The member is used only to return value back from
fs_path_prepare_for_add, we can do it locally and save 8 bytes for the
inline_buf path.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

The buffer passed to snprintf can hold the fully expanded format string,
64 = 3x largest ULL + 3x char + trailing null.  I don't think that removing the
check entirely is a good idea, hence the ASSERT.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

The commit titled "Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send"
didn't cover a particular case where the parent-child relationship inversion
of directories doesn't imply a rename of the new parent directory. This was
due to a simple logic mistake, a logical and instead of a logical or.

Steps to reproduce:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
  $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3/bar4 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2/bar3 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1/bar2 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/bar1 /mnt/btrfs/a/b/k44/bar3/bar2/k11
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers
this case, will be submitted soon.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

This fixes a case that the commit titled:

   Btrfs: fix infinite path build loops in incremental send

didn't cover. If the parent-child relationship between 2 directories
is inverted, both get renamed, and the former parent has a file that
got renamed too (but remains a child of that directory), the incremental
send operation would use the file's old path after sending an unlink
operation for that old path, causing receive to fail on future operations
like changing owner, permissions or utimes of the corresponding inode.

This is not a regression from the commit mentioned before, as without
that commit we would fall into the issues that commit fixed, so it's
just one case that wasn't covered before.

Simple steps to reproduce this issue are:

      $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
      $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
      $ touch /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d/file
      $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x
      $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/x /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2
      $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/x2/d2/file2
      $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
      $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

A patch to update the test btrfs/030 from xfstests, so that it covers
this case, will be submitted soon.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

Function wait_for_parent_move() returns negative value if an error
happened, 0 if we don't need to wait for the parent's move, and
1 if the wait is needed.
Before this change an error return value was being treated like the
return value 1, which was not correct.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>

For non compressed extents, iterate_extent_inodes() gives us offsets
that take into account the data offset from the file extent items, while
for compressed extents it doesn't. Therefore we have to adjust them before
placing them in a send clone instruction. Not doing this adjustment leads to
the receiving end requesting for a wrong a file range to the clone ioctl,
which results in different file content from the one in the original send
root.

Issue reproducible with the following excerpt from the test I made for
xfstests:

  _scratch_mkfs
  _scratch_mount "-o compress-force=lzo"

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 118811" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x0d -b 39987 92267 39987" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1

  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0x3e -b 80000 200000 80000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xdc -b 10000 250000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "pwrite -S 0xff -b 10000 300000 10000" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo

  # will be used for incremental send to be able to issue clone operations
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvolume snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2

  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/2.fssum -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/mysnap1 \
      -x $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
  $FSSUM_PROG -A -f -w $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap \
      -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap1 -x $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap/mysnap2

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap -f $tmp/clones.snap
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 \
      -c $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 -f $tmp/2.snap

  _scratch_unmount
  _scratch_mkfs
  _scratch_mount

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/1.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 2>> $seqres.full

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/clones.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/clones.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/clones_snap 2>> $seqres.full

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap
  $FSSUM_PROG -r $tmp/2.fssum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 2>> $seqres.full
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Wang noticed that he was failing btrfs/030 even though me and Filipe couldn't
reproduce.  Turns out this is because Wang didn't have CONFIG_BTRFS_ASSERT set,
which meant that a key part of Filipe's original patch was not being built in.
This appears to be a mess up with merging Filipe's patch as it does not exist in
his original patch.  Fix this by changing how we make sure del_waiting_dir_move
asserts that it did not error and take the function out of the ifdef check.
This makes btrfs/030 pass with the assert on or off.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

After the commit titled "Btrfs: fix btrfs boot when compiled as built-in",
LIBCRC32C requirement was removed from btrfs' Kconfig. This made it not
possible to build a kernel with btrfs enabled (either as module or built-in)
if libcrc32c is not enabled as well. So just replace all uses of libcrc32c
with the equivalent function in btrfs hash.h - btrfs_crc32c.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

If we truncate an uncompressed inline item, ram_bytes isn't updated to reflect
the new size.  The fixe uses the size directly from the item header when
reading uncompressed inlines, and also fixes truncate to update the
size as it goes.
Reported-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org

There was a case where file hole detection was incorrect and it would
cause an incremental send to override a section of a file with zeroes.

This happened in the case where between the last leaf we processed which
contained a file extent item for our current inode and the leaf we're
currently are at (and has a file extent item for our current inode) there
are only leafs containing exclusively file extent items for our current
inode, and none of them was updated since the previous send operation.
The file hole detection code would incorrectly consider the file range
covered by these leafs as a hole.

