交于
      Problem:
      New Dell PowerEdge servers have 2 embedded ethernet ports, which are
      labeled NIC1 and NIC2 on the chassis, in the BIOS setup screens, and
      in the printed documentation.  Assuming no other add-in ethernet ports
      in the system, Linux 2.4 kernels name these eth0 and eth1
      respectively.  Many people have come to expect this naming.  Linux 2.6
      kernels name these eth1 and eth0 respectively (backwards from
      expectations).  I also have reports that various Sun and HP servers
      have similar behavior.
      
      
      Root cause:
      Linux 2.4 kernels walk the pci_devices list, which happens to be
      sorted in breadth-first order (or pcbios_find_device order on i386,
      which most often is breadth-first also).  2.6 kernels have both the
      pci_devices list and the pci_bus_type.klist_devices list, the latter
      is what is walked at driver load time to match the pci_id tables; this
      klist happens to be in depth-first order.
      
      On systems where, for physical routing reasons, NIC1 appears on a
      lower bus number than NIC2, but NIC2's bridge is discovered first in
      the depth-first ordering, NIC2 will be discovered before NIC1.  If the
      list were sorted breadth-first, NIC1 would be discovered before NIC2.
      
      A PowerEdge 1955 system has the following topology which easily
      exhibits the difference between depth-first and breadth-first device
      lists.
      
      -[0000:00]-+-00.0  Intel Corporation 5000P Chipset Memory Controller Hub
                 +-02.0-[0000:03-08]--+-00.0-[0000:04-07]--+-00.0-[0000:05-06]----00.0-[0000:06]----00.0  Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet (labeled NIC2, 2.4 kernel name eth1, 2.6 kernel name eth0)
                 +-1c.0-[0000:01-02]----00.0-[0000:02]----00.0  Broadcom Corporation NetXtreme II BCM5708S Gigabit Ethernet (labeled NIC1, 2.4 kernel name eth0, 2.6 kernel name eth1)
      
      
      Other factors, such as device driver load order and the presence of
      PCI slots at various points in the bus hierarchy further complicate
      this problem; I'm not trying to solve those here, just restore the
      device order, and thus basic behavior, that 2.4 kernels had.
      
      
      Solution:
      
      The solution can come in multiple steps.
      
      Suggested fix #1: kernel
      Patch below optionally sorts the two device lists into breadth-first
      ordering to maintain compatibility with 2.4 kernels.  It adds two new
      command line options:
        pci=bfsort
        pci=nobfsort
      to force the sort order, or not, as you wish.  It also adds DMI checks
      for the specific Dell systems which exhibit "backwards" ordering, to
      make them "right".
      
      
      Suggested fix #2: udev rules from userland
      Many people also have the expectation that embedded NICs are always
      discovered before add-in NICs (which this patch does not try to do).
      Using the PCI IRQ Routing Table provided by system BIOS, it's easy to
      determine which PCI devices are embedded, or if add-in, which PCI slot
      they're in.  I'm working on a tool that would allow udev to name
      ethernet devices in ascending embedded, slot 1 .. slot N order,
      subsort by PCI bus/dev/fn breadth-first.  It'll be possible to use it
      independent of udev as well for those distributions that don't use
      udev in their installers.
      
      Suggested fix #3: system board routing rules
      One can constrain the system board layout to put NIC1 ahead of NIC2
      regardless of breadth-first or depth-first discovery order.  This adds
      a significant level of complexity to board routing, and may not be
      possible in all instances (witness the above systems from several
      major manufacturers).  I don't want to encourage this particular train
      of thought too far, at the expense of not doing #1 or #2 above.
      
      
      Feedback appreciated.  Patch tested on a Dell PowerEdge 1955 blade
      with 2.6.18.
      
      You'll also note I took some liberty and temporarily break the klist
      abstraction to simplify and speed up the sort algorithm.  I think
      that's both safe and appropriate in this instance.
      Signed-off-by: NMatt Domsch <Matt_Domsch@dell.com>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>
      
      6b4b78fe
  25. 26 9月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] x86: Allow disabling early pci scans with pci=noearly or disallowing conf1 · 0637a70a
      Andi Kleen 提交于
      Some buggy systems can machine check when config space accesses
      happen for some non existent devices.  i386/x86-64 do some early
      device scans that might trigger this. Allow pci=noearly to disable
      this. Also when type 1 is disabling also don't do any early
      accesses which are always type1.
      
      This moves the pci= configuration parsing to be a early parameter.
      I don't think this can break anything because it only changes
      a single global that is only used by PCI.
      
      Cc: gregkh@suse.de
      Cc: Trammell Hudson <hudson@osresearch.net>
      Signed-off-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
      0637a70a