1. 26 8月, 2010 9 次提交
  2. 25 8月, 2010 4 次提交
  3. 17 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  4. 27 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 23 7月, 2010 4 次提交
  6. 17 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  7. 15 7月, 2010 1 次提交
  8. 03 7月, 2010 4 次提交
  9. 26 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  10. 15 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  11. 06 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  12. 03 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 14 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  14. 11 5月, 2010 2 次提交
  15. 01 5月, 2010 1 次提交
  16. 17 4月, 2010 1 次提交
  17. 10 4月, 2010 3 次提交
  18. 24 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  19. 12 2月, 2010 1 次提交
  20. 26 1月, 2010 1 次提交
    • W
      iwlwifi: module parameter to enable/disable bt co-exist · 06702a73
      Wey-Yi Guy 提交于
      Adding "bt_coex_active" module parameter for iwlcore to enable/disable
      BT coexist; if bt_coex_active is true (default), uCode will do kill/defer
      every time the priority line is asserted (BT is sending signals on the
      priority line in the PCIx). By disable the bt_coex_active, uCode will
      ignore the BT activity and perform the normal operation.
      
      Users might experience transmit issue on some platform due to this
      WiFi/BT co-exist problem. The possible symptoms are: NetworkManager and
      other similar programs can scan and find all the available APs, but will
      timeout and unable to associate with any of the APs; no out-going frames
      can be found with wireless sniffer tools.
      
      On those platforms, WiFi communication can be restored by set "bt_coex_active"
      module parameter to "false"
      Signed-off-by: NWey-Yi Guy <wey-yi.w.guy@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NReinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
      06702a73