A test case for xfstests follows soon.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Instead of looking for a file extent item, process it, release the path
and do a btree search for the next file extent item, just process all
file extent items in a leaf without intermediate btree searches. This way
we save cpu and we're not blocking other tasks or affecting concurrency on
the btree, because send's paths use the commit root and skip btree node/leaf
locking.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The send operation processes inodes by their ascending number, and assumes
that any rename/move operation can be successfully performed (sent to the
caller) once all previous inodes (those with a smaller inode number than the
one we're currently processing) were processed.

This is not true when an incremental send had to process an hierarchical change
between 2 snapshots where the parent-children relationship between directory
inodes was reversed - that is, parents became children and children became
parents. This situation made the path building code go into an infinite loop,
which kept allocating more and more memory that eventually lead to a krealloc
warning being displayed in dmesg:

  WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 5705 at mm/page_alloc.c:2477 __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0()
  Modules linked in: btrfs raid6_pq xor pci_stub vboxpci(O) vboxnetadp(O) vboxnetflt(O) vboxdrv(O) snd_hda_codec_hdmi snd_hda_codec_realtek joydev radeon snd_hda_intel snd_hda_codec snd_hwdep snd_seq_midi snd_pcm psmouse i915 snd_rawmidi serio_raw snd_seq_midi_event lpc_ich snd_seq snd_timer ttm snd_seq_device rfcomm drm_kms_helper parport_pc bnep bluetooth drm ppdev snd soundcore i2c_algo_bit snd_page_alloc binfmt_misc video lp parport r8169 mii hid_generic usbhid hid
  CPU: 1 PID: 5705 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G           O 3.13.0-rc7-fdm-btrfs-next-18+ #3
  Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./Z77 Pro4, BIOS P1.50 09/04/2012
  [ 5381.660441]  00000000000009ad ffff8806f6f2f4e8 ffffffff81777434 0000000000000007
  [ 5381.660447]  0000000000000000 ffff8806f6f2f528 ffffffff8104a9ec ffff8807038f36f0
  [ 5381.660452]  0000000000000000 0000000000000206 ffff8807038f2490 ffff8807038f36f0
  [ 5381.660457] Call Trace:
  [ 5381.660464]  [<ffffffff81777434>] dump_stack+0x4e/0x68
  [ 5381.660471]  [<ffffffff8104a9ec>] warn_slowpath_common+0x8c/0xc0
  [ 5381.660476]  [<ffffffff8104aa3a>] warn_slowpath_null+0x1a/0x20
  [ 5381.660480]  [<ffffffff81144995>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x365/0xad0
  [ 5381.660487]  [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
  [ 5381.660491]  [<ffffffff811430e8>] ? free_one_page+0x98/0x440
  [ 5381.660495]  [<ffffffff8108313f>] ? local_clock+0x4f/0x60
  [ 5381.660502]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660508]  [<ffffffff81095fb8>] ? trace_hardirqs_off_caller+0x28/0xd0
  [ 5381.660515]  [<ffffffff81183caf>] alloc_pages_current+0x10f/0x1f0
  [ 5381.660520]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] ? __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660524]  [<ffffffff8113fae4>] __get_free_pages+0x14/0x50
  [ 5381.660530]  [<ffffffff8115dace>] kmalloc_order_trace+0x3e/0x100
  [ 5381.660536]  [<ffffffff81191ea0>] __kmalloc_track_caller+0x220/0x230
  [ 5381.660560]  [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] ? fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660564]  [<ffffffff8178085c>] ? retint_restore_args+0xe/0xe
  [ 5381.660569]  [<ffffffff811580ef>] krealloc+0x6f/0xb0
  [ 5381.660586]  [<ffffffffa0729fdb>] fs_path_ensure_buf.part.12+0x6b/0x200 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660601]  [<ffffffffa072a208>] fs_path_prepare_for_add+0x98/0xb0 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660615]  [<ffffffffa072a2bc>] fs_path_add_path+0x2c/0x60 [btrfs]
  [ 5381.660628]  [<ffffffffa072c55c>] get_cur_path+0x7c/0x1c0 [btrfs]

Even without this loop, the incremental send couldn't succeed, because it would attempt
to send a rename/move operation for the lower inode before the highest inode number was
renamed/move. This issue is easy to trigger with the following steps:

