Device node major/minor numbers are just stored in the payload of a single
data node. Just extend that to 4 bytes and use new_encode_dev() for it.

We only use the 4-byte format if we _need_ to, if !old_valid_dev(foo).
This preserves backwards compatibility with older code as much as
possible. If we do make devices with major or minor numbers above 255, and
then mount the file system with the old code, it'll just read the first
two bytes and get the numbers wrong. If it comes to garbage-collect it,
it'll then write back those wrong numbers. But that's about the best we
can expect.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>

Return an error if a name is too long for JFFS2 rather than
corrupting data.
Signed-off-by: NRichard Purdie <rpurdie@rpsys.net>

This is a conversion to make the various file_operations structs in fs/
const.  Basically a regexp job, with a few manual fixups

The goal is both to increase correctness (harder to accidentally write to
shared datastructures) and reducing the false sharing of cachelines with
things that get dirty in .data (while .rodata is nicely read only and thus
cache clean)
Signed-off-by: NArjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>

Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

The goal of summary is to speed up the mount time. Erase block summary (EBS)
stores summary information at the end of every (closed) erase block. It is
no longer necessary to scan all nodes separetly (and read all pages of them)
just read this "small" summary, where every information is stored which is
needed at mount time.

This summary information is stored in a JFFS2_FEATURE_RWCOMPAT_DELETE. During
the mount process if there is no summary info the orignal scan process will
be executed. EBS works with NAND and NOR flashes, too.

There is a user space tool called sumtool to generate this summary
information for a JFFS2 image.
Signed-off-by: NFerenc Havasi <havasi@inf.u-szeged.hu>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NArtem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

JFFS2 uses f->dents to store the pointer to the symlink target string (in case
the inode is symlink). This is somewhat ugly to use the same field for
different reasons. Introduce distinct field f->target for this purpose.
Note, f->fragtree, f->dents, f->target may probably be put in a union.
Signed-off-by: NArtem B. Bityutskiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Signed-off-by: NArtem B. Bityuckiy <dedekind@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: NThomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>

Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
infrastructure for it.

Let it rip!