Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 23 9月, 2009 4 次提交
    • T
      eCryptfs: Handle unrecognized tag 3 cipher codes · b0105eae
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      Returns an error when an unrecognized cipher code is present in a tag 3
packet or an ecryptfs_crypt_stat cannot be initialized.  Also sets an
crypt_stat->tfm error pointer to NULL to ensure that it will not be
incorrectly freed in ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat().
Acked-by: NSerge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      b0105eae
    • D
      ecryptfs: improved dependency checking and reporting · 38268498
      由 Dave Hansen 提交于 
      So, I compiled a 2.6.31-rc5 kernel with ecryptfs and loaded its module.
When it came time to mount my filesystem, I got this in dmesg, and it
refused to mount:

[93577.776637] Unable to allocate crypto cipher with name [aes]; rc = [-2]
[93577.783280] Error attempting to initialize key TFM cipher with name = [aes]; rc = [-2]
[93577.791183] Error attempting to initialize cipher with name = [aes] and key size = [32]; rc = [-2]
[93577.800113] Error parsing options; rc = [-22]

I figured from the error message that I'd either forgotten to load "aes"
or that my key size was bogus.  Neither one of those was the case.  In
fact, I was missing the CRYPTO_ECB config option and the 'ecb' module.
Unfortunately, there's no trace of 'ecb' in that error message.

I've done two things to fix this.  First, I've modified ecryptfs's
Kconfig entry to select CRYPTO_ECB and CRYPTO_CBC.  I also took CRYPTO
out of the dependencies since the 'select' will take care of it for us.

I've also modified the error messages to print a string that should
contain both 'ecb' and 'aes' in my error case.  That will give any
future users a chance of finding the right modules and Kconfig options.

I also wonder if we should:

	select CRYPTO_AES if !EMBEDDED

since I think most ecryptfs users are using AES like me.

Cc: ecryptfs-devel@lists.launchpad.net
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Dustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: NDave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com: Removed extra newline, 80-char violation]
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      38268498
    • R
      eCryptfs: Fix lockdep-reported AB-BA mutex issue · aa06117f
      由 Roland Dreier 提交于 
      Lockdep reports the following valid-looking possible AB-BA deadlock with
global_auth_tok_list_mutex and keysig_list_mutex:

  ecryptfs_new_file_context() ->
      ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs() ->
          mutex_lock(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex);
          -> ecryptfs_add_keysig() ->
              mutex_lock(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex);

vs

  ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set() ->
      mutex_lock(&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex);
      -> ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig() ->
          mutex_lock(&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex);

ie the two mutexes are taken in opposite orders in the two different
code paths.  I'm not sure if this is a real bug where two threads could
actually hit the two paths in parallel and deadlock, but it at least
makes lockdep impossible to use with ecryptfs since this report triggers
every time and disables future lockdep reporting.

Since ecryptfs_add_keysig() is called only from the single callsite in
ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs(), the simplest fix seems to
be to move the lock of keysig_list_mutex back up outside of the where
global_auth_tok_list_mutex is taken.  This patch does that, and fixes
the lockdep report on my system (and ecryptfs still works OK).

The full output of lockdep fixed by this patch is:

=======================================================
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd2
-------------------------------------------------------
gdm/2640 is trying to acquire lock:
 (&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90

but task is already holding lock:
 (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81217728>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x58/0x2b0

which lock already depends on the new lock.

the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

-> #1 (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff8108c897>] check_prev_add+0x2a7/0x370
       [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
       [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
       [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
       [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
       [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
       [<ffffffff8121526a>] ecryptfs_add_keysig+0x5a/0xb0
       [<ffffffff81213299>] ecryptfs_copy_mount_wide_sigs_to_inode_sigs+0x59/0xb0
       [<ffffffff81214b06>] ecryptfs_new_file_context+0xa6/0x1a0
       [<ffffffff8120e42a>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x4a/0x140
       [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
       [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
       [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
       [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
       [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
       [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
       [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
       [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