  $ mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sdb3
  $ mount /dev/sdb3 /mnt/btrfs
  $ mkdir -p /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d
  $ mkdir /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap1
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c/d /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2
  $ mv /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c /mnt/btrfs/a/b/c2/d2/cc
  $ btrfs subvol snapshot -r /mnt/btrfs /mnt/btrfs/snap2
  $ btrfs send -p /mnt/btrfs/snap1 /mnt/btrfs/snap2 > /tmp/incremental.send

The structure of the filesystem when the first snapshot is taken is:

	 .                       (ino 256)
	 |-- a                   (ino 257)
	     |-- b               (ino 258)
	         |-- c           (ino 259)
	         |   |-- d       (ino 260)
                 |
	         |-- c2          (ino 261)

And its structure when the second snapshot is taken is:

	 .                       (ino 256)
	 |-- a                   (ino 257)
	     |-- b               (ino 258)
	         |-- c2          (ino 261)
	             |-- d2      (ino 260)
	                 |-- cc  (ino 259)

Before the move/rename operation is performed for the inode 259, the
move/rename for inode 260 must be performed, since 259 is now a child
of 260.

A test case for xfstests, with a more complex scenario, will follow soon.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The buffer size argument passed to snprintf must account for the
trailing null byte added by snprintf, and it returns a value >= then
sizeof(buffer) when the string can't fit in the buffer.

Since our buffer has a size of 64 characters, and the maximum orphan
name we can generate is 63 characters wide, we must pass 64 as the
buffer size to snprintf, and not 63.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

To search tree root without transaction protection, we should neither search commit
root nor skip locking here, fix it.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

It is possible for the send feature to send clone operations that
request a cloning range (offset + length) that is not aligned with
the block size. This makes the btrfs receive command send issue a
clone ioctl call that will fail, as the ioctl will return an -EINVAL
error because of the unaligned range.

Fix this by not sending clone operations for non block aligned ranges,
and instead send regular write operation for these (less common) cases.

The following xfstest reproduces this issue, which fails on the second
btrfs receive command without this change:

  seq=`basename $0`
  seqres=$RESULT_DIR/$seq
  echo "QA output created by $seq"

  tmp=`mktemp -d`

  status=1	# failure is the default!
  trap "_cleanup; exit \$status" 0 1 2 3 15

  _cleanup()
  {
      rm -fr $tmp
  }

  # get standard environment, filters and checks
  . ./common/rc
  . ./common/filter

  # real QA test starts here
  _supported_fs btrfs
  _supported_os Linux
  _require_scratch
  _need_to_be_root

  rm -f $seqres.full

  _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 819200" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch

  $XFS_IO_PROG -c "falloc -k 819200 667648" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "pwrite 1482752 2978" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 | \
      _filter_scratch

  $XFS_IO_PROG -f -c "truncate 883305" $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_xfs_io
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG filesystem sync $SCRATCH_MNT | _filter_scratch

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG subvol snapshot -r $SCRATCH_MNT $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 | \
      _filter_scratch

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 -f $tmp/1.snap 2>&1 | _filter_scratch
  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG send -p $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1 $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2 \
      -f $tmp/2.snap 2>&1 | _filter_scratch

  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo | _filter_scratch
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch

  _scratch_unmount
  _check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV
  _scratch_mkfs >/dev/null 2>&1
  _scratch_mount

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/1.snap
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo | _filter_scratch

  $BTRFS_UTIL_PROG receive $SCRATCH_MNT -f $tmp/2.snap
  md5sum $SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo | _filter_scratch

  _scratch_unmount
  _check_btrfs_filesystem $SCRATCH_DEV

  status=0
  exit

The tests expected output is:

  QA output created by 025
  FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
  FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
  wrote 2978/2978 bytes at offset 1482752
  XXX Bytes, X ops; XX:XX:XX.X (XXX YYY/sec and XXX ops/sec)
  FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
  Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1'
  FSSync 'SCRATCH_MNT'
  Create a readonly snapshot of 'SCRATCH_MNT' in 'SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2'
  At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1
  At subvol SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2
  129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3  SCRATCH_MNT/foo
  42b6369eae2a8725c1aacc0440e597aa  SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo
  129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3  SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo
  At subvol mysnap1
  42b6369eae2a8725c1aacc0440e597aa  SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap1/foo
  At snapshot mysnap2
  129b8eaee8d3c2bcad49bec596591cb3  SCRATCH_MNT/mysnap2/foo
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We will finish orphan cleanups during snapshot, so we don't
have to commit transaction here.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We should gurantee that parent and clone roots can not be destroyed
during send, for this we have two ideas.

1.by holding @subvol_sem, this might be a nightmare, because it will
block all subvolumes deletion for a long time.

