- 21 5月, 2016 29 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Use the more standard 'node' and 'child' instead of 'to_free' and 'slot'. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
As with indirect_to_ptr(), ptr_to_indirect() and RADIX_TREE_INDIRECT_PTR, change radix_tree_is_indirect_ptr() to radix_tree_is_internal_node(). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Mirrors the earlier commit introducing node_to_entry(). Also change the type returned to be a struct radix_tree_node pointer. That lets us simplify a couple of places in the radix tree shrink & extend paths where we could convert an entry into a pointer, modify the node, then convert the pointer back into an entry. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
ptr_to_indirect() was a bad name. What it really means is "Convert this pointer to a node into an entry suitable for storing in the radix tree". So node_to_entry() seemed like a better name. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The name RADIX_TREE_INDIRECT_PTR doesn't really match the meaning. RADIX_TREE_INTERNAL_NODE is a better name. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The only remaining references to root->height were in extend and shrink, where it was updated. Now we can remove it entirely. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
If radix_tree_shrink returns whether it managed to shrink, then __radix_tree_delete_node doesn't ned to query the tree to find out whether it did any work or not. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
node->shift represents the shift necessary for looking in the slots array at this level. It is equal to the old (node->height - 1) * RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Neither piece of information we're storing in node->path can be larger than 64, so store each in its own unsigned char instead of shifting and masking to store them both in an unsigned int. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Typos, whitespace, grammar, line length, using the correct types, etc. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The multiorder support is a sufficiently large feature to be worth adding copyrigt lines for. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ross Zwisler 提交于
- Print which indices are covered by every leaf entry - Print sibling entries - Print the node pointer instead of the slot entry - Build by default in userspace, and make it accessible to the test-suite Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
I had previously decided that tagging a single multiorder entry would count as tagging 2^order entries for the purposes of 'nr_to_tag'. I now believe that decision to be a mistake, and it should count as a single entry. That's more likely to be what callers expect. When walking back up the tree from a newly-tagged entry, the current code assumed we were starting from the lowest level of the tree; if we have a multiorder entry with an order at least RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT in size then we need to shift the index by 'shift' before we start walking back up the tree, or we will end up not setting tags on higher entries, and then mistakenly thinking that entries below a certain point in the tree are not tagged. If the first index we examine is a sibling entry of a tagged multiorder entry, we were not tagging it. We need to examine the canonical entry, and the easiest way to do that is to use radix_tree_descend(). We then have to skip over sibling slots when looking for the next entry in the tree or we will end up walking back to the canonical entry. Add several tests for radix_tree_range_tag_if_tagged(). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite radix_tree_locate_item(). Modify the locate tests to test multiorder entries too. [hughd@google.com: radix_tree_locate_item() is often returning the wrong index] Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.LSU.2.11.1605012108490.1166@eggly.anvilsSigned-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
If the radix tree user attempted to insert a colliding entry with an existing multiorder entry, then radix_tree_create() could encounter a sibling entry when walking down the tree to look for a slot. Use radix_tree_descend() to fix the problem, and add a test-case to make sure the problem doesn't come back in future. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ross Zwisler 提交于
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite radix_tree_tag_get() Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ross Zwisler 提交于
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite radix_tree_tag_clear() Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ross Zwisler 提交于
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite radix_tree_tag_set() Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Ross Zwisler 提交于
This enables the macros radix_tree_for_each_slot() and friends to be used with multi-order entries. The way that this works is that we treat all entries in a given slots[] array as a single chunk. If the index given to radix_tree_next_chunk() happens to point us to a sibling entry, we will back up iter->index so that it points to the canonical entry, and that will be the place where we start our iteration. As we're processing a chunk in radix_tree_next_slot(), we process canonical entries, skip over sibling entries, and restart the chunk lookup if we find a non-sibling indirect pointer. This drops back to the radix_tree_next_chunk() code, which will re-walk the tree and look for another chunk. This allows us to properly handle multi-order entries mixed with other entries that are at various heights in the radix tree. Signed-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
These BUG_ON tests are to ensure that all the tags are clear when inserting a new entry. If we insert a multiorder entry, we'll end up looking at the tags for a different node, and so the BUG_ON can end up triggering spuriously. Also, we now have three tags, not two, so check all three are clear, and check all the root tags with a single call to BUG_ON since the bits are stored contiguously. Include a test-case to ensure this problem does not reoccur. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Use the new multi-order support functions to rewrite __radix_tree_lookup() Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Setting the indirect bit on the user data entry used to be unambiguous because the tree walking code knew not to expect internal nodes in the last level of the tree. Multiorder entries can appear at any level of the tree, and a leaf with the indirect bit set is indistinguishable from a pointer to a node. Introduce a special entry (RADIX_TREE_RETRY) which is neither a valid user entry, nor a valid pointer to a node. The radix_tree_deref_retry() function continues to work the same way, but tree walking code can distinguish it from a pointer to a node. Also fix the condition for setting slot->parent to NULL; it does not matter what height the tree is, it only matters whether slot is an indirect pointer. Move this code above the comment which is referring to the assignment to root->rnode. Also fix the condition for preventing the tree from shrinking to a single entry if it's a multiorder entry. Add a test-case to the test suite that checks that the tree goes back down to its original height after an item is inserted & deleted from a higher index in the tree. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The current code will insert entries at each level, as if we're going to add a new entry at the bottom level, so we then get an -EEXIST when we try to insert the entry into the tree. The best way to fix this is to not check 'order' when inserting into an empty tree. We still need to 'extend' the tree to the height necessary for the maximum index corresponding to this entry, so pass that value to radix_tree_extend() rather than the index we're asked to create, or we won't create a tree that's deep enough. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
All the tree walking functions start with some variant of this code; centralise it in one place so we're not chasing subtly different bugs everywhere. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Now that sibling pointers are handled explicitly, there is no purpose served by restricting the order to be >= RADIX_TREE_MAP_SHIFT. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
If we deleted an entry through an index which looked up a sibling pointer, we'd end up zeroing out the wrong slots in the node. Use get_slot_offset() to find the right slot. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The subtraction was the wrong way round, leading to undefined behaviour (shift by an amount larger than the size of the type). Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
The code I previously added to enable multiorder radix tree entries was untested and therefore buggy. This commit adds the support functions that Ross and I decided were necessary over a four-week period of iterating various designs. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
I've been receiving increasingly concerned notes from 0day about how much my recent changes have been bloating the radix tree. Make it happier by only including multiorder support if CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES is set. This is an independent Kconfig option, so other radix tree users can also set it if they have a need. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <koct9i@gmail.com> Cc: Kirill Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 3月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
This is debug code which is #if 0 out. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
With huge pages, it is convenient to have the radix tree be able to return an entry that covers multiple indices. Previous attempts to deal with the problem have involved inserting N duplicate entries, which is a waste of memory and leads to problems trying to handle aliased tags, or probing the tree multiple times to find alternative entries which might cover the requested index. This approach inserts one canonical entry into the tree for a given range of indices, and may also insert other entries in order to ensure that lookups find the canonical entry. This solution only tolerates inserting powers of two that are greater than the fanout of the tree. If we wish to expand the radix tree's abilities to support large-ish pages that is less than the fanout at the penultimate level of the tree, then we would need to add one more step in lookup to ensure that any sibling nodes in the final level of the tree are dereferenced and we return the canonical entry that they reference. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
When we introduce entries that can cover multiple indices, we will need to stop in __radix_tree_create based on the shift, not the height. Split out for ease of bisect. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
Set the 'indirect_ptr' bit on all the pointers to internal nodes, not just on the root node. This enables the following patches to support multi-order entries in the radix tree. This patch is split out for ease of bisection. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
由 Vladimir Davydov 提交于
Allocation of radix_tree_node objects can be easily triggered from userspace, so we should account them to memory cgroup. Besides, we need them accounted for making shadow node shrinker per memcg (see mm/workingset.c). A tricky thing about accounting radix_tree_node objects is that they are mostly allocated through radix_tree_preload(), so we can't just set SLAB_ACCOUNT for radix_tree_node_cachep - that would likely result in a lot of unrelated cgroups using objects from each other's caches. One way to overcome this would be making radix tree preloads per memcg, but that would probably look cumbersome and overcomplicated. Instead, we make radix_tree_node_alloc() first try to allocate from the cache with __GFP_ACCOUNT, no matter if the caller has preloaded or not, and only if it fails fall back on using per cpu preloads. This should make most allocations accounted. Signed-off-by: NVladimir Davydov <vdavydov@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 04 2月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Wilcox 提交于
If the indirect_ptr bit is set on a slot, that indicates we need to redo the lookup. Introduce a new function radix_tree_iter_retry() which forces the loop to retry the lookup by setting 'slot' to NULL and turning the iterator back to point at the problematic entry. This is a pretty rare problem to hit at the moment; the lookup has to race with a grow of the radix tree from a height of 0. The consequences of hitting this race are that gang lookup could return a pointer to a radix_tree_node instead of a pointer to whatever the user had inserted in the tree. Fixes: cebbd29e ("radix-tree: rewrite gang lookup using iterator") Signed-off-by: NMatthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com> Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@openvz.org> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 11月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mel Gorman 提交于
mm, page_alloc: distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to sleep and avoiding waking kswapd __GFP_WAIT has been used to identify atomic context in callers that hold spinlocks or are in interrupts. They are expected to be high priority and have access one of two watermarks lower than "min" which can be referred to as the "atomic reserve". __GFP_HIGH users get access to the first lower watermark and can be called the "high priority reserve". Over time, callers had a requirement to not block when fallback options were available. Some have abused __GFP_WAIT leading to a situation where an optimisitic allocation with a fallback option can access atomic reserves. This patch uses __GFP_ATOMIC to identify callers that are truely atomic, cannot sleep and have no alternative. High priority users continue to use __GFP_HIGH. __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM identifies callers that can sleep and are willing to enter direct reclaim. __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM to identify callers that want to wake kswapd for background reclaim. __GFP_WAIT is redefined as a caller that is willing to enter direct reclaim and wake kswapd for background reclaim. This patch then converts a number of sites o __GFP_ATOMIC is used by callers that are high priority and have memory pools for those requests. GFP_ATOMIC uses this flag. o Callers that have a limited mempool to guarantee forward progress clear __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM but keep __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. bio allocations fall into this category where kswapd will still be woken but atomic reserves are not used as there is a one-entry mempool to guarantee progress. o Callers that are checking if they are non-blocking should use the helper gfpflags_allow_blocking() where possible. This is because checking for __GFP_WAIT as was done historically now can trigger false positives. Some exceptions like dm-crypt.c exist where the code intent is clearer if __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is used instead of the helper due to flag manipulations. o Callers that built their own GFP flags instead of starting with GFP_KERNEL and friends now also need to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. The first key hazard to watch out for is callers that removed __GFP_WAIT and was depending on access to atomic reserves for inconspicuous reasons. In some cases it may be appropriate for them to use __GFP_HIGH. The second key hazard is callers that assembled their own combination of GFP flags instead of starting with something like GFP_KERNEL. They may now wish to specify __GFP_KSWAPD_RECLAIM. It's almost certainly harmless if it's missed in most cases as other activity will wake kswapd. Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net> Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com> Cc: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Vitaly Wool <vitalywool@gmail.com> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 26 6月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于
Currently we use per-cpu array to hold pointers to preallocated nodes. Let's replace it with linked list. On x86_64 it saves 256 bytes in per-cpu ELF section which may translate into freeing up 2MB of memory for NR_CPUS==8192. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix comment, coding style] Signed-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 19 5月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Frederic Weisbecker 提交于
preempt_mask.h defines all the preempt_count semantics and related symbols: preempt, softirq, hardirq, nmi, preempt active, need resched, etc... preempt.h defines the accessors and mutators of preempt_count. But there is a messy dependency game around those two header files: * preempt_mask.h includes preempt.h in order to access preempt_count() * preempt_mask.h defines all preempt_count semantic and symbols except PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED that is needed by asm/preempt.h Thus we need to define it from preempt.h, right before including asm/preempt.h, instead of defining it to preempt_mask.h with the other preempt_count symbols. Therefore the preempt_count semantics happen to be spread out. * We plan to introduce preempt_active_[enter,exit]() to consolidate preempt_schedule*() code. But we'll need to access both preempt_count mutators (preempt_count_add()) and preempt_count symbols (PREEMPT_ACTIVE, PREEMPT_OFFSET). The usual place to define preempt operations is in preempt.h but then we'll need symbols in preempt_mask.h which already includes preempt.h. So we end up with a ressource circle dependency. Lets merge preempt_mask.h into preempt.h to solve these dependency issues. This way we gather semantic symbols and operation definition of preempt_count in a single file. This is a dumb copy-paste merge. Further merge re-arrangments are performed in a subsequent patch to ease review. Signed-off-by: NFrederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1431441711-29753-2-git-send-email-fweisbec@gmail.comSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
-
- 13 2月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rasmus Villemoes 提交于
The comment helpfully explains why hardirq.h is included, but since commit 2d4b8473 ("hardirq: Split preempt count mask definitions") in_interrupt() has been provided by preempt_mask.h. Use that instead, saving around 40 lines in the generated dependency file. Signed-off-by: NRasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Catalin Marinas 提交于
Since radix_tree_preload() stack trace is not always useful for debugging an actual radix tree memory leak, this patch updates the kmemleak allocation stack trace in the radix_tree_node_alloc() function. Signed-off-by: NCatalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> Acked-by: NJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-