1. 02 8月, 2012 1 次提交
  2. 19 7月, 2012 1 次提交
  3. 28 6月, 2012 1 次提交
  4. 16 5月, 2012 1 次提交
  5. 02 4月, 2012 1 次提交
  6. 26 2月, 2012 1 次提交
  7. 23 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  8. 11 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • S
      xfrm: Assign the inner mode output function to the dst entry · 43a4dea4
      Steffen Klassert 提交于
      As it is, we assign the outer modes output function to the dst entry
      when we create the xfrm bundle. This leads to two problems on interfamily
      scenarios. We might insert ipv4 packets into ip6_fragment when called
      from xfrm6_output. The system crashes if we try to fragment an ipv4
      packet with ip6_fragment. This issue was introduced with git commit
      ad0081e4 (ipv6: Fragment locally generated tunnel-mode IPSec6 packets
      as needed). The second issue is, that we might insert ipv4 packets in
      netfilter6 and vice versa on interfamily scenarios.
      
      With this patch we assign the inner mode output function to the dst entry
      when we create the xfrm bundle. So xfrm4_output/xfrm6_output from the inner
      mode is used and the right fragmentation and netfilter functions are called.
      We switch then to outer mode with the output_finish functions.
      Signed-off-by: NSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      43a4dea4
  9. 23 4月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 11 4月, 2011 1 次提交
    • M
      Disable rp_filter for IPsec packets · 990078af
      Michael Smith 提交于
      The reverse path filter interferes with IPsec subnet-to-subnet tunnels,
      especially when the link to the IPsec peer is on an interface other than
      the one hosting the default route.
      
      With dynamic routing, where the peer might be reachable through eth0
      today and eth1 tomorrow, it's difficult to keep rp_filter enabled unless
      fake routes to the remote subnets are configured on the interface
      currently used to reach the peer.
      
      IPsec provides a much stronger anti-spoofing policy than rp_filter, so
      this patch disables the rp_filter for packets with a security path.
      Signed-off-by: NMichael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      990078af
  11. 29 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  12. 22 3月, 2011 1 次提交
    • W
      xfrm: Fix initialize repl field of struct xfrm_state · a454f0cc
      Wei Yongjun 提交于
      Commit 'xfrm: Move IPsec replay detection functions to a separate file'
        (9fdc4883)
      introduce repl field to struct xfrm_state, and only initialize it
      under SA's netlink create path, the other path, such as pf_key,
      ipcomp/ipcomp6 etc, the repl field remaining uninitialize. So if
      the SA is created by pf_key, any input packet with SA's encryption
      algorithm will cause panic.
      
          int xfrm_input()
          {
              ...
              x->repl->advance(x, seq);
              ...
          }
      
      This patch fixed it by introduce new function __xfrm_init_state().
      
      Pid: 0, comm: swapper Not tainted 2.6.38-next+ #14 Bochs Bochs
      EIP: 0060:[<c078e5d5>] EFLAGS: 00010206 CPU: 0
      EIP is at xfrm_input+0x31c/0x4cc
      EAX: dd839c00 EBX: 00000084 ECX: 00000000 EDX: 01000000
      ESI: dd839c00 EDI: de3a0780 EBP: dec1de88 ESP: dec1de64
       DS: 007b ES: 007b FS: 00d8 GS: 00e0 SS: 0068
      Process swapper (pid: 0, ti=dec1c000 task=c09c0f20 task.ti=c0992000)
      Stack:
       00000000 00000000 00000002 c0ba27c0 00100000 01000000 de3a0798 c0ba27c0
       00000033 dec1de98 c0786848 00000000 de3a0780 dec1dea4 c0786868 00000000
       dec1debc c074ee56 e1da6b8c de3a0780 c074ed44 de3a07a8 dec1decc c074ef32
      Call Trace:
       [<c0786848>] xfrm4_rcv_encap+0x22/0x27
       [<c0786868>] xfrm4_rcv+0x1b/0x1d
       [<c074ee56>] ip_local_deliver_finish+0x112/0x1b1
       [<c074ed44>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x1b1
       [<c074ef32>] NF_HOOK.clone.1+0x3d/0x44
       [<c074ef77>] ip_local_deliver+0x3e/0x44
       [<c074ed44>] ? ip_local_deliver_finish+0x0/0x1b1
       [<c074ec03>] ip_rcv_finish+0x30a/0x332
       [<c074e8f9>] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x332
       [<c074ef32>] NF_HOOK.clone.1+0x3d/0x44
       [<c074f188>] ip_rcv+0x20b/0x247
       [<c074e8f9>] ? ip_rcv_finish+0x0/0x332
       [<c072797d>] __netif_receive_skb+0x373/0x399
       [<c0727bc1>] netif_receive_skb+0x4b/0x51
       [<e0817e2a>] cp_rx_poll+0x210/0x2c4 [8139cp]
       [<c072818f>] net_rx_action+0x9a/0x17d
       [<c0445b5c>] __do_softirq+0xa1/0x149
       [<c0445abb>] ? __do_softirq+0x0/0x149
      Signed-off-by: NWei Yongjun <yjwei@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a454f0cc
  13. 14 3月, 2011 4 次提交
  14. 13 3月, 2011 3 次提交
  15. 02 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  16. 28 2月, 2011 4 次提交
  17. 24 2月, 2011 12 次提交
  18. 23 2月, 2011 3 次提交