2.Miao pointed out we can reuse @send_in_progress, that mean we will
skip snapshot deletion if root sending is in progress.

Here we adopt the second approach since it won't block other subvolumes
deletion for a long time.

Besides in btrfs_clean_one_deleted_snapshot(), we only check first root
, if this root is involved in send, we return directly rather than
continue to check.There are several reasons about it:

1.this case happen seldomly.
2.after sending,cleaner thread can continue to drop that root.
3.make code simple

Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NMiao Xie <miaox@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Steps to reproduce:
 # mkfs.btrfs -f /dev/sda8
 # mount /dev/sda8 /mnt
 # btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap1
 # btrfs sub snapshot -r /mnt /mnt/snap2
 # btrfs send /mnt/snap1 -p /mnt/snap2 -f /mnt/1
 # dmesg

The problem is that we will sort clone roots(include @send_root), it
might push @send_root before thus @send_root's @send_in_progress will
be decreased twice.

Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Convert all applicable cases of printk and pr_* to the btrfs_* macros.

Fix all uses of the BTRFS prefix.
Signed-off-by: NFrank Holton <fholton@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Warn if the balance goes below zero, which appears to be unlikely
though. Otherwise cleans up the code a bit.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Since daivd did the work that force us to use readonly snapshot,
we can safely remove transaction protection from btrfs send.
Signed-off-by: NWang Shilong <wangsl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

All the subvolues that are involved in send must be read-only during the
whole operation. The ioctl SUBVOL_SETFLAGS could be used to change the
status to read-write and the result of send stream is undefined if the
data change unexpectedly.

Fix that by adding a refcount for all involved roots and verify that
there's no send in progress during SUBVOL_SETFLAGS ioctl call that does
read-only -> read-write transition.

We need refcounts because there are no restrictions on number of send
parallel operations currently run on a single subvolume, be it source,
parent or one of the multiple clone sources.

Kernel is silent when the RO checks fail and returns EPERM. The same set
of checks is done already in userspace before send starts.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Unused since ed259095
"Btrfs: stop using vfs_read in send".
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Remove ifdefed code:

- tlv_put for 8, 16 and 32, add a generic tempalte if needed in future
- tlv_put_timespec - the btrfs_timespec fields are used
- fs_path_remove obsoleted long ago
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
fs/btrfs/send.c:2190:9:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
fs/btrfs/send.c:2195:17:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9: warning: incorrect type in argument 3 (different base types)
fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9:    expected unsigned long long [unsigned] [usertype] value
fs/btrfs/send.c:3716:9:    got restricted __le64 [usertype] ctransid
Signed-off-by: NFilipe David Borba Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Btrfs has always had these filler extent data items for holes in inodes.  This
has made somethings very easy, like logging hole punches and sending hole
punches.  However for large holey files these extent data items are pure
overhead.  So add an incompatible feature to no longer add hole extents to
reduce the amount of metadata used by these sort of files.  This has a few
changes for logging and send obviously since they will need to detect holes and
log/send the holes if there are any.  I've tested this thoroughly with xfstests
and it doesn't cause any issues with and without the incompat format set.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The closing parenthesis is in the wrong place.  We want to check
"sizeof(*arg->clone_sources) * arg->clone_sources_count" instead of
"sizeof(*arg->clone_sources * arg->clone_sources_count)".
Signed-off-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: NJie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

I hit this problem with my no holes patch and it made me realize what the
problem was for bz 60834.  If the first item in the leaf is an inline extent and
we try to read anything starting from disk_bytenr onward we will read off the
end of the leaf.  So we need to check to see what it's type is, and if it's not
REG we can just break out.  This should fix this problem.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Use WARN_ON()'s return value in place of WARN_ON(1) for cleaner source
code that outputs a more descriptive warnings. Also fix the styling
warning of redundant braces that came up as a result of this fix.
Signed-off-by: NDulshani Gunawardhana <dulshani.gunawardhana89@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NZach Brown <zab@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Apparently we don't actually close the files until we return to userspace, so
stop using vfs_read in send.  This is actually better for us since we can avoid
all the extra logic of holding the file we're sending open and making sure to
clean it up.  This will fix people who have been hitting too many files open
errors when trying to send.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Remove unused eb parameter from btrfs_item_nr
Signed-off-by: NRoss Kirk <ross.kirk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

To get name of the file from a pathname let's use kbasename() helper. It allows
to simplify code a bit.
Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Send was just sending everything it found, even if the extent was a hole.  This
is unpleasant for users, so just skip holes when we are sending.  This will also
skip sending prealloc extents since the send spec doesn't have a prealloc
command.  Eventually we will add a prealloc command and rev the send version so
we can send down the prealloc info.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

make C=2 fs/btrfs/ CF=-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__

I tried to filter out the warnings for which patches have already
been sent to the mailing list, pending for inclusion in btrfs-next.

