- 05 11月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add new generic routines are provided for retrieving properties from device description objects in the platform firmware in case there are no struct device objects for them (either those objects have not been created yet or they do not exist at all). The following functions are provided: fwnode_property_present() fwnode_property_read_u8() fwnode_property_read_u16() fwnode_property_read_u32() fwnode_property_read_u64() fwnode_property_read_string() fwnode_property_read_u8_array() fwnode_property_read_u16_array() fwnode_property_read_u32_array() fwnode_property_read_u64_array() fwnode_property_read_string_array() in analogy with the corresponding functions for struct device added previously. For all of them, the first argument is a pointer to struct fwnode_handle (new type) that allows a device description object (depending on what platform firmware interface is in use) to be obtained. Add a new macro device_for_each_child_node() for iterating over the children of the device description object associated with a given device and a new function device_get_child_node_count() returning the number of a given device's child nodes. The interface covers both ACPI and Device Trees. Suggested-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Acked-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
We have lots of existing Device Tree enabled drivers and allocating separate _HID for each is not feasible. Instead we allocate special _HID "PRP0001" that means that the match should be done using Device Tree compatible property using driver's .of_match_table instead if the driver is missing .acpi_match_table. If there is a need to distinguish from where the device is enumerated (DT/ACPI) driver can check dev->of_node or ACPI_COMPATION(dev). Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Device Tree is used in many embedded systems to describe the system configuration to the OS. It supports attaching properties or name-value pairs to the devices it describe. With these properties one can pass additional information to the drivers that would not be available otherwise. ACPI is another configuration mechanism (among other things) typically seen, but not limited to, x86 machines. ACPI allows passing arbitrary data from methods but there has not been mechanism equivalent to Device Tree until the introduction of _DSD in the recent publication of the ACPI 5.1 specification. In order to facilitate ACPI usage in systems where Device Tree is typically used, it would be beneficial to standardize a way to retrieve Device Tree style properties from ACPI devices, which is what we do in this patch. If a given device described in ACPI namespace wants to export properties it must implement _DSD method (Device Specific Data, introduced with ACPI 5.1) that returns the properties in a package of packages. For example: Name (_DSD, Package () { ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"), Package () { Package () {"name1", <VALUE1>}, Package () {"name2", <VALUE2>}, ... } }) The UUID reserved for properties is daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301 and is documented in the ACPI 5.1 companion document called "_DSD Implementation Guide" [1], [2]. We add several helper functions that can be used to extract these properties and convert them to different Linux data types. The ultimate goal is that we only have one device property API that retrieves the requested properties from Device Tree or from ACPI transparent to the caller. [1] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-implementation-guide-toplevel.htm [2] http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-device-properties-UUID.pdfReviewed-by: NHanjun Guo <hanjun.guo@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NJosh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org> Reviewed-by: NGrant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NDarren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 10月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Aaron Lu 提交于
When we have the acpi_device pointer, there is no need to pass the device's handle to the acpi_bus_xxx_power functions to get/set/update the device's power state, instead, use the acpi_device_xxx_power functions directly. To make this happen for fan module, export acpi_device_update_power. Signed-off-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>
-
- 21 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 46394fd0 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core) removed the generation of "online" uevents for containers, because "add" uevents are now generated for them automatically when container system devices are registered. However, there are user space tools that need to be notified when the container and all of its children have been enumerated, which doesn't happen any more. For this reason, add a mechanism allowing "online" uevents to be generated for ACPI containers after enumerating the container along with all of its children. Fixes: 46394fd0 (ACPI / hotplug: Move container-specific code out of the core) Reported-and-tested-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
Revert parts of f244d8b6 ("ACPIPHP / radeon / nouveau: Fix VGA switcheroo problem related to hotplug"). A previous commit 5493b31f0b55 ("PCI: Add pci_ignore_hotplug() to ignore hotplug events for a device") added equivalent functionality implemented in a different way for both acpiphp and pciehp. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com> Acked-by: NRajat Jain <rajatxjain@gmail.com>
-
- 04 9月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Yasuaki Ishimatsu 提交于
