- 07 7月, 2015 31 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Have caller fetch the block number *and* remove it from wherever it was. Pass the block number instead. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
turn recursion into a pair of loops Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We always have 0 < depth2 <= depth in there, so if (--depth) { if (--depth2) A B } else { C // not using depth2 } D // not using depth2 is equivalent to if (--depth2) A with s/depth/depth - 1/ if (--depth) B else C D Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
open-coded in several places... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
For calls in __ufs_truncate_blocks() it's just a matter of not incrementing offsets[0] and not making that call - immediately following loop will be executed one extra time and we'll be just fine. For recursive call in ufs_trunc_branch() itself, just assing NULL to offsets if we would be about to make such call. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... and turn the switch into if (), since all cases with depth != 1 have just become identical. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Instead of manually checking that the array contains only zeroes, find the position of the last non-zero (in __ufs_truncate(), where we can conveniently do that) and use that to tell if there's any non-zero in the array tail passed to ufs_trunc_...indirect(). The goal of all that clumsiness is to get fold these functions together. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
rather than bitslicing the offset just formed as sum of shifted indices, pass the array of those indices itself. NULL is used as equivalent of "all zeroes" (== free the entire branch). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
same as the previous two. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
... instead of file offset. Same cleanups as in the tindirect conversion in previous commit. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
IOW, the distance of cutoff from the begining of the branch (in blocks). That (and the fact that block just prior to cutoff is guaranteed to be present) allows to tell whether to free triple indirect block just by looking at the offset. While we are at it, using u64 for index in the block is wrong - those should be unsigned int. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Use ufs_block_to_path() to find the cutoff path in the block pointers' tree. For now just use the information about the depth (to bypass the fully preserved subtrees); subsequent commits will use the information about actual path. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
type makes no sense - those are indices in block number arrays, not block numbers. And no, UFS is not likely to grow indirect blocks with 4Gpointers in them... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
It is closely tied to block pointers handling there, can benefit from existing helpers, etc. - no point keeping them apart. Trimmed the trailing whitespaces in inode.c at the same time. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Currently - on lock_ufs(), eventually - on per-inode mutex. lock_ufs() used to be mere BKL, which is much weaker, so it needed those rechecks. BKL doesn't provide any exclusion once we lose CPU; its blind replacement, OTOH, _does_. Making that per-filesystem was an atrocity, but at least we can simplify life here. And yes, we certainly need to make that sucker per-inode - these days inode.c and truncate.c uses are needed only to protect the block pointers. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
make it return void Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
There were 3 remaining users; in two of them we took ->s_lock immediately after lock_ufs() and held it until just before unlock_ufs(); the third one (statfs) could not be called from itself or from other two (remount and sync_fs). Just use ->s_lock in statfs and don't bother with lock_ufs at all. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
* stores to block pointers are under per-inode seqlock (meta_lock) and mutex (truncate_mutex) * fetches of block pointers are either under truncate_mutex, or wrapped into seqretry loop on meta_lock * all changes of ->i_size are under truncate_mutex and i_mutex * all changes of ->i_lastfrag are under truncate_mutex It's similar to what ext2 is doing; the main difference is that unlike ext2 we can't rely upon the atomicity of stores into block pointers - on UFS2 they are 64bit. So we can't cut the corner when switching a pointer from NULL to non-NULL as we could in ext2_splice_branch() and need to use meta_lock on all modifications. We use seqlock where ext2 uses rwlock; ext2 could probably also benefit from such change... Another non-trivial difference is that with UFS we *cannot* have reader grab truncate_mutex in case of race - it has to keep retrying. That might be possible to change, but not until we lift tail unpacking several levels up in call chain. After that commit we do *NOT* hold fs-wide serialization on accesses to block pointers anymore. Moreover, lock_ufs() can become a normal mutex now - it's only used on statfs, remount and sync_fs and none of those uses are recursive. As the matter of fact, *now* it can be collapsed with ->s_lock, and be eventually replaced with saner per-cylinder-group spinlocks, but that's a separate story. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
right now it doesn't matter (lock_ufs() serializes everything), but when we switch to per-inode locking, it will be needed. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
just prior to __ufs_truncate_blocks(), with matching change of calling conventions Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Broken in "[PATCH] ufs: truncate should allocate block for last byte"; all way back in 2006. ufs_setattr() hadn't been the only user of vmtruncate() and eliminating ->truncate() method required corrections in a bunch of places. Eventually those places had migrated into ->write_begin() failure exit and ->write_end() after short copy... Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
a) move it inside ufs_truncate() b) ufs_free_inode() doesn't need it - it's serialized on ->s_lock c) ufs_write_inode() doesn't need it either (and can be called without it anyway). Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 24 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
dir_pages was declared in a lot of filesystems. Use newly dir_pages() from pagemap.h Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 18 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
Add last missing line in commit "cdd9eefd" ("fs/ufs: restore s_lock mutex") Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 16 6月, 2015 5 次提交
-
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
See "ext2: Do not update mtime of a moved directory" (and followup in "ext2: fix unbalanced kmap()/kunmap()") for background; this is UFS equivalent - the same problem exists here. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Al Viro 提交于
We are already serialized by ->i_mutex and operations on different directories are independent. These calls are just rudiments of blind BKL conversion and they should've been removed back then. Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit e4502c63 (ufs: deal with nfsd/iget races) made ufs create inodes with I_NEW flag set. However ufs_mkdir() never cleared this flag. Thus if someone ever tried to lookup the directory by inode number, he would deadlock waiting for I_NEW to be cleared. Luckily this mostly happens only if the filesystem is exported over NFS since otherwise we have the inode attached to dentry and don't look it up by inode number. In rare cases dentry can get freed without inode being freed and then we'd hit the deadlock even without NFS export. Fix the problem by clearing I_NEW before instantiating new directory inode. Fixes: e4502c63Reported-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Jan Kara 提交于
Commit e4502c63 (ufs: deal with nfsd/iget races) introduced unlock_new_inode() call into ufs_add_nondir(). However that function gets called also from ufs_link() which hands it already initialized inode and thus unlock_new_inode() complains. The problem is harmless but annoying. Fix the problem by opencoding necessary stuff in ufs_link() Fixes: e4502c63Signed-off-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
Commit 0244756e ("ufs: sb mutex merge + mutex_destroy") generated deadlocks in read/write mode on mkdir. This patch partially reverts it keeping fixes by Andrew Morton and mutex_destroy() [AV: fixed a missing bit in ufs_remount()] Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Reported-by: NIan Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Cc: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 14 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
This reverts commit 9ef7db7f ("ufs: fix deadlocks introduced by sb mutex merge") That patch tried to solve commit 0244756e ("ufs: sb mutex merge + mutex_destroy") which is itself partially reverted due to multiple deadlocks. Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Suggested-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com> Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru> Cc: Alexey Khoroshilov <khoroshilov@ispras.ru> Cc: Roger Pau Monne <roger.pau@citrix.com> Cc: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@eu.citrix.com> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 02 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tejun Heo 提交于
With the planned cgroup writeback support, backing-dev related declarations will be more widely used across block and cgroup; unfortunately, including backing-dev.h from include/linux/blkdev.h makes cyclic include dependency quite likely. This patch separates out backing-dev-defs.h which only has the essential definitions and updates blkdev.h to include it. c files which need access to more backing-dev details now include backing-dev.h directly. This takes backing-dev.h off the common include dependency chain making it a lot easier to use it across block and cgroup. v2: fs/fat build failure fixed. Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
-