- 18 9月, 2014 40 次提交
-
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
seed fs devices don't participate as rw_device, so don't increment rw_devices when the device being handled belongs to a seed fs. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
When we replace all the seed device in the system there is no point in just keeping the btrfs_fs_devices with out any device Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
We are not updating sprout fs seed pointer when all seed device is replaced. This patch will check if all seed device has been replaced and then update the sprout pointer accordingly. Same reproducer as in the previous patch would apply here. And notice that btrfs_close_device will check if seed fs is present and spits out the error with out this patch. int btrfs_close_devices(struct btrfs_fs_devices *fs_devices) { :: seed_devices = fs_devices->seed; :: while (seed_devices) { fs_devices = seed_devices; seed_devices = fs_devices->seed; __btrfs_close_devices(fs_devices); free_fs_devices(fs_devices); } Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
reproducer: reproducer: mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /btrfs btrfs rep start -B /dev/sdb /dev/sdd /btrfs umount /btrfs WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 3882 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:892 __btrfs_close_devices+0x1c8/0x200 [btrfs]() which is WARN_ON(fs_devices->rw_devices); The problem here is that we did not add one to the rw_devices when we replace the seed device with a writable device. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
reproducer: mount /dev/sdb /btrfs btrfs dev add /dev/sdc /btrfs btrfs rep start -B /dev/sdb /dev/sdd /btrfs umount /btrfs WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 12661 at fs/btrfs/volumes.c:891 __btrfs_close_devices+0x1b0/0x200 [btrfs]() :: __btrfs_close_devices() :: WARN_ON(fs_devices->open_devices); After the seed device has been replaced the new target device is no more a seed device. So we need to update the device numbers in the fs_devices as pointed by the fs_info. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
There is no logical change in this patch, just a preparatory patch, so that changes can be easily reasoned. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Andrey Utkin 提交于
The issue was introduced in a79b7d4b, adding allocation of extent_workers, so this stray check is surely not meant to be a check of something else. Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82021Reported-by: NMaks Naumov <maksqwe1@ukr.net> Signed-off-by: NAndrey Utkin <andrey.krieger.utkin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
None of the uses of btrfs_search_forward() need to have the path nodes (level >= 1) read locked, only the leaf needs to be locked while the caller processes it. Therefore make it return a path with all nodes unlocked, except for the leaf. This change is motivated by the observation that during a file fsync we repeatdly call btrfs_search_forward() and process the returned leaf while upper nodes of the returned path (level >= 1) are read locked, which unnecessarily blocks other tasks that want to write to the same fs/subvol btree. Therefore instead of modifying the fsync code to unlock all nodes with level >= 1 immediately after calling btrfs_search_forward(), change btrfs_search_forward() to do it, so that it benefits all callers. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
Not sure how this escaped many eyes so far Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
BTRFS_ATTR_RW could set the mode and be inline with BTRFS_ATTR Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
All that uses BTRFS_ATTR want mode to be set at 0444 so just do it at the define. And few spacing alignments. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
we have BTRFS_ATTR define to create sysfs RO file, use that. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
If we need to cow a node, increase the write lock level and retry the tree search, there's no point of changing the node locks in our path to blocking mode, as we only waste time and unnecessarily wake up other tasks waiting on the spinning locks (just to block them again shortly after) because we release our path before repeating the tree search. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
In ctree.c:setup_items_for_insert(), we can unlock all nodes in our path before we process the leaf (shift items and data, adjust data offsets, etc). This allows for better btree concurrency, as we're often holding a write lock on at least the node at level 1. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Satoru Takeuchi 提交于
btrfs_lookup_csums_range() uses ALIGN() to check if "start" and "end + 1" are aligned to "root->sectorsize". It's better to replace these with IS_ALIGNED() for simplicity. Signed-off-by: NSatoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Tracepoint trace_btrfs_normal_work_done never has an user, just cleanup it. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Liu Bo 提交于
Kernel workqueue's tracepoints print the address of work_struct, while btrfs workqueue's tracepoints print the address of btrfs_work. We need a connection between this two, for example when debuging, we usually grep an address in the trace output. So it'd be better to also print work_struct in btrfs workqueue's tracepoint. Please note that we can only add this into those tracepoints whose work is still available in memory because we need to reference the work. Signed-off-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Mark Fasheh 提交于
We want this to debug qgroup changes on live systems. Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The member variants - latest_devid and latest_trans - of fs_devices structure are set, but no one use them to do anything. so remove them. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The io error might happen during writing out the device stats, and the device stats information and dirty flag would be update at that time, but the current code didn't consider this case, just clear the dirty flag, it would cause that we forgot to write out the new device stats information. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The lock in btrfs_device structure was far away from its protected data, it would make CPU load the cache line twice when we accessed them, move them together. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
The super block generation of the seed devices is not the same as the filesystem which sprouted from them because we don't update the super block on the seed devices when we change that new filesystem. So we should not use the generation of that new filesystem to check the super block generation on the seed devices, Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
All the metadata in the seed devices has the same fsid as the fsid of the seed filesystem which is on the seed device, so we should check them by the current filesystem. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 David Sterba 提交于