The _SUN device indentification object is not guaranteed to return the same value every time it is executed, so we should not cache its return value, but rather execute it every time as needed. If it is cached, an incorrect stale value may be used in some situations. This issue was exposed by commit 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace). Fix it by avoiding to cache the return value of _SUN. Fixes: 202317a5 (ACPI / scan: Add acpi_device objects for all device nodes in the namespace) Signed-off-by: NYasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: 3.14+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.14+ [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 7月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Wakeup GPEs are currently only enabled when setting up devices for remote wakeup at run time. During system-wide transitions they are enabled by ACPICA at the very last stage of suspend (before asking the BIOS to take over). Of course, that only works for system sleep states supported by ACPI, so in particular it doesn't work for the "freeze" sleep state. For this reason, modify the ACPI core device PM code to enable wakeup GPEs for devices when setting them up for wakeup regardless of whether that is remote wakeup at runtime or system wakeup. That allows the same device wakeup setup routine to be used for both runtime PM and system-wide PM and makes it possible to reduce code size quite a bit. This make ACPI-based PCI Wake-on-LAN work with the "freeze" sleep state on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500 and should help other systems too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since ACPI wakeup GPEs are going to be enabled during system suspend as well as for runtime wakeup by a subsequent patch and the same notify handlers will be used in both cases, rework the ACPI device wakeup notification framework so that the part specific to physical devices is always run asynchronously from the PM workqueue. This prevents runtime resume callbacks for those devices from being run during system suspend and resume which may not be appropriate, among other things. Also make ACPI device wakeup notification handling a bit more robust agaist subsequent removal of ACPI device objects, whould that ever happen, and create a wakeup source object for each ACPI device configured for wakeup so that wakeup notifications for those devices can wake up the system from the "freeze" sleep state. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since all of the acpi_set_hp_context() callers pass at least one NULL function pointer and one caller passes NULL function pointers only to it, drop function pointer arguments from acpi_set_hp_context() and make the callers initialize the function pointers in struct acpi_hotplug_context by themselves before passing it to acpi_set_hp_context(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
-
- 07 7月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Zhang Rui 提交于
PNPACPI uses acpi_bus_type to do ACPI binding for the PNPACPI devices. This is overkill because PNPACPI code already knows which ACPI device object to bind during PNPACPI device enumeration. This patch removes acpi_pnp_bus and does the binding by invoking acpi_bind_one() directly after device enumerated. This also fixes a bug in the previous code that some PNPACPI devices failed to be bound because 1. the ACPI device _HID is not pnpid, e.g. "MSFT0001", but its _CID is, e.g. "PNP0303", thus ACPI _CID is used as the pnp device device id. 2. device is bound only if the pnp device id matches the ACPI device _HID. Tested-by: NPrigent Christophe <christophe.prigent@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NZhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Only certain types of ACPI device objects can be enumerated as platform devices, so in order to distinguish them from the others introduce a new ACPI device PNP type flag, platform_id, and set it for devices with a valid _HID to start with. This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce a .match() callback for ACPI scan handlers to allow them to use more elaborate matching algorithms if necessary. That is needed for the upcoming PNP scan handler in particular. This change is based on a Zhang Rui's prototype. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 27 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lan Tianyu 提交于
There is already acpi_bus_get_private_data() to get ACPI handle data which is associated with acpi_bus_private_data_handler(). This patch is to add acpi_bus_attach_private_data() to make a pair and facilitate to attach and get data to/from ACPI handle. Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 5月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the ACPI PM domain's PM callbacks to avoid resuming devices during system suspend (in order to modify their wakeup settings etc.) if that isn't necessary. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core, simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h. Modify the definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of struct acpi_hp_work accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 22 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost() everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug _OST is supported unconditionally. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify the SATA subsystem to add hotplug contexts to ACPI companions of SATA devices and ports instead of registering special ACPI dock operations using register_hotplug_dock_device(). That change will allow the entire code handling those special ACPI dock operations to be dropped in the next commit. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
-
- 21 2月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order to avoid the need to register special ACPI dock operations for SATA devices add a .uevent() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context and make dock_hotplug_event() use that callback if available. Also rename the existing .event() callback in struct acpi_hotplug_context to .notify() to avoid possible confusion in the future. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In order for the ACPI dock station code to be able to use the callbacks pointed to by the ACPI device objects' hotplug contexts add a .fixup() callback pointer to struct acpi_hotplug_context. That callback will be useful to handle PCI devices located in dock stations. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Rename acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() to acpi_evaluate_ost() for later resue. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI dock station code carries out an extra namespace scan before the main one in order to find and register all of the dock device objects. Then, it registers a notify handler for each of them for handling dock events. However, dock device objects need not be scanned for upfront. They very well can be enumerated and registered during the first phase of the main namespace scan, before attaching scan handlers and ACPI drivers to ACPI device objects. Then, the dependent devices can be added to the in the second phase. That makes it possible to drop the extra namespace scan, so do it. Moreover, it is not necessary to register notify handlers for all of the dock stations' namespace nodes, becuase notifications may be dispatched from the global notify handler for them. Do that and drop two functions used for dock notify handling, acpi_dock_deferred_cb() and dock_notify_handler(), that aren't necessary any more. Finally, some dock station objects have _HID objects matching the ACPI container scan handler which causes it to claim those objects and try to handle their hotplug, but that is not a good idea, because those objects have their own special hotplug handling anyway. For this reason, the hotplug_notify flag should not be set for ACPI device objects representing dock stations and the container scan handler should be made ignore those objects, so make that happen. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
In some cases it may be necessary to perform certain setup/cleanup operations on a device object representing a physical device after it has been associated with an ACPI companion by acpi_bind_one() or before disassociating it from that companion by acpi_unbind_one(), respectively. If there is a struct acpi_bus_type object for the given device's bus type, the .setup()/.cleanup() callbacks from there are executed for these purposes. However, an analogous mechanism will be necessary for devices whose bus types don't have corresponding struct acpi_bus_type objects and that have specific ACPI scan handlers. For those devices, add new .bind() and .unbind() callbacks to struct acpi_scan_handler that will be executed by acpi_platform_notify() right after the given device has been associated with an ACPI comapnion and by acpi_platform_notify_remove() right before calling acpi_unbind_one() for that device, respectively. To make that work for scan handlers registering new devices in their .attach() callbacks, modify acpi_scan_attach_handler() to set the ACPI device object's handler field before calling .attach() from the scan handler at hand. This changeset includes a fix from Mika Westerberg. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2014 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to the same function for all hotplug devices. This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device hotplug code. Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler, or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() does not use its data argument any more, the second argument of acpi_install_hotplug_notify_handler() can be dropped, so do that and update its callers accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) code currently attaches its hotplug context objects directly to ACPI namespace nodes representing hotplug devices. However, after recent changes causing struct acpi_device to be created for every namespace node representing a device (regardless of its status), that is not necessary any more. Moreover, it's vulnerable to the theoretical issue that the ACPI handle passed in the context between handle_hotplug_event() and hotplug_event_work() may become invalid in the meantime (as a result of a concurrent table unload). In principle, this issue might be addressed by adding a non-empty release handler for ACPIPHP hotplug context objects analogous to acpi_scan_drop_device(), but that would duplicate the code in that function and in acpi_device_del_work_fn(). For this reason, it's better to modify ACPIPHP to attach its device hotplug contexts to struct device objects representing hotplug devices and make it use acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() as its notify handler. At the same time, acpi_device_hotplug() can be modified to dispatch the new .hp.event() callback pointing to acpiphp_hotplug_event() from ACPI device objects associated with PCI devices or use the generic ACPI device hotplug code for device objects with matching scan handlers. This allows the existing code duplication between ACPIPHP and the ACPI core to be reduced too and makes further ACPI-based device hotplug consolidation possible. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2014 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Subsequent changes will require the ACPI core to acquire the lock protecting the ACPIPHP hotplug contexts, so move the definition of the lock to the core and change its name to be more generic. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a slight possibility for the ACPI device object pointed to by adev in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to become invalid between the acpi_bus_get_device() that it comes from and the subsequent dereference of that pointer under get_device(). Namely, if acpi_scan_drop_device() runs in parallel with acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), acpi_device_del_work_fn() queued up by it may delete the device object in question right after a successful execution of acpi_bus_get_device() in acpi_bus_notify(). An analogous problem is present in acpi_bus_notify() where the device pointer coming from acpi_bus_get_device() may become invalid before it subsequent dereference in the "if" block. To prevent that from happening, introduce a new function, acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), working analogously to acpi_bus_get_device() except that it will grab a reference to the ACPI device object returned by it and it will do that under the ACPICA's namespace mutex. Then, make both acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() and acpi_bus_notify() use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of acpi_bus_get_device() so as to ensure that the pointers used by them will not become stale at one point. In addition to that, introduce acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as a wrapper around put_device() to be used along with acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() and make the (new) users of the latter use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 05 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
