Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 7
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 05 3月, 2011 3 次提交
    • A
      ipx: remove the BKL · b0d0d915
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      This replaces all instances of lock_kernel in the
IPX code with lock_sock. As far as I can tell, this
is safe to do, because there is no global state
that needs to be locked in IPX, and the code does
not recursively take the lock or sleep indefinitely
while holding it.

Compile-tested only.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
      b0d0d915
    • A
      appletalk: remove the BKL · 60d9f461
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      This changes appletalk to use lock_sock instead of
lock_kernel for serialization. I tried to make sure
that we don't hold the socket lock during sleeping
functions, but I did not try to prove whether the
locks are necessary in the first place.

Compile-tested only.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
      60d9f461
    • A
      x25: remove the BKL · 77b22836
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      This replaces all instances of lock_kernel in x25
with lock_sock, taking care to release the socket
lock around sleeping functions (sock_alloc_send_skb
and skb_recv_datagram). It is not clear whether
this is a correct solution, but it seem to be what
other protocols do in the same situation.

Includes a fix suggested by Eric Dumazet.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Tested-by: NAndrew Hendry <andrew.hendry@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-x25@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
      77b22836
  3. 03 3月, 2011 2 次提交
    • A
      ufs: remove the BKL · 788257d6
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      This introduces a new per-superblock mutex in UFS to replace
the big kernel lock. I have been careful to avoid nested
calls to lock_ufs and to get the lock order right with
respect to other mutexes, in particular lock_super.

I did not make any attempt to prove that the big kernel
lock is not needed in a particular place in the code,
which is very possible.

The mutex has a significant performance impact, so it is only
used on SMP or PREEMPT configurations.

As Nick Piggin noticed, any allocation inside of the lock
may end up deadlocking when we get to ufs_getfrag_block
in the reclaim task, so we now use GFP_NOFS.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Tested-by: NNick Bowler <nbowler@elliptictech.com>
Cc: Evgeniy Dushistov <dushistov@mail.ru>
Cc: Nick Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
      788257d6
    • A
      hpfs: remove the BKL · 9a311b96
      由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于 
      This removes the BKL in hpfs in a rather awful
way, by making the code only work on uniprocessor
systems without kernel preemption, as suggested
by Andi Kleen.

The HPFS code probably has close to zero remaining
users on current kernels, all archeological uses of
the file system can probably be done with the significant
restrictions.

The hpfs_lock/hpfs_unlock functions are left in the
code, sincen Mikulas has indicated that he is still
interested in fixing it in a better way.
Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Acked-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
      9a311b96
  5. 02 3月, 2011 3 次提交
  7. 22 2月, 2011 32 次提交