- 03 6月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
This makes it possible to support drivers that use fwnode_property_get_reference_args() function. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
Until now the software nodes could only be created dynamically with fwnode_create_software_node() function. This introduces struct software_node data structure, which makes it possible to describe the software nodes also statically. The statically described software nodes can be registered with a new function fwnode_register_software_node(). This also adds a helper fwnode_register_software_nodes() which makes it possible to register an array of struct software_nodes, i.e. multiple nodes at the same time. There is no difference between statically described and dynamically allocated software nodes. Even the registration does not differ, except that during node creation the device properties are only copied if the node is created dynamically. With statically described nodes, the property entries in the descriptor (struct software_node) are assigned directly to the new software node that is being created without any copies. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Tested-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 18 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() is intended for obtaining local endpoints by a given local port. fwnode_graph_get_endpoint_by_id() is slightly different from its OF counterpart, of_graph_get_endpoint_by_regs(): instead of using -1 as a value to indicate that a port or an endpoint number does not matter, it uses flags to look for equal or greater endpoint. The port number is always fixed. It also returns only remote endpoints that belong to an available device, a behaviour that can be turned off with a flag. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> [ rjw: Changelog ] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
With string type property entries we need to use sizeof(const char *) instead of the number of characters as the length of the entry. If the string was shorter then sizeof(const char *), attempts to read it would have failed with -EOVERFLOW. The problem has been hidden because all build-in string properties have had a string longer then 8 characters until now. Fixes: a85f4204 ("device property: helper macros for property entry creation") Cc: 4.5+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 4.5+ Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 27 11月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
Software node is a new struct fwnode_handle type that can be used to describe devices in kernel (software). It is meant to complement fwnodes representing real firmware nodes when they are incomplete (for example missing device properties) and to supply the primary fwnode when the firmware lacks hardware description for a device completely. The software node type is really meant to replace the currently used "property_set" struct fwnode_handle type. The handling of struct property_set is glued to the generic device property handling code, and it is not possible to create a struct property_set independently from the device that it is bind to. struct property_set is only created when device properties are added to already initialized struct device, and control of it is only possible from the generic property handling code. Software nodes are instead designed to be created independently from the device entries (struct device). It makes them much more flexible, as then the device meant to be bind to the node can be created at a later time, and from another location. It is also possible to bind multiple devices to a single software node if needed. The software node implementation also includes support for node hierarchy, which was the main motivation for this commit. The node hierarchy was something that was requested for the struct property_set, but it did not seem reasonable to try to extend the property_set support for that purpose. struct property_set was really meant only for device property handling like the name suggests. Support for struct property_set is not yet removed in this commit, but it will be in the following one. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
Commit 318a1971 (device property: refactor built-in properties support) went way too far and brought a union aliasing. Partially revert it here to get rid of union aliasing. Note, all Apple properties are considered as u8 arrays. To get a value of any of them the caller must use device_property_read_u8_array(). What's union aliasing? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ The C99 standard in section 6.2.5 paragraph 20 defines union type as "an overlapping nonempty set of member objects". It also states in section 6.7.2.1 paragraph 14 that "the value of at most one of the members can be stored in a union object at any time'. Union aliasing is a type punning mechanism using union members to store as one type and read back as another. Why it's not good? ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Section 6.2.6.1 paragraph 6 says that a union object may not be a trap representation, although its member objects may be. Meanwhile annex J.1 says that "the value of a union member other than the last one stored into" is unspecified [removed in C11]. In TC3, a footnote is added which specifies that accessing a member of a union other than the last one stored causes "the object representation" to be re-interpreted in the new type and specifically refers to this as "type punning". This conflicts to some degree with Annex J.1. While it's working in Linux with GCC, the use of union members to do type punning is not clear area in the C standard and might lead to unspecified behaviour. More information is available in this [1] blog post. [1]: https://davmac.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/c99-revisited/Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NArd Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 12 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
Constify device_get_match_data() as OF and ACPI variants return constant value. Acked-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 25 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
Some of the drivers may use the macro at runtime flow, like struct property_entry p[10]; ... p[index++] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8("u8 property", u8_data); In that case and absence of the data type compiler fails the build: drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: Expected ; at end of statement drivers/char/ipmi/ipmi_dmi.c:79:29: error: got { Acked-by: NCorey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Cc: Corey Minyard <minyard@acm.org> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- 22 1月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Marcin Wojtas 提交于