There are several drivers making use of ACPI _DSM method to detect and invoke device specific methods. Currently every driver has implemented its private version to support ACPI _DSM method. So this patch introduces three helper functions to support ACPI _DSM method, which will be used to replace open-coded versions. It helps to simplify code and improve code readability. Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 31 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The changes in the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem made during the 3.12 development cycle uncovered a problem with VGA switcheroo that on some systems, when the device-specific method (ATPX in the radeon case, _DSM in the nouveau case) is used to turn off the discrete graphics, the BIOS generates ACPI hotplug events for that device and those events cause ACPIPHP to attempt to remove the device from the system (they are events for a device that was present previously and is not present any more, so that's what should be done according to the spec). Then, the system stops functioning correctly. Since the hotplug events in question were simply silently ignored previously, the least intrusive way to address that problem is to make ACPIPHP ignore them again. For this purpose, introduce a new ACPI device flag, no_hotplug, and modify ACPIPHP to ignore hotplug events for PCI devices whose ACPI companions have that flag set. Next, make the radeon and nouveau switcheroo detection code set the no_hotplug flag for the discrete graphics' ACPI companion. Fixes: bbd34fcd (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Register all devices under the given bridge) References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61891 References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64891Reported-and-tested-by: NMike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk> Reported-and-tested-by: <madcatx@atlas.cz> Reported-and-tested-by: NJoaquín Aramendía <samsagax@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+
-
- 29 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Add a new ACPI hotplug profile flag, demand_offline, such that if set for the given ACPI device object's scan handler, it will cause acpi_scan_hot_remove() to check if that device object's physical companions are offline upfront and fail the hot removal if that is not the case. That flag will be useful to overcome a problem with containers on some system where they can only be hot-removed after some cleanup operations carried out by user space, which needs to be notified of the container hot-removal before the kernel attempts to offline devices in the container. In those cases the current implementation of acpi_scan_hot_remove() is not sufficient, because it first tries to offline the devices in the container and only if that is suffcessful it tries to offline the container itself. As a result, the container hot-removal notification is not delivered to user space at the right time. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2013 6 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since drivers/ide/ide-acpi.c is the only remaining user of acpi_get_child(), move that function into that file as a static routine. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Replace the .find_device function pointer in struct acpi_bus_type with a new one, .find_companion, that is supposed to point to a function returning struct acpi_device pointer (instead of an int) and takes one argument (instead of two). This way the role of this callback is more clear and the implementation of it can be more straightforward. Update all of the users of struct acpi_bus_type (PCI, PNP/ACPI and USB) to reflect the structure change. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@intel.com> # for USB/ACPI
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Modify acpi_preset_companion() to take a struct acpi_device pointer instead of an ACPI handle as its second argument and redefine it as a static inline wrapper around ACPI_COMPANION_SET() passing the return value of acpi_find_child_device() directly as the second argument to it. Update its users to pass struct acpi_device pointers instead of ACPI handles to it. This allows some unnecessary acpi_bus_get_device() calls to be avoided. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA binding
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_get_child() is the only user of acpi_find_child() now, drop the static inline definition of the former and redefine the latter as new acpi_get_child(). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Tested-by: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> # for ATA binding
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Now that we create a struct acpi_device object for every ACPI namespace node representing a device, it is not necessary to use acpi_walk_namespace() for child device lookup in acpi_find_child() any more. Instead, we can simply walk the list of children of the given struct acpi_device object and return the matching one (or the one which is the best match if there are more of them). The checks done during the matching loop can be simplified too so that the secondary namespace walks in find_child_checks() are not necessary any more. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce a static inline function for setting the status field of struct acpi_device on the basis of a supplied u32 number, acpi_set_device_status(), and use it instead of the horrible horrible STRUCT_TO_INT() macro wherever applicable. Having done that, drop STRUCT_TO_INT() (and pretend that it has never existed). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move container-specific uevents from the core hotplug code to the container scan handler's .attach() and .detach() callbacks. This way the core will not have to special-case containers and the uevents will be guaranteed to happen every time a container is either scanned or trimmed as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Rework the common ACPI device hotplug code so that it is suitable for PCI host bridge hotplug and switch the PCI host bridge scan handler to using the common hotplug code. This allows quite a few lines of code that are not necessary any more to be dropped from the PCI host bridge scan handler and removes arbitrary differences in behavior between PCI host bridge hotplug and ACPI-based hotplug of other components, like CPUs and memory. Also acpi_device_hotplug() can be static now. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-