-> #0 (&mount_crypt_stat->global_auth_tok_list_mutex){+.+.+.}:
       [<ffffffff8108c675>] check_prev_add+0x85/0x370
       [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
       [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
       [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
       [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
       [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
       [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
       [<ffffffff812177d5>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x105/0x2b0
       [<ffffffff81212f49>] ecryptfs_write_headers_virt+0xc9/0x120
       [<ffffffff8121306d>] ecryptfs_write_metadata+0xcd/0x200
       [<ffffffff8120e44b>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x6b/0x140
       [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
       [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
       [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
       [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
       [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
       [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
       [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
       [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff

other info that might help us debug this:

2 locks held by gdm/2640:
 #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#11){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff8113cb8b>] do_filp_open+0x3cb/0xae0
 #1:  (&crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81217728>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x58/0x2b0

stack backtrace:
Pid: 2640, comm: gdm Tainted: G         C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd2
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8108b988>] print_circular_bug_tail+0xa8/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8108c675>] check_prev_add+0x85/0x370
 [<ffffffff81094912>] ? __module_text_address+0x12/0x60
 [<ffffffff8108cfc1>] validate_chain+0x661/0x750
 [<ffffffff81017275>] ? print_context_stack+0x85/0x140
 [<ffffffff81089c68>] ? find_usage_backwards+0x38/0x160
 [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
 [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
 [<ffffffff8108b0b0>] ? check_usage_backwards+0x0/0xb0
 [<ffffffff815526cd>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ? ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
 [<ffffffff8108c02c>] ? mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0
 [<ffffffff81125b0d>] ? kmem_cache_alloc+0xfd/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff8108c34d>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x14d/0x190
 [<ffffffff81552b56>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
 [<ffffffff8121591e>] ecryptfs_find_global_auth_tok_for_sig+0x2e/0x90
 [<ffffffff812177d5>] ecryptfs_generate_key_packet_set+0x105/0x2b0
 [<ffffffff81212f49>] ecryptfs_write_headers_virt+0xc9/0x120
 [<ffffffff8121306d>] ecryptfs_write_metadata+0xcd/0x200
 [<ffffffff81210240>] ? ecryptfs_init_persistent_file+0x60/0xe0
 [<ffffffff8120e44b>] ecryptfs_initialize_file+0x6b/0x140
 [<ffffffff8120e54d>] ecryptfs_create+0x2d/0x60
 [<ffffffff8113a7d4>] vfs_create+0xb4/0xe0
 [<ffffffff8113a8c4>] __open_namei_create+0xc4/0x110
 [<ffffffff8113d1c1>] do_filp_open+0xa01/0xae0
 [<ffffffff8129a93e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8155410b>] ? _spin_unlock+0x2b/0x40
 [<ffffffff81139e9b>] ? getname+0x3b/0x240
 [<ffffffff81148a5a>] ? alloc_fd+0xfa/0x140
 [<ffffffff8112d8d9>] do_sys_open+0x69/0x140
 [<ffffffff81553b8f>] ? trace_hardirqs_on_thunk+0x3a/0x3f
 [<ffffffff8112d9f0>] sys_open+0x20/0x30
 [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <rolandd@cisco.com>
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      aa06117f
    • R
      ecryptfs: Remove unneeded locking that triggers lockdep false positives · 05dafedb
      由 Roland Dreier 提交于 
      In ecryptfs_destroy_inode(), inode_info->lower_file_mutex is locked,
and just after the mutex is unlocked, the code does:

 	kmem_cache_free(ecryptfs_inode_info_cache, inode_info);

This means that if another context could possibly try to take the same
mutex as ecryptfs_destroy_inode(), then it could end up getting the
mutex just before the data structure containing the mutex is freed.
So any such use would be an obvious use-after-free bug (catchable with
slab poisoning or mutex debugging), and therefore the locking in
ecryptfs_destroy_inode() is not needed and can be dropped.

Similarly, in ecryptfs_destroy_crypt_stat(), crypt_stat->keysig_list_mutex
is locked, and then the mutex is unlocked just before the code does:

 	memset(crypt_stat, 0, sizeof(struct ecryptfs_crypt_stat));

Therefore taking this mutex is similarly not necessary.

