1. 15 4月, 2015 3 次提交
  2. 25 3月, 2015 2 次提交
  3. 29 1月, 2015 2 次提交
  4. 28 11月, 2014 3 次提交
  5. 09 10月, 2014 2 次提交
  6. 22 7月, 2014 8 次提交
  7. 16 1月, 2014 1 次提交
  8. 09 11月, 2013 1 次提交
  9. 28 10月, 2013 1 次提交
  10. 30 7月, 2013 1 次提交
  11. 01 7月, 2013 6 次提交
  12. 31 5月, 2013 1 次提交
    • S
      s390/dasd: fix handling of gone paths · 8b811bae
      Stefan Weinhuber 提交于
      When a path is gone and dasd_generic_path_event is called with a
      PE_PATH_GONE event, we must assume that any I/O request on that
      subchannel is still running. This is unlike the dasd_generic_notify
      handler and the CIO_NO_PATH event, which implies that the subchannel
      has been cleared.
      If dasd_generic_path_event finds that the path has been the last
      usable path, it must not call dasd_generic_last_path_gone (which would
      reset the state of running requests), but just set the
      DASD_STOPPED_DC_WAIT bit.
      Signed-off-by: NStefan Weinhuber <wein@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      8b811bae
  13. 07 5月, 2013 1 次提交
  14. 17 4月, 2013 2 次提交
  15. 14 2月, 2013 2 次提交
  16. 30 11月, 2012 1 次提交
  17. 17 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • S
      s390/dasd: fix pathgroup race · 12d7b107
      Stefan Haberland 提交于
      If a new path is available we need to verify the path data. If it is the
      first path for a device the stop bits are removed after path verification.
      If a pathgroup is established we need to set system characteristics for
      the lcu. Therefore I/O has to be started.
      If the device is stopped the set system characteristics worker may block
      the path verification worker and the device is blocked.
      
      Turn on failfast for set system characteristics CQR to prevent a deadlock
      with the path verification worker.
      
      If a pathgroup is established on a device that is not in use trigger path
      verification. Maybe we were not informed about a working path.
      Signed-off-by: NStefan Haberland <stefan.haberland@de.ibm.com>
      Reviewed-by: NStefan Weinhuber <wein@de.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NMartin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
      12d7b107
  18. 06 9月, 2012 1 次提交
  19. 20 7月, 2012 1 次提交
    • H
      s390/comments: unify copyright messages and remove file names · a53c8fab
      Heiko Carstens 提交于
      Remove the file name from the comment at top of many files. In most
      cases the file name was wrong anyway, so it's rather pointless.
      
      Also unify the IBM copyright statement. We did have a lot of sightly
      different statements and wanted to change them one after another
      whenever a file gets touched. However that never happened. Instead
      people start to take the old/"wrong" statements to use as a template
      for new files.
      So unify all of them in one go.
      Signed-off-by: NHeiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
      a53c8fab