Implement a new helper function fwnode_get_next_available_child_node(), which enables obtaining next enabled child fwnode, which works on a similar basis to OF's of_get_next_available_child(). This commit also introduces a macro, thanks to which it is possible to iterate over the available fwnodes, using the new function described above. Signed-off-by: NMarcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Marcin Wojtas 提交于
Until now there were two very similar functions allowing to get Linux IRQ number from ACPI handle (acpi_irq_get()) and OF node (of_irq_get()). The first one appeared to be used only as a subroutine of platform_irq_get(), which (in the generic code) limited IRQ obtaining from _CRS method only to nodes associated to kernel's struct platform_device. This patch introduces a new helper routine - fwnode_irq_get(), which allows to get the IRQ number directly from the fwnode to be used as common for OF/ACPI worlds. It is usable not only for the parents fwnodes, but also for the child nodes comprising their own _CRS methods with interrupts description. In order to be able o satisfy compilation with !CONFIG_ACPI and also simplify the new code, introduce a helper macro (ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE), with which it is possible to reach an ACPI handle directly from its fwnode. Signed-off-by: NMarcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Marcin Wojtas 提交于
Until now there were two almost identical functions for obtaining network PHY mode - of_get_phy_mode() and, more generic, device_get_phy_mode(). However it is not uncommon, that the network interface is represented as a child of the actual controller, hence it is not associated directly to any struct device, required by the latter routine. This commit allows for getting the PHY mode for children nodes in the ACPI world by introducing a new function - fwnode_get_phy_mode(). This commit also changes device_get_phy_mode() routine to be its wrapper, in order to prevent unnecessary duplication. Signed-off-by: NMarcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
由 Marcin Wojtas 提交于
Until now there were two almost identical functions for obtaining MAC address - of_get_mac_address() and, more generic, device_get_mac_address(). However it is not uncommon, that the network interface is represented as a child of the actual controller, hence it is not associated directly to any struct device, required by the latter routine. This commit allows for getting the MAC address for children nodes in the ACPI world by introducing a new function - fwnode_get_mac_address(). This commit also changes device_get_mac_address() routine to be its wrapper, in order to prevent unnecessary duplication. Signed-off-by: NMarcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 13 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sinan Kaya 提交于
There is an OF/ACPI function to obtain the driver data. We want to hide OF/ACPI details from the device drivers and abstract following the device family of functions. Signed-off-by: NSinan Kaya <okaya@codeaurora.org> Reviewed-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NVinod Koul <vinod.koul@intel.com>
-
- 09 11月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
Add a convenience macro for iterating over graph endpoints. Iterating over graph endpoints using fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint() is a recurring pattern, and this macro allows calling that function in a slightly more convenient way. For instance, for (child = NULL; (child = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, child)); ) becomes fwnode_graph_for_each_endpoint(fwnode, child) Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
The fwnode_handle_get() function is used to obtain a reference to an fwnode. A common usage pattern for the OF equivalent of the function is: mynode = of_node_get(node); Similarly make fwnode_handle_get() return the fwnode to which the reference was obtained. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 7月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
The new fwnode_property_get_reference_args() interface amends the fwnode property API with the functionality of both of_parse_phandle_with_args() and __acpi_node_get_property_reference(). The semantics is slightly different: the cells property is ignored on ACPI as the number of arguments can be explicitly obtained from the firmware interface. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
Make fwnode arguments to the fwnode property API const. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 22 6月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Kieran Bingham 提交于
Provide a helper to obtain the parent device fwnode without first parsing the remote-endpoint as per fwnode_graph_get_remote_port_parent. Signed-off-by: NKieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@ideasonboard.com> Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
Add fwnode_graph_get_remote_node() function which is equivalent to of_graph_get_remote_node() on OF. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
Add fwnode_device_is_available() to tell whether the device corresponding to a certain fwnode_handle is available for use. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 29 3月, 2017 8 次提交
-
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
In order to differentiate the functionality between dropping a reference to the node (or not) for the benefit of OF, introduce fwnode_get_next_parent(). Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
Similar to OF endpoints, endpoint type nodes can be also supported on ACPI. In order to make it possible for drivers to ignore the matter, add a type for fwnode_endpoint and a function to parse them. On ACPI, find the child node index instead of relying on the "endpoint" property. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
The function to obtain a fwnode related to a struct device is useful for drivers that use the fwnode property API: it allows not being aware of the underlying firmware implementation. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sakari Ailus 提交于
fwnode_handle_get() is used to obtain a reference to a fwnode_handle container. In this case this is OF specific struct device_node. This complements fwnode_handle_put() which is already implemented. Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
This follows DT implementation of of_graph_* APIs but we call them fwnode_graph_* instead. For DT nodes the existing of_graph_* implementation will be used. For ACPI we use the new ACPI graph implementation instead. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NSakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Since now we have means to enumerate all children of any fwnode even in ACPI we can implement fwnode_get_named_child_node(). This is similar than device_get_named_child_node() with the exception that it can be called to any fwnode handle. Make device_get_named_child_node() call directly this new function. This is useful in cases where we need to be able to find child nodes which are not direct descendants of the parent device. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