Removing this locking fixes false-positive lockdep reports such as the
following (and they are false-positives for exactly the same reason
that the locking is not needed):

=================================
[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd3
---------------------------------
inconsistent {RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} -> {IN-RECLAIM_FS-W} usage.
kswapd0/323 [HC0[0]:SC0[0]:HE1:SE1] takes:
 (&inode_info->lower_file_mutex){+.+.?.}, at: [<ffffffff81210d34>] ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
{RECLAIM_FS-ON-W} state was registered at:
  [<ffffffff8108c02c>] mark_held_locks+0x6c/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8108c10f>] lockdep_trace_alloc+0xaf/0xe0
  [<ffffffff81125a51>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x41/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff8113117a>] get_empty_filp+0x7a/0x1a0
  [<ffffffff8112dd46>] dentry_open+0x36/0xc0
  [<ffffffff8121a36c>] ecryptfs_privileged_open+0x5c/0x2e0
  [<ffffffff81210283>] ecryptfs_init_persistent_file+0xa3/0xe0
  [<ffffffff8120e838>] ecryptfs_lookup_and_interpose_lower+0x278/0x380
  [<ffffffff8120f97a>] ecryptfs_lookup+0x12a/0x250
  [<ffffffff8113930a>] real_lookup+0xea/0x160
  [<ffffffff8113afc8>] do_lookup+0xb8/0xf0
  [<ffffffff8113b518>] __link_path_walk+0x518/0x870
  [<ffffffff8113bd9c>] path_walk+0x5c/0xc0
  [<ffffffff8113be5b>] do_path_lookup+0x5b/0xa0
  [<ffffffff8113bfe7>] user_path_at+0x57/0xa0
  [<ffffffff811340dc>] vfs_fstatat+0x3c/0x80
  [<ffffffff8113424b>] vfs_stat+0x1b/0x20
  [<ffffffff81134274>] sys_newstat+0x24/0x50
  [<ffffffff81013132>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
  [<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
irq event stamp: 7811
hardirqs last  enabled at (7811): [<ffffffff810c037f>] call_rcu+0x5f/0x90
hardirqs last disabled at (7810): [<ffffffff810c0353>] call_rcu+0x33/0x90
softirqs last  enabled at (3764): [<ffffffff810631da>] __do_softirq+0x14a/0x220
softirqs last disabled at (3751): [<ffffffff8101440c>] call_softirq+0x1c/0x30

other info that might help us debug this:
2 locks held by kswapd0/323:
 #0:  (shrinker_rwsem){++++..}, at: [<ffffffff810f67ed>] shrink_slab+0x3d/0x190
 #1:  (&type->s_umount_key#35){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff811429a1>] prune_dcache+0xd1/0x1b0

