Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 16 11月, 2019 2 次提交
  3. 13 11月, 2019 2 次提交
  5. 12 11月, 2019 4 次提交
  7. 11 11月, 2019 7 次提交
  9. 08 11月, 2019 8 次提交
  11. 07 11月, 2019 3 次提交
    • R
      drm/i915: FB backing gem obj should reside in LMEM · 9e678fc9
      由 Ramalingam C 提交于 
      If Local memory is supported by hardware, we want framebuffer backing
gem objects from local memory.

if the backing obj is not from LMEM, pin_to_display is failed.

v2:
  memory regions are correctly assigned to obj->memory_regions [tvrtko]
  migration failure is reported as debug log [Tvrtko]
v3:
  Migration is dropped. only error is reported [Daniel]
  mem region check is move to pin_to_display [Chris]
v4:
  s/dev_priv/i915 [chris]
v5:
  i915_gem_object_is_lmem is used for detecting the obj mem type. [Matt]

cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRamalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191105144414.30470-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com
      9e678fc9
    • D
      drm/i915: use might_lock_nested in get_pages annotation · 74ceefd1
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      So strictly speaking the existing annotation is also ok, because we
have a chain of

obj->mm.lock#I915_MM_GET_PAGES -> fs_reclaim -> obj->mm.lock

(the shrinker cannot get at an object while we're in get_pages, hence
this is safe). But it's confusing, so try to take the right subclass
of the lock.

This does a bit reduce our lockdep based checking, but then it's also
less fragile, in case we ever change the nesting around.
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191104173720.2696-3-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
      74ceefd1
    • D
      drm/i915: Switch obj->mm.lock lockdep annotations on its head · f86dbacb
      由 Daniel Vetter 提交于 
      The trouble with having a plain nesting flag for locks which do not
naturally nest (unlike block devices and their partitions, which is
the original motivation for nesting levels) is that lockdep will
never spot a true deadlock if you screw up.

This patch is an attempt at trying better, by highlighting a bit more
of the actual nature of the nesting that's going on. Essentially we
have two kinds of objects:

- objects without pages allocated, which cannot be on any lru and are
  hence inaccessible to the shrinker.

- objects which have pages allocated, which are on an lru, and which
  the shrinker can decide to throw out.

For the former type of object, memory allocations while holding
obj->mm.lock are permissible. For the latter they are not. And
get/put_pages transitions between the two types of objects.

This is still not entirely fool-proof since the rules might change.
But as long as we run such a code ever at runtime lockdep should be
able to observe the inconsistency and complain (like with any other
lockdep class that we've split up in multiple classes). But there are
a few clear benefits:

- We can drop the nesting flag parameter from
  __i915_gem_object_put_pages, because that function by definition is
  never going allocate memory, and calling it on an object which
  doesn't have its pages allocated would be a bug.

- We strictly catch more bugs, since there's not only one place in the
  entire tree which is annotated with the special class. All the
  other places that had explicit lockdep nesting annotations we're now
  going to leave up to lockdep again.

- Specifically this catches stuff like calling get_pages from
  put_pages (which isn't really a good idea, if we can call get_pages
  so could the shrinker). I've seen patches do exactly that.

Of course I fully expect CI will show me for the fool I am with this
one here :-)

v2: There can only be one (lockdep only has a cache for the first
subclass, not for deeper ones, and we don't want to make these locks
even slower). Still separate enums for better documentation.

Real fix: don't forget about phys objs and pin_map(), and fix the
shrinker to have the right annotations ... silly me.

v3: Forgot usertptr too ...

v4: Improve comment for pages_pin_count, drop the IMPORTANT comment
and instead prime lockdep (Chris).

v5: Appease checkpatch, no double empty lines (Chris)

v6: More rebasing over selftest changes. Also somehow I forgot to
push this patch :-/

Also format comments consistently while at it.

v7: Fix typo in commit message (Joonas)

Also drop the priming, with the lmem merge we now have allocations
while holding the lmem lock, which wreaks the generic priming I've
done in earlier patches. Should probably be resurrected when lmem is
fixed. See

commit 232a6eba
Author: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Date:   Tue Oct 8 17:01:14 2019 +0100

    drm/i915: introduce intel_memory_region

I'm keeping the priming patch locally so it wont get lost.

Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: "Tang, CQ" <cq.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v5)
Reviewed-by: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> (v6)
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191105090148.30269-1-daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch
[mlankhorst: Fix commit typos pointed out by Michael Ruhl]
      f86dbacb
  13. 06 11月, 2019 8 次提交
    • C
      drm/i915/gem: Fix error path to unlock if the GEM context is closed · feba2b81
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      When inside the lock, remember to unlock even if you want to leave
early.
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Fixes: a4e7ccda ("drm/i915: Move context management under GEM")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191106144155.25727-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      feba2b81
    • C
      drm/i915/gem: Early rejection of no-aperture map_ggtt · bee0a70a
      由 Chris Wilson 提交于 
      If the device does not have an aperture through which we can indirectly
access and detile the buffers, simply reject the ioctl. Later we can
extend the ioctl to support different modes, but as an extension the
user must opt in and explicitly control the mmap type (viz
MMAP_OFFSET_IOCTL).
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Abdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAbdiel Janulgue <abdiel.janulgue@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191105145305.14314-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
      bee0a70a
    • J
      drm/i915/cmdparser: Add support for backward jumps · f8c08d8f
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      To keep things manageable, the pre-gen9 cmdparser does not
attempt to track any form of nested BB_START's. This did not
prevent usermode from using nested starts, or even chained
batches because the cmdparser is not strictly enforced pre gen9.