The ACPI _DSD hierarchical data extension makes it possible to have hierarchies deeper than one level in similar way than DT allows. These "subsubnodes" have not been accessible because device property implementation only provides device_get_next_child_node() that is limited to direct descendants of a device. We need this ability in order support things like remote endpoints currently supported in DT with of_graph_* APIs. Modify acpi_get_next_subnode() to accept fwnode handle instead and update callers accordingly. Also add a new function fwnode_get_next_child_node() that works directly with fwnodes and modify device_get_next_child_node() to call it directly. While there add a macro fwnode_for_each_child_node() analogous to the current device_for_each_child_node() but it works with fwnodes instead of devices. Link: http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-hierarchical-data-extension-UUID-v1.pdfSigned-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
Now that ACPI has support for returning parent firmware node for both types of nodes we can expose this to others as well. This adds a new function fwnode_get_parent() that can be used for DT and ACPI nodes to retrieve the parent firmware node. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
When augmenting ACPI-enumerated devices with additional property data based on DMI info, a module has often several potential property sets, with only one being active on a given box. In order to save memory it should be possible to mark everything and __initdata or __initconst, execute DMI match early, and duplicate relevant properties. Then kernel will discard the rest of them. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
Data that is fed into property arrays should not be modified, so let's mark relevant pointers as const. This will allow us making source arrays as const/__initconst. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Dmitry Torokhov 提交于
There is no reason why statically defined properties should be modifiable, so let's make device_add_properties() and the rest of pset_*() functions to take const pointers to properties. This will allow us to mark properties as const/__initconst at definition sites. Signed-off-by: NDmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 10月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Youn 提交于
This fixes commit d76eebfa ("include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4"). With that commit we get the following compile error when using the PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY macro. include/linux/property.h:201:39: error: `u32_data' undeclared (first use in this function) PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY(_name_, u32, _val_) ^ include/linux/property.h:193:17: note: in definition of macro `PROPERTY_ENTRY_INTEGER_ARRAY' { .pointer = { _type_##_data = _val_ } }, \ ^ This needs a '.' to reference the union member. It seems this was just overlooked here since it is done correctly in similar constructs in other parts of the original commit. This fix is in preparation of upcoming commits that will use this macro. Fixes: commit d76eebfa ("include/linux/property.h: fix build issues with gcc-4.4.4") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2de3b929290d88a723ed829a3e3cbd02044714df.1475114627.git.johnyoun@synopsys.comSigned-off-by: NJohn Youn <johnyoun@synopsys.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Adam Thomson 提交于
For device nodes in both DT and ACPI, it possible to have named child nodes which contain properties (an existing example being gpio-leds). This adds a function to find a named child node for a device which can be used by drivers for property retrieval. For DT data node name matching, of_node_cmp() and similar functions are made available outside of CONFIG_OF block so the new function can reference these for DT and non-DT builds. For ACPI data node name matching, a helper function is also added which returns false if CONFIG_ACPI is not set, otherwise it performs a string comparison on the data node name. This avoids using the acpi_data_node struct for non CONFIG_ACPI builds, which would otherwise cause a build failure. Signed-off-by: NAdam Thomson <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@diasemi.com> Acked-by: NSathyanarayana Nujella <sathyanarayana.nujella@intel.com> Acked-by: NRob Herring <robh@kernel.org> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
-
- 09 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
Since device_add_property_set() now always takes a copy of the property_set, and also since the fwnode type is always hard coded to be FWNODE_PDATA, there is no need for the drivers to deliver the entire struct property_set. The function can just create the instance of it on its own and bind the properties from the drivers to it on the spot. This renames device_add_property_set() to device_add_properties(). The function now takes struct property_entry as its parameter instead of struct property_set. Reviewed-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NThierry Reding <treding@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 01 1月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
Just a style fix, no functional changes. Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Andrew Morton 提交于
gcc-4.4.4 has problems with initialization of anonymous unions: drivers/mfd/intel-lpss-acpi.c:30: error: unknown field 'value' specified in initializer work around this by crafting the initializers in a manner which the compiler can handle. Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 07 12月, 2015 4 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Westerberg 提交于
It is convenient if the property set associated with the device secondary firmware node is a copy of the original. This allows passing property set from a stack for example for devices created dynamically. This also ties the property set lifetime to the associated device. Because of that we provide new function device_remove_property_set() that is used to disassociate and release memory allocated for the property set. Signed-off-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
There is no functional change. Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Heikki Krogerus 提交于
Marcos for easier creation of build-in property entries. Signed-off-by: NHeikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Andy Shevchenko 提交于
We may save a lot of lines of code and space by keeping single values inside the struct property_entry. Refactor the implementation to do so. Signed-off-by: NAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-