stack backtrace:
Pid: 323, comm: kswapd0 Tainted: G         C 2.6.31-2-generic #14~rbd3
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8108ad6c>] print_usage_bug+0x18c/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff8108aff0>] ? check_usage_forwards+0x0/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8108bac2>] mark_lock_irq+0xf2/0x280
 [<ffffffff8108bd87>] mark_lock+0x137/0x1d0
 [<ffffffff81164710>] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0x30/0xf0
 [<ffffffff8108bee6>] mark_irqflags+0xc6/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff8108d337>] __lock_acquire+0x287/0x430
 [<ffffffff8108d585>] lock_acquire+0xa5/0x150
 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
 [<ffffffff8108d2e7>] ? __lock_acquire+0x237/0x430
 [<ffffffff815526ad>] __mutex_lock_common+0x4d/0x3d0
 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
 [<ffffffff81164710>] ? fsnotify_clear_marks_by_inode+0x30/0xf0
 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ? ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
 [<ffffffff8129a91e>] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x5e/0xb0
 [<ffffffff81552b36>] mutex_lock_nested+0x46/0x60
 [<ffffffff81210d34>] ecryptfs_destroy_inode+0x34/0x100
 [<ffffffff81145d27>] destroy_inode+0x87/0xd0
 [<ffffffff81146b4c>] generic_delete_inode+0x12c/0x1a0
 [<ffffffff81145832>] iput+0x62/0x70
 [<ffffffff811423c8>] dentry_iput+0x98/0x110
 [<ffffffff81142550>] d_kill+0x50/0x80
 [<ffffffff81142623>] prune_one_dentry+0xa3/0xc0
 [<ffffffff811428b1>] __shrink_dcache_sb+0x271/0x290
 [<ffffffff811429d9>] prune_dcache+0x109/0x1b0
 [<ffffffff81142abf>] shrink_dcache_memory+0x3f/0x50
 [<ffffffff810f68dd>] shrink_slab+0x12d/0x190
 [<ffffffff810f9377>] balance_pgdat+0x4d7/0x640
 [<ffffffff8104c4c0>] ? finish_task_switch+0x40/0x150
 [<ffffffff810f63c0>] ? isolate_pages_global+0x0/0x60
 [<ffffffff810f95f7>] kswapd+0x117/0x170
 [<ffffffff810777a0>] ? autoremove_wake_function+0x0/0x40
 [<ffffffff810f94e0>] ? kswapd+0x0/0x170
 [<ffffffff810773be>] kthread+0x9e/0xb0
 [<ffffffff8101430a>] child_rip+0xa/0x20
 [<ffffffff81013c90>] ? restore_args+0x0/0x30
 [<ffffffff81077320>] ? kthread+0x0/0xb0
 [<ffffffff81014300>] ? child_rip+0x0/0x20
Signed-off-by: NRoland Dreier <roland@digitalvampire.org>
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      05dafedb
  3. 22 9月, 2009 1 次提交
  5. 29 7月, 2009 2 次提交
  7. 12 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • C
      push BKL down into ->put_super · 6cfd0148
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Move BKL into ->put_super from the only caller.  A couple of
filesystems had trivial enough ->put_super (only kfree and NULLing of
s_fs_info + stuff in there) to not get any locking: coda, cramfs, efs,
hugetlbfs, omfs, qnx4, shmem, all others got the full treatment.  Most
of them probably don't need it, but I'd rather sort that out individually.
Preferably after all the other BKL pushdowns in that area.

[AV: original used to move lock_super() down as well; these changes are
removed since we don't do lock_super() at all in generic_shutdown_super()
now]
[AV: fuse, btrfs and xfs are known to need no damn BKL, exempt]
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      6cfd0148
  9. 09 5月, 2009 1 次提交
  11. 28 4月, 2009 2 次提交
  13. 23 4月, 2009 2 次提交
    • T
      eCryptfs: Larger buffer for encrypted symlink targets · 3a6b42ca
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      When using filename encryption with eCryptfs, the value of the symlink
in the lower filesystem is encrypted and stored as a Tag 70 packet.
This results in a longer symlink target than if the target value wasn't
encrypted.

Users were reporting these messages in their syslog:

[ 45.653441] ecryptfs_parse_tag_70_packet: max_packet_size is [56]; real
packet size is [51]
[ 45.653444] ecryptfs_decode_and_decrypt_filename: Could not parse tag
70 packet from filename; copying through filename as-is

This was due to bufsiz, one the arguments in readlink(), being used to
when allocating the buffer passed to the lower inode's readlink().
That symlink target may be very large, but when decoded and decrypted,
could end up being smaller than bufsize.

To fix this, the buffer passed to the lower inode's readlink() will
always be PATH_MAX in size when filename encryption is enabled.  Any
necessary truncation occurs after the decoding and decrypting.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      3a6b42ca
    • T
      eCryptfs: Lock lower directory inode mutex during lookup · ca8e34f2
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      This patch locks the lower directory inode's i_mutex before calling
lookup_one_len() to find the appropriate dentry in the lower filesystem.
This bug was found thanks to the warning set in commit 2f9092e1.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      ca8e34f2
  15. 22 4月, 2009 5 次提交
    • T
      eCryptfs: Remove ecryptfs_unlink_sigs warnings · e77cc8d2
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      A feature was added to the eCryptfs umount helper to automatically
unlink the keys used for an eCryptfs mount from the kernel keyring upon
umount.  This patch keeps the unrecognized mount option warnings for
ecryptfs_unlink_sigs out of the logs.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      e77cc8d2
    • T
      eCryptfs: Fix data corruption when using ecryptfs_passthrough · 13a791b4
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      ecryptfs_passthrough is a mount option that allows eCryptfs to allow
data to be written to non-eCryptfs files in the lower filesystem.  The
passthrough option was causing data corruption due to it not always
being treated as a non-eCryptfs file.