The transaction thread may want to do more work, namely it pokes the cleaner ktread that will start processing uncleaned subvols. This can be triggered by user via the 'btrfs fi sync' command, otherwise there was a delay up to 30 seconds before the cleaner started to clean old snapshots. Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
inline data is stored from offset of @disk_bytenr in struct btrfs_file_extent_item. So substracting total size of struct btrfs_file_extent_item is wrong, fix it. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Btrfs could still inline file data if its size is same as page size, so don't skip max value here. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
If flag NOCOMPRESS is set which means bad compression ratio, we could avoid call cow_file_range_async() for this case earlier. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
If a file's compression ratios is bad, we will set NOCOMPRESS flag for it, and it will skip compression for that inode next time. However, if we remount fs to COMPRESS_FORCE, it still should try if we could compress pages for that inode, this patch fix wrong check for this problem. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
Fix the following sparse warning: fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: warning: incorrect type in argument 2 (different address spaces) fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: expected char const [noderef] <asn:1>*<noident> fs/btrfs/send.c:518:51: got char * We can safely use (const char __user *) with set_fs(KERNEL_DS) __force added to avoid sparse-all warning: fs/btrfs/send.c:518:40: warning: cast adds address space to expression (<asn:1>) Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@zabbo.net> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 HIMANGI SARAOGI 提交于
Use BUG_ON(x) rather than if(x) BUG(); The semantic patch that fixes this problem is as follows: // <smpl> @@ identifier x; @@ -if (x) BUG(); +BUG_ON(x); // </smpl> Signed-off-by: NHimangi Saraogi <himangi774@gmail.com> Acked-by: NJulia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Sergey Senozhatsky 提交于
`struct workspace' used for zlib compression contains two zlib z_stream-s: `def_strm' used in zlib_compress_pages(), and `inf_strm' used in zlib_decompress/zlib_decompress_biovec(). None of these functions use `inf_strm' and `def_strm' simultaniously, meaning that for every compress/decompress operation we need only one z_stream (out of two available). `inf_strm' and `def_strm' are different in size of ->workspace. For inflate stream we vmalloc() zlib_inflate_workspacesize() bytes, for deflate stream - zlib_deflate_workspacesize() bytes. On my system zlib returns the following workspace sizes, correspondingly: 42312 and 268104 (+ guard pages). Keep only one `z_stream' in `struct workspace' and use it for both compression and decompression. Hence, instead of vmalloc() of two z_stream->worskpace-s, allocate only one of size: max(zlib_deflate_workspacesize(), zlib_inflate_workspacesize()) Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NSergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
We were returning with 0 (success) because we weren't extracting the error code from em (PTR_ERR(em)). Fix it. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Reviewed-by: NSatoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Filipe Manana 提交于
The tree field of struct extent_state was only used to figure out if an extent state was connected to an inode's io tree or not. For this we can just use the rb_node field itself. On a x86_64 system with this change the sizeof(struct extent_state) is reduced from 96 bytes down to 88 bytes, meaning that with a page size of 4096 bytes we can now store 46 extent states per page instead of 42. Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Fabian Frederick 提交于
replace IS_ERR/PTR_ERR Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com> Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NFabian Frederick <fabf@skynet.be> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Marc argued that if there are several btrfs filesystems mounted, while users even don't know which filesystem hit the corrupted errors something like generation verification failure. Since @extent_buffer structure has a member @fs_info, let's output btrfs device info. Reported-by: NMarc MERLIN <marc@merlins.org> Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Miao Xie 提交于
If we mounted a seed filesystem with degraded option, and then added a new device into the seed filesystem, then we found adding device failed because of the IO failure. Steps to reproduce: # mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 <dev0> <dev1> # btrfstune -S 1 <dev0> # mount <dev0> -o degraded <mnt> # btrfs device add -f <dev2> <mnt> It is because the original didn't set the chunk on the seed device to be read-only if the degraded flag was set. It was introduced by patch f48b9075, which fixed the problem the raid1 filesystem became read-only after one device of it was missing. But this fix method was not right, we should set the read-only flag according to the number of the missing devices, not the degraded mount option, if the number of the missing devices is less than the max error number that the profile of the chunk tolerates, we don't set it to be read-only. Cc: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Wang Shilong 提交于
Btrfs defragment will utilize COW feature, which means this did not work for nodatacow option, this problem was detected by xfstests generic/018 with nodatacow mount option. Fix this problem by forcing cow for a extent with state @EXTETN_DEFRAG setting. Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Satoru Takeuchi 提交于
Rediffed remaining parts of original patch from Anand Jain. This makes sure to avoid trailing newlines in the btrfs label output reproducer.sh: =============================================================================== TEST_DEV=/dev/vdb TEST_DIR=/home/sat/mnt umount /home/sat/mnt mkfs.btrfs -f $TEST_DEV UUID=$(btrfs fi show $TEST_DEV | head -1 | sed -e 's/.*uuid: \([-0-9a-z]*\)$/\1/') mount $TEST_DEV $TEST_DIR LABELFILE=/sys/fs/btrfs/$UUID/label echo "Test for empty label..." >&2 LINES="$(cat $LABELFILE | wc -l | awk '{print $1}')" RET=0 if [ $LINES -eq 0 ] ; then echo '[PASS] Trailing \n is removed correctly.' >&2 else echo '[FAIL] Trailing \n still exists.' >&2 RET=1 fi echo "Test for non-empty label..." >&2 echo testlabel >$LABELFILE LINES="$(cat $LABELFILE | wc -l | awk '{print $1}')" if [ $LINES -eq 1 ] ; then echo '[PASS] Trailing \n is removed correctly.' >&2 else echo '[FAIL] Trailing \n still exists.' >&2 RET=1 fi exit $RET =============================================================================== Signed-off-by: NSatoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@jp.fujitsu.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-
由 Anand Jain 提交于
as in the disk add patch, disk detached from the volume must be recorded in the syslog as well for the same reason. Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <Anand.Jain@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
-