- 05 9月, 2009 3 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The decision to delay due to Nagle should be based on the path mtu and future packet size. We currently incorrectly base it on 'frag_point' which is the SCTP DATA segment size, and also we do not count DATA chunk header overhead in the computation. This actuall allows situations where a user can set low 'frag_point', and then send small messages without delay. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
We are now trying to bundle SACKs when we have outbound DATA to send. However, there are situations where this outbound DATA will not be sent (due to congestion or available window). In such cases it's ok to wait for the timer to expire. This patch refactors the sending code so that betfore attempting to bundle the SACK we check to see if the DATA will actually be transmitted. Based on eirlier works for Doug Graham <dgraham@nortel.com> and Wei Youngjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
由 Doug Graham 提交于
This patch corrects the conditions under which a SACK will be piggybacked on a DATA packet. The previous condition was incorrect due to a misinterpretation of RFC 4960 and/or RFC 2960. Specifically, the following paragraph from section 6.2 had not been implemented correctly: Before an endpoint transmits a DATA chunk, if any received DATA chunks have not been acknowledged (e.g., due to delayed ack), the sender should create a SACK and bundle it with the outbound DATA chunk, as long as the size of the final SCTP packet does not exceed the current MTU. See Section 6.2. When about to send a DATA chunk, the code now checks to see if the SACK timer is running. If it is, we know we have a SACK to send to the peer, so we append the SACK (assuming available space in the packet) and turn off the timer. For a simple request-response scenario, this will result in the SACK being bundled with the response, meaning the the SACK is received quickly by the client, and also meaning that no separate SACK packet needs to be sent by the server to acknowledge the request. Prior to this patch, a separate SACK packet would have been sent by the server SCTP only after its delayed-ACK timer had expired (usually 200ms). This is wasteful of bandwidth, and can also have a major negative impact on performance due the interaction of delayed ACKs with the Nagle algorithm. Signed-off-by: NDoug Graham <dgraham@nortel.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 30 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Wei Yongjun 提交于
Commit 'net: skb->dst accessors'(adf30907) broken the sctp protocol stack, the sctp packet can never be sent out after Eric Dumazet's patch, which have typo in the sctp code. Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Acked-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladisalv.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 6月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Define three accessors to get/set dst attached to a skb struct dst_entry *skb_dst(const struct sk_buff *skb) void skb_dst_set(struct sk_buff *skb, struct dst_entry *dst) void skb_dst_drop(struct sk_buff *skb) This one should replace occurrences of : dst_release(skb->dst) skb->dst = NULL; Delete skb->dst field Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 28 4月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jesse Brandeburg 提交于
this is the sctp code to enable hardware crc32c offload for adapters that support it. Originally by: Vlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> modified by Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NJesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NJeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 22 3月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Remove 2 TEST_FRAME hacks that are no longer needed. These allowed sctp regression tests to compile before, but are no longer needed. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 16 2月, 2009 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The sctp crc32c checksum is always generated in little endian. So, we clean up the code to treat it as little endian and remove all the __force casts. Suggested by Herbert Xu. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Lucas Nussbaum 提交于
This is a new version of my patch, now using a module parameter instead of a sysctl, so that the option is harder to find. Please note that, once the module is loaded, it is still possible to change the value of the parameter in /sys/module/sctp/parameters/, which is useful if you want to do performance comparisons without rebooting. Computation of SCTP checksums significantly affects the performance of SCTP. For example, using two dual-Opteron 246 connected using a Gbe network, it was not possible to achieve more than ~730 Mbps, compared to 941 Mbps after disabling SCTP checksums. Unfortunately, SCTP checksum offloading in NICs is not commonly available (yet). By default, checksums are still enabled, of course. Signed-off-by: NLucas Nussbaum <lucas.nussbaum@ens-lyon.fr> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 2月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
Base versions handle constant folding now. Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 23 1月, 2009 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Recent changes to the retransmit code exposed a long standing bug where it was possible for a chunk to be time stamped after the retransmit timer was reset. This caused a rare situation where the retrnamist timer has expired, but nothing was marked for retrnasmission because all of timesamps on data were less then 1 rto ago. As result, the timer was never restarted since nothing was retransmitted, and this resulted in a hung association that did couldn't complete the data transfer. The solution is to timestamp the chunk when it's added to the packet for transmission purposes. After the packet is trsnmitted the rtx timer is restarted. This guarantees that when the timer expires, there will be data to retransmit. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 01 10月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Neil Horman 提交于
sctp_chunks should be put on a diet. This is some of the low hanging fruit that we can strip out. Changes all the __s8/__u8 flags to bitfields. Saves 12 bytes per chunk. Signed-off-by: NNeil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Loopback used to clobber the ip_summed filed which sctp then used to figure out if it needed to do checksumming or not. Now that loopback doesn't do that any more, sctp needs to set the ip_summed field correctly. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 8月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Herbert Xu 提交于