The first 8 bytes of an eCryptfs file contains the decrypted file size.
This value was being written to the non-eCryptfs files, too.  Also,
extra 0x00 characters were being written to make the file size a
multiple of PAGE_CACHE_SIZE.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      13a791b4
    • T
      eCryptfs: Print FNEK sig properly in /proc/mounts · 3a5203ab
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      The filename encryption key signature is not properly displayed in
/proc/mounts.  The "ecryptfs_sig=" mount option name is displayed for
all global authentication tokens, included those for filename keys.

This patch checks the global authentication token flags to determine if
the key is a FEKEK or FNEK and prints the appropriate mount option name
before the signature.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      3a5203ab
    • T
      eCryptfs: NULL pointer dereference in ecryptfs_send_miscdev() · 57ea34d1
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      If data is NULL, msg_ctx->msg is set to NULL and then dereferenced
afterwards.  ecryptfs_send_raw_message() is the only place that
ecryptfs_send_miscdev() is called with data being NULL, but the only
caller of that function (ecryptfs_process_helo()) is never called.  In
short, there is currently no way to trigger the NULL pointer
dereference.

This patch removes the two unused functions and modifies
ecryptfs_send_miscdev() to remove the NULL dereferences.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      57ea34d1
    • T
      eCryptfs: Copy lower inode attrs before dentry instantiation · ae6e8459
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      Copies the lower inode attributes to the upper inode before passing the
upper inode to d_instantiate().  This is important for
security_d_instantiate().

The problem was discovered by a user seeing SELinux denials like so:

type=AVC msg=audit(1236812817.898:47): avc:  denied  { 0x100000 } for
pid=3584 comm="httpd" name="testdir" dev=ecryptfs ino=943872
scontext=root:system_r:httpd_t:s0
tcontext=root:object_r:httpd_sys_content_t:s0 tclass=file

Notice target class is file while testdir is really a directory,
confusing the permission translation (0x100000) due to the wrong i_mode.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      ae6e8459
  17. 21 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  19. 01 4月, 2009 1 次提交
  21. 28 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  23. 23 3月, 2009 2 次提交
    • T
      eCryptfs: NULL crypt_stat dereference during lookup · 2aac0cf8
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      If ecryptfs_encrypted_view or ecryptfs_xattr_metadata were being
specified as mount options, a NULL pointer dereference of crypt_stat
was possible during lookup.

This patch moves the crypt_stat assignment into
ecryptfs_lookup_and_interpose_lower(), ensuring that crypt_stat
will not be NULL before we attempt to dereference it.

Thanks to Dan Carpenter and his static analysis tool, smatch, for
finding this bug.
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NDustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Cc: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Cc: Serge Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      2aac0cf8
    • T
      eCryptfs: Allocate a variable number of pages for file headers · 8faece5f
      由 Tyler Hicks 提交于 
      When allocating the memory used to store the eCryptfs header contents, a
single, zeroed page was being allocated with get_zeroed_page().
However, the size of an eCryptfs header is either PAGE_CACHE_SIZE or
ECRYPTFS_MINIMUM_HEADER_EXTENT_SIZE (8192), whichever is larger, and is
stored in the file's private_data->crypt_stat->num_header_bytes_at_front
field.

ecryptfs_write_metadata_to_contents() was using
num_header_bytes_at_front to decide how many bytes should be written to
the lower filesystem for the file header.  Unfortunately, at least 8K
was being written from the page, despite the chance of the single,
zeroed page being smaller than 8K.  This resulted in random areas of
kernel memory being written between the 0x1000 and 0x1FFF bytes offsets
in the eCryptfs file headers if PAGE_SIZE was 4K.