Instead, the existence of a nested BB_START would cause the batch
to be emitted in insecure mode, and any privileged capabilities
would not be available.

For Gen9, the cmdparser becomes mandatory (for BCS at least), and
so not providing any form of nested BB_START support becomes
overly restrictive. Any such batch will simply not run.

We make heavy use of backward jumps in igt, and it is much easier
to add support for this restricted subset of nested jumps, than to
rewrite the whole of our test suite to avoid them.

Add the required logic to support limited backward jumps, to
instructions that have already been validated by the parser.

Note that it's not sufficient to simply approve any BB_START
that jumps backwards in the buffer because this would allow an
attacker to embed a rogue instruction sequence within the
operand words of a harmless instruction (say LRI) and jump to
that.

We introduce a bit array to track every instr offset successfully
validated, and test the target of BB_START against this. If the
target offset hits, it is re-written to the same offset in the
shadow buffer and the BB_START cmd is allowed.

Note: This patch deliberately ignores checkpatch issues in the
cmdtables, in order to match the style of the surrounding code.
We'll correct the entire file in one go in a later patch.

v2: set dispatch secure late (Mika)
v3: rebase (Mika)
v4: Clear whitelist on each parse
    Minor review updates (Chris)
v5: Correct backward jump batching
v6: fix compilation error due to struct eb shuffle (Mika)

Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      f8c08d8f
    • J
      drm/i915: Allow parsing of unsized batches · 435e8fc0
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      In "drm/i915: Add support for mandatory cmdparsing" we introduced the
concept of mandatory parsing. This allows the cmdparser to be invoked
even when user passes batch_len=0 to the execbuf ioctl's.

However, the cmdparser needs to know the extents of the buffer being
scanned. Refactor the code to ensure the cmdparser uses the actual
object size, instead of the incoming length, if user passes 0.
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      435e8fc0
    • J
      drm/i915: Support ro ppgtt mapped cmdparser shadow buffers · 4f7af194
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      For Gen7, the original cmdparser motive was to permit limited
use of register read/write instructions in unprivileged BB's.
This worked by copying the user supplied bb to a kmd owned
bb, and running it in secure mode, from the ggtt, only if
the scanner finds no unsafe commands or registers.

For Gen8+ we can't use this same technique because running bb's
from the ggtt also disables access to ppgtt space. But we also
do not actually require 'secure' execution since we are only
trying to reduce the available command/register set. Instead we
will copy the user buffer to a kmd owned read-only bb in ppgtt,
and run in the usual non-secure mode.

Note that ro pages are only supported by ppgtt (not ggtt), but
luckily that's exactly what we need.

Add the required paths to map the shadow buffer to ppgtt ro for Gen8+

v2: IS_GEN7/IS_GEN (Mika)
v3: rebase
v4: rebase
v5: rebase
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      4f7af194
    • J
      drm/i915: Add support for mandatory cmdparsing · 311a50e7
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      The existing cmdparser for gen7 can be bypassed by specifying
batch_len=0 in the execbuf call. This is safe because bypassing
simply reduces the cmd-set available.

In a later patch we will introduce cmdparsing for gen9, as a
security measure, which must be strictly enforced since without
it we are vulnerable to DoS attacks.

Introduce the concept of 'required' cmd parsing that cannot be
bypassed by submitting zero-length bb's.

v2: rebase (Mika)
v2: rebase (Mika)
v3: fix conflict on engine flags (Mika)
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      311a50e7
    • J
      drm/i915: Remove Master tables from cmdparser · 66d8aba1
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      The previous patch has killed support for secure batches
on gen6+, and hence the cmdparsers master tables are
now dead code. Remove them.
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      66d8aba1
    • J
      drm/i915: Disable Secure Batches for gen6+ · 44157641
      由 Jon Bloomfield 提交于 
      Retroactively stop reporting support for secure batches
through the api for gen6+ so that older binaries trigger
the fallback path instead.

Older binaries use secure batches pre gen6 to access resources
that are not available to normal usermode processes. However,
all known userspace explicitly checks for HAS_SECURE_BATCHES
before relying on the secure batch feature.

Since there are no known binaries relying on this for newer gens
we can kill secure batches from gen6, via I915_PARAM_HAS_SECURE_BATCHES.

v2: rebase (Mika)
v3: rebase (Mika)
Signed-off-by: NJon Bloomfield <jon.bloomfield@intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>
      44157641
  15. 05 11月, 2019 4 次提交
  17. 01 11月, 2019 2 次提交