The ipfragok flag controls whether the packet may be fragmented either on the local host on beyond. The latter is only valid on IPv4. In fact, we never want to do the latter even on IPv4 when PMTU is enabled. This is because even though we can't fragment packets within SCTP due to the prtocol's inherent faults, we can still fragment it at IP layer. By setting the DF bit we will improve the PMTU process. RFC 2960 only says that we SHOULD clear the DF bit in this case, so we're compliant even if we set the DF bit. In fact RFC 4960 no longer has this statement. Once we make this change, we only need to control the local fragmentation. There is already a bit in the skb which controls that, local_df. So this patch sets that instead of using the ipfragok argument. The only complication is that there isn't a struct sock object per transport, so for IPv4 we have to resort to changing the pmtudisc field for every packet. This should be safe though as the protocol is single-threaded. Note that after this patch we can remove ipfragok from the rest of the stack too. Signed-off-by: NHerbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 19 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 7月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Pavel Emelyanov 提交于
Signed-off-by: NPavel Emelyanov <xemul@openvz.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 20 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
RFC 4960, Section 11.4. Protection of Non-SCTP-Capable Hosts When an SCTP stack receives a packet containing multiple control or DATA chunks and the processing of the packet requires the sending of multiple chunks in response, the sender of the response chunk(s) MUST NOT send more than one packet. If bundling is supported, multiple response chunks that fit into a single packet MAY be bundled together into one single response packet. If bundling is not supported, then the sender MUST NOT send more than one response chunk and MUST discard all other responses. Note that this rule does NOT apply to a SACK chunk, since a SACK chunk is, in itself, a response to DATA and a SACK does not require a response of more DATA. We implement this by not servicing our outqueue until we reach the end of the packet. This enables maximum bundling. We also identify 'response' chunks and make sure that we only send 1 packet when sending such chunks. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 6月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
Commit e9df2e8f ("[IPV6]: Use appropriate sock tclass setting for routing lookup.") also changed the way that ECN capable transports mark this capability in IPv6. As a result, SCTP was not marking ECN capablity because the traffic class was never set. This patch brings back the markings for IPv6 traffic. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 06 3月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Harvey Harrison 提交于
__FUNCTION__ is gcc-specific, use __func__ Signed-off-by: NHarvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 05 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
I was notified by Randy Stewart that lksctp claims to be "the reference implementation". First of all, "the refrence implementation" was the original implementation of SCTP in usersapce written ty Randy and a few others. Second, after looking at the definiton of 'reference implementation', we don't really meet the requirements. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The crc32c library used an identical table and algorithm as SCTP. Switch to using the library instead of carrying our own table. Using crypto layer proved to have too much overhead compared to using the library directly. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 10月, 2007 2 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP-AUTH, Section 6.2: Endpoints MUST send all requested chunks authenticated where this has been requested by the peer. The other chunks MAY be sent authenticated or not. If endpoint pair shared keys are used, one of them MUST be selected for authentication. To send chunks in an authenticated way, the sender MUST include these chunks after an AUTH chunk. This means that a sender MUST bundle chunks in order to authenticate them. If the endpoint has no endpoint pair shared key for the peer, it MUST use Shared Key Identifier 0 with an empty endpoint pair shared key. If there are multiple endpoint shared keys the sender selects one and uses the corresponding Shared Key Identifier Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
The patch initializes AUTH related members of the generic SCTP structures and provides a way to enable/disable auth extension. Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 26 4月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 Stephen Hemminger 提交于
Spring cleaning time... There seems to be a lot of places in the network code that have extra bogus semicolons after conditionals. Most commonly is a bogus semicolon after: switch() { } Signed-off-by: NStephen Hemminger <shemminger@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 11 2月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 YOSHIFUJI Hideaki 提交于
Signed-off-by: NYOSHIFUJI Hideaki <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 30 9月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sridhar Samudrala 提交于
Currently if the sender is sending small messages, it can cause a receiver to run out of receive buffer space even when the advertised receive window is still open and results in packet drops and retransmissions. Including a overhead while updating the sender's view of peer receive window will reduce the chances of receive buffer space overshooting the receive window. Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 18 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sridhar Samudrala 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 03 2月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Vlad Yasevich 提交于
SCTP used to "fast retransmit" a TSN every time we hit the number of missing reports for the TSN. However the Implementers Guide specifies that we should only "fast retransmit" a given TSN once. Subsequent retransmits should be timeouts only. Also change the number of missing reports to 3 as per the latest IG(similar to TCP). Signed-off-by: NVlad Yasevich <vladislav.yasevich@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 04 1月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frank Filz 提交于
This patch adds support to set/get heartbeat interval, maximum number of retransmissions, pathmtu, sackdelay time for a particular transport/ association/socket as per the latest SCTP sockets api draft11. Signed-off-by: NFrank Filz <ffilz@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 09 7月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 David S. Miller 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 29 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sridhar Samudrala 提交于
Signed-off-by: NSridhar Samudrala <sri@us.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-