This patch allocates a variable number of pages, calculated with
num_header_bytes_at_front, and passes the number of allocated pages
along to ecryptfs_write_metadata_to_contents().

Thanks to Florian Streibelt for reporting the data leak and working with
me to find the problem.  2.6.28 is the only kernel release with this
vulnerability.  Corresponds to CVE-2009-0787
Signed-off-by: NTyler Hicks <tyhicks@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NDustin Kirkland <kirkland@canonical.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEugene Teo <eugeneteo@kernel.sg>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: dann frazier <dannf@dannf.org>
Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Florian Streibelt <florian@f-streibelt.de>
Cc: stable@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8faece5f
  25. 15 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  27. 07 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  29. 22 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  31. 07 1月, 2009 10 次提交
  33. 06 1月, 2009 2 次提交
    • C
      add a vfs_fsync helper · 4c728ef5
      由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于 
      Fsync currently has a fdatawrite/fdatawait pair around the method call,
and a mutex_lock/unlock of the inode mutex.  All callers of fsync have
to duplicate this, but we have a few and most of them don't quite get
it right.  This patch adds a new vfs_fsync that takes care of this.
It's a little more complicated as usual as ->fsync might get a NULL file
pointer and just a dentry from nfsd, but otherwise gets afile and we
want to take the mapping and file operations from it when it is there.

Notes on the fsync callers:

 - ecryptfs wasn't calling filemap_fdatawrite / filemap_fdatawait on the
   	lower file
 - coda wasn't calling filemap_fdatawrite / filemap_fdatawait on the host
	file, and returning 0 when ->fsync was missing
 - shm wasn't calling either filemap_fdatawrite / filemap_fdatawait nor
   taking i_mutex.  Now given that shared memory doesn't have disk
   backing not doing anything in fsync seems fine and I left it out of
   the vfs_fsync conversion for now, but in that case we might just
   not pass it through to the lower file at all but just call the no-op
   simple_sync_file directly.

[and now actually export vfs_fsync]
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      4c728ef5
    • A
      inode->i_op is never NULL · acfa4380
      由 Al Viro 提交于 
      We used to have rather schizophrenic set of checks for NULL ->i_op even
though it had been eliminated years ago.  You'd need to go out of your
way to set it to NULL explicitly _and_ a bunch of code would die on
such inodes anyway.  After killing two remaining places that still
did that bogosity, all that crap can go away.
Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      acfa4380
  35. 05 1月, 2009 1 次提交
    • N
      fs: symlink write_begin allocation context fix · 54566b2c
      由 Nick Piggin 提交于 
      With the write_begin/write_end aops, page_symlink was broken because it
could no longer pass a GFP_NOFS type mask into the point where the
allocations happened.  They are done in write_begin, which would always
assume that the filesystem can be entered from reclaim.  This bug could
cause filesystem deadlocks.

The funny thing with having a gfp_t mask there is that it doesn't really
allow the caller to arbitrarily tinker with the context in which it can be
called.  It couldn't ever be GFP_ATOMIC, for example, because it needs to
take the page lock.  The only thing any callers care about is __GFP_FS
anyway, so turn that into a single flag.

Add a new flag for write_begin, AOP_FLAG_NOFS.  Filesystems can now act on
this flag in their write_begin function.  Change __grab_cache_page to
accept a nofs argument as well, to honour that flag (while we're there,
change the name to grab_cache_page_write_begin which is more instructive
and does away with random leading underscores).

This is really a more flexible way to go in the end anyway -- if a
filesystem happens to want any extra allocations aside from the pagecache
ones in ints write_begin function, it may now use GFP_KERNEL (rather than
GFP_NOFS) for common case allocations (eg.  ocfs2_alloc_write_ctxt, for a
random example).

[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix ubifs]
[kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com: fix fuse]
Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Cc: <stable@kernel.org>		[2.6.28.x]
Signed-off-by: NKOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
[ Cleaned up the calling convention: just pass in the AOP flags
  untouched to the grab_cache_page_write_begin() function.  That
  just simplifies everybody, and may even allow future expansion of the
  logic.   - Linus ]
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      54566b2c
  37. 01 1月, 2009 1 次提交