All these changes should be obviously safe.
Signed-off-by: NStefan Behrens <sbehrens@giantdisaster.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

If you are sending a snapshot and specifying a parent snapshot we will walk the
trees and figure out where they differ and send the differences only.  The way
we check for differences are if the leaves aren't the same and if the keys are
not the same within the leaves.  So if neither leaf is the same (ie the leaf has
been cow'ed from the parent snapshot) we walk each item in the send root and
check it against the parent root.  If the items match exactly then we don't do
anything.  This doesn't quite work for inode refs, since they will just have the
name and the parent objectid.  If you move the file from a directory and then
remove that directory and re-create a directory with the same inode number as
the old directory and then move that file back into that directory we will
assume that nothing changed and you will get errors when you try to receive.

In order to fix this we need to do extra checking to see if the inode ref really
is the same or not.  So do this by passing down BTRFS_COMPARE_TREE_SAME if the
items match.  Then if the key type is an inode ref we can do some extra
checking, otherwise we just keep processing.  The extra checking is to look up
the generation of the directory in the parent volume and compare it to the
generation of the send volume.  If they match then they are the same directory
and we are good to go.  If they don't we have to add them to the changed refs
list.

This means we have to track the generation of the ref we're trying to lookup
when we iterate all the refs for a particular inode.  So in the case of looking
for new refs we have to get the generation from the parent volume, and in the
case of looking for deleted refs we have to get the generation from the send
volume to compare with.

There was also the issue of using a ulist to keep track of the directories we
needed to check.  Because we can get a deleted ref and a new ref for the same
inode number the ulist won't work since it indexes based on the value.  So
instead just dup any directory ref we find and add it to a local list, and then
process that list as normal and do away with using a ulist for this altogether.

Before we would fail all of the tests in the far-progs that related to moving
directories (test group 32).  With this patch we now pass these tests, and all
of the tests in the far-progs send testing suite.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

We have logic to see if we've already created a parent directory by check to see
if an inode inside of that directory has a lower inode number than the one we
are currently processing.  The logic is that if there is a lower inode number
then we would have had to made sure the directory was created at that previous
point.  The problem is that subvols inode numbers count from the lowest objectid
in the root tree, which may be less than our current progress.  So just skip if
our dir item key is a root item.  This fixes the original test and the xfstest
version I made that added an extra subvol create.  Thanks,
Reported-by: NEmil Karlson <jekarlson@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

When doing a send with a parent subvol we will check to see if the file we are
acting on is being overwritten and move it if we think it may be needed further
down the line during the send.  We check this by checking its directory and
making sure it existed in the parent and making sure the file existed in the
parent.  The problem with this check is that if we create a directory and a file
in that directory, and then snapshot, and then remove and re-create that same
directory and file with different inode numbers and then try to snapshot and
send with the original parent we will try and save the original file inside of
that directory.  This is a problem because during the receive we move the
directory out of the way because it is a completely new inode, which makes us
unable to find the old file inside of the directory when we try to move that out
of the way for the overwrite.  We fix this by checking the parent directory of
the inode we think we are overwriting.  If the parent directory generation in
the send root != the parent directory generation in the parent root then we know
it is a completely new directory and we need not bother with moving the file out
of the way because it would have been completely destroyed.  This fixes bz
60673.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>

Don't emit OOM warnings when k.alloc calls fail when
there there is a v.alloc immediately afterwards.

Converted a kmalloc/vmalloc with memset to kzalloc/vzalloc.
Signed-off-by: NJoe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Acked-by: N"Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Meyer <thomas@m3y3r.de>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>

This fixes bugzilla 57491.  If we take a snapshot of a fs with a unlink ongoing
and then try to send that root we will run into problems.  When comparing with a
parent root we will search the parents and the send roots commit_root, which if
we've just created the snapshot will include the file that needs to be evicted
by the orphan cleanup.  So when we find a changed extent we will try and copy
that info into the send stream, but when we lookup the inode we use the normal
root, which no longer has the inode because the orphan cleanup deleted it.  The
best solution I have for this is to check our otransid with the generation of
the commit root and if they match just commit the transaction again, that way we
get the changes from the orphan cleanup.  With this patch the reproducer I made
for this bugzilla no longer returns ESTALE when trying to do the send.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: NChris Wilson <